Home
Help

E-mail to a friend
See what stories users are sending to friends

The Big Idea
The old cities-versus- suburbs view is giving way to new patterns about our communities
* A place of extremes
* Welcome to the
'exit ramp' economy


Columnists
Ellen Goodman
Derrick Z. Jackson
Jeff Jacoby
Robert Jordan
Martin F. Nolan
David Nyhan
Thomas Oliphant
Jack Thomas
Joan Vennochi

Your Views
Write a letter to the editor

Sections
Boston Globe Online: Page One
Nation | World
Metro | Region
Business
Sports
Living | Arts
Editorials

Weekly
Health | Science (Tue.)
Food (Wed.)
Calendar (Thu.)
Life at Home (Thu.)

Sunday
Automotive
Focus
Learning
Magazine
Real Estate
Travel

Local news
City Weekly
South Weekly
Globe West
North Weekly
NorthWest Weekly
NH Weekly

Features
Globe archives
Book Reviews
Book Swap
Columns
Comics
Crossword
Horoscopes
Death Notices
Lottery
Movie Reviews
Music Reviews
NetWatch weblog
Obituaries
Special Reports
Today's stories A-Z
TV & Radio
Weather

Classifieds
Autos
BostonWorks
Real Estate
Place an Ad


Buy a Globe photo

Help
E-mail addresses
Send us feedback

Alternative views
Low-graphics version
Acrobat version (.pdf)

Search the Globe:

Today
Yesterday


The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com Boston Globe Online / Editorials | Opinion
[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version ]

In Virginia, a 7-by-50 foot monument to free expression

By Ellen Goodman, Globe Staff, 5/17/2001

CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va.JOSH WHEELER WALKS me to the busy traffic island that separates the local Merrill Lynch office from the nondescript City Hall. On one side of the island, money talks. On the other side, politics is debated.

Smack in the middle is the designated site for what will soon become something quite remarkable. A monument to the First Amendment, a public welcome mat to free expression.

Wheeler, a tall, friendly bear of a man walks up and down, measuring off the monument that will be as simple and ephemeral and controversial as free speech itself. It will be a chalkboard more than 7 feet tall and 50 feet long.

Here, any citizen will be able to pick up a piece of chalk and write. Anything. Freely.

Wheeler, who shepherded this project under the auspices of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, is still somewhat amazed that this monument got final approval. After all, he reminds me with only a half-smile, if the First Amendment itself were up for a vote today, it might never pass.

These days, we tend to think of free speech as one of those troublesome legacies of the Constitution that we have to tolerate but not always enthusiastically.

We believe in free expression and defend it from the sort of random censorship that keeps Judy Blume or Maya Angelou out of the library. Indeed, the Jefferson Center distributes Muzzle Awards every spring to censors like those who cover up the private parts of a public statue in Sacramento or slice pages out of a controversial play in Jacksonville, Fla.

But free speech often conjures up some reluctant defense of pornography or hate speech. It comes to the public eye or courtroom with defendants like Larry Flynt or the Ku Klux Klan. We may defend free speech, but invite it?

That's what is so refreshing about this particular monument. When the Jefferson Center set out to create a physical paean to freedom of expression, they had only a vague idea of ''a people's monument.''

It was two young architects, Peter O'Shea and Robert Winstead, who came up with the simple and dramatic idea of a chalkboard. ''We started with the idea that for the project to be successful it had to be confrontational,'' says O'Shea. It wasn't to be a static place where people would bow to free speech, but a fluid, dynamic, controversial space where they would exercise it.

Wheeler and the architects thought it would be difficult to get approval even in the heart of Jefferson country. And at times, the long and very public debate in Charlottesville seemed to mirror the debate about free speech itself.

Concerns were raised about swear words and swastikas. People wondered about graffiti and hate speech. Questions were asked about what should be said in public and what should be read by children.

''People were afraid of what people would say,'' says Wheeler. The monument backers understood that: ''We're not naive. We do envision the occasional racial slur or offensive comment. But we see 20 people responding as well.''

Indeed, the response to the wall itself was enthusiastic as well as worried. Novelist Rita Mae Brown, who lives nearby, even imagined the wall impishly as a ''a high class Gossip Central.''

But the city council was asked to give personal approval of a wall of criticism right outside their workplace. Finally, and even bravely, this council said yes. What remains now is to pay the price of this emblem of free speech, a tag of about $250,000 to be raised by private funds.

Wheeler says that the first lesson has come from the process itself. Free expression is not something chiseled in marble to be admired from afar. It's as messy and as temporary and as powerful as the debate over this small space.

Not long from now, this corner will be a designated place to exercise that rough muscle of democracy. Opinions and arguments will be erased and renewed and rebutted. The people of Charlottesville will get to see what people think. The handwriting on the wall.

And the rest of us will have a monument to a country in which free expression requires nothing more - or less - than the willingness to step up to the blackboard.

Ellen Goodman's e-mail address is ellengoodman@globe.com.

This story ran on page 18 of the Boston Globe on 5/17/2001.
© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company.

[ Send this story to a friend | Easy-print version ]


Click here for advertiser information

© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company
Boston Globe Extranet
Extending our newspaper services to the web
Return to the home page
of The Globe Online