RazorMouth.com | Cutting-edge Christianity  
 
-
[search]

[community]
MenschWerks
Oakdown Books
GodGaveWine.com
-
[audio]
Daily: R.C. Sproul
Weekly: Doug Wilson
More audio from John Piper, Steve Schlissel, Michael Horton, others
-
[contributors]
David L. Bahnsen
Jamey Bennett
Tristan Emmanuel
Jeremy Lott
Dale Meador
Joel Miller
P. Andrew Sandlin
R.C. Sproul Jr.
Tom White
John W. Whitehead
Guest writers
Meet the whole clan
-
[resources]
Bible Study
Slice of the Web
-
Friday, February 08, 2002
To the Greeks, foolishness
P. Andrew Sandlin | The importance of the resurrection to the Christian life


Editor's note: The following column is adapted from a chapter in Sandlin's forthcoming book The Lord of the Dead and the Living: The Victory of Christian Resurrection.

But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness (1 Cor. 1:23).

In late November 2001, the Arts and Entertainment Television Network carried a special by popular rock singer Billy Joel. Among other inane comments, he said, “I believe that when people die, they go to live in the hearts of the people they love.” This is a manifestly pagan idea; and it should not surprise us, because Billy Joel is a manifest pagan. Unfortunately, it is only a somewhat secularized notion of a heresy too commonly held by many Christians today that the “release” of death is the joy of a disembodied “spiritual” existence.

The ancient pagan Greeks were proponents of the inherent immortality of the soul. The Bible, on the other hand, stresses the resurrection of the body. While we do not cease to exist at death (“soul sleep”), the Bible has little to say of this “intermediate” existence.

In the Bible, personal eschatology is inextricably linked with the resurrection of the body. First Corinthians 15 and 1 Thessalonians 4 (among other Scriptures) make this abundantly clear. As G. I. Williamson wrote several years ago, one of the big defects of many Christian funerals is all of the talk about the deceased’s being “with the Lord” (which is blissfully correct) but no talk whatsoever about the resurrection. This, in fact, is to reverse the biblical emphasis and to revert somewhat to Greek paganism.

To the ancient Greeks, man is made up of several distinct, and potentially independent, parts. The soul is the principal part of man—it is his insubstantial existence, which conforms to eternal, super-temporal “Forms.”

Another part of man is his body. The body is simply the house of the soul. In fact, it is the prison of the soul. According to the Greeks, the body is unnatural for man. It is an alien part that prevents him from realizing what he could if he were not imprisoned within it. The body was a troubling vexation to the pagan Greeks—it constrains man to time and space, subjects him to sickness and weariness, and gives him all sorts of fits. Therefore, the Greeks saw death as a pleasant, delightful, joyous experience. At death, we finally get rid of this old constricting baggage we carry around. Death was man’s Great Emancipation.

This is why the Athenians (Ac. 17) rather politely listened to Paul (“After all, isn’t everyone entitled to his own point of view?” [v. 21]) until he mentioned Christ’s resurrection (v. 32). To the Greeks, resurrection was silly. After all, the whole goal of life is death, so that man may escape the limitations of the body and join the eternal Forms. Why would he want to be re-embodied after death? That defeats the whole purpose!

Both the preaching of both the Cross and the resurrection were foolishness to the Greeks because these Christian realities centered salvation in redemptive history. The Greeks wanted a salvation from history. They wanted an escape. They didn’t want to be “Left Behind.”

The Goodness of Creation
This is as far removed from the Christian teaching of the body set forth in the Bible as the East is from the West. The contrast, as Oden suggests, is unmistakable:

The Greek tradition held that the soul existed before and after earthly life, hence one’s true life is the life of one’s soul, the body being ancillary to the human person. The Hebraic tradition viewed the human person as a single composite reality of inspirited mud, grounded in the earth yet capable of transcendence, in an interface so closely woven that it was unthinkable that one could be a person without a body of some sort.1

This latter idea was seemingly incomprehensible to the Greeks. They surely did not deny an afterlife. The problem was resurrection, which was simply not a tenet of ancient thought apart from many Old Testament Jews and the Christian church.

The main impetuses behind the Greek’s general denial of the resurrection were (1) the low value they placed on the human body and (2) their firm belief in man’s inherent immortality, i.e., that his soul was naturally imperishable. We one day (fortunately) lose the “bad body” but we retain the inherently imperishable soul.

According to the Bible, however, the body is good because God makes it. It is a good work of divine creation. When Adam led the human race into sin, this sin affected his body, just as it affected every other aspect of his being (Gen. 3:16-19). But this act of sin did not undo the goodness of God’s creation. Man’s body succumbs to illness and death because of sin, but these are not natural. In particular, death is not natural. It is unnatural.

God threatened Adam with death if he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Gen. 2:15-17). Death is the result of sin, not the result of humanity. Had Adam never sinned, he never would have died. Just as sin is unnatural, so death, its consequence, is unnatural.

This is why death is described as an enemy in the Bible. In fact, we read in 1 Corinthians 15, Paul’s great chapter on the resurrection, that death is the “last enemy” that will be “destroyed” (v. 26). Similarly, we read in Hebrews that Jesus came to turn back men’s fearfulness of death (Heb. 2:14-15). Death is man’s enemy that our Lord vanquishes.

None of this means that the Bible teaches what some (like the Seventh Day Adventists) have called “soul sleep.” It does not teach that we completely lose existence between our death and the time of the final resurrection. But it does teach what we may call “body sleep.” In fact, the Bible uses this very expression to refer to our bodies. Paul speaks of those who are “asleep in the Lord” (1 Thes. 4:14). Jesus Himself spoke of the dead child as one who “sleepeth” (Mt. 9:24). The reason the Bible refers to Christians who have died as “sleeping” is that their bodies will one day wake up!

The great war on things material is a largely pagan conviction, deeply pessimistic, which has infected the church as heresy. The greatest proof of the inherent goodness of creation is Jesus Christ’s bodily resurrection—and ours. Our hope is not a Casper-the-Friendly-Ghost existence, but an existence on a renovated earth in a resurrected body. Glory be to God!

Notes

1. Thomas C. Oden, Life in the Spirit (Peabody, Massachusetts: Prince Press [1992], 1998), 397.


Monday, October 14, 2002

SCHLOCK WATCH
Witness with EvangeCandyTM!
Jamey Bennett | Forget about religion and books, it's all about being hip, baby


Friday, October 11, 2002

SMOKE & DRINK
Why the Church Should Hold its Liquor
Guest | Roberta Knowles explains the importance of drinking in the community of believers—especially for young adults


THEOLOGIA
Sullivan Agonistes
Jeremy Lott | Watching Andrew Sullivan come apart over conflict between "true" church and his "alternative" lifestyle
PUBLIC SQUARE
Doping our Kids
Joel Miller | Wondering whether mom and dad are parents or pushers
JOTS & TITTLES
Joyful and Good for You, Too
Quoth the Maven | A scriptural syllogism to support healthy drinking
Wednesday, October 09, 2002

SMOKE & DRINK
No Wine for the Pastor?
Joel Miller | What's wrong with the idea of leadership abstinence


JOTS & TITTLES
Salvation: An Individual Affair
Quoth the Maven | P.J. O'Rourke proves he's not a theologian, but makes us wish more theologians were like him
Tuesday, October 08, 2002

PUBLIC SQUARE
Bush Doctrine Heresy
John W. Whitehead | Does the president have the authority to wage war on Iraq?


PUBLIC SQUARE
On Your Way to Iraq
David L. Bahnsen | A few thoughts on America's sincerity
JOTS & TITTLES
Victory in the World
Quoth the Maven | Why Christians are called to be in the world but not of it
Friday, October 04, 2002

CHRISTIAN LIVING
The Pious Totalitarians
P. Andrew Sandlin | When God and his Word won't cut it, we can always make up more morality as we go along


END-TIMES FRENZY
Myth, Miles, and Money
Joel Miller | End-times fancy, Christ's supposed suicide, and why Americans have been so prosperous
JOTS & TITTLES
More than Numbers
Quoth the Maven | Martin Luther explains the entire federal budget
Thursday, October 03, 2002

SMOKE & DRINK
Church and Moral Meddling, Part 2
Email to Editor | How far can the church go in pushing its social agendas?


Wednesday, October 02, 2002

SMOKE & DRINK
Church and Moral Meddling
Email to Editor | How far can the church go in pushing its social agendas?


mainpage
info & submissions
email to editor

sections
public square
christian living
sex & marriage
arts & entertainment
theologia
end-times frenzy
smoke & drink
schlock watch
jots & tittles
cartoons

[special offer]
Click to order 'Ritalin Nation' Ritalin Nation by Richard DeGrandpre

Ritalin Nation describes how the modern mania for diagnosing and treating so-called "Attention Deficit Disorder" is a mark of our age, rather than a demonstration of medical discovery and cure. While some of his analysis and solutions are not "Christian" per se, DeGrandpre's diagnosis of the problem is keen. Anyone concerned about the drugging of our children by the medical establishment needs this book.
 

284 pages. Hardback.
RazorMouth price: $8.00 + $4 s&h

CLICK TO ORDER


© 2002 MenschWerks.
Inquire for reprint permission by emailing here.
Copyright violaters will be pelted mercilessly with free AOL promo discs.
-