In the light of the growing discussion initiated by Israeli
Zionist enthusiasts regarding the eruption of new anti-Semitism I am here to
announce as loudly as I can: there is no anti-Semitism any more. In the
devastating reality created by the Jewish state, anti-Semitism has been
replaced by political reaction. I am not suggesting that Jewish interests
are not being mutilated and vandalized. I am not saying that synagogues aren
't being attacked, that Jewish graves are not brutally smashed up. I am
saying that these acts, that are in no way legitimate, should be seen as
political responses rather than racially motivated acts or 'irrational' hate
crimes. If Israel is the state of the Jewish people and the Jewish people
themselves do not stand up collectively against the crimes that are
committed on their behalf, then every Jewish person, Jewish symbol and
Jewish object becomes an Israeli interest and a potential terrorist target.
It is up to the Jewish people to take a stand against their Jewish state and
to disassociate themselves from their zealous national movement.
If, for instance, we woke up tomorrow morning to find that
so-called 'soft target' had been blown to pieces, no one would think to
suggest that it was a 'racially motivated anti-American attack'. We would be
naturally inclined to view the incident as an 'act of terror' against
'American interests'. Our political analysts would probably tell us that it
was a form of retaliation against 'American colonialism', 'expansionism',
'support of Zionism' and so forth. Since Zionists want Israel to be seen as
'a nation among nations' we should not treat them as a unique case. We
should treat them as we do the Americans and the British who have already
realised that their various expansionist interests around the world are
under severe threat. If we go along with the Zionist call to regard
Jewish-ness as a nationalistic category rather than a religious one, we
should be consistent and regard any act against Jews as a political reaction
rather than an irrational racist attack. In other words: the success of
Zionism drains away any possibility of anti-Semitism.
The last statement is perplexing because it is the Zionists
who tell us all
the time that anti-Semitism is on the rise. Zionism is fuelled by
anti-Semitism. The Zionists need anti-Semitic acts in order to justify the
state of Israel as the only viable option for Jewish existence. Zionists
have long understood that it is anti-Semitic acts that push Jews to support
the idea of a Jewish state. Accordingly, in order to promote Zionist
interests, Israel must generate significant anti-Jewish sentiment. Cruelty
against Palestinian civilians is a favourite Israeli means of achieving this
aim. Hence, we confront something of a vicious circle: the Israelis commit
atrocities against the Palestinians; some anti-Israeli feelings mature into
sporadic verbal and violent attacks against Jewish people and Jewish
interests; Jews around the world feel rightly threatened and inclined to
support Israel; some of those Jews emigrate to Israel; more Palestinian land
is confiscated; anti-Jewish outrage around the world grows. This is
apparently the Zionist perpetuum mobile. Unfortunately, it is damn
effective. It has worked since the early days of Zionism. Zionist leaders
in Germany were very fast to welcome Hitler and the Nazi regime (Dr Joachim
Prinz (Germany, 1933) is just one example). Sometimes, the Mossad itself has
initiated attacks against Jews in order to 'push them in the right direction
' (for instance, attacks against synagogues in Iraq in the 1950s).
In its perpetuation of anti-Jewish feeling Zionism has two
The first is simply to convince Jews that Israel is their safest option. The
second is more interesting: to shatter any possibility for criticism of
Israel. Zionist lobbies present all critical views of Israel as a form of
anti-Semitism. Zionists are now very well trained in plucking on the gentile
guilt string. This method is very effective because most westerners fail to
grasp the vicious deception entangled within the Zionist identity. Zionism
is grounded on a very specific realisation of the Jewish identity as a
synthesis of racial awareness, religious awareness and nationalistic
While it is more than legitimate to criticise racist fundamentalism
nationalistic zeal, Zionists present any attack on their venture as an
assault on the Jewish religion or the freedom of belief, or even the right
of Jews to exist.
Let's review some current typical Zionist arguments:
a. The 'Elders of Zion' syndrome: Zionists complain that Jews
continue to be
associated with a conspiracy to rule the world via political lobbies, media
Is the suggestion of conspiracy really an empty accusation?
list is presented with pride in several Jewish American websites.
Jews in Bush's Administration:
White House Press Secretary
Deputy Chief of Staff
White House Political Director
White House Director of Scheduling
Undersecretary of Defense (Controller)
Deputy Secretary of Defense
I. Lewis Libby
Chief of Staff to the Vice President
White House Liaison to the Jewish Community
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and
Families at HHS
Director of the National Security Council's Office for Democracy, Human
Rights and International Operations
Mark D. Weinberg
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Head of the Justice Department's criminal division
Ambassador to Israel
Ambassador to the Netherlands
Ambassador to Denmark
Ambassador to Hungary
Ambassador to Singapore
Ambassador to Slovakia
Ambassador to Italy
Ambassador to Uruguay
Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy
Let me assure you, in Clinton's administration the situation
was even worse.
Even though the Jews only make up 2.9 per cent of the country's population,
an astounding 56 per cent of Clinton's appointees were Jews. A coincidence?
I don't think so.
We have to ask ourselves what motivates American Jews to gain
power. Is it a genuine care for American interests? Soon, following the
growing number of American casualties in Iraq, American people will start to
ask themselves this very question.
Since America currently enjoys the status of the world's only
and since all the Jews listed above declare themselves as devoted Zionists,
we must begin to take the accusation that the Jewish people are trying to
control the world very seriously. It is beyond doubt that Zionists, the most
radical, racist and nationalistic Jews around, have already managed to turn
America into an Israeli mission force. The world's number one super power is
there to support the Jewish state's wealth and security matters. The
one-sided pro-Zionist take on the IsraeliPalestinian conflict, the American
veto against every 'anti-Israeli' UN resolution, the war against Iraq and
now the militant intentions against Syria, all prove beyond doubt that it is
Zionist interests that America is serving. American Jewry makes any debate
on whether the 'Protocols of the elder of Zion' are an authentic document or
rather a forgery irrelevant. American Jews do try to control the world, by
proxy. So far they are doing pretty well for themselves at least. Whether
the Americans enjoy the deterioration of their state's affairs will no doubt
be revealed soon.
b. Zionists occasionally argue that if Jewish nationalism is
bad so is any
other form of nationalism.
I would argue, however, that there is nothing wrong with nationalism.
nationalistic like being religious or loving punk music is about
belonging. Yet Jewish nationalism is unacceptable because it is based on
racist fundaments and religious zeal. Zionism, which originally presented
itself as a secular movement, developed real ambitions in relation to the
land of Canaan. These aspirations were based on the Biblical promise. In
fact, Zionists were very quick to transform the Holy Scriptures into a legal
document. This was a radical distortion of the most sacred Jewish spiritual
text but they didn't finish there.
While being Jewish is about 'race' (you are a Jew only if your
mother is a
Jew), Zionists believe that the whole of Palestine belongs solely to the
Jewish people. If we articulate this idea in Zionist terms we should rather
say that the whole of Palestine belongs to the Jewish race. This type of
idea ought to remind us of the Nazi expansionist philosophy, but then we
must remember that Zionism predates Nazi ideology. It is Jewish
nationalistic ideology that introduced the idea of 'living space' and the
expulsion of the indigenous years before Hitler was even born. Presumably,
if Nazism is regarded as an unacceptable form of nationalism, Zionism should
be treated the same.
But Zionists won't give up; in a righteous manner they will
claim that Jews
are entitled to self-determination. They will argue that Jews, like any
other nation, are entitled to land. Whether this is the case or not,
however, is irrelevant. Even if we agree that Jews are entitled to have a
national home the existence of this national home cannot be at the expense
of the Palestinians or anyone else.
We tend to associate nationalism with a geographical reference.
people, for example, are those who live in France or were born there.
Similarly, the Americans are those who live in America or were born there.
When it comes to Jewish nationalism there is no demand for geographical
bonds but rather a special notion of geographical aspiration. Every Jew from
Brooklyn (NYC) or Golders Green (London, UK) is entitled to Israeli
citizenship at the expense of the Palestinian people. This form of
nationalism is unique and a form of racist, expansionist colonialism. Jewish
nationalism is best understood as an international imperial movement
specialising in colonising Palestine.
It should be noted that Palestinian nationalism is very different
Jewish rival. It is multi-cultural and based on a multi-ethnic society.
Palestinian nationalism is geographically based. It confers Palestinian
identity to those who live in Palestine. Among the Palestinian people you
will find Jewish Palestinians, many different Christian Palestinians, many
different Muslim groups. (In discussing Palestinian identity I do not deny
the possibility of ethnic clashes between the different groups.) Palestinian
nationalism produces the ideal form of multi-ethnic democratic Arabic
society. No wonder the American tyrant is so keen to destroy it.
c. Zionists are not happy at all with the recycling of some
'Anti-Semitic slogans and images'. They are especially annoyed when they are
blamed for the death of Jesus. (I am referring here to the Jewish American
organisations' reaction to Mel Gibson's The Passion. Many people around the
world regarded the Israeli siege of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem
as an attempt to kill Jesus 'again'.)
I would suggest that perhaps we should face it once and for
all: the Jews
were responsible for the killing of Jesus who, by the way, was himself a
Palestinian Jew. But then two questions should be asked:
1. How is it that people living today feel accountable
or chased for a
crime committed by their great great great ancestors almost 2,000 years ago?
I assume that those Jews who get angry when blamed for killing Jesus are
those who identify themselves with Jesus's killers. Those who would commit
this murderous act today. Those Jews are called Zionists and they are
already advancing into their sixth decade of inhuman crimes against the
Palestinian people and the Arab world. Zionism, for those who do not know,
is a repetition of the darkest age of the Jewish Biblical era. It isn't that
surprising therefore that Zionists have selected the most suicidal chapters
in Jewish history (such as Massada and Bar Cochva) and turned them into the
pillars of their reborn culture. On the other hand, we must praise the
Zionists for being consistent. Zionists claim that the whole of Palestine
belongs to the Jews because their Jewish ancestors lived there 2,000 ago.
Jews attempting to live on confiscated Palestinian lands nowadays regard
themselves as the same Jews who lived in Palestine two millennia ago. This
must explain why Zionists are so offended when they are blamed for the
actions of Judas. They are offended because they are all Judases. Might I
remind the reader that the Judases of today are armed with hundreds of
nuclear weapons without being signed to any international control treaty.
2. Why is it that the Jews who repeatedly demand that
world should apologise for its involvement in previous persecutions, have
never thought that it is about time that they apologised for killing Jesus?
I wouldn't ask the Italians to apologise on behalf of the Romans for their
part in Christ's killing simply because Italians do not feel remotely
offended when Romans are blamed for it. I merely suggest that if a Jew feels
offended when accused, this reveals attachment to the perpetrators. It might
be the right time for the Jewish state to ask for forgiveness on behalf of
the Jewish people for their immoral behaviour.
I assume that the following lingual fact isn't known to most
do not use the name 'Jesus' when referring to Christ. Instead, they use the
Hebrew word 'Yeshu' which means 'may his name and memory be erased for ever'
(yeshu Yimach Shemo Vzichro). I do want to believe that most ordinary Jews
are not familiar with the etymology of the name Yeshu. In Jewish the
hierarchy of insults this is the gravest and most disrespectful. This
combination of words is usually attached to Hitler and evils of his calibre.
Jesus, it would appear, is considered by Jewish spiritual leaders as the
embodiment of all evil. I ask myself, if Jesus was as bad as Hitler (in the
eyes of the rabbis), why is it that the Jews are so offended when blamed for
killing him? Why don't they regard his killing as the most glamorous chapter
of their history?
d. Zionists are always outraged when they are equated with
Nazis. They will
say that to claim 'yesterday's victims are today's perpetrators' is a form
of 'Holocaust denial' and will argue that describing Israel as the root of
all evil justifies the Holocaust. With great shame I have to agree that
Israel's behaviour throws some light on the persecution of Jews throughout
history. Perhaps it is time to dispose of the notion of 'Holocaust denial'.
Westerners are very concerned not to be associated with any
Holocaust denial. In some countries Holocaust denial is treated as a
criminal offence. For years I have argued that Holocaust denial is not a
particularly interesting subject because as a notion it is far too wide. In
practice, anyone who tries to oppose the official Zionist interpretation of
World War II events instantly becomes a 'Holocaust denier'. Some Zionists
went so far as to accuse Roberto Benigni of Holocaust denial when he made
his masterpiece, Life is Beautiful.
It is true that for quite a while the Zionists were fairly
managed to stop the world from studying its history. Few people in Germany,
in Israel or anywhere else know about the extensive collaboration between
the Zionists and the Nazis before and during World War II. I am not a
historian and the question of whether 6 million or rather 5,500,000 Jews
died in the Holocaust is not really my major concern. For me, the act of
killing is a catastrophe and 'state organised serial killing' is an
unbearable and colossal catastrophe. Accordingly, the form of Holocaust
denial that really bothers me is the denial of the on-going Palestinian
Holocaust. This Holocaust is documented and covered daily by the western
media. The turning of residential Palestinian cities into concentration
camps; the deliberate starvation of the Palestinian population; the
withholding of medical aid from Palestinian civilians; the wall that tears
the holy land into isolated cantons and Bantustans; the continuous
bombardment of civilians by the IAF are known to us all. This Holocaust is
committed by the Jewish state with the support of world Jewry. This
Holocaust, despite being well documented, is largely ignored. This is the
most serious form of Holocaust denial. Moreover, I would suggest that the
Zionists promote the issue of Holocaust denial so as to spread heavy smoke
in an attempt to hide their own atrocities. The Zionists are the ones to be
blamed for committing a holocaust and being the first to deny it.
Israel and the Zionist venture are principally responsible
anti-Jewish outrage. It is time for Jews to stand up against their
nationalistic movement. It is time for the world to stand up against the
Zionist crime. As we learn from a recent EU poll, 58 per cent of Europeans
regard Israel as the biggest threat to world peace. They are right. The
Jewish state must be stopped and the sooner the better.
At this point some Zionists would try to revise their argument
that real anti-Semitism is in fact a form of blind hatred towards Jews
regardless of their politics and misdoings. They would say that a Jew is
hated just for being a Jew. My response would be that though such hatred
might exist it needn't be labelled 'anti-Semitism'. It is xenophobia,
defined by the Oxford Dictionary as an 'intense dislike or fear of
foreigners or strangers'. Perhaps Jews aren't so unique after all.
Back to home page