Breaking News Late Breaking Industry News
Traffic & Market Trends
In This Issue
Commentary
|
Railroads in the 20th Century Pride, principle, determination By Frank N. Wilner, Contributing Editor
The American railroad experience is one of private enterprise. Only during the final decade of the 20th Century did other nations recognize the overwhelming efficiency of such an approach to railroading. So as the Third Millennium dawns, American railroaders may be found about the globe transforming former government-owned rail operations into more efficient market-driven enterprises mirroring the U.S. model. Private ownership has not meant laissez faire. Federal regulation-drawing its authority from the Constitution's Commerce Clause-is less pervasive today than in previous years, but still exists. The Interstate Commerce Commission was created by Congress in 1887 to regulate railroad pricing and treatment of customers. Initially, obedience was voluntary. It wasn't until later that the ICC gained power to compel reporting, require a uniform system of accounts, institute investigations on its own motion, suspend tariffs, and prescribe reasonable rates and divisions of revenue.
The quest to improve safety The Safety Appliance Acts, a series of laws passed by Congress between the late 19th Century and 1910, mandated substitution of automatic couplers for link-and-pin devices, installation of compressed-air train brakes applied by the engineer rather than brakemen climbing atop moving cars, and the addition to rolling stock and locomotives of sills, steps, ladders, running boards, and grab irons. Congress urged railroads in 1907 to utilize telegraph and telephones to institute an automatic block system. Automatic train stops and other train control devices were ordered for passenger trains in 1920. The caboose, now virtually extinct, was a safety device. American railroads retained the caboose until the 1980s, primarily to house brakemen and conductors who assisted with track and switching functions. Collectively-bargained agreements between railroads and their labor unions in 1982 and 1985 spelled the end of the caboose. Hospital and rehabilitation insurance was unavailable to the working classes at the dawn of this century. Widows and disabled employees were reduced to depending upon assistance from relatives and friends. In this environment, Congress passed the 1908 Federal Employers Liability Act, which permitted injured rail workers (or survivors of those killed) to sue railroads for negligence in federal court and have a jury of peers determine damages. Railroad workers remain under this plan today.
Labor gets a voice The RLA is unique in that it requires railroads be organized along craft lines-a reason for the existence of some one-dozen principal rail unions.
The move toward consolidation The nation's more than 2,000 railroads in 1900 began to consolidate in the 20th Century. Where there were but 11 railroads with more than 1,000 route-miles in 1877, the number reached 48 by 1900 as railroading became big business. In 1906, 85% of the bonds and 50% of the stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange were those of railroad companies. Railroads required immense amounts of capital to build, maintain themselves, and grow. Economies of scale in both purchasing and management encouraged unification. Where the Sherman and Clayton antitrust laws were used to break apart or prevent unified rail systems during the first decade of the 20th Century, lawmakers reversed course in 1920 and actually encouraged unification. This followed World War I, which left railroads with substantial deferred maintenance and huge capital demands. When the U.S. entered World War I in 1917, troops and all combat supplies moved to ports almost exclusively by rail. But disruption of Atlantic shipping by German submarines caused massive congestion at East Coast ports, leading to unprecedented gridlock in Eastern and Midwestern rail yards and intolerable empty-car shortages nationwide. Railroads were nationalized under the Army Appropriations Act of 1916-still in effect-which permits the President, during time of war, to take control of any transportation system. The United States Railroad Administration, under the direction of a director general appointed by the president, took centralized operational control of the nation's railroads. Nationalization lasted for 26 months through March 1, 1920-more than a year after the Nov. 11, 1918 armistice. Congress gave thought to nationalizing the railroads permanently, but shippers began clamoring for a return of competition and its attendant efficiency. Railroads had lost $2 million a day during the war and government overseers failed to invest in sufficient maintenance during the period of federal control. The Transportation Act of 1920 restored railroads to private ownership with congressional encouragement to merge. Actually, the ICC was instructed to help plan orderly mergers. To prevent the Justice Department from meddling by invoking the Sherman and Clayton Acts, ICC-approved mergers were exempted from antitrust laws. Alas, healthy railroads were unwilling to absorb unprofitable carriers and their debts. So Congress considered compulsory mergers-but retreated.
Depression-era reforms The ICC, which gained regulatory authority over line abandonments in 1920, authorized the scrapping of more than 21,000 miles of track during the 1930s-a record that would hold until the 1970s when more than 30,000 miles were abandoned. The nation's rail route mileage, which reached a record 254,037 in 1916, commenced a shrinkage that would continue to the end of the 20th Century. In the midst of the Great Depression, Congress crafted the 1933 Emergency Railroad Transportation Act, which scrapped central planning of rail mergers. It also created a federal coordinator of transportation with broad powers to order equipment and traffic pooling and track sharing-all aimed at cost-saving efficiencies and shielded from antitrust laws. President Roosevelt recommended greater voluntary coordination among railroads-and so was born in 1934 the Association of American Railroads. But the hope for voluntary mergers still failed to materialize because of another provision of the 1933 law-job protection for rail workers. The incentive to consolidate was removed when carriers were prohibited from eliminating redundant tasks. Railroads recognized that nationalization loomed if they did not achieve increased traffic density and other cost savings through merger. So they sat down with their unions and crafted the Washington Job Protection Agreement, which provided temporary income protection in exchange for a scrapping of mandatory job protection. It remains in force today. Attempts by government to design railroad mergers ended formally with passage of the Transportation Act of 1940. Public policy continued to encourage rail mergers, but limited government's involvement to regulatory approval and oversight. The Great Depression was devastating in economic terms. Yet much like a forest fire it cleared smothering underbrush and less productive old growth so that progressive ideas might take hold and flourish. More than a year before the advent of Social Security and unemployment compensation became available to workers generally, Congress moved toward providing these benefits to rail workers: Railroad Retirement provided cash benefits to encourage older workers to retire and make way for younger workers in an economy offering few jobs.
Wartime prosperity Railroads carried 50% more freight during World War II than World War I and nearly 100% more passenger traffic. Rationing of fuel and rubber limited truck transportation, so some 90% of military equipment and more than 95% of military troops moved by rail during World War II. The rail industry was not nationalized during World War II, although labor disruptions did cause a 27-day government takeover during the winter of 1943-1944. There was, however, substantial federal coordination of rail service through the Office of Defense Coordination, which worked closely with the AAR and shipper advisory boards.
Post-war decline The railroad's decline was persistent and painful. Between the end of World War II and the mid-1970s, the federal government spent more than $81 billion on highways and another $10 billion on inland waterways. Not surprisingly, rail freight market share tumbled from more than 60% to 44% and the rails' passenger market share of more than 70% in 1947 evaporated to less than 8% by 1970. Excess capacity was so pervasive that 33% of the nation's rail route-miles carried only 1% of the freight. Desperate for economies of scale, railroads were propelled to use every cost-cutting tool available and began a stampede to the marriage altar beginning in the late 1950s. By 1970 each of the nation's 25 largest rail carriers was involved in at least one significant unification. Almost 60 merger applications involving two or more Class I railroads were filed between 1957 and 1970 and the ICC denied only six. Where 110 Class I railroads operated in 1957 there were 71 in operation in 1970. It was believed that railroad consolidation was essential to achieving greater efficiency of equipment utilization, routing of long-haul traffic away from congested terminals, concentration of traffic over fewer route-miles, modernization of maintenance practices, and reduction of duplicate facilities. Railroads also sought to eliminate money-losing passenger trains. With the industry fast approaching financial ruin, Congress passed the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, which created the federally-owned and subsidized Amtrak, to which railroads transferred their passenger trains on May 1, 1971. In exchange, they were required to give Amtrak access to their track-at reasonable fees to be arbitrated by the ICC in the event of dispute-and dispatching priority. Freight operations continued to falter as subsidized truckers cherry-picked the most valuable freight by offering premium service. In desperation, the New York Central and the Pennsylvania merged in 1969, but this largest rail marriage in history soon became the nation's largest corporate bankruptcy. Failures of the Milwaukee Road and the Rock Island followed and it appeared nationalization was the only light at the end of the tunnel.
Deregulation prompts a renaissance The 1973 Regional Rail Reorganization (3-R) Act set the stage for the creation of Conrail from the ashes of Penn Central and other bankrupts. It provided $1 billion in new loan guarantees, $558 million in direct grants, and $85 million in operating subsidies for routes deemed essential. The U.S. Railway Association was formed to oversee the transfer of federal aid to Conrail. It was viewed, however, as too little too late and served only to bandage over a systemic problem of huge subsidies to trucks and barges coupled with excessive regulation of railroads. The 1976 Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory (4-R) Act offered the first dose of deregulation since railroads first came under price controls in 1887. The 4-R Act's objectives were to infuse much needed capital into the rail industry and encourage the ICC to provide railroads with greater ratemaking so they could regain financial independence. A recalcitrant ICC refused to cooperate. Conrail continued to lose money, the Rock Island ceased operations, and the Milwaukee Road exhausted its cash. Regulatory relief finally came in 1980, when Congress passed the Staggers Rail Act. Staggers imposed specific regulatory reform intended to permit railroads to function more like their truck and barge competitors. For the first time, railroads were permitted to enter into confidential rate and service contracts with their customers. This time the ICC did cooperate. In the 20 years since passage of Staggers, railroads shed tens of thousands more miles of excess and unprofitable track-most of it converted into successful short line railroads-substantially improved profitability, reversed decades of market-share decline, invested $230 billion in improved service, almost tripled intermodal volume, and placed 70% of traffic under long-term contract. The industry eliminated deferred maintenance and made record capital investments. Railroads entered into business partnerships with shippers who made substantial investment in freight cars and loading and unloading facilities. A cooperative ICC-succeeded in 1996 by the Surface Transportation Board-permitted a series of cost-saving mergers that reduced the number of major rail systems to just seven and permitted unprecedented concentration of most rail traffic on a route-mile network that has declined by 40% since 1980.
What the next century holds Other problems remain to be solved. Highways and inland waterways still receive massive federal subsidies and trucking interests continue to push Congress for liberalization of truck length and weight limits. But the most pressing railroad concern on the eve of the 21st Century is with bulk commodity shippers having limited transportation alternatives. These so-called captive shippers complain that the STB has largely ignored invoking its residual regulatory authority where railroads remain market dominant and has placed too much emphasis on improving railroad profitability and not enough on encouraging rail-to-rail competition. The outcome will be the first major congressional pronouncement on railroads of the 21st Century. Looking back on the 20th Century, one constant among perpetual change and sometimes-sudden upheaval was railroads. With very few exceptions, railroads delivered on the advertised and with pride, principle, and determination. This will be an admirable objective in the next 100 years.
|
|||||
Copyright © 1999. Simmons-Boardman Publishing Corp. |