Sandia Lab News
April 25,1997


Sandia-led research may zap old beliefs about lightning protection at critical facilities

Triggered lightning tests leading to safer storage bunkers

John German

(back to Lab News contents page)
Sandia research into nature's most striking phenomenon is jolting some long-standing beliefs about how to protect concrete structures from damage caused by lightning. The findings may prompt updated construction standards for certain critical facilities, such as oil refineries, chemical plants, and financial institutions.


A LIGHTNING BOLT strikes Albuquerque, N.M., during a summer thunderstorm in 1992. Sandia National Labs photographer Walt Dickenman photographed the storm from Albuquerque's West Mesa. (Click on image for page containing larger view)
Lightning strikes the earth's surface an average of 6,000 times a minute. In the US, it does an estimated $138 million in damage each year, according to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). A direct strike to a building can start fires; damage electrical, communications, and computer systems; and in rare instances injure or kill a building's occupants.

You can't stop lightning from striking a building, but many facilities employ lightning protection systems meant to conduct the electrical discharge from a strike through the building to the ground along specific conductive pathways, minimizing damage to the building's structural and electrical systems.

Better bunkers the goal

Typical lightning protection systems utilize such equipment as grounded lightning rods meant to draw the strike to a preferred spot and away from vulnerable parts of a building's structure, a "downconductor" line meant to convey current through the building to the ground without electrifying the building's infrastructure, and "earthing" systems meant to disperse and dilute the current at ground level.


MULTIPLE-STROKE FLASH photographed during a 1993 rocket-triggered lightning test at Ft. McClellan, Ala., aimed at measuring electromagnetic fields on the ground near the flash. The appearance of multiple strokes in the time-exposed photograph is a result of wind drifting particles in the plasma column to the right. (Click on image for page containing larger view)
In 1991, Sandia began a series of triggered lightning tests on buried DoD nuclear weapons bunkers as part of a DOE program to improve the safety of the nation's stored nuclear weapon stockpile (Lab News, July 24, 1992).

Although safety systems in modern nuclear weapons employ a series of electrical and mechanical switches that would prevent a stray electrical discharge from detonating a weapon or its high explosives, researchers wanted hard data about the electromagnetic field that might pass through a concrete structure struck by lightning, as well as about how electric current travels through a structure's structural elements. Such data, it was hoped, would lead to improvements in the way such facilities are constructed in the future.

"Little data were available regarding the electromagnetic effects of a direct lightning strike to a concrete structure," says Marvin Morris, Manager of Electromagnetic Test and Analysis Dept. 9753. "We knew weapons magazines had been struck before, and we were confident in the safety of the weapons, but we wanted a set of verifiable measurements based on real lightning strikes to show us how to make improvements."

Normally air serves as an insulator, preventing an electrical discharge between the ground and an electrified cloud until the charge differential between the two becomes so great that a conductive "bridge" of ionized air particles is formed, initiating a strike.

In a triggered lightning test, a small rocket is launched toward a thundercloud above the object being tested. The rocket unspools a fine trailing wire attached at one end to a grounded structure, providing a ready conductor. The process not only triggers a flash in most cases, it also aims the strike to a point where its effects can be evaluated. It's really just a modification of Ben Franklin's historic kite and key test, Marvin says.

Sandia has conducted rocket-triggered lightning tests as part of its nuclear weapons safety mission since the early 1980s.

Rebar integrity matters most

An initial series of tests in 1991 at an empty Army weapons storage magazine at Ft. McClellan, Ala., and later tests at simulated weapons maintenance cells in Anniston, Ala., evaluated lightning effects on concrete bunker-type buildings.

Sensors at various locations on the tested structures helped researchers measure currents in concrete rebar elements and in the lightning protection systems, voltage differences among structural elements, and inductance levels inside the structures.

"What we found out was that the lightning protection system played a limited role in directing current from a lightning strike," he says. "Current traveled through the rebar, through concrete, through pipes, through cables, through vent stacks, and through the electrical systems, but in few cases did the lightning protection systems significantly affect the electromagnetic field inside the building."

The tests did show, however, that the degree to which the steel rebar rods in the concrete structure were connected played a far greater role in controlling electromagnetic effects inside the structure than did the lightning protection systems.

"When rebar and other conductors in a building form what is essentially a Faraday cage around the building, current from a strike tends to flow around the structure's shell and into the ground through pipes and other large metal conductors," he says. (A Faraday cage is a shell made of conductive mesh or parallel wires that routes an electrical current around the outside of the shell.)

Tests led to safety improvements

The findings led the researchers to conclude that well-connected rebar in the ceiling, walls, and floor of a concrete building could improve lightning protection by a factor of 100. In contrast, a typical lightning protection system might improve lightning protection by only two or three times over a nonprotected structure.

As a result of the tests, Sandia and the Army developed a system of rack-mounted measurement equipment and associated testing techniques. That equipment and a portable suitcase-sized version now under joint development will help the Defense Special Weapons Agency and the Army evaluate rebar integrity at thousands of weapons storage magazines worldwide and possibly abandon intensive, expensive maintenance procedures required to keep their lightning protection systems operational.

The tests also led to safety improvements for nuclear weapons assembly and disassembly cells and bays at DOE's Pantex plant near Amarillo, Texas. Subsequent Sandia tests helped verify the rebar integrity of Pantex's critical facilities, and improved surge protectors were installed in the buildings' electrical systems to minimize voltage spikes.

As a further outcome of the Sandia research, DOE, the DoD, and the Defense Special Weapons Agency are looking into updating their construction standards for new weapon storage magazines to include guidance on rebar construction.

Marvin suspects that the standards for other types of facilities - including those that house vital information or electronic systems (such as financial institutions and supercomputer facilities) and those at which a lightning strike might cause a serious accident or jeopardize people's safety (such as petrochemical plants and oil refineries) - might also be updated sometime in the future.

Because of a lack of technical information supporting the effectiveness of lightning protection systems, the NFPA subcommittee that writes national construction standards for lightning protection recently downgraded its lightning-related standards, making lightning protection systems optional rather than required. Marvin expects that the NFPA will write new codes incorporating the Sandia findings.

Prize-winning research

The research earned a Sandia team the prize paper award at the 1994 meeting of the IEEE's Industrial Applications Society national conference. Team members included Marvin, Kimball Merewether, Roy Jorgenson (both 9753), Richard Fisher (former Sandian), and George Schnetzer (ret.).

Sandia-led triggered lightning research continues. The University of Florida is conducting another series of lightning studies under contract with Sandia at its lightning research center in Gainesville, primarily to better understand how different grounding techniques can control the ground arcing that results from a lightning strike.

"You can't stop ground arcing, but we're showing that you can get arcs to occur where you want them to," he says.

The ongoing tests, it is hoped, will lead to further lightning safety improvements inside and outside the federal government.

"We sort of knew traditional lightning protection systems couldn't work based on back-of-the-envelope calculations," adds Marvin. "But there's nothing more convincing than measured data."


back to beginning of article
back to Lab News contents page

If you have questions or need further information, contact Rod Geer by e-mail at: wrgeer@sandia.gov
Last Modified: April 28, 1997