Lets get right to the point: The courts recognize only two
classes of people in the United States today:
DEBTORS AND CREDITORS
The concept and status of DEBTORS AND CREDITORS is very important for you to understand. Every legal action where you are brought before the court: e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards, bank loans or anything else they might dream up to charge you where you find yourself in front of a court--It is an equity court, administering commercial law having a debtor/creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we have an equity court but not an equity court as referred to in the Constitution of the U.S. or any of the legal documents before 1938.
All the courts of this once great land have been changed starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in Erie vs. Thompkins. Let's look at the background which led to this decision.
U.S. INC. GOES TO GENEVA 1930S
In order for you to understand just how this fraud works, you need to know the history of its inception. It goes like this: From 1928-1932 there were five years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal, etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find them because they dont publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.
Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932 Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United States. Roosevelts job was to put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had been declared two years earlier. The corporate government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate United States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy. Now, this doesnt mean the bankruptcy wasnt implemented before 1938 with the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930 -1931. The bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn in during the month of January 1933. He started right away in the bankruptcy with what is known as "The Banking Holiday", and proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That was the beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for bankruptcy.
Roosevelt Stacks Supreme Court
It is a know historical fact that during 1933 and 1937-1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices. Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme Court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt tried to enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case which would support their bankruptcy problem.
There was resistance to Roosevelts court stacking efforts. Some of the justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of the court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new procedure for the law of the land.
The Mother Corporation Goes Bankrupt
A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states). This compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C., (the headquarters of the corporation called "The United States"). Since the United States Corporation, having established its headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to be the corporate state governments of the Union). The corporate state governments didnt have to vote on the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason the Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. She has for her trade names the following: "United States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "United States of America", Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds, Federal Government. She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office, etc. etc. Etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the I.R.S. and her state corporations, to the United Nations and the International Banksters as payment for her debt. The UN and the International Banksters use this money and service for various world wide projects to include war. War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for reconstruction. Loans for controlling people on her world property.
U.S. Inc. Declares Bankruptcy
The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who met at Geneva, to decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate representatives of corporate several states were not in attendance. If the states had their own power to declare bankruptcy, regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then the several states of America would have been represented at Geneva. The several states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via compact to the several corporate states as a group, association, corporation or as a club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy as one government corporate group in 1930. The several states only needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington DC The delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the mother corporation located in Washington D.C., the seat and headquarters of the Federal Corporate Government. And, presto BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!
From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The case had to come down from the Federal level so that the states could then rely on the Federal decision and use this decision within the states as justification for the bankruptcy process within the states.
By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been declared back in 1930 could be upheld and administrated. Thats why the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedence, all appearance and even the statute of law itself That is, the Statutes as Large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from preface of the 1990 Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th edition:
"The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and the American Bar Association in 1952; and, was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in the light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962 and 1966."
The above named groups and associations of private lawyers got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was somewhere between 1938 and 40, 1 dont recall; but, by the early 40s and during the war, this committee was working to form the UCC and got ready to put on the market. The UCC is the law merchants code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the new law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This legal committee was working to form the UCC and got it ready to put on the market. The UCC is the law merchants code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the new law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This Legal Committee of lawyers put everything:
Negotiable Instruments, Security, Sales, Contracts and the whole mess under the UCC. Thats where the "Uniform" word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as well as being uniform with the District of Columbia. It doesnt mean you didnt have the uniform instrument laws on the books before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to state. By the middle 1960s, every state had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial code as the law of the land. The state fully understood they had to administrate bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six weeks or so after Kennedy was killed.
Your Lawyers Secret Oath ?
What was the effect and the significance of the Erie vs. Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1939. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers (who were members of the American Bar Association were, and are currently, under and controlled the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain). Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice of law in this country was never to be the same.
It has been reported (source unknown to writer) that every lawyer in existence and every lawyer coming up has to take a secret oath to support the bankruptcy. This seems to make sense after you read about Mr. Sweets case file disappearance discussed below. There is more to it. Not only do they promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers and judges also promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party is in the bankruptcy proceedings. In court there is never identification and appearance of the true character and principal of the proceedings. This is where you can get them for not making an appearance in court. If there is no appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know the true NATURE AND THE CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE AND THE CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is forbidden to tell you that information. Thats why, if you question the true nature and cause, the judge will say, "Its not my job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I cant give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer".
Hire A Lawyer?
The problem here is. . if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause. . ..how will you ever find out the nature and the cause? You wont! Why? If the true nature and the cause of the action against you is revealed it will expose the real creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say, "Its a bankruptcy proceeding". The true creditor would have to say "Im the creditor and hes the debtor." That declaration then opens the door for you to question "Who the heck are you? How did you get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level from the justice of the peace level all the way up -- even into the International law arena (called the World Court) are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or participant to the corporate United States debt.
What would really kill these people off would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer to the court room and present himself as the attorney for the true creditor (the International Banksters). Then have the attorney to put into the record the true nature and the cause of the proceedings against you on that particular day.
The International Banksters told these various countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice but for all these participating counties to declare bankruptcy. If they didnt agree to declare bankruptcy, the Banksters threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The Banksters made an offer they couldnt refuse!
To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a world wide depression. The bankers said, "Look! You can do it either of two ways. . . the easy way or the hard way". "You just accept the bankruptcy and well let you out of the depression. If you dont, youre on your own". So all the countries involved agreed because they realized that the International Banksters had them by the throat. The countries therefore afraid that over a period of several years they would pass statutes and legislation for the implantation of the bankruptcy in favor of the International Banksters.
Now, I would say that the key Banksters were Rothchild and family and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of the Federal Reserve Banksters. Who were more specifically involved as key Banksters and their agents is pure conjure on my part. . .but, it really doesnt matter at this point. The point is: There was an international bankruptcy and an international conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries accepted the offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were bankrupt.
The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real estate? The Banksters did it with real estate the same way they did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign Banksters simply and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself as a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which ties you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges".. Then, the Banksters con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary agreements. These slick paper agreements establish your "vocabulary" indebtedness to the banister creditor.
If at any time you decide to balk at this scheme because you dont like it, the real creditor never has to make an appearance in court to list the true nature and cause of the action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course) is administrating the bankruptcy which the government agreed per the Geneva meetings. The court system never lets you put the original creditor on the courtroom stand so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The system is set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never has to make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law that gives him the right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness (bondage/servitude). Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came first. . . signed in secrecy, THEN congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could make decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy. It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now... any case brought in is under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional case. It is now a bankruptcy case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised as, a constitutional case.
The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being asked to perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banister creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said "NO. We will not give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then enforce against everybody; a decision not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also having effect within the corporate state governments. This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldnt be fraud if the government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several corporate states declared bankruptcy. . .then let the people know about the bankruptcy. (Notice: when I say corporate "government" I dont mean you and me. You and I are not the corporate government. The corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat of the corporate Federal Government. The capital of the corporate state is the seat of the corporate state government. If the corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate state government want to join forces and declare bankruptcy. . .thats not fraud. This is their corporate business.
However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities declare bankruptcy; but, do not disclose to you, me and every other American, that they have so declared bankruptcy. Further, they have not and do not disclose that their intention is to get you and every other American in this country to pledge to pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility. . . not the responsibility of Americans --the people.
"We the People" who created and signed the contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by and for the Constitutional Corporation (U.S.); using the trade name of the "United States of America" is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE from Americans or the unenfranchized people of America. The private natural American people did not create the corporation of the United States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the creation of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation has located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C. Virginia state (state territory) gave land to the newly formed United States Corporation. Notice: here we have a state giving something of value (land) to the United States. The United States Corporation agreed in the Constitutional contract, to protect the states. Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the states and the people by deception and at the will of their foreign Banksters with whom they have been doing business. Our forefathers gave their lives and property to prevent enslavement. Today we are again enslaved.
Private natural American people have been tricked, deceived and setup to carry the U.S. Inc. Perpetual corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their knowledge and lawful consent. That is FRAUD. All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by "Public Policy" of, by and for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).
The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C. Public policy and only public policy is being administered against you in the corporate courts today. The public policy that is dictated by all the courts from the smallest to the most powerful courts in the world. . . is public policy. This is why I said, in another tape, that the Russian people would be enslaved into indebtedness. What will happen is that it will become public policy in Russia to have the people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians will be forced to promise to pay those debts. They will be forced to pay off on those corporate debts. Corporate Public policy is the crux of the whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate Public policy is forever a Corporate Public policy and the laws that have been passed since 1938 are all corporate public policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy. Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public policy. The public policy is OF (belonging to) the United States corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF (belonging to) America, The Republic.
The Erie vs. Thompkins  case was a decision based upon public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938 have been public policy decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations and procedures that have been passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all been passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when F.D.R. came in office, he brought in public policy of the government to declare banking holiday. It was the public policy of the Government in Washington D.C.(the Federal Government) to give out government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be compatible with the Federal legal system.
This is why, when people like us go to court without being represented by a lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their corporate administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers are pledged to uphold public policy. . .which is the corporate U.S. administration of their corporate bankruptcy. Thats why youll find stamped on many, if not all, our briefs: "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER CASE ANT) IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS". The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or file a claim were not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The arguments we put forth predate 1938. We come in with Constitutional law, etc. All these early cases support our rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court, lawyers and judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case before 1938.
Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these old cases were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the bankruptcy for the benefit of the bankster creditors and to protect the bankster creditor. Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the corporate legislatures, "I want a law passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the longest period possible". It doesnt behoove the creditor if all of his debtors die at an average age of 30 years. What would happen to the banksters lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on the entire funding and lending process if the average American life span was only 30 years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2½ times the current consumer population to equal their current take. The banksters would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or even more. Maybe the banksters would need 2 billion Americans because the individual cant contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the creditor could collect on the debt for only 12 years.
Now, if the banksters can just get people to live an average of 70 years, you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they contract and for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With this situation, the bankster creditor can now float loans worth 50 years of potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years. The creditors and their property and their people are well taken care of The creditor doesnt want the population to decrease per say, unless it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in anothers name and then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people.
For example, lets consider the aids problem today among the black people. What better group to inject aids into black people? Read the Strecker Memorandum on aides and the World Health Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Dont you understand that the blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have reached the max of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone over their limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public housing, medicaid, medicare, food stamps etc. . Now, the situation is that instead of paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he cant collect any revenue?
The corporate public policy of the corporate United States and the states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of these people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because when you, as a member of the corporate body politic, allow laws to be passed which says the minorities must be taken care of, then, the corporate legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these people taken care of Therefore, when given a chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a chance; therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges and opportunities. This is what these people need to make them socially, politically and economically equal with every one else. The legislatures have passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone in to challenge them; telling them that it is not your public policy to assume the debts of other people.
On the contrary, all the court decisions coming out indicate it is the corporate public policy and it is your willingness to support the corporate public policy to pay off these debts. Remember, "public" means of and for the corporate Government. It does not mean of and for Private People. "Public" means corporate government. It is corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they are talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge against this corporate created debt.
The Real Estate Snare
How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate? These bankster creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy; that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this the same way they get away with any other case that is brought before the court, whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever. Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving information and jurisdiction to the banksters through their agents. The instruments (forms) you signed include, but are not limited to the following: social security registration, registration of birth, IRS forms, driver license, traffic citations, jury duty, voter registration, using their address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc. . ..The banksters then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you without your ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true creditor. Whats more: you are never informed as to whom that true creditor is and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the paper work that you are filling out.
If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find that you promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you originally acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never promised to pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never promised to pay taxes to the creditor. You did. In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being enforced against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage or the deed stating the true nature and cause of the action.
Since you have made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for property taxes. You dont realize that the only way they can bill you for taxes is through your own stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. You volunteered. They take advantage of you, conning you to promise to pay property taxes. When they send you their bill, they are coming against you for the collection of the promise you made to the creditor. Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the local bank. The bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasnt loaned you credit. The bank hasnt loaned you ANYTHING. It was not their credit to loan. This is why the bank cant loan credit. There is a credit involved, but not the banks credit. It is the credit of the International Banksters. The international Banksters are making you the loan based upon their operation of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have against you personally, as well as your property.
Now, lets say you get the tax bill and you decide "Im not going to pay it".. You will find that the courts and the lawyers and the county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor simply by not identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the true creditor, the international Banksters can make you a credit loan that has no value in reality. In the case of real property, he claims to loan you the use of your own property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is allowed to do this because you are presumed by statutory law and the banister to be in bankruptcy. This fraud is not revealed because he does not have to make an appearance in court to present and defend his claim. His name is not mentioned in the case.
Lets say you are not aware of your remedies provided for you within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to dishonor the countys presentment of the tax bill. You dont pay your tax bill. You, therefore, just sit on it and dont do or say anything. A couple of years go by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or else in a certain period of time, your property will be taken from you and put up for tax sale. Now here is what is interesting -- If you dont pay your tax bill and they contact you asking you to pay it and you dont do it, they will declare that you are in default. It is based on that default, as provided for in the UCC, that they sell your property for the tax (rent).
However, the county never goes into court to put into the record the identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state the true nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they have developed a legal procedure which is based upon your promise to pay. This procedure provides that they dont have to come to the court to get a court order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor never made an appearance in court. The reality is. . . you are denied any possibility of appearing in court to exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became the creditor under "public policy". To ask if it is under "public policy", just what is the "public policy"? And how did you (as an international banker) become "creditor" to me and everyone else in this country (American people). They dont want you to ask the real creditor (The International Banksters), to produce the documents upon which your personal debt is established. If they were forced to go into court, they would have to produce the deed or mortgage showing you knowingly, willingly and voluntarily promised to pay the corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly and voluntarily promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930s. This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is that there was absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it through their deception and fraud. The deception, in a broader sense, permeates the education system and the new media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you are a statutory "U.S. citizen" and "resident of the United States".
Your Signature Is Your Most Valuable Property
Your property is pledged for the rest of your live upon your signature: and, your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The Banksters dont even bother to go to court. They leave it up to the agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the public policy or that agency to bill you on your promise to perform. If you dont pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice of default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is your most valuable personal property? Did your government teachers ever tell you that any time you sign any document, you should sign it "Non Assumpsit" ? The Corporate U.S. "Government" provides for this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this area. It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "Public" schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings. The Corporate "Public" schools are strictly designed for their Corporate Citizens. That is: the Corporate U.S. Public School citizens. All their students and teachers are trained to produce labor and material in exchange for valueless green paper called "money". It is not money - - it functions "AS" money. Lawful money must be backed by something for value. Banksters take your labor, services and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the "full faith and confidence of the United States Government" (THE MOTHER CORPORATION). I DO NOT HAVE FAITH OF CONFIDENCE IN THE U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL CHARTER, enslaving the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the corporate governments bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically impossible to pay off. You and your family are in continual financial bondage to the international Banksters. They love it so! Blacks Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money changers" as: . . .business of a banker. . .today handled by the international departments of banks". Let me think for a moment: what did Christ do to the "Money changers".. Oh Yes, He severely interfered with their activity. Three days later Christ was crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers.
Lets return to the subject of your property and the tax sale for not paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed (not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you understand the default or you like being in default. . .you just are in default of the tax payment. So they put your property up for sale. At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average America, bids on your property and gets it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to establish. He is required to give you another chance. You have six months and a day to pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay off the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties, interest, fines, etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is yours to continue to pay taxes on the next year.
In my brothers case he was never in default as he never made the promise in the common law deed to pay taxes; therefore, the man who bought the property is moving against my brother through an attorney who is claiming that my brother never redeemed the property. His attorney had followed procedure by publishing the property tax notice in the newspaper for three printings. Now they show up in court to get the court to declare default. After a default judgment, the attorneys client then has right to the property.
Now, my brother comes in and challenges this action. The problem is, the man who bought the property is trying to claim the property when in fact he is not the original creditor. He is not the person who said my brother was in default or that he owed a tax in the first place. Now, when my brother comes in and challenges the new buyer, the court rules that the new buyer is not required to produce any documents in support of his cause. The only documents they are required to produce are the documents related to procedure of foreclosure. Do you understand? There is not court case where the true creditor has to make an appearance. You cannot question or challenge the true creditor.
When you do go to court, the person you are allowed to question is the person who bought the property. The buyer is not required to produce documents because the only one who would be required to do so is the true is the true creditor. Now you are in the position of fighting yourself in court. This is a very clever way for the creditor to avoid the courts in order to settle the dispute for his claim against you. This is also a very clever way to avoid naming the true claimant; true plaintiff. The true plaintiff is the international bankster. The international banksters claim they have a claim against my brothers property because my brothers property has been pledged by the state as collateral for the corporate debts under bankruptcy to the international bankers.
Once my brother removed his property from their jurisdiction and venue by claiming back all his rights, titles and interest. . . the only way that they would be able to stand a chance would be for the original claimant (international banksters) to make an appearance through their attorney to place in the record a statement identifying the true nature and cause for their actions. The courts and the attorneys have cleverly avoided this process.
Remember, when you are dealing in bankruptcy, slight of hand, lies and deception you have to protest to the head man in all of this action. . just like the Watergate tapes. Everybody tried to protect Nixon -- the head dog. It is the same in this bankruptcy scam.. .they all have to protect the International Banksters. The proof that this is true is that: (1) My brother is now in front of the court of appeals. . ..the attorney for the people who bought the property has already said, "the buyers should not be required to present the authority establishing the State of Marylands authority to tax property and to collect these taxes. This statement is the tip-off for how they are attempting to protect the International Banksters. Since the International Banksters never had to appear in court, they never were required to show where they got the right to pledge everybodys property into the United States corporate debt. The buyers attorney says his client should not demand that he has to produce and this court should not demand that he has to produce. Guess What? The court will agree with the buyers attorney. They dont have to do it. They have to protect everybodys butt.
The attorney never cited one case before 1953, The attorney put a lot of cases in his paper work; but, nothing is cited before 1938. Most of the cites are since 1963, when the State of Maryland passed the UCC. All of the cites were in the 70s & 80s. A few cites were in the late 60s and one in the 50s. This lawyer knew what was going on. Thats why, no matter what happens, someone in the court will stamp on the paperwork that this case cannot be cited in other cases. This case is not to be reported in the legal reports.
There was a deal struck that: if any person who doesnt have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts; and, this person proves a fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have case freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the fraud. This is why you cant hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.
"Im Here To Help You."
"I Gave The Government Permission To Practice."
"Im A Member Of The Bar."
The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyers will cite no cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of B.S. The lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy by supporting it. . . even at your expense. The lawyers cant go against the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the bankruptcy.
For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they are only those selected cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system has to work that way.. After the last 30-40-50 years of cases, after cases having been decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record substantial information and argument to prove the fraud?
Blood In The Streets ?
Can you imagine how damaging it be if they allowed your case to be cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine a copy of your brief that discloses evidence of fraud? This exposure would render null and void everything for which they have worked so hard. Wouldnt this exposure make the people mad? Wouldnt this exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets? Especially in the cities where the poor people have been really taken by this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is that the case never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns and shoot the traitors.
Mr. Sweets Case Disappeared !
There is a man . . lets say his name is Sweet He has been investigating the corporate government activities for over 12 years on a full time basis. Now, lets look at Sweets recent case. He won his case. He went into court and defended his common law lien on his property so as to be compatible with statutory law. The judge said, "However, since you presented me with a lien on your property I will stipulate that the county is the owner of your property with the provision that all liens be satisfied". Sweet was very happy about the judgment. Sweet doesnt care if the county is the owner of the property for the next 90 years. The county cant take the property for the next 90 years. The county cant take the property away from him because of his common law lien on the property. Sweet is free to use it, rent it, whatever. If the county really wants the property, they have to satisfy the lien first. However, there is a problem regarding setting a precedent. Sweet went back a couple weeks later and asked them to punch up his case number. Guess what? The case number had disappeared! The reason the case number disappeared is that after the judge ruled the county owned the property, subject to the lien, it became a case that goes against the corporate county bankruptcy public policy.
Since Sweet placed a lien on his own property, he is the one who has to be paid off first - -not the county! The county is now required to satisfy the lien before the county is allowed to take possession of the property. The property is probably not worth the price of the lien. This would not satisfy the true creditors, the International Banksters. If the county pays Sweet off first, the city has to put on their records a $75,000.00 deficit. The true creditors wouldnt like that deficit. They certainly wouldnt like the fact that Sweets clever maneuver had out foxed the foxes.
What if one hundred, two hundred, a thousand or ten thousand people in this state would just put a common law lien on their property and then stopped paying taxes; then cited Sweets case. It would set a precedent. Let the county have the property as long as the judge makes the judgment subject to existing liens. In this situation, the county would end up holding all this property but could have no use of it. No rent. No taxes. No permits. All deficient. The Bankster creditors certainly dont want this scenario. The banksters dont want any cases administered except through the application of bankruptcy procedure. The bankster want your rights, privileges and due process strictly administered by and through the corporate courts under their corporate public policy - -international bankruptcy procedure. The International Banksters and their unregistered foreign agents dont want any evidence on the record showing how you can get out from under them. Any revenue collecting individual or agency such as the courts, judges, lawyers, law enforcement officers and tax collectors who are attempting to take money from you as a private American must be registered as a foreign agent. If they are not duly registered and properly identified they are involved in extortion and treason against private Americans.
How Sweet It Is !
As part of Sweets maneuver, he filled out a financing statement using the UCC-1 form whereby he put his wife and himself as debtors and creditors. Now, the legal situation is switched. The UCC-1 financing record Sweet filed with the state shows Sweet and his wife being the parties of interest recorded with the state rather then the presumption that the international banksters are the parties of interest.
There is an office within each corporate state (Secretary of State) that handles the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC -1 claim forms). Since Sweet is listed on corporate state records as debtor and the creditor on his own property. . . his property cannot be put up in any way for collateral against any debts claimed by the banksters. The reason is that the International Banksters and their flunky agents--NOW--cannot prove that Sweets property is debt property of the bank or the corporate county. The property cannot be put up against any debt claims until it is not encumbered by Sweets Lien. Sweets property is not free and clear of all liens. The result is that for all practical purposes the property is now Sweets being unencumbered by any further demand for payment of taxes. Sweet has not paid property taxes for may years. Sweet is how his own creditor. And Sweet is his own debtor. Therefore, the International Banksters, along with the county corporate thieves are knocked out of the stealing process. How sweet it is! Congratulations Mr. Sweet.
You may want to do it the way Sweet did. If you own property, you will need to get your deed and a common law lien. . .then fill out a UCC- 1 Form. Then file it with the Secretary of State. This seems to be the only way for you to get out from under being a debtor of these dastardly Corporate Foreign International Banksters. The judges have to know whats going on. The only way this scheme can work is to have all the lawyers and judges pledge to uphold the corporate bankruptcy public policy. The banksters just cant allow lawyers in a legal system who refuse to uphold the bankruptcy policy. These renegade lawyers would have to be quickly weeded out. They certainly have a neat little system going here in America. The Land of the Fee and the Home of the Slave.
I hope youre listening to this tape, Law Student You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope youre listening closely, because here is the legal system youre headed to serve, and serve you will. You said you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath theyre taking, in secret, behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the "business of the court" as judges and lawyers. Now, you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the bankruptcy. If you want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer, I can tell you this, they will get rid of you. They will pull you license. So you spent all that money and time going to school under the guise of helping people and youre wasting your time. Without that license you cant go into a courtroom. I would think about this.
Regarding the UCC-1 form. You can also file it against your car. Wouldnt that be a kick in the tail if you went into court for a traffic citation where you had signed "without prejudice UCC 1-207" (or rather used Non-Assumpsit without signing name). And you had dishonored the traffic citation using the UCC in your procedure by having signed "without prejudice" and having gone home and sent in your dishonor of the presentment of the traffic citation. Now, lets say you are in front of the judge. The judge says, "Whats this dishonor stuff all about ?" The judge wont want any mention that the citation was issued under bankruptcy. He is afraid youll mention the bankruptcy issue. The reason you dishonored the traffic citation is that it was issued to you under bankruptcy corporate public policy. He wont get in to that. When you get before the judge, you just state you have removed yourself from the bankruptcy. Tell him that your auto is no longer pledged for collateral against the debt. Hell say, "Oh yeah. What are you talking about?" Thats when you hand him the UCC-1 Form that you filed with the state. This UCC 1 Form will show that you are the debtor and the creditor on your auto. Now what happens? The corporate county / state cant collect on the traffic citation debt instrument. Why? Because now that youre the creditor on the ticket; if they collect a $100.00 fine, they have to pay you the amount of the fine. How sweet it is! Youre the creditor arent you? People have done this. Of course, there is no record, no paper trail in such cases. It is not cited. The corporate Banksters agents, clerks, lawyers, judges, etc. Take the information out of the records as soon as you beat them at their own game.
Here is what I think happens in these cases. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association is not concerned primarily with what happens in any case on the local level. However, when a case leaves the local level, by that I mean the state court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court, and goes to the appeals court - - it would appear that the American Bar Association takes notice of the case. It would seem that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that any action brought on an appeal must have an agreement that any action brought on an appeal must be reviewed by the American Bar Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would the American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain, which is the legal arm of the Rothehilds Dynasty, be able to monitor and administrate the corporate Bankruptcy. It would appear that the American Bar Association would be compelled to review all appeal cases and to make certain any case brought under common law or the constitutional law that would expose the bankruptcy, would be immediately stamped on the back that "this case is not to be cited or published".. I believe that this is the stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in such cases. The justice department may be able to do that in Washington D.C. . .1 cant see where any judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or label the case as one not to be cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the American Bar Association.
Now, Joe Law Student, if youre still attending classes and you have a good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes from that youve seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is tampering with the law. There is one thing certain: The creditor and or his agents are watching these cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books. When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the creditor -- the corporate International Banksters. This is just one of the Banksters state side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another agency they use for this country. This is where all the accounting goes to keep track of the debt. All the states have to send reports to Washington D.C. itself, has to send reports to the (GAO). Take a look at your state Comptrollers Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I found it in the library located in the city of the corporate state capital. Look under "Trust Fund" for each state sub-corporation like the state courts, I-IRS, Banks, Education, etc. You will be amazed at the amount of money being pumped into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State Departmental Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes, fines, fees, licenses, etc.). There are million and billions of your hard earned worthless federal reserve notes, "dollars", being held in "trust". This money is being siphoned off into the coffers of the International Banksters while the corporate government officials are hounding you for more taxes.
All this accounting system is not so the people will know what is going on. The accounting reports are for the Bankster creditors to keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from. The Banksters want to know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from what source. This accounting is the purpose behind Ml, M2, M3, M4 and MS. All this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day; but, at least once a week. These Ms are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The amount of debt Out there and the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the bankruptcy at all time. This system allows the creditors to figure out and know exactly what is going on in their domain.
It all makes sense. Dont the banksters hire bill collectors? Creditors hire bill collectors to snoop around to see why youre not paying. They want to know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much will be coming in. How much they will collect. They want to know who will pay and who wont. The whole system is nothing but credit and debt.
The World Credit Union
Here is what is going to very quickly happen internationally. All of the governments around the world are going to unite. They will create one big giant credit union for collecting the debt for the International Banksters. We have allowed ourselves to get into this very sad situation; but, that is the way it is.
Click Here for more Information.
By: Brenda McCurdy