The position of Russia

Since the forces of the evil launched the final assault, it became essential to distort and hide the position of Russia (the history of the last days before the First World War repeats).
Here you find the positions of the Russian leaders and events in Russia (translation from Russian news agency ITAR-TASS).

Chechnya

The western media tries to make believe that Russia accepted the New World Order, that is, that the self proclaimed enlightened (illuminati) rule the world, replacing international law accepted until now.
Example, November 19, 1999, Portugal's media :
  • Daily Publico: "  Moscovo Accepted the Moderation of OSCE in Chechnya " (headlines).
  • Daily DN: " Russia gives up in Chechnya ".

  • The reality is that Russia just allowed one representative of OSCE to visit the area of Chechnya under Russian control, emphasizing clearly that with bandits (remembers that one of the main income sources of Chechnyan warlords was the ransoms for abductions of people) one cannot have mediation and that with the democratical Chechnyan it is not necessary " foreign aid "  ...

    Expansion of NATO to the East

    The western media  hides the reason of NATO to expand to the East: the base of nuclear dissuasion lays in the fact the enemy's attack is detected soon enough to retaliate. It's all a question of minutes. Only the U.S.A. and Russia  possess this capacity.

    Anatoly Kvashnin, head of the Staff the Russian Armed Forces, 15 of November of 1999:

  • The zone of responsability of NATO grew of 650-750 kilometers to the east, what  sensibly reduced the strategical alarm period of Russia.

  • Source: http://www.tass.ru/english/template3.htmls?id=143761&p=0

    NATO aggression to Serbia

    Doesn't Russia understand the objective of NATO ? That it's not only the occupation of the Kosovo but in fact the occupation of all Yugoslavia (as was explicitly formulated  in the Rambouillet Treaty, Appendix B), to destroy the Russian deterrent capacity (retaliation) when nuclear missiles are to be installed in the new members of NATO in the east?

    Viktor Ozerov, head of the Russian delegation in the session of the Parliamentary Assembly of NATO, November 16, 1999:

  • No matter what NATO says, they had not obtained to reach the objective of their " humanitarian operation " in Kosovo.

  • Source: http://www.tass.ru/english/template3.htmls?id=144057&p=0

    The capacity of dissuasion of the Russian nuclear arsenal

    Here you find plenty of information. Click on the photos, to see all the data.


    Check here the last news from ITAR-TASS.
    The title is still " War in Yugoslavia " but the contents are the strategical battlefields of the final confrontation, in the desperate attempt of NATO to control the Russian nuclear arsenal through the neutralization of the deterrent power  of Russia.

    Note: this strategy did not work, as the position of Russia shows.
    As the auto proclaimed enlightened cannot go back,  they must resort to a nuclear first strike against Russia.
    By the way this is exactly what NATO was preparing in Summer using the cover up of a "ground operation" in Kosovo (to understand this you just need to think that practically there has never been a soldier of NATO ready to die for the UCK).


    Last update - November 19, 1999 
    //