HERITAGE FRONT: NEW MANAGEMENT, SAME SHODDY GOODS
By David Lethbridge
 
Note from CHA Administration
Lethbridge writes again…. proudly flaunting his "investigating prowess" that is riddled with his own biases and misinterpretations. Since Lethbridge visits CHA sites regularly, I will leave a dictionary explanation of the word, "fascism". Maybe this will help him distinguish what the word truly means.
 
(From Dictionary.com)
fas·cism n.
  1. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
  • A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
  1. Oppressive, dictatorial control.
 
Note: it's strange he should call all right-wingers "fascist" when he is a communist. LOL Is this a case of the "pot calling the kettle black"?
Last fall, Canadian far-right extremists Wolfgang Droege, Marc Lemire, and others traveled to Moscow where David Duke, former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, and current leader of the white supremacist National Organization for European Rights (NOFEAR), was wooing racist and anti-Jewish elements in Russia.
In the political turmoil that has gripped Russia since the betrayal and collapse of the Soviet Union, and the restoration of capitalism, racist and fascist political organizing has been evident within a number of political parties. Russian National Unity is an openly pro-Nazi party, Pamyat promotes antisemitism, and the National Bolshevik Front espouses extreme nationalist views. Even some allegedly Communist parties, such as the Russian Communist Workers Party (RKRP), have expressed racist and anti-Jewish positions. Granted, all of these organizations have extremely small memberships and little actual influence, but the potential for fascist developments in Russia should not be overlooked. David Duke, in particular, has been to Moscow several times over the last decade, and the recent appearance of Droege and Lemire is not without its own significance.

Since the Canadian fascist contingent returned from Moscow, there has been a resurgence of far-right activity in Canada. It's most significant expression is the sudden renewal and restructuring of the Heritage Front (HF).

The Heritage Front was established in Toronto in 1989 by Wolfgang Droege, himself a Klansman, who has had long connections to David Duke and a variety of other neo-Nazis, going back to the early 1970s. For some years, HF billed itself as the "largest racialist group" in Canada, a status which, once accepted by the media, allowed them to play a major role within the contemporary fascist movement.

But in the mid-1990s, the HF began to fall apart. The famous "Bristow affair," which revealed a government double-agent in their midst, ravaged their credibility. "Tell-all" defectors went public. The HF journal, "Up Front," was released with less and less regularity. Criminal charges and appearances before Human Rights Commissions drained HF's financial resources. Toward the end of the 1990s it was commonly declared that the HF was dead. This was, in fact, never true, since a number of its chapters continued to exist, but its public face and its effectiveness were indeed severely restricted. By 2000, the Heritage Front was little more than a shell of its former self, and Droege remained leader in name only.

Since January, HF has been in a process of major structural change. They are clearly determined to rebuild their organization across the country. They are planning to begin publishing their magazine, "HF Report," on a regular basis no later than this summer. They are, in their own words, "moving into full gear."

What changes can be expected from a resurgent HF? Without doubt, there will be a number of public actions, rallies, and demonstrations. Leaflets will be distributed. Recruiting will be stepped up both at the street level and through the internet. But the ideology will remain the same - white racism and neo-fascism in its usual contemporary disguises as "white pride" and "concern" over non-white immigration. They will, of course, continue to deny their fascism; a process made somewhat difficult in the past considering Droege's early predilection for wearing a white hood and burning crosses.

As example, a related organization, with ties to HF, the Canadian Heritage Alliance (CHA), recently bristled at the suggestion that they are a neo-fascist group. "Nothing on the CHA site includes approval or encouragement of the fascist ideology," they claimed. This, however, is the usual politics of denial that has become the standard tactic of HF and significant related sectors of the Canadian extreme-right.

It is only necessary to examine the "links" page of the CHA internet site to confirm its fascist character. On that page there are at least a dozen neo-fascist organizations, and very little else. Indeed, CHA links directly to such familiar fascists as "Stormfront," "Aryan Women," "White Power for Kids," "National Alliance," "Toronto Skins," "14 Word Press," the Holocaust-denial "Institute for Historical Review," and, of course, the Heritage Front.

As if that were not enough, a visit to the "guestbook" of the openly Nazi "Tri-City-Skins" internet site, which features a large photograph of Adolf Hitler, reveals three laudatory messages from CHA. One of these messages is from "RavennaX," CHA's leader, who writes, "Good to see movement of White Pride brothers and sisters in the tri-city area. We must unite - our voices must be heard over the persistent whining of the minority 'victim'."

Yes, the Heritage Front is back. What role it will play in the coming months and years cannot yet be predicted. What remains essential, however, is that its neo-fascist nature be thoroughly exposed, and that mass public opposition be mounted against its renewed activity.


   Search This Site or the Web
 
  Site search Web search
CHA eNEWSLETTER
Email Address: Subscribe Unsubscribe