think there are times when logic just isn't the right way to think."
Richardson, WTC structural engineer, in The New Yorker, Nov 19,
is seeing what everyone else has seen
and thinking what no one else has thought."
Szent-Györgyi, Nobel laureate for physiology & medical
1 Part 3 Part
4 Part 5
in Religious War / 2
1. Religious war involves subtleties and complexities beyond (or
beneath) the discernment of most media-pundit political scientists,
textbook historians, and respected public figures. In religious
war, a great deal of unverified information is prepared, broadcast and
obediently received as factual. Well-disciplined energies are spent
establishing possible untruths as articles of faith. The American people,
their government, and the world community seem quite comfortable with
a theory of 9/11 that is rich in questionable data. For example:
- Why the uninvestigated discrepancy between the stated number of
passengers on the deadly jetliners and the passenger lists themselves?
- Why the uninvestigated phenomenon of an accused hijacker's
passport that reportedly sailed free of the planes pulverizing
incineration (how many other passports sailed free?) so that officials
might recover it two blocks away?
- Why was the miraculous passport bearers name withheld when
so many other hijacker names, all Arab, were publicized?
- Why the uninvestigated fact that none of the publicized Arab names
appear on the airlines' passenger lists?
- Why the uninvestigated possibility that the hijackers might have
boarded the jets without tickets?
- Why the uninvestigated fact that British PM Tony Blairs declaration
on October 3 that I have seen absolutely powerful and incontrovertible
evidence of (bin Laden's) links to the events of September 11,
spoken with the force of a verdict of guilt on bin Laden in the court
of international opinion, is supported only by a list of hearsay?
- Why the unmentioned fact, in recent announcements that a brand
new type of unmanned reconnaissance plane, the Global Hawk,
was now flying over Afghanistan, that a Boeing 737-sized Global Hawk
flew unmanned from California to Australia last May?
- Why the uninvestigated possibility (first articulated by Carol Valentine)
that the 9/11 jets might have been implanted with Global Hawk remote
- Why the uninvestigated possibility that the planes might have served
as spectacular eye-catchers to divert attention away from secondary
explosions in the twin towers designed to destroy evidence? According
to terrorism expert Van Romero, Arab terrorists routinely support
diversionary explosions with more elaborate secondary bombs.
- Why no interest in the fact that Dr. Romero, who happens to be vice-president
for research at New Mexico Tech, one of the government's leading counter-terrorist
contractors, (a) candidly told the Albuquerque Journal on 9/11 that
the towers collapse could only have happened with the help of
secondary demolition explosives, and (b) ten days later retracted
- Why no interest in the fact that the professional debate on the
towers collapse seems determined to arrive at any suitable explanation
short of controlled implosion? Leslie Robertson, WTCs structural
engineer, was asked by a reporter how long, once hed learned
of the crashes, he thought the buildings would stand. Mr. Robertson
replied (in the November 19 issue of New Yorker magazine), I
cant...I think there are times when logic just isnt the
right way to think. Is that it? Must we look beyond logic
the laws of physics to explain why the towers collapsed as
- Why the uninvestigated discrepancy between (a) official claims that
Osama bin Laden is the mastermind of a type of act that is perfected
only when the perpetrator accepts responsibility for it, and (b) Osama
bin Laden's denial of responsibility?
- Why the uninvestigated possibility that President Bush might have
been speaking truthfully when he told
an audience December 4th that he witnessed on television the morning
of September 11 something untelevised to the rest of the world: the
first WTC crash? Might this have been a private transmission from
a government camera trained expectantly on the target?
- Why haven't commercial media plunged enthusiastically into these
issues in search of truth? Who has power to keep them from doing so?
These are just some of the mysteries, but as we apply the ROE filter,
most will solve themselves.
2. In religious war there are more combatants than meet the eye.
The attack on America resulted in an increased American
presence in the Arab world. The alleged perpetrators meant to achieve
the opposite objective to run American military out of the Arab
- Is such a colossal failure consistent with the brilliance of the
- Or could bin Laden and his associates be an Oswald funded
by a combatant so powerful that it can conceal itself from world imagination?
3. In religious war the apparent belligerents are often deceived
out of knowing who it is they're really fighting, and why. Consequent
to 9/11, American citizens have shackled themselves with steep tax debt
by permitting their representatives to make war of indeterminate duration
on a worldwide enemy called terrorism, whose adherents are
The intangibility of the enemy permits unlimited interchange of targets,
battlefields, and causes. Already information has surfaced that the
Phoenix office of the FBI circulates a booklet for local law enforcement
personnel that describes as terrorists various domestic
politically-active organizations, some of them religious in character,
who had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11. Many persons associated
with these organizations imagined themselves defenders of American institutions,
Why no vigorous public discussion as to the possibility that 9/11 was
engineered by an unknown beneficiary to secure drastic reduction in
safeguards of the rights of citizens to assemble, petition for redress,
and speak freely a reduction Congress could not have achieved
in peacetime? Why is that those interested in examining all the evidence
are branded enemies of the state?
4. In religious war victory is often gained long before the first
battle is joined, and the loser's mind is so boggled that identifying
the winner is quite beyond him. This is because religious war,
according to the Bible, is not about flesh and blood but about principalities,
powers, the rulers of the darkness of this world, and spiritual wickedness
in high places.
The pattern of religious war begins with unperceived victory by an
unimagined winner over an unwitting loser, followed by an outworking
of historico-theatrical war, consisting of organized bloodshed conducted
by officials for the people's participation, observation, and commemoration.
Thus, 9/11 may have inaugurated the historico-theatrical war following
America's earlier, unperceived defeat by a combatant the citizenry cannot
imagine. Such a bewildering state of affairs is normal in religious
By way of example, take the American Revolution, a religious war if
there ever was one.
Some important background. Prior to and during the Revolution,
the colonies of New England were split into unequal religious factions,
mainly Christian. Christianity itself had been split since at least
the fourth century between Biblicists and Romanists. The former held
that a loving, eternal relationship with God required intelligent and
prayerful reading of the sacred scriptures of Israel, including the
gospel of Jesus Christ. The latter held that the same relationship required
following these same scriptures, but only as interpreted by the Church
of Rome, and pronounced by its Bishop, the Pope. For Romanists, reading
scripture was a dangerous pastime that could put one in possibly fatal
conflict with the Church.
Gutenberg technology, which made Bibles available to the masses, forced
a crisis on the Church of Rome. Catholics reading the Bible for the
first time joyously discovered that God spoke directly through printed
words, and his message conflicted with the Pope's.
Biblicists soon came to be called Protestants because the Bible led
them to protest many of the Church of Rome's most cherished traditions
as offensive to the God of scripture.
Bible-reading threatened the Church's authority to such an extent that
extremities were resorted to. In 1540, Pope Paul II issued the bull
Regimini militantis ecclesiae (On the Supremacy of the
Church Militant). RME ordained a clandestine military priesthood
to resume the Crusades that were discontinued in the 13th century. The
new order inherited the rich legacy of the Knights Templars (with their
elaborate secret network called Freemasonry) to wage religious war on
departed believers to retrieve, occupy, or destroy them, and
in any event to defeat Protestantism by deception, manipulation, indoctrination,
entertainment, and terror.
Their corporate name was Company (or Society) of Jesus, soon shortened
to Jesuits, and massive bylaws called Constitutions
were drawn up by founding father Ignatius Loyola. The Jesuit Constitutions
provide for a Superior General elected for life and due unquestioning
obedience from his priestly soldiers. In the Generals person,
Jesuits are required to see Jesus Christ.
(Pursuant to the Constitutions, Padre Pozzos ceiling in the magnificent
Jesuit Church of the Gesù in Rome glorifies Ignatius Loyola,
the first Jesuit General, in whose central radiance Jesus is still burdened
by the cross.)
Working under the maxim taught by their own moralists If the
end is good, the means are legal, the Jesuits established colleges,
universities and masonic lodges that linked budding political and mercantile
princes Catholic and Protestant alike in learning more
from the Aristotelian humanities than the Bible.
By 1622, the Jesuits were openly celebrating their infiltration, occupation,
and defeat of Protestantism. Within two centuries of their founding,
all western civilization was developing according to Jesuit educational
techniques. Three of the Companys grander successes were modern
monetized indebtedness, the modern masonic lodge, and the Age of Enlightenment.
Enough background. Now to the Revolution.
In 1758, Protestant biblicism was the state religion.of both Great
Britain and the colonies. Roman Catholicism claimed no more than 1%
of the American colonists. Catholics in New England, said
John Adams, are rarer than earthquakes.
Because Catholicism smacked of treason, with its implicit obedience
to the Papal Mitre over the British Crown, most of colonial America
denied Catholics the right to vote, to hold public office, to own property,
or even to worship in their customary forms. Came the Revolution, it
never entered the Protestant majoritys mind to allow their despised
co-inhabitants to function politically.
Between 1758 and 1775 the colonists suffered Englands long
train of abuses and usurpations. Few realized that the many apparently
spontaneous acts of tyranny (and decisive reactions thereto) were in
fact pages of a rough script written in the mind of Jesuit Superior
General Laurence Richey and executed through the Jesuits secret
masonic bridge into the Protestant ruling classes on both sides of the
Richeys script called for no less than motivating rebellious
colonial energies to divide from England (its Bible, King, Parliament,
and Church) and form a new, independent national government which could
be legitimately occupied and eventually controlled by Roman Catholic
To distance his army from suspicion of complicity, General Richey made
his Jesuits virtually invisible. He did this by arranging for European
monarchs under his obedience to persecute and tyrannize his own men
during the very years the colonists were suffering their tyranny. It
was sublime oriental warfare, memorialized by General Richey's publication
in 1772 of Sun-Tzu's Art of War (the first translation of this
masterpiece from the original Manchurian into a western language).
When you are strong,said Sun-Tzu, make it appear
that you are weak. In 1773 the Pope condemned the Jesuits to perfect
weakness, and placed them under perfect cover, by dissolving the Company
for all eternity.
Pope Clement XIV
informing the Spanish ambassador of the "dissolution, extinction,
and quite abolition"
of the Jesuit priesthood. (From a contemporary engraving)
(Since the Popes word was to be trusted, no one dreamed that
the order would be resurrected in 1814.)
Laurence Richeys war of Catholic liberation was won when the
Continental Congress adopted its Declaration of the Causes and Necessities
of Taking Up Arms in August 1775. English-speaking Protestantism was
thus irreparably divided.
The real war was over before it began. All the restthe battles,
the legends, the heroes and the villains, the endless philosophical
speculations, the enraging and the moving human interest stories of
tragedy and hope and separation and reunionthis was the historico-theatrical
production made possible by the fundamental circumstance for the people's
participation, observation, empathy, celebration, and commemoration.
Flesh-and-blood combatants, colonists against tyrants, masked the true
combatants, non-existent Jesuits against unsuspecting Protestants.
Church Militants momentous victory over America was proved with
the ratification of Article VI of the Constitution in 1789 "No
religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office
or public trust under the United States." The remarkable irony
(religious war is invariably ironic) is that Roman Catholicism's most
ardent enemies had dedicated their lives, fortunes, and sacred honour
to surrendering their political scepter to. . . the Papacy.
Evidence of the success? Georgetown University, the incubator of American
governmental policy, domestic and foreign, was founded by one of those
non-existent Jesuit priests, John Carroll, who also was made Americas
first Roman Catholic Bishop. Georgetown is still owned and operated
by the Jesuits.
Consult any comprehensive Congressional directory and youll find
that the Congressional committees and subcommittees regulating nearly
all aspects of American life are chaired by Roman Catholic lay-persons.
Reflect on the United States seals, mottoes, customs, imagery, architecture,
and archaeology and youll find an intense dedication to eternal
Rome. Archaeology? Example: the land on which the U.S. Capitol
is situated was Jesuit real estate that had been known for a hundred
years prior to the Revolution as Rome. And who chose the
property to become the Capitol site? Its owner, Bishop Carrolls
Jesuit-trained brother Daniel, a signer of the Declaration of Independence
who also happened to be the Commissioner appointed by President Washington
to find a site for the new federal city. (These facts were openly boasted
by the Church until the mid-20th century, when they were stricken from
the Catholic Encyclopedia and removed from acceptable conversation.)
More evidence? Witness how Jesuit warfare has silenced American Protestantism.
Scholarly biblicists describe the way Protestantism has morphed into
a lifestyle demonstrably more Babylonian than Christian with the term
5. Religious war is funded not by money but by the love of money.
Money in law and Bible is quite different from the money we use. Legal
and biblical money (as shall be documented presently) is gold and silver.
Beginning in 1913, the Church Militant persuaded Americans to exchange
their gold and silver for notes of indebtedness, which were then made
to circulate as money. (This is done through legal tender
laws that permit debts to be settled in something other than gold and
Debt money worked because it was infinitely easier than precious metals
to produce, and therefore could be created by the truckload. It played
on human narcissism and shot-logic. Everybody loves money,
as the Danny DeVito character in David Mamet's Heist reasoned.
Thats why they call it money.
To underwrite war....
1 Part 3 Part
4 Part 5