Missing Pieces To The
Amazing 911 Mystery Puzzle
By Michael Shore
A View From Jerusalem, Israel
1-1-2
|
There are so many amazing
possibilities to the true story of what really happened and who is the real
mastermind behind 911, that some sort of independent peoples' committee (like
that which revealed the TWA 800 coverup - ed) should be set up to investigate
all the facts and questions that have never been answered since the horrific
attacks on 911. This peoples' committee could be made up of intelligent
independent citizens who have no connection to anyone in the U.S.government.
Here is a list of some of the questions that might be answered with such an
inquiry. It would seem easy enough
for the FBI and CIA to go to the stockbrokers where these trades were made
and find out who made them. This is probably the closest link that can be
established to someone who was involved in 911 but neither the FBI nor CIA
is, apparently, pursuing this. Why? 2. It was reported that
none of the names of the so-called Arab terrorists were on any of the
passenger lists of any of the four planes involved in 911. Plus, the FBI and
CIA with all their multi-billion dollar budgets claimed that they had no
prior information that a "terrorist" act of this magnitude was
about to happen. Yet within 48 hours, the FBI and CIA somehow managed to
produce the pictures and names of 19 Arabs who were supposedly the
"terrorists" on the planes, even though none of their names were on
ANY of the passenger lists. How did they know? Just because you had an Arab
name, they were able to determine that you were a "terrorist" on
the planes? Plus, you may recall, when the names of the
"terrorists" were first released to the press, there were reports
in the media that some of the passports which the "terrorists" were
using may have been stolen and the real names of the "terrorists"
may have been different than the names released to the media. 3. It was reported that a
number of passengers were able to make cell phone calls from the planes that
were supposedly hijacked. You'll see why I used the term "supposedly
hijacked" in number 4. It was also reported by some sources that these
reported cell calls never showed up on the cell phone company billings. Why
are hijackers letting anyone on the planes make cell phone calls to people on
the ground? Can you remember any other hijacked airplane incident where
people were making cell phone calls? Can you easily make cell phone calls
from a plane that is 35,000 feet high and hundreds of miles away from your cell
phone provider? It was reported that the
black boxes from the planes, which record conversations between the pilot and
ground control, were all either destroyed or the conversations on recovered
blackboxes could not be released for some rediculous reason. Number one,
black boxes are built to survive the worst fiery plane crashes. By not
releasing the black box communications and data, we cannot know what is
really happening in the cockpit or on the aircraft and who is flying those
planes. Additionally, there had to be some communication between the pilots
and someone in the control towers. Yet no air traffic controller was
interviewed to talk about their conversations with the pilots during the
course of the "hijackings." Therefore, the 19 Arab
"hijackers" didn't even need to board the planes. You didn't even
need "hijackers." All you need is 'Global Hawk' technology to take
over control of the aircraft from the ground. By the US government refusing to
release any of the pilot-to-ground control communication from the (allegedly
destroyed) blackboxes in the aircraft, the US government blacks out any
conversation from the "hijacked" airline pilots possibly telling
the control tower that the flight controls of their planes had been taken
over. You might ask, what
happened to the fourth plane, Flight 93? According to one theory, Global Hawk
technology malfunctioned on Flight 93. Somehow the pilots onboard were able
to regain control of their aircraft. If Flight 93 lands safely on the ground,
the secret of what was really happening on all four planes would be revealed.
A back-up plan had to be implemented. Flight 93 was then
supposedly shot down by a US military jets. There are verifiable facts to
substantiate this possibility. There were a number of eye witnesses who
claimed to have seen flight 93 explode before it fell to the ground. These
eye witnesses also saw a military jet in the sky near the crash site. Plus,
there were reports of a small white private plane circling the crash site
immediately after the crash - even though all private aircraft were supposed
to be grounded at the time. Aircraft debris from flight 93 was strewn over an
area six to eight miles from the crash site, which would be impossible,if as
the government said that some passengers fought with the hijackers and
intentionally crashed the plane to prevent the plane from hitting another
terrorist target.Explaining how metal parts and other debris flew through the
air and landed six to eight miles from the crash site, without there being an
explosion in the air before the plane crashed to the ground, would be very
hard for the government to do..Plus if the passengers did overtake the
hijackers,why would they want to crash the plane? Couldn't the real flight 93
pilots fly the plane and land it safely? Now comes the hero story
from the government. This story is used to supply all the answers to all the
questions about what happened on Flight 93 and to avoid any further inquiry
by a gullible American public that accepts most anything their government
officials say is truth. As George Bush, Sr. was quoted as saying: "Don't
confuse people with the truth." 5. No US military planes
were sent up to intercept any of the hijacked planes even though there were
at least 30 minutes to one hour from the time it was known that the planes
were hijacked. Much has been written about this by the alternatve free press
on the internet. It is standard procedure for military planes to be sent up
if a plane is off course and the plane is not or cannot communicate with
ground control. This is just normal safety protocol because if a plane starts
flying in a different flight pattern, it could crash into another plane in
the sky. The big question is who gave the order to not "scramble"
US military jets under these emergency and highly-dangerous conditions? If
you think Bin Laden could have done this sitting in some cave in Afghanistan
- think again. The only people who could have pulled this one off are high-ranking
government officials who were part of the plan of the real
"Mastermind" behind the attacks. 6} So why wage a war in
Afghanistan as a result of 911, costing billions of dollars? Oil, oil, oil.
Unocal, a huge American oil conglomerate, along with other connected
individuals, wanted to take control of six trillion dollars of oil (that's
trillion, not billion) in the Caspian Sea...right near Afghanistan. Need you
be reminded that the Bush's and Vice President Cheny just happen to be
wealthy oil men and Cheney's Haliburton Corporation will probably be building
the multi-billion dollar oil pipeline across Afghanistan that will be needed
to bring much of that oil to market. It is important to be aware that the new
leader of Afghanistan used to work for Unocal. Isn't that convenient? The American people along
with the Europeans have been told that the war on terrorism is going to be a
long war. What a shame George Jr's father's corporation doesn't make peace
products. Then his father would have an incentive to make money from having
Peace in the World instead of war. Not only this. The
so-called "mastermind terrorist", Bin Laden, that President Bush
sent a huge military force to capture or kill, has amazingly disappeared. It has
cost the American taxpayers billions of dollars and now Pentagon officials
have said they may never be able to find Bin Laden. What gives? If you really
wanted to get Bin Laden, wouldn't it have been easier and cheaper to have
offered a one billion dollar reward for him and his cronies and not send any
military force to Afghanistan which has killed thousands of innocent Afghani
civilians, along with Taliban and American military personnel? (It is
reported the US had plans to invade Afghanistan and oust the Taliban months
before 911...remember the oil in the Caspian and the big pipeline project?) |