|
|
The following was borrowed from Dixienet, the internet home of the League
of the South. It has been slightly edited for length. To read the complete
version, or to find out how you can be a part of the solution, why not
visit them? Click on the icon below and Dixienet will open in a new
window.
The Confederate Battle Flag:
A Symbol of Racism?
by Charles Davidson
Media Propaganda
Our South, our Confederate history, and by extension, our
Confederate battle flag, have suffered for many years from the
relentless hatchet job of false propaganda heaped upon them by the news
media, the education system, and, of course, Hollywood and television.
It appears that they wish to drive a wedge between Southern
Blacks and Whites, much as the carpetbaggers did after the War for
Southern Independence and much as the Northern news media drove a wedge
between the North and South before the War. It is important to remember
that movies such as Roots and North and South are make-believe, fiction.
In other words, they are not true, just like Uncle Tom's Cabin, written
before the War, was not true. One must wonder if the only reason such
false propaganda is produced and promoted by the movie and television
industry, is to make Blacks hate Whites, especially Southern Whites.
For example, the Confederate battle flag has no more to do with
the Ku Klux Klan than the Christian cross which the Klan carries and
burns or the flag of the United States that the Klan says the Pledge of
Allegiance to, yet the news media and Hollywood constantly try to
connect our Confederate flag to the Klan in their propaganda. However,
the news media never ask preachers if they are Klan members, because
they wear a cross around their necks or link the American Legion to the
Klan because they carry the U.S. flag. It is time to put an end to this
anti-Confederate bigotry. It is past time that the truth was told.
Hitler's tactic of "tell a big enough lie often enough and people will
believe it" has been utilized to the fullest extent, to smear the
Confederate States of America and her symbols such as the battle flag.
Fortunately, most people have not been deceived by such
hate-mongering tactics, as is evidenced in a recent Louis Harris poll
which shows that 92% of the Southern people, of all races, are not
offended by our Confederate battle flag, and that 68% of Blacks
nationwide are not offended. Unfortunately, a few too many have believed
the lies about our Confederate battle flag, which has resulted in
unjustified and horrible intolerance, bigotry, hatred, violence, and
even murder.
Today, I come before you to set the record straight, to refute
the myths and false propaganda, and to remind you of the truth
concerning our Confederate ancestors and history. It is my hope and
fervent prayer that truth will replace fiction, that tolerance will
replace intolerance, that peace will replace violence, that love will
replace hate, and that unity will replace division. Our Lord Jesus said,
"Know the truth and the truth will set you free" in this case, free from
hate and intolerance of our Confederate symbols. I beg of you to the
following information with an open mind and a Christian heart.
Is Slavery Racism?
The first lie that I will deal with here concerns slavery and
its alleged link to racism. The lie is that only Blacks were slaves and
thus have some special right to a "pity party" because their ancestors
were slaves, and that anyone who owned slaves was a racist. This is not
true.
The word "slave" is a transliteration of the Greek word slavos,
which rightly applies only to White European Slavs from the countries of
Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Slavonia, Russia, Poland, Hungary, and
others. The Slavonic tribes are the root of all European White people.
For a thousand years, so many millions of these White European Slavs
were captured and sold as servants, that the word "slaves" became
universally used for the word "servant" and was only later applied to
Black servants. Every White person in America has ancestors who were
slaves, including the Scots, British, French, and Germans. In the early
colonies of America, Whites were regularly sold as permanent slaves. If
it were justifiable, Whites would be much more justified in having a
"chip on their shoulder" or a "pity party" because more of their
ancestors were slaves and for a longer period of time. Almost all Blacks
in the United States were under slavery for less than 100 years.
Furthermore, only 5% of all Black slaves shipped by Black masters out of
Africa ever came to the United States because most Black slaves were
shipped to South America or the West Indies.
The White European Slavs, or slaves, were sold to Romans, Arabs,
Germans, and even to Black African masters in northern Africa,
particularly Egypt, Libya, and Ethiopia. Were these Black masters in
Africa racists because they owned White European slaves? The Bible tells
us that the Blacks of Egypt owned the oriental Jews as slaves for 400
years. Does that make Africans in Egypt racists? The Bible also tells us
that Abraham, who is the father of the Jews, the Christians, and the
Muslims, owned hundreds of slaves. God also required Abraham to
circumcise those slaves that he bought with money, as well as those
slaves who were homeborn. Moreover, Abraham's slaves fought for him in a
war with King Chedorlaomer to rescue his nephew Lot. In addition, Isaac,
Jacob, Daniel, Job, Joseph, and David all owned slaves and even the
Apostle Paul returned a White runaway slave to his Christian master in
the book of Philemon.
My question is this: Is the anti-Southern news media, education
system, and Hollywood calling these great men of God racists or evil or
wicked because they owned hundreds of slaves? If not, then neither can
they call Southerners like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and
Jefferson Davis racists because they owned slaves. What hypocrisy and
bigotry to criticize only White Southerners or the Confederate States
for owning slaves. Nearly every nation in the world owned slaves,
especially the Black masters in Nigeria, where most American Blacks have
their roots. Accordingly, if flags of nations that owned slaves are to
be labelled as "racist," then nearly all the flags in the world are
"racist," especially the African flag of Nigeria which dealt so
overwhelmingly in the slave trade.
Slavery in the Old South
The second lie that I wish to address here is that slaves were
mistreated in the Old South. Again, this is not true. In Colossians 4:1,
the Apostle Paul wrote, "Masters, give unto your servants that which is
just and equal; knowing that ye also have a Master in heaven." To say
that slaves were mistreated in the Old South is to say that the most
Christian group of people in the entire world, the so-called "Bible
Belt," mistreated their servants and violated the commandments of Jesus
their Lord. Anyone who says this is an accuser of the brethren of Jesus
Christ, which is not a very good position to take. We in the South are
offended by such false accusations. Just the opposite is true. In the
Old South there were numerous laws that protected servants from abuse,
just as there are laws today that protect wives or children from abuse.
But just because a few men abuse their wives and children does not make
marriage or having children a cruel and hateful endeavor. The same is
true for slavery. Of course, there were masters who violated the law and
mistreated their servants, such as Union General William T. Sherman, who
owned a number of slaves before the War and who was constantly in court
facing charges for abusing them. That is what the laws were for, to stop
Yankees like Sherman from mistreating their slaves. The incidence of
abuse, rape, broken homes, and murder are one-hundred times greater
today in the housing projects than they every were on the slave
plantations in the Old South.
The truth is, that nowhere on the face of the earth, in all of
history, were servants better treated or better loved than they were in
the Old South by White, Black, Hispanic, and Indian slave owners. Yes,
even Bla ' eks and Indians owned slaves in the Old South. While 7% of
Southern Whites owned slaves, 2% of free Blacks in the South owned
slaves. For example, in 1860, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that
around 10,000 free Blacks owned some 60,000 Black slaves. It was a Black
slave master, named Anthony Johnson, who sued and won his case in a
Virginia court in 1653 that changed temporary servitude into lifetime
servitude. Thus, this Black slave owner established permanent slavery in
Virginia. Moreover, when the Cherokee Indians were removed by the U.S.
Government along the "Trail of Tears" out West, nearly 30% of the people
removed were Black slaves of the Cherokees. Just as White European
slaves were primitive, barbaric pagans who practices human sacrifice,
incest, witchcraft, and idolatry, yet were converted to Christianity,
learned trades and skills and became a civilized people under Black,
Oriental, and White masters, so also did Black African barbaric pagans
become civilized Christians with skills and trades under slavery in the
Old South.
Slavery was a family institution in the Old South, just as is
stated in Galatians 4:1: "Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a
child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all." A
typical family plantation had one family of Whites living next door to
one family of Blacks. They had the same last name, worked in the same
fields side by side, played together, prayed together, raised each
other's children, took care of each other in sickness, and all in all,
loved one another, just like family. It was at these small family farms
that Southern Blacks were taught about and converted to Christianity by
the millions. It is to be sure that those converted Black Southerners
are most grateful today, just as our White European ancestors are
grateful for their conversion to Christianity while slaves to Black
masters in northern Africa, such as the Black Coptic Christians in
Egypt, one of the oldest Christian groups in the world. Remember, it was
not from Yankees that the Southern Blacks learned about Jesus Christ;
for the most part, it was from Southern slave owners.
It was here, on the family plantation, that Blacks learned
trades and skills such as farming, saw milling, carpentry, and even
driving steamboats and railroad trains. Even the Abolitionist Yankee
government's Department of Education admitted in 1892, after the total
failure of the "Reconstruction Experiment," that the best technical
education that the world had ever seen, was the education that was given
to the slaves by their masters before their emancipation.
It should also be remembered that the Blacks from Nigeria, the
most populous region in Africa, were not civilized and not Christian,
practicing voodoo, cannibalism, and witchcraft, just as the White
Europeans did. These Blacks were captured in tribal wars by other Blacks
in Nigeria. White people did not run through the jungles of Africa
kidnapping Blacks and making them slaves. Black Africans captured and
sold other Blacks as slaves; they were already slaves before they ever
set foot on a Spanish, Portuguese, English, or New England Yankee slave
ship. Such ships stayed anchored off shore for fear of jungle diseases
and the slaves were rowed out in long boats by Africans and put on
board. Many of these slaves were already riddled with disease and
half-starved.
All slave ships from the United States sailed from the Northern
states of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, and
Delaware under the United States flag. Not one Southern ship sailed to
Africa to bring back slaves. This slave trading was the big business of
the rich New England Yankees. They traded rum made in Northern factories
to Black African slave owners for their slaves and then traded most of
the slaves to South America or the West Indies for molasses, and then
manufactured the molasses into rum and made another trip. Only 5% of the
African slaves ever reached the United States, and with rare exception,
the life of a slave in the United States was ten times better than his
life had been as a slave in Africa.
The War Was Not Fought Over Slavery
The third lie is that the War for Southern Independence (or as
the U.S. Congress officially declared it to be -- The War Between the
States; it was not a "civil war") was fought over slavery, with the
North fighting to free Southern slaves and the South fighting to keep
her slaves. This is, of course, not true.
First of all, all thirteen original states which seceded from
England in 1776 and which formed the United States of America, from
Maine (a part of Massachusetts at that time) to Georgia, owned slaves.
Was the First American Revolution fought over slaver . If not, then
neither was the Second American Revolution fought over slavery when the
Southern states withdrew from the Union and formed the Confederate
States of America. Is the Fourth of July a racist holiday because all
thirteen original colonies had slaves? If not, then neither are our
Confederate holidays. Is the U.S. flag a racist flag because all
thirteen original states had slaves? If not, then neither is the
Confederate battle flag a racist flag -- or do these intolerant
individuals and the news media advocate taking down the U.S. flag as
well? If they do, then they will need to take down nearly every national
flag in the world, starting with the flag of Nigeria in Africa.
What blatant bigotry to call the Confederate flag racist!
During the War for Southern Independence, many in the North also
had slaves, but refused to free their slaves until after the War. People
in Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri, West Virginia, and even
Washington, D.C., owned slaves; these states never seceded and were
under the control of the United States throughout the course of the
entire War. However, they were not required to free their slaves by the
U.S. government. The U.S. Congress in 1862 even refused to pass a
constitutional amendment abolishing slavery, when the only Senators and
Representatives in Congress were from the North (all Southerners had
left Congress to form their own nation). How could the North be fighting
the War to free Southern slaves when they would not free their own, such
as Ulysses S. Grant's personal slave or Abraham Lincoln's
father-in-law's slaves? What hypocrisy! Even worse, Lincoln and the U.S.
Congress offered to pass a constitutional amendment for the South,
guaranteeing permanent slavery forever in the slave states, if only the
Southern states would return to the Union. The South refused the offer.
Northern slaves were even exempt from Lincoln's Emancipation
Proclamation. Furthermore, captured Southern slaves on the Mississippi
River were forced to work on the plantations as slaves for the United
States Army, growing cotton for Northern factories, rather than being
set free. Also, during the War, just as many Union soldiers owned slaves
as Confederate soldiers. Is the U.S. flag a symbol of slavery because
the North owned slaves during the War? If not, then neither is the
Confederate battle flag a symbol of slavery. How could the War have been
fought over slavery when both sides had slaves?
The War for Southern Independence was fought over local
self-government by the South versus centralist government by the North;
the centralist government won and the local self government lost. The
Confederate battle flag is the symbol of the right of the local people
and the states to govern themselves and is flown in memory and honor of
our Confederate ancestors and veterans who gave their lives for less
government, less taxes, and Southern independence.
In his inaugural address of March 4, 1861, U.S. President
Abraham Lincoln stated, "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to
interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists.
I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to
do so." Furthermore, Union General U.S. Grant said, "If I thought this
war was to abolish slavery, I would resign my commission, and offer my
sword to the other side."
A war over slavery? Not hardly!
The Confederate States of America even offered to free all
Southern slaves in return for independence; Lincoln refused the offer.
The term "free state" meant free from Blacks. Northerners did not want
to live with Blacks, slave or free, and many Northern states and
territories actually passed laws prohibiting free Blacks from entering
into them. Lincoln himself stated the opinion of the Northern people at
during a meeting with a group of Black leaders during the War, saying,
"There is an unwillingness on the part of our people [Northern Whites]
to live with you free colored people. Whether this is right or wrong, I
am not prepared to discuss, but it is a fact with which we must deal.
Therefore, I think it best for us to separate." Acting upon this
sentiment, Abraham Lincoln and the United States Congress purchased
land, passed laws, and started shipping free Northern Blacks out of the
country down to poverty-stricken Haiti. Lincoln put together several
such schemes to remove free Blacks from the United States, to send some
back to Africa and some to Central and South America. At the end of the
War, a few weeks before Lincoln was assassinated, Union General Benjamin
Butler asked him what he was going to do with all the recently free
Southern Blacks. To this Lincoln replied, "I think we should deport them
all."
Meanwhile, down South, Confederate States President Jefferson
Davis and his wife Varina were adopting an eight-year-old free Black
orphan boy named Jim Limber. After his mother died, little Jim was
placed with a free Black family as foster parents. However, this family
badly mistreated him to such a degree that the news reached the ears of
the President and Mrs. Davis, who, in the middle of the War, took the
time and effort to intercede and rescue Jim from this child abuse.
Little Jim's wounds were doctored and he was welcomed into the
Confederate White House as a member of the Davis family. President Davis
himself went to court in Richmond and had free papers registered on Jim
Limber, so he would always be free. Even when our President was on his
way to prison for trying to obtain independence and self-government for
the Southern people, he made arrangements and provided for Jim Limber's
future education and care. In the Old South it was not uncommon for
Blacks to take in orphaned Whites or for Whites to take in orphaned
Blacks. There was a relationship between Blacks and Whites that
Northerners even today do not understand or appreciate.
The War for Southern Independence was fought over the right of
the local people to govern themselves versus a centralist government by
the few, the rich, and the powerful. The South wanted less government,
less taxes, independence, and decisions made at the local level where
the people have control. The North wanted more taxes, more government,
and centralism, with a compulsory union at bayonet point and decisions
made in Washington D.C. rather than by the local people. The South stood
on the principles of the Southerner Thomas Jefferson, who in the
Declaration of Independence, stated, "Governments are instituted among
men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that,
whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is
the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a
new government." In other words, the people should control the
government, not the government controlling the people. The North stood
on the principles of the Northerner Alexander Hamilton, who believed
that government should be ruled by an intellectual aristocracy,
maintained by the enlightened self-interest of the wealthy rather than
the common people, governing themselves. Northern Abolitionists such as
William Lloyd Garrison, burned the U.S. Constitution in the streets,
calling it "a pact with the devil." Lincoln likewise brutally violated
nearly every article and amendment to the U.S. Constitution, throwing
over 35,000 Northern Citizens in prison as political prisoners,
including state legislators, without cause or trial, as well as,
violently closing a dozen opposition newspapers and suppressing freedom
of speech.
President Jefferson Davis and the Confederate States Congress
never did such things. The Southern people took the U.S. Constitution
with them when they voluntarily withdrew from the voluntary Union and
brought forth upon this continent, a new nation, where the right of the
local people to govern themselves was protected.
Just as with the War for American Independence of 1776, the War
for Southern Independence of 1861 was fought over "taxation without
representation." The North was constantly trying to raise taxes on
Southerners through high tariffs on imported goods, in order to protect
the inefficient big businesses in the North which could not compete with
manufactured goods from England and France with whom the South traded
cotton. The South did not have factories and had to import most finished
products.
The Industrial Revolution allowed England and France to produce
and ship across the Atlantic products that were cheaper than the
products Northern manufacturers, who refused to modernize, could produce
with their White child labor- ten-year-old children working sixteen
hours a day in "sweat shops" for mere pennies and sleeping in the
streets. Slaves in the South were treated much better than child
laborers in the North.
When the taxes on imports were rejected, rich big businessmen in
the North were promised that, if elected, Lincoln would drastically
raise the import tax. That is why the Southern states quickly began to
escape from the tax net that Lincoln was spreading. Within Lincoln's
first month in office, the U.S. Congress had passed the Morrill Tariff,
which was the highest import tax in U.S. history, more than doubling the
import tax rate from 20% to 47%, which was enough to bankrupt many
Southerners. This oppressive tax was what pushed Southern states to
legally withdraw from the voluntary Union, not slavery.
Since the Southerners had escaped the tax by withdrawing from
the Union, the only way the North could collect this oppressive tax was
to invade the Confederate States and force them at gunpoint back into
the Union. It was to collect this import tax to satisfy his Northern
industrialist supporters that Abraham Lincoln invaded our South and not
to free any slaves. Lincoln's war cost the lives of 600,000 Americans.
When Lincoln invaded Charleston and then Virginia, all
Southerners- Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Indians, Orientals, Protestants,
Catholics, Jews, rich and poor, male and female almost to a person rose
up and volunteered their services in defense of the Confederate States
of America because all were going to suffer from this horrible federal
tax. Nowhere in the history of movements of independence and
self-government have a people been so united in purpose and dedicated to
the cause of Independence. No, not even in 1776 did the thirteen
colonies receive such support and sacrifice by the people, and that war
was fought over a 3% tax on tea!
My fellow Americans, the South was right! The Confederate battle
flag represents all Southerners and even Northern Confederates from
states such as Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and others, who supported the
South and who even tried to secede from the Union and form their own
nation but whose efforts for freedom were crushed by Lincoln's troops.
Confederate Indians, Hispanics, Blacks, and Whites all received
Confederate pensions after the War and attended Confederate veterans'
reunions together, year after year, just as they had suffered and fought
together during the War. The Confederate battle flag represents all
Confederates, regardless of race or religion, and is the symbol of less
government, less taxes, and the right of a people to govern themselves.
It is flown in memory and honor of our Confederate ancestors and
veterans who willingly shed their blood for Southern independence
|