[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BinHex decoding

To: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: BinHex decoding
From: Daniel Vainsencher <danielv@netvision.net.il>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 21:41:43 +0300
Reply-To: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-Date: 12 Jun 2000 19:29:44 -0000
Resent-From: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu
Resent-Message-ID: <WQTPT.A.vlG.moTR5@jerry.cs.uiuc.edu>
Resent-Sender: squeak-request@cs.uiuc.edu

Why the condition? BinHex is not a MIME format. It WOULD be nicer if
they all had one common, convinient interface (I'm not sure what my
opinion is on the MIME decoders).
But it'd also be nice to just have a BinHexer.

Bert Freudenberg <bert@isgnw.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 danielv@netvision.net.il wrote:
> 
> > I vote for adding Bob's converter to the main image.
> 
> If you make it compliant to the other MIME converters interface first, I
> agree.
> 
> -- Bert

Prev by Date: RE: [ENH] on:collect:
Next by Date: [ENH] MailNotifier
Prev by thread: Re: BinHex decoding
Next by thread: Linux VMs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread