Today's Woot — Aspire Digital AD-1100 Plus 650 watt Home Theater $99.99 — You have 'til midnight.
The Unofficial Apple Weblog

WIN member since Jan, 2004
Have an idea for a new blog? Let us know.

New WIN blogs — Xbox 2, Playstation 3 & VoIP

Best friends…

If I didn’t know any better, I’d actually believe that Microsoft was trying to play buddy buddy with Apple.  After all, not only have they never delivered a version of Virtual PC or Office for Linux or Solaris, but they are continuing to deliver quality products on the Mac. 

As anticipated yesterday, Microsoft’s Macintosh Business Unit today officially announced the release to manufacturer (RTM) of Microsoft Virtual PC 7 and Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac Professional Edition.
Virtual PC 7, software that allows Mac users to simultaneously run other operating systems such as Windows, brings important improvements in support, speed and reliability, including support for Apple’s G5 processor. Version 7 will allow users to run Virtual PC on a Mac equipped with a G3, G4 or 64-bit G5 processor, including the new iMac G5. Full retail versions of Virtual PC 7 ($250) and Office 2004 for Mac Professional Edition ($500) with Windows XP Professional are expected to be available in stores in October.

 

Permalink | Email this | Comments [8]


Recent Entries

 » Man eats 13 roaches, wins an iPod (10/10/2004)
 » Remember when 300MHz was really fast? (10/9/2004)
 » MSN Messenger delayed due tyo “rogue winks” (10/8/2004)
 » What could be more pointless than Mac OS X on an Xbox? (10/7/2004)
 » Jonathan Ive’s Apple Cube still considered a work of art (10/7/2004)


(Add your comments)

Reader Comments

Girly Men
Posted Sep 3, 2004, 11:49 AM ET by Don Jeter

Microsoft is scared.

Skin Deep
Posted Sep 4, 2004, 8:52 PM ET by bedoughty

Don't be fooled... it's not like a whole bunch of M$ employees decided to convert. They went out and found a bunch of Mac developers and coaxed em into doing this work.. M$ bought the company that makes Virtual PC, and probably didn't do much with/to it. In fact if I'm not mistaken, not even the PC version of Office is truly produced 'in house.' I sadly don't have the article on hand, but I believe I read that it's written by a 3rd party, beta tested and checked for quality, (if you can call it that) and put out under their name. Just like Final Cut Pro was in the beginning... Apple bought a company who was making the software and re-branded it. Boiled down: these situations are never quite what they seem.

I think history proves that Bill and his company have never been that hip to playing well with others...

The Truth
Posted Sep 5, 2004, 4:30 AM ET by Dennis T Cheung

"They went out and found a bunch of Mac developers and coaxed em into doing this work.. "

As opposed to what? Have a bunch of Windows developers write Office for the Mac? Oh wait... that was the Word 6.0 debacle.

"In fact if I'm not mistaken, not even the PC version of Office is truly produced 'in house.'"

The lies we spread. Sheez, the things people will make up.

Ironically, the iPod wasn't even invented by Apple.

Batting for the Same Team
Posted Sep 5, 2004, 9:09 PM ET by bedoughty

Dennis that's exactly the point I'm getting at..... these companies aren't always doing this stuff in house. I gave examples, like the iPod, from both sides. :P

What lies am I spreading? We're both making the same point...

Your Lie
Posted Sep 6, 2004, 3:05 AM ET by Dennis T Cheung

Your claim that Microsoft Office is not developed by Microsoft is completely off base.

Microsoft Word was created by Microsoft, and has been so since 1983?

Microsoft Excel was created by Microsoft, first for the Mac, in 1984-5?

Microsoft Outlook and PowerPoint have been written at Microsoft for ages now.

Touchet
Posted Sep 6, 2004, 5:09 PM ET by Sam Martin

nice counter punch by Dennis......Skin is down.....more to come.....hehe :)

http://www.vitaminjungle.net

sharing
Posted Sep 6, 2004, 9:17 PM ET by hank

Microsoft helped Apple develop Safari. They had a whole team share all kinds of stuff they used for IE.

remember that antitrust settlement?
Posted Sep 13, 2004, 11:41 PM ET by Ben Chun

office for mac is clearly good business for microsoft -- small product team, big margins. decent article here: http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,61801,00.html

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry: inappropriate comments may be removed. Email addresses are never displayed. To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.







Do you want us to remember your personal information for next time?
   




   

Advertisement 

SPONSORED TEXT LINKS

IceRocket —
A new way to search.
www.IceRocket.com

Text links like this one are affordable — starting at $100 — and effective. Email us for more information.


SPONSORS

If you're interested in advertising on Weblogs, Inc., please write us.

MOST COMMENTED ON
(past 60 days)


WEBLOGS, INC. NETWORK

Consumer
Autoblog
Blogging Baby
Engadget
hack a day
Joystiq
Technology
Apple (Unofficial)
CSS
Digital Photography
Google (Unofficial)
Grid Computing
JavaScript
Microsoft (Unofficial)
Office
Open Source
Peer-to-Peer
Photoshop (Unofficial)
RSS
Search Engine Marketing
Social Software
Spam
Tablet PCs
VoIP
Yahoo (Unofficial)
Wireless
Bluetooth
Engadget: Cellphones
Engadget: GPS
RFID
Ultra Wideband
WiFi
Engadget: Wireless
Wireless Dev
Wireless
Video Games
Blogging E3
Engadget: Gaming
Joystiq
Playstation 3
Video Games
Xbox 2
Media & Entertainment
Art
Design
Digital Music
Documentary Film
Independent Film
Magazine Design
Nanopublishing
Business
The Mortgages Weblog
Online Finance
Outsourcing
Life Sciences
Medical Informatics
Telemedicine
Personal
Brian Alvey
Jason Calacanis
Blog Maverick
Gordon Gould
Events
Blogging E3
Blogging ETech
Future of Music
Blogging Milken
Blogging Sundance
Blogging Web 2.0
Other
Weblogs, Inc.