Guardian Unlimited
Go to:  
Guardian UnlimitedSpecial reports
Home UK Business Online World dispatch The Wrap Weblog Talk Search
The Guardian World News guide Arts Special reports Columnists Audio Help Quiz

Special report: the anti-war movement


  Search this site

Go to ...
Special report: anti-war movement

Anti-war movement: archived articles



 In this section
Israeli soldier held on shooting of Briton

Stopping the war and beyond

Protester fined £200 for US base trespass

Letters: CND and the unions

From Aldermaston to Iraq: 45 years of protest

Far left has hijacked peace group, says CND veteran

Richard Eyre on London's anti-Bush protests

FBI uses new powers to bug anti-war groups

Bush widens the Great British divide

Leader: Goodbye to Bush

Press review: 'He reached out his hand to Europeans'

From the palace to the pub: another perfect photo op

Letters: Protesters under fire

Jackson saga and gay marriages turn US media focus from visit

What the US papers are saying


Protester fined £200 for US base trespass

Richard Norton-Taylor
Thursday December 18, 2003
The Guardian


After two extraordinary trials and thousands of pounds worth of legal costs, Lindis Percy, the veteran opponent of American military bases in Britain, has been fined £200 for entering a secret US establishment.

Mrs Percy, 62, was charged with aggravated trespass after climbing over the fence at RAF Croughton, Northamptonshire, at the time of the invasion of Iraq in March. Despite its name, the base is a US-controlled satellite communications centre.

Mrs Percy was carrying a Stars and Stripes on which she had written "War on Iraq ... Immoral ... Unlawful ... Madness". Last month she draped the same flag on the railings of Buckingham Palace during President Bush's state visit, an incident over which she was not charged.

Mrs Percy said that in the Croughton grounds she was stopped and searched by American security personnel who had no authority to do so.

With her lawyer, Raza Husain, she also argued she could not be charged with trespass because what was going on at Croughton was unlawful. The defence argued that Croughton was playing a crucial role helping the US pursue the war against Iraq.

The first trial was abandoned after the district judge at Northampton magistrates court stood down when he admitted being party to discussion with the US authorities in which they said they could not reveal documents setting out security procedures at the base.

Mrs Percy had argued that proceedings in an English court were in effect being conducted by US officials. The prosecution said the documents were not relevant, even though it had not seen them.

At the second trial this week, the US authorities insisted it was up to them, not the English court, to decide what should be released.

In the end, irrespective of the documents, Mrs Percy lost the case because the district judge, Richard Holland, ruled that in law there was no distinction between arguments about the legality of war - an issue which can be argued before the courts - and arguments about how a war should be conducted - an issue which the courts have said they cannot rule on.

He said Mrs Percy had "placed the flag in a secure area at a time of war and was capable of being an aggravating feature". Disrupting the Croughton base could have threatened "national security".

On Tuesday, he fined Mrs Percy £200, with £50 for breach of a conditional discharge, and ordered her to pay £100 costs. American officials involved in the case had demanded over £3,000 in costs.

Special reports
The anti-war movement
Iraq
Afghanistan

Useful links
28.01.2003: Guide to anti-war websites




Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story





UP

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003