|
Links:
|
The Functional Standards
|
|
Volume
1 - Introduction to Case Management Standards |
The National
Consortium on State Court Automation Standards |
If
you are interested in any of the following Case
Management Functional Standards, please read this
introduction first.
Top
|
|
Volume 2 - Civil Case Management Functional Requirements
--Approved
-- |
The National
Consortium on State Court Automation Standards |
Comments on
Civil Functional ---
standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
|
|
Volume
3 - Domestic Relations Case Management Functional Requirements
--Approved-- |
Joint Technology Committee
|
On July 21st,
2002, the Joint Technology Committee of COSCA/NACM
accepted the report of the National Consortium for
State Court Automation Standards adopting the
Domestic Relations Case Management Functional
Requirements as “recommended standards”. As a
result of the action of the Joint Technology
Committee, the recommended standards
was submitted to the COSCA and NACM
Boards of Directors, and they were approved in March
2003.
Comments
on Domestic Relations Functional Standards--- standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
Top |
|
Volume 4 - Criminal Case Management Functional
Requirements
--Approved-- |
|
On December 5,
2002, the Joint Technology Committee of COSCA/NACM
accepted the report of the National Consortium for
State Court Automation Standards adopting the
Criminal Case Management Functional Requirements as
a “recommended standard." As a result of the
action of the Joint Technology Committee, the
recommended standard was
submitted to the COSCA and NACM Boards of Directors,
and they were approved in March of 2003.
Comments on
Criminal Functional --- standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
Top |
|
Volume 5 - Juvenile Case Management Functional
Requirements
--Proposed -- |
|
On October 27, 2003, the National
Consortium on State Court Automation Standards, the standards subcommittee of the
COSCA/NACM Joint Technology Committee, reviewed public comment on the requirements.
The Consortium will recommend that the Joint Technology Committee accept the
requirements as a recommended standard at its meeting scheduled in December of
2003. If the Joint Technology Committee accepts the motion of the Consortium,
then the JTC will forward the requirements as a recommended standard to the COSCA
and NACM Boards for action.
Comments
on Juvenile Functional Standards --- standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
Top
|
|
Electronic
Filing Processes (Technical and Business Approaches)
--Approved-- |
|
On December 5, 2002, the Joint
Technology Committee of COSCA/NACM accepted the
report of the National Consortium for State Court
automation Standards adopting th eE-Filing
Functional Requirements as a "recommended
standards." As a result of the action of the
Joint Technology Committee, the recommended standard
was submitted to the COSCA and NACM Boards of
Directors, and they were approved in March 2003.
Comments on
E-filing Functional contact --- standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
.
|
|
This Electronic Court Filing XML
Standard version 1.1 DTD is the current recommended
standard of the COSCA/NACM Joint Technology
Committee. Although this document is available for
your use and consideration, we strongly recommend
that you wait until the XML Schema version 3.0
(currently under construction by Georgia Tech
Research Institute) is available. The current plan
is to have this Schema version 3.0 available by
about mid 2003.
Comments on
Electronic Court Filing XML Standards contact ---
standards.comments@ncsc.dni.us
Top
|
|
|
|
This Electronic Court Filing XML Standard version 1.1
DTD is the current recommended standard of the COSCA/NACM
Joint Technology Committee. Although this
document is available for your use and consideration,
we strongly recommend that you use the Justice XML
Data Dictionary version 3.0.
Justice XML Data
Dictionary v3.0
-
The NCSC has been
working with the various XML initiative (for
e-filing document and information exchange) since
this all started in about 1999. The most
important thing to remember about this new
technology is that XML will allow us to send and
receive documents and court case information
electronically. To do that, however, we
MUST first all agree on standards. Without
standards, XML will be extremely difficult to
implement. The first court standard adopted
was the LegalXML e-filing DTD 1.0 inthe year 2000.
Then the US DOJ, through their GLOBAL initiative
asked all agencies that were developing XML tag
standards to join forces to compile one national
standard. The Georgia Tech Research Institute
(GTRI) was asked to work with all agencies to help
build a Justice XML Data Dictionary v.3.0.
GTRI used the Legal XML e-filing DTD v1.1 along with
other material to build this new v3.0 and then used
staff from all agencies to review and edit the
material. The review and editing process is
now complete. The Justice XML Data Dictionary
v3.0 is now available for review and comment.
-
Please go to <http://it.ojp.gov/jxdm>
to read and review this very important information.
Please review the release information, and provide
your comments to the feedback page <http://justicexml.gtri.gatech.edu/feedback>.
This material represents all agencies, but you
should only review material that is court related.
We need your comments.
|
|
Report
on Georgia XML Interoperability Test
|