American Computer Company (http://www.american-computer.com) has been persistent: I understand that they have fired off a lawsuit (four weeks ago) with the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, and have obtained a Court Order against the Air Force Engineering Installations and IT Divisions that may eventually compel them to release both a) the documents they failed to about Project Blue Book and the Roswell UFO and b) the actual debris from Roswell and an unclaimed craft that was found by the Air Force in the  vicinity of Corona California in July of 1947. The craft is not "classified", Jack told me it has been dubbed "experimental military air craft" - so that it ordinarily would not be available to the public and all documents about it subject to perpetual classification.  I understand that the Air Force has until the second week in January to respond and is bound irrevocably by the Order of Protection, being monitored by the Department of Justice and the US Marshall Service.  The lawsuit is based on "fraudulent representation of property of the United States Government" and includes writs of Habeous Corpus demanding production of documents, things and corpses, connected with the Roswell matter.  ACC says it may be pending for several years, given the immediate effort by the Air Force to slow the fast track of the lawsuit, and to quell production. 

ACC has also cornered President Clinton, sending one of their lobbyists to meet with him: they got him to release a statement that he has a "personal interest"in UFO-ology and wants the ultimate facts surrounding any military dossiers and Alien Hardware in the US Government's possession released to the public (but admitting that despite the fact that he is the CIC, he may not have the ability to cause the release, due to the problem with ultra-classified materials from the past, he has not yet been able to get the DoD to brief him on the project allegedly assigned to the Roswell craft, or so he said). 

ACC has approached both Colin Powell and Norman Schwartzkopf about the possibility of organizing a Pro Bono Observation Team to enter and examine the alleged storage facility housing the craft.  It is my understanding that the Judge Advocate General of the Army and Air Force has issued a ruling ordering a protective order on the facility, barring removal of any materials from it by the NSA and by the DoD, or any agent thereof. 

ACC has asked Gen'l (ret.) Alexander Haig to join the PBOT, apparently Al Haig was one of the sources of the ACC story (although I have not confirmed this) and may be the consultant, the identity of whom Jack has been protecting (note that Haig is working on Defense Communications based on high altitude Blimps, and that they have adopted the name of the Air Force's secret extra-terrestrial flyby monitoring system: Skystation, which is referred to in the FAX sent to ACC's technical support desk, but HAIG is not the source of that document - ACC has confirmed it came from Langley Air Force Base, and was sent them not so by accident, after the posting of their story on the Internet). 

ACC has also met with estate management trustees for Walter Brittain about some documents that were in his estate when he passed away which despite his published writings, were dispositive about his having been convinced by his superiors at Bell Labs to put his name on phony patent disclosures surrounding the AT&T Transistor.  I understand that the lawyers who 
Brittain had originally hired for his estate had passed copies to ACC for examination.  I understand that a document (designed to protect them from AT&T) signed by Brittain, Shockley and Bardeen may be being sought, in that it was filed with their lawyer as a means by which to convince AT&T that "if anything should happen to us, then our lawyers will release this letter to the public, the press and the government". 

ACC has indicated they will not be adding new information to their website until almost New Years, and have asked me to serve as a "go between", limiting my postings to those who have sent me their email addresses, and to Francisco Lopez's List Serve.  I believe however that they are still taking calls, but keeping their heads down and also having a very busy holiday sale season on their PCs.  Shulman told me he didn't want the Public coming to his website and buying PCs for the holidays as a result of any earth shattering news posted there about Roswell, so he has locked the Roswell story-well (but many of us are trying to convince him to change his mind, there are about 50 pages of things ACC does NOT want me to release in my letters to you that have my mind boggled.) 

ACC has also indicated that while it has received numerous offers about books and movies concerning its story, it has withheld any agreement to the many offerers, and is working mainly on the effort to get the UFO and documents (and bodies?) produced by the Air Force for public inspection...  I applaud them.  I heard that they have put a lawyer between them and the many requests coming from companies, from ghost writers, from screenplay writers and many others and aren't committing to anything. 

Here is an email that ACC responded to, forwarded to me from a South American journalist. 
ACC's replies are highlit in BLUE. 

-------- 
Subject: NOT SO QUIET ON THE ACC FRONT. 
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 00:24:03 -0600 
X-Priority: 3 
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) 
X-MS-Embedded-Report: 

FROM A LETTER REPLY ISSUED NOVEMBER 14, 1997: 
  To: acsa@ix.netcom.com 
  Subject: Report about ACC and Roswell 
  Date: Friday, October 31, 1997 8:20 AM 

  To the Mr. President of American Computer Company 
 
  Dear Sir, 
 
  My name is Jeferson Martinho, I am journalist, Brazilian, and I 
publish an electronic magazine in the Internet called "Vigilia", in which we 
treat the theme 'Ufology'. This is a magazine with no financial interest, 
looking for scientific and objectifies approach. 
 
  There is some time we are accompanying the facts exposed in the site 
of ACC and the unfoldings of those facts in the ambit of the ufology 
research. 
 
  However, after that whole time, some subjects were not totally 
illustrious for us. We would like to publish the history--and we took 
advantage of this mensage to request your authorization for this--and we came here 
to ask your collaboration, through the Internet, to elucidate some points, in 
case it is possible. 
 
ANSWER:  We see no reason to believe any person who writes us is, in fact, the person he or she claims to be.  Notwithstanding that fact, we are answering your email. WE wish to invite your readers to the newly updated http://american-computer.com, click on the "Roswell UFO - here's a story that rocked our world" link on the main page, read, and respond on the Opinion Form.  All opinions submitted are carefully considered.  It is really time we heard more from the International Community. 

  1. Why did ACC decide to place the history in its site? Which the 
contact   point --beyond, sure, the computers-- of ACC with the past of the 
transistor? 

ANSWER: We were outraged by much of the story, and felt the Public had a right to consider it, without our claiming it to be true or false.  It's the Public's right to decide if it is, in whole or in part, or if theparty who related it to us, was portraying a fiction.  The story is too fundamentally profound to be ignored out of hand. 

  2. ACC was, already for several times, accused of using the page on 
Roswell to promote spam. How does the company reject those accusations? 
 
ANSWER:  Exactly how does one "promote spam" with a website?  Spam is defined as the "unsolicited mailing of an email item to a third party". We do neither.  We did, however, become the object of hate mail and lots of SPAM direct at shutting us down during the course of the  past few months.  We have been publically critical of Scott McNealy, the head of a competitor: Sun Microsystems, Inc., for advocating the SPAMMING of Bill Gates, the head of Microsoft, as was related in the New York Times, last week.  That should tell you what our opinion of SPAM is. 
 

  3. An exhibition with a fantastic content still demands tests more 
fantastic.  Do these tests exist? Which are they? 
 
 REPLY:  We do not understand the specific question.  Please be more specific. 

  4. The messages in the Internet revealed the occurrence of an invasion 
to ACC soon after the publication of the material.  Did that invasion 
really exist? 
 
REPLY: presumably you are referring to the "break-in" at ACC's offices.  Yes, the break in took place, the front glass door was shattered and had to be replaced,  and we found things missing and new things added among an inventory we took. Yes, the US Air Force OSI came to our offices, and examined the scene, then filed an entirely incorrect report with the offices of the Public Information Officer. Both events are a matter of public record with the Air Force (although the report, discovered by a member of the public, is at once both incorrect AND incomplete, for reasons we are sure relate to National Security) and with the local Police Department (which aside from mentioning names and companies, is typically vague for a local police investigation - also do perhaps to the presently unsolved crime the break-in constitutes).  Yet, the OSI report does not mention the break-in, and the Police Report does not mention the OSI investigation. 

  5. The same messages that talked about the invasion said that CIA had 
been at  the building of ACC. Who did call CIA? What did happen in the 
chats among the  employees of ACC, or you, and the agents of CIA? 
 
REPLY: The CIA was not ever alleged to be at the building.  We contacted the CIA by phone seeking their assistance to identify the unusual "Sattelite" referred to in the mysterious FAX sent to our office the week before the break-in, which has been concluded to have been some kind of ruse intended to get our attention. 

  6. Which the size of ACC? Does the company cross financial difficulties? 
 
REPLY: ACC is the spin-off of another company, but was founded in 1970.  It is presently owned by Bell North America Corporation.  I am not at liberty to tell you how we ended up being owned by BellNAC at this time, 
as the merger is still in progress.  The company has experienced some expenses it didn't expect to, financially, from the cost of pursuing the ongoing investigation of the Roswell related matters, due to the 10,000 emails per day, the large number of interviews, and so on.  We have had one major client cancel its contracts with us because it simply doesn't believe in what we have done re the Roswell story.  However, on the whole, our sales are up for the year, due to the massive drop in our system pricing since May. Today, a Pentium 200 worth $2500 at the beginning fo the year, is selling for under $789.  Technology marches on. 

  7. Is the placement of the history in the site of ACC a marketing play 
for  promote the visitation to the site? 
 
REPLY: We wish there were some benefit to us for having promoted the story with our website.   If anything, our handling of the matter may have contributed to our image as being a "people oriented" business. The thousands of 
people who came to our website simply visited the pages relating to Roswell, and then left.  How did that benefit us?  It didn't. Did it benefit the public? 

Certainly, as the story would never have seen the light of day in the first place, if we had not  publicized it.  Do we deserve a Nobel Peace Prize, as some have suggested:   We do not think so, not for this.  It still is our hope that we get to the bottom of this, rather than that the story end here, with the DoD having admitted to irregularities in their story, and with the NASA Astronauts insisting ACC's story is true.  There is no reason to believe that we  will be able to convince anyone anything, unless we can definitively announce that we have found the remains of the 
Roswell UFO. 

  8. Did ACC try to review the data that it obtained for confirmation for 
  specialists and exempted researchers? 
 
REPLY: In our opinion, there are NO researchers in the UFO Investigations Field presently equipped to cope with the enormity of this story, it is way to big for any one small group of researchers to deal with, particularly the parts involving, allegedly, Bell Laboratories and the cultural history of the Bell System. We presented the story on our Web site, partly in hopes of finding the Investigation Community open to doing exactly what you have asked, but the results were not as we anticipated: to date, aside from skeptics, NONE OF WHOSE ALLEGATIONS have succeeded in refuting the story, the representatives of Bell, Motorola and the IEEE, who failed to provide any real evidence that refutes the Transistor aspects, and the representatives of the estates of Earl Lilienfield, Jack Morton, and the various parties from learned research facilities, who have done nothing but confirm most of the allegations, the answer is: where do you believe we should TURN next? 
 

  9. Do you believe in flying saucers and extraterrestrial life? 
 
REPLY: The term "flying saucer" is a misnomer referring to "alien spacecraft", presumably.  ACC can neither confirm, nor deny the existence of either. However, employees of the company are a lot less skeptical today, than 
they were when the story first surfaced on our website in July.  We are engaging in a point by point recreation of exactly what happened during the past 5 months at this time, to see if we missed anything.  It is difficult to tell what we believe, right now, because in  the course of recreating things, we followed a lead that has convinced us we know exactly where the remains of the so-called UFO from Roswell are.  We  are also intent upon pointing out to the public that the term UFO was invented by a dilemma expert, who noted that a UFO could never be "identified", because then it would be an IFO.  We believe the Roswell UFO, is, in reality, an IFO. 

IT's identity will have to be proven, before we will further publicize it. Furthermore: we have isolated about three distinct teams of personnel of the National Security  Agency who have been laying down a steady stream of false Information in the ET Investigation Community for the past 25 years, since the days the Starpoint investigation surfaced in the midst of the Bell System, after Jack Morton was murdered. They are almost single handedly responsible for maintaining a cloud of disinformation about the Roswell matter intended to hide what COULD HAVE BEEN one or more technology transfer programs involving an other-worldly species that contacted the United States Government in 1945, 1947, 1952, 1955, 1963 and later.  We believe that if this lead bears fruit, there will also be a completely different explanation for events which led up to the end of  World War II than has ever been contemplated before.  The species in question are euphemistically referred to by the NSA and DoD as the "Time Skippers", and while, assuming they are real, and we are not being fed a line of disinformation by snitches we have employed, they are not exactly Time Travellers, they are capable of travelling great expanses of space, in violation of the laws of Time - in extremely short periods of time, but are still bound by a law of the natural universe that prevents them from arriving anywhere "before they started".  They simply skip the time interval, supposedly, that it would take to travel tens of thousands of Light Years between stellar systems.  They use a technology that reduces the mass of their craft to Zero, so as to defeat the laws of space/time.  Or so the story goes...  We have every reason to believe that this story is true, and preambles the Roswell Crash by several years, leading up to the crash and beyond. 

  10. Do you believe that the transistor was created starting from the 
  extraterrestrial interference? 
 
REPLY: See prior question. 
 
Just ten questions that will contribute a lot here to the 
understanding of the readers of Vigília in Brazil. At once, we thanked your valuable 
collaboration and good will, certain of we could count with brief 
answer. 

 
  Our more cordial greetings, 
 
REPLY: We hope your readers find the above information useful.  We are right now between a rock and a hardplace in verifying all of the information about the Time Skippers' race and point of origination, or even whether the entire thing is not just some kind of NSA ruse to further ruin our effort to reveal the Truth about Roswell.  If what we have alleged above is true, it involves matters even more earthshaking than the original story about the Transistor: it would imply that History is being molded by our interactions with a Race capable of travelling back and forth between our Solar System and their own, in only a few months, and who possess an enormous intellectual capacity, one about 3 times that of our own, and a much more well developed "telephathic" or "empathic" ability, or both.  And, the lead we are following implies that our two races are genetically related in some way.  We are hopeful that this lead, however slim the possibility that it is true, pans out, or at least helps us to further evidence Disinformation 
plots by Intelligence Agencies, hiding some sinister secret about Alien matters they simply do not want us to find out about. 

Again, We wish to invite your readers to the newly updated http://american-computer.com, click on the "Roswell UFO - here's a story that rocked our world" link on the main page, read, and respond on the Opinion Form.  All opinions submitted are carefully considered.  It is really time we heard more from the International Community. 

 
Jeferson Martinho 
  Vigilia Magazine Editor 
  http://empresa.com/com/vigilia 
  vigilia@empresa.com 
  Adress: Rua Alaska, 316, Vila Municipal, 
  Carapicuíba - SP Brazil Zip Code: 06328-230 
  phone: +55 011 702-6003 +55 011 429 6831 
 
   ____________[ ]'s Jeff______________ 
  |   R E V I S T A   V I G I L I A                 | 
  |    --- Jeferson Martinho <---                    | 
  |  http://empresa.com/com/vigilia             | 
  |    jeff@br.homeshopping.com.br             | 
  |_______ vigilia@empresa.com _______| 
 
 

--- AND TWO LETTERS BY THE FAMOUS DR. EDWARD WANG --- 

Hi, "Authority@WebTV.Com" - sorry I have been very busy. In response to 
your question about the :Under Construction: pages on ACC's website... 

[ For those new to this story, American Computer published on July 18, an 
amazing story alleging that Bell Labs had access to an Alien Spacecraft, 
from which it developed several key semiconductive technologies, on the 
Internet at: 
  http://american-computer.com 
and  http://american-computer.com/roswell.htm ] 

As to "Authority's" question, I called and asked Jack Shulman through his 
secretary. He replied (quoted from a fax I received this evening on my computer): 

"It is the Holiday Season at ACC and we are having some remarkable sales on 
PCs and some new laptops that embarrass IBM and Compaq.  We added house 
leasing and military-government leasing programs.  We have new servers that 
focus on the need for fast workstation technology for graphics and for the 
Internet.  This has pre-occupied us.  We don't want people coming to our 
site over our Roswell findings and then staying to buy PCs, it just isn't 
right for any company to leverage this story." 

"I have dispatched legal to contact the Air Force and seek to compel them 
to release more information about the Alien Craft allegedly in their possession, 
i.e. - its state of repair, and bonafide technological information, plus we are 
seeking an order from the Judge Advocate General to compel its display at 
the Smithsonian for a 'by appointment only' viewing by select heads of 
government, military staff, UN Staff and the Press.  I have a feeling we 
are going to have a 10 year battle in the Military Court over this thing." 

"At this point, we are pretty much convinced that not only does the Craft 
exist, but that the Air Force is hiding it purely so as to preserve their 
monopoly over it from a military and technological standpoint.  We believe 
that to be an outdated notion, a vestige of Cold War philosophies: allowing 
it to be viewed and photographed should still preserve most of its secrets, 
as under international salvage laws, no one having come forward to claim 
it in over 25 years, it now belongs to the Federal Government." 

"We have also discovered what we believe to have been an indication that 
Nazi Germany may have possessed its own film of Alien Craft buzzing its 
Peenemunde V-2 Rocket Production Facility, and had been inspired to attempt 
to build at least one aircraft that had some of the observable 
characteristics of said craft.  It appears likely that a limited contact of some 
kind took place at the end to World War II (with Germany) that may have led 
to our ability to knock out V-2 Rocket Installations, perhaps our Aliens have a 
conscience and may have believed the Nazi's to be way beyond the acceptable 
limits of barbarism, and took the time to get the Nazi's attention in a way that 
enabled the Allies to track down certain secrets related to the V-2's and other 
such technology - it appears that the Aliens may have even been partly 
responsible for ensuring that the Allies (particularly Eisenhower and 
Marshall) reached the V-2's before the Soviet Red Army did. There are other 
facts that have recently come into our possession which I dare not reveal 
until we verify them". 

"Please note that the V-2's that were taken in for study, and resided 
presumably at the old White Sands test facility, at the time of the Roswell 
Crash, were in the line of flight of both the Alien craft allegedly 
involved in the Roswell incident, one of which appears to have crashed, 
badly, and the other to have landed to attempt a rescue, resulting in the 
marooning of its two occupants here, perhaps due to the fact that an 
ungrateful Army Air Force may have incarcerated them, leading to their 
death by ordinary or unknown causes some time five years later." 

"It appears that AT&T first came into contact with the contract situations 
involving the Aliens, in attempts that were made to decode recordings of 
radio transmissions allegedly obtained from fly-bys of Alien craft during 
World War II.  A special project group in Holmdel and a sub-group in 
Princeton, NJ, were supposedly involved in it, from 1945-1947.  This group 
allegedly served as advisors, allegedly, on the effort after July of 1947, 
to decode information onboard the debris from the Alien crash, and 
on-board the Craft that was secured intact." 

That's all he wrote me. 

PS, I am enclosing a copy of a letter I sent which may have been censored 
by several lists here.  am under the impression that the mainstream UFO 
Investigations Community may have a culture shock in store for them if 
Shulman and ACC are successful, even if it does take them 10 years. I 
understand from Bob that Jack Shulman is a bit discouraged by the attitude 
of some in the ETI community, whom he felt should have pursued the story 
from the Air Force with a bit greater gusto, rather than attacking myself, 
Stig and others who discovered the story on the ACC website and publicized 
it.  He said it reminded him of McCarthyism or Nazi Book Burning, and felt 
it was diagnostic of global interference with Internet operations by AT&T 
and DoD employees, whom he believes are prone to attacking the messengers, 
to "isolate the story from Public review, as it does not call attention to 
their prejudiced nature". 

Oh yes, one other thing, ACC has indicated you can obtain copies of the Air 
Force Office of Special Investigations Report about the FAX from their 
public information office, if you need one, for the cost of a SASE and $.75 
for copying... 

By the way, thanks to the author of the earlier document entitled "REASONS 
TO KEEP AN OPEN MIND" from Gleason Sackman.  In it he claims that Bill 
Gates believed 640K was enough for anyone on a PC in 1981.  Interestingly, 
Jack Shulman was the guy who did the feasibility design study for the PC, and he was 
arguing against Bill Gates (to IBM Research) on that subject.   Jack tried to get IBM go 
give the PC an initial 16 MB Address Space or larger, and tried to get IBM to implement 
Windowing, Jack used the example of the 4MB Wang System he had written the first 
Windows system on in 1974 at Citibank.  IBM AND BILL GATES shot Jack down, and 
Jack was packed off to work at Apollo Computer, ultimately to write IBM's 
first Windows (Office of the Future) in 1982 and 93, later sold off to APPLE 
COMPUTER to use in its development of LISA (the fore-runner of the Macintosh). 

I learned this interesting tidbit from an internal memo at IBM Yorktown's 
"Library of  the IBM Presidents' Club" when I was writing an article about IBM and 
Microsoft a couple of years ago. I understand that Jack and IBM have no great regard 
for each other, and I understand that Gates is a bit afraid of Jack, despite his 
great wealth, on account of Jack being more technical than Gates.  On the other hand, Jack 
has been very outspoken towards Microsoft, commending them for undertaking to write 
a Windowed Operating System for the common PC.  Interesting coming from someone who 
also interned at Bell Labs in his Youth, writing pieces of UNIX in the 60's.  I 
heard that Jack finds UNIX "archaeic, difficult for the non-technical user, and prone to 
performance limitations that give rise from some rather limited approaches to message 
queueing and multiprocessor data sharing".  (Direct quote, anyone know what it means?). 
I just may do a biography. 

-- Ed 
 

--- AND A SECOND LETTER FROM THE FAMOUS DR. EDWARD WANG ---- 

Return-Path: <acsa@ix.netcom.com> 
Received: (from smap@localhost) 
          by dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) 
  id SAA28214; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 18:22:31 -0600 (CST) 
Message-Id: <199711260022.SAA28214@dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com> 
Received: from nyc-ny49-21.ix.netcom.com(199.183.204.245) by 
dfw-ix6.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) 
id rma028124; Tue Nov 25 18:22:03 1997 
From: "acsa" <acsa@ix.netcom.com> 
To: "Francisco Lopez" <d005734c@dc.seflin.org>, <veterick@ix.netcom.com>, 
        <RICKG1@ix.netcom.com>, <mzum73@ix.netcom.com>, 
        <mcashman@ix.netcom.com>, <jsf1763@ix.netcom.com>, 
        <HATCHCOV@ix2.ix.netcom.com>, <dcox@ix.netcom.com>, 
        <bsciubba@ix.netcom.com>, <abtex@ix.netcom.com>, 
        <nicolai_tesla@msn.com> 
Subject: Re: Corso's Convoluted Claims (Re: Dr. Darlington) 
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 19:21:09 -0500 
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 
X-Priority: 3 
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 
MIME-Version: 1.0 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 

Sorry, in advance, about the copies sent to anyone who didn't want one, I  may have hit "Reply All" key. I would tend to disagree with the term "Convoluted" in this thread. 

You should write to Jack Shulman at American Computer, as he personally knew Darlington. 

Interesting that a Motorola Corporation Executive claimed in writing to me that Darlington "Pair" Compound Transistors were "the First Germanium Transistors fabricated, long prior to alleged Roswell Spacecraft crash mentioned by ACC in their article on the Internet..." -- in light of the  Times article which indicated the first time (allegedly) Darlington saw a 
Transistor wasn't until 1950. Also, note that the Lawyers at Bell Labs don't go into little rooms and take instructions from the likes of  Darlington, Schockley, etc.  They have teams of analysts who analyze the technology evaluated at the Labs for development (like the Alien electronic components) and technology developed at the Labs  (like the Picture Phone), then they "Pass out orders" to the big exec guns, who orchestrate their decision in accordance with an operating plan, which is reviewed weekly at Steering Committee meetings.  What is described about Bell Labs lawyers below in the Times article is a lot of Hooey. I've been there. 

By the way, I was listening to the Omega Short Wave Radio Network on Sunday Night, and caught the Mike Jarmus Live Talkshow, Jack Shulman was being interviewed and had some startling revalations.  I called him today (he didn't take the call, but one of his staff answered a few questions for me...). 

I have been led to believe that ACC is locked in a legal struggle with Air Force Public Information who has since posted copies of the CLASSIFIED Fax received by ACC, and I was told that Air Force OSI filed an incorrect report about American with the Air Force Secretariat, from the Field Office in New York.  The Field Office representative I contacted, when he heard that I had obtained a copy (see my previous email) of the FAX, dropped a brick... apparently the whole subject matter of the Fax is HIGHLY CLASSIFIED and Level 7 Top Secret, but the Information Officers at the AFPI didn't realize it, as Shulman's lawyers supposedly subpoena'd the documents, leading to their being placed without Court Protection, into a domain that has allowed the FAX to become publically circulated.  I have a copy and I have heard ACC is going to post it, once they are certain it won't damage anything.  ACC staff told me the Air Force is "busy trying to minimize the damage caused by the FAX, perhaps figuring no one will be able to figure out what it is about, being so technical, and minimizing ACC's size in the report, so no one inside of the Government will take the reports filed by (them) seriously".  They suggested that the project involving the satellite is so deeply covert, that they are worried Shulman will pull a few republican senators out of his top hat and sic them on the Air Force to find out what "cost 120 Billion dollars to put up there in high orbit, and that Air Force is apparently spending 13 Billion dollars per year on to keep up there in high orbit, without Congress knowing all the details about". 

Meanwhile, in the report, part of which is highly complementary (prior to the break-in) about ACC, part of which is terse and vague (after the break-in), does not mention that the OSI Officers went to ACC because of the break-in, nor does it mention the break-in at all in the report, referring simply to Shulman's having been involved in the development of the IBM PC, and Windows, and saying ACC has a "single small room in a business complex"... which is untrue.  They actually occupy two levels of one commercial building and the top floor of a second, in Cranford, and I have been to their assembly operation in Piscataway, NJ, and hear they have others in Andover, Mass (I called it, it exists) and Plainfield, NJ and a Laptop plant in Rahway, NJ, plus a container receiving yard in Linden, NJ (for the historians out there).  I also understand they maintain a Web Management Center in San Diego, California, and just opened a regional manufacturing plant in Ann Arbor, Michigan. 

I was told by American's Jay Schwartz, who told me to tell you these and other facts will be more fleshed out on ACC's website: 

"ACC, is surfacing an indepth profile of the relationship between Brigadiere General Roger Maxwell Ramey, General Hoyt Vandenberg, Harry Truman, Lt. Colonel Charles Irvine, Colonel Herb Kalberer, and General Jack Cossart, as being the key players in the hiding and transport of the undamaged Space Craft, and the pieces from its partner, the Space Craft that crash landed.  According to ACC, the craft were transported and described to curious people, by air, flatbed and rail, as "Radar Dish Components".  They were taken underground and hidden at the "Advanced Radiotronic Research Center" during the early part of August, 1947.  This was an AT&T facility in 1947 secretly located on what is now on the grounds of and part of the "Holmdel, Crawford Corners" Research Centers maintained by Bell Labs, AT&T Labs and Lucent Labs.  The damaged or separate electronic components were then transported by two NJ State Troopers in a Truck along with two Air Force personel (Irvine and Kalberer) with instructions from Hoyt Vandenberg on the wishes of the Air Force and Army and Truman, and transferred to Charles Kelley and John M. Morton, employed in the executive staff at Bell Labs in Murray Hill.  The lab shopkeeper's notebook was from Kelley's assistant, Jefferey Prokauer - a maintenance worker on an internship from his high school at that time - and has been maintained by Prokauer ever since.  It has a detailed depiction of the planning Kelley, Morton, the legal staff and operating comittee of the physics and electronics MSS (Members of Scientific Staff) from the time period." 

I was further told by Schwartz: 

" the undamage craft, while entered, filmed, photographed and examined, is made of a superhard synthetic element or alloy that even high energy laser's fired at it, have been unable to damage.  It is also still running from a nuclear power source that has never been disconnected, and maintains an operating on-board flight control system to this very day.  The craft is extremely hard to comprehend, it was designed by an entirely different form of engineering than we even today understand.  Some of its features have been copied (its resistance to radar penetration, some of its electronic components, and materials mainly obtained from what appear to be its passenger bedding and eating area).  By an executive order of Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1967, it was ordered encased in a plastic resin and placed into a lead lined and cement lined casket and stowed at an Air Force Engineering Installations facility under level 10 clearance protection.  Periodically, when the Air Force records an increase in sightings by qualified personnel, the craft has been observed by electronic monitoring equippment, to become more electronically active and records 'lighter' on the equipment connected with it intended to monitor it through its 'casket'..." 

The following and other facts were revealed by Shulman in the Omega broadcast. 

I understand Omega has a website, but I don't think they are going to place the recording on it.  I believe ACC is going to post it, if Omega will let them.  During the broadcast, the caller stream was interrupted by a crew of  "The Landing on the Moon was a Government Hoax" and "Space Flight and  Aliens are a Government Hoax" people all calling from a central point in Northern NJ.  They had to be put off by Jarmis.  What was interesting was Jack's response, he suggested that they may have been part of three "disinformation projects put in place by order of Hoyt Vandenberg and the Secretary of the Air Force, under executive order, involving what is today  known as the National Security Agency".  He described the three projects as..." 

"1.  General Denial (citing General Shalikashvili), 
 2. Plausible Deniability (also known as "Weather Baloon Palaver") and 
 3. Covert Disinformation (which he suggested has infiltrated the UFO-ology community, spreading believable or nonsensical threads intended to misdirect the UFO community and the public away from where the real story may be being hidden by the Air Force and companies like AT&T and others involved in the overall Roswell matter and subsequent events)". 

The American Computer Company website, 

http://american-computer.com 

appears to be undergoing a massive transformation, with an entire section devoted strictly to Roswell. 

Jay said, Jack Shulman said: "I fear that even were I to haul that UFO out of its storage area on the back of a Dodge Ram, and parade it right down the middle of Broadway, New York City, carcasses of Dead Aliens, and all, the disinformation campaigners will have so misdirected both the Public and the UFO community, that more than likely people will wonder whether it was some late-to-end part of the Wacky Greenwich Village Halloween Parade, and turn back to reading their New York Times about how great a job Bill Clinton is supposedly doing dealing with the Saddam Hussein problem, or what other rediculous notion Janet Reno has for persecuting Microsoft again..." 

By the way, my thanks for the reply from Dr. Boylan, at the end of this letter, to this odd letter about Dr. Darlington.  To one and all, I say: Don't believe ANYTHING YOU READ that originated at Bell Labs.  It's all carefully calculated stuff from THE MOST POWERFUL COMPANY on the PLANET.  Even their alleged problems.  Go to the 

http://acsa.net 

site and read the two articles about AT&T and its Telephone Lobby (attacking Microsoft) there and you will see to what depths AT&T is capable of manipulating both public and government opinion.   And we all believe Janet Reno tells the truth, right?  Riiiiiiiiight! 

-- Ed Wang 
 

==== End of Reprint ===== 

(c) 1997, 1998 American Computer Company.  All Rights Reserved. 
May not be commercially reproduced. 
 

Member Of Link Me! Banner Exchange

Member of the Internet Link Exchange