RazorMouth.com | Cutting-edge Christianity  

Oakdown Books
Daily: R.C. Sproul
Weekly: Doug Wilson
More audio from John Piper, Steve Schlissel, Michael Horton, others
David L. Bahnsen
Jamey Bennett
Tristan Emmanuel
Jeremy Lott
Dale Meador
Joel Miller
P. Andrew Sandlin
R.C. Sproul Jr.
Tom White
John W. Whitehead
Guest writers
Meet the whole clan
Bible Study
Slice of the Web
Tuesday, January 01, 2002
Libertarian Theocracy, Part 2
P. Andrew Sandlin | The Right is stuck in the Left's paradigm, and that's not a good—or free—place to be (second of a two-part series; read part 1 here)

Contrary to broad generalizations, not all theocrats are created equal. For example, there is the vast, left-wing political theocracy. Those whose religious views (usually secular humanism) spur radical environmentalism, feminism, and racism operate politically in terms of their religion. They want the state to enforce their theocratic views in the form of laws seizing property (federal land grabs) and discriminating against sexes and races (quotas). We libertarian theocrats vigorously oppose this theft, sexism and racism.

Then there are their counterparts on the Right — right-wing, and often Christian, political theocrats. As I pointed out in an earlier Razormouth column, Attorney General John Ashcroft, a fervent Pentecostal, is also a theocrat, affirming “the Crown Rights of Jesus Christ” (as he should!). In the words of Newsweek, he is “a hero to law-and-order conservatives . . . son and grandson of fundamentalist Christian preachers.” However, in the present war climate, he has lobbied for vastly expanded state powers (domestic, not only foreign) and elicited the ire of liberty-loving Christians.

Both Ashcroft and we advocate theocracy, godly rule; but we surely don’t agree on the way to achieve it. We libertarian theocrats want less state interference and protection and more godliness and safety. We don’t think that the state, in the vast majority of cases, does as good a job at protecting citizens as the family and church and other “private” institutions.

Other examples of political theocracy include many Christians’ (understandable) support for a Human Life Amendment to crush the scourge of abortion. We libertarian theocrats oppose abortion as vehemently as the Christian political theocrats, and we define it as murder that must be criminalized. But we don’t want to put additional power in the hands of an already bloated federal government, as such a Constitutional amendment would. We want less murder, and a smaller state.

Then there’s economic protectionism, a linchpin of a lot of political theocrats’ economic views. They advocate national socialism in the name of “keeping American jobs at home.” They advocate tariffs and duties that deprive American citizens of the liberty to buy from whom they will and American companies from hiring whom they will. They believe that protectionism is a holy cause to “keep America great.” We libertarian theocrats too want to “keep America great”; but protectionism is a mighty bad way to do it. We believe that a holy economic cause is getting the Feds out of the economy and allowing individuals and families and businesses to contract freely and peacefully with whom they will. You don’t advance Christian theocracy by curbing political liberty, as national socialism surely does.

Like’s Gandalf’s caveat about the “precious” ring in J. R. R. Tolkien’s trilogy, power corrupts, even — perhaps especially — when it’s wielded with virtuous intentions.

Christian political theocrats have been duped by the left-wing paradigm. In the last century, political liberalism was convinced that social change is impossible apart from state coercion. This is why whenever there’s a school shooting, a rise in homelessness, or a health-care predicament, the first things liberals say is, “What can we get Washington to do about this?” The idea that there could be non-political answers to these problems doesn’t enter the minds of most on the Left.

Now when many Christians, whose only prominent exposure to social action is from the Left, encounter socially malignant sins like atheism, homosexuality, racism and pornography, their first impulse, like the liberals’, is to respond, “What can we get Washington to do about this?” The idea that there could be non-political answers to these evils doesn’t enter the minds of many on the Christian Right. They join secularist liberals in seeing politics as the principal means of social change.

It’s easy to see theocracy in political terms, and why it could be attractive, because theocracy certainly is a rule and governance, and we in the modern world are accustomed to understanding rule and governance as almost exclusively political functions. But when your eyes are opened to the power of God to change individuals, and the godly authority of the family and church (and other private institutions and associations) to govern their external actions, you’ll be less inclined to trust politics for such theocratic purposes.

You’ll want greater theocracy and, therefore, less state interference. You’ll repudiate political theocracy on the Left and the Right.

Liberty for Unbelievers
Of course, not all people in the world are — or ever will be — Christians. Does libertarian theocracy deprive them of political liberty? All to the contrary, it guarantees that liberty. Secular views of “political rights” suspend them on flimsy theories (legal positivism, the greatest good for the greatest number, whatever works, etc.). But libertarian theocrats agree with Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence that “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” are rights granted by God. We believe that the state may not deprive them. In other words, atheists are politically safer in a Christian society than an atheistic society (like Cuba or North Korea!). We believe their beliefs and practices (like Christians’), if peaceful and law-abiding, should be politically protected. Political persecution for religion (or irreligion) is an anathema to libertarian theocracy.

Libertarian Theocracy and American Political Institutions
The role of the state in a Christian society is essentially to protect life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the trio of rights spelled out in the Declaration of Independence. The United States Constitution itself, as John Eidsmoe demonstrates, was shaped by a Christian ethos. In fact, libertarian theocrats are firm proponents of the free institutions of American democracy: divided, representative government; wide suffrage; checks and balances; and Constitutional guarantees like due process and a bill of rights. In this environment, Christians can preach the gospel, propagate God’s law in the church and wider society, and live peaceably with unbelievers, jealously guarding political (and not just religious) liberty for all — not just Christians. We must advance Christ’s kingdom, and that necessitates political liberty. Every area of life must be Christianized, including the state — and this means a minuscule state!

Precisely because we believe so fervently in theocracy, we must largely dismantle and greatly decentralize politics.

Thursday, July 04, 2002

Elders, their Families and Theological Fine Tuning
Guest | Fred Peatross points to popular misunderstanding about 'pastors' kids'

The Scary Birth of Hal Lindsey
Joel Miller | How doom peddlers learned to stop worrying and love the bombast
Tuesday, July 02, 2002

Belle and Sebastian v. CCM
Guest | Tim Eaton finds spiritual value in secular band

Saturday, June 29, 2002

Is God an American Institution?
John W. Whitehead | Pledge decision shows public side of churning debate in U.S.

Under God, Under Man?
Jim Babka | Should Christians be upset by court's decision on Pledge of Allegiance?
'In God We Trust,' the American Pun
Guest | Aaron Shafovaloff explains the upside of the Pledge decision
Matt's Great Idea
Joel Miller | Turning the Pledge fiasco into a win situation with the IRS
Thursday, June 27, 2002

Our New Atheistic Pledge of Allegiance?
P. Andrew Sandlin | Purging the Pledge of God

Wednesday, June 26, 2002

Is Dave Hunt an Honest Man?
Joel Miller | Intrepid blogger catches anti-Calvinist in a bit of truth-triflery

Tuesday, June 25, 2002

Is Iraq a Paper Tiger?
John W. Whitehead | Time to question if anti-Saddam rhetoric is 'full of sound and fury, signifying nothing'

Richard Lewis Re-Redux
Email to Editor | Debate continues on alcohol abuse and finding God
Friday, June 21, 2002

Anti-American Americans
David L. Bahnsen | Let's be a bit more exact in our definition of the war on terror. We don't want to shoot our neighbors

Richard Lewis Redux
Email to Editor | One reader explains how Joel got AA all wrong
Tossing the Junk
Guest | David Black sees a new art for the new age of mysticism
Wine Nazi
Joel Miller | Robert Parker's stranglehold on the vintner's art
info & submissions
email to editor

public square
christian living
sex & marriage
arts & entertainment
end-times frenzy
smoke & drink
schlock watch
jots & tittles

[special offer]
Click to order 'Ritalin Nation' Ritalin Nation by Richard DeGrandpre

Ritalin Nation describes how the modern mania for diagnosing and treating so-called "Attention Deficit Disorder" is a mark of our age, rather than a demonstration of medical discovery and cure. While some of his analysis and solutions are not "Christian" per se, DeGrandpre's diagnosis of the problem is keen. Anyone concerned about the drugging of our children by the medical establishment needs this book.

284 pages. Hardback.
RazorMouth price: $8.00 + $4 s&h


© 2002 MenschWerks.
Inquire for reprint permission by emailing here.
Copyright violaters will be pelted mercilessly with free AOL promo discs.