WORLD | UTAH | BUSINESS | SPORTS | OPINION | FEATURES | CLASSIFIEDS
Quick Search

Enter search term
Advanced Search
News
Contents
Past Content
Photos
Obituaries
Archives
Legislature 2005
Utah Politics
Drought
Columnists
TribTalk Forums
Weather
Ski Report
Opinion
Bagley Cartoons
Editorials
Commentary
Public Forum
Sports
Utah Jazz
BYU Cougars
Utah Utes
USU Aggies
Prep Sports
Features
Sundance 2005
Film Finder
Arts
Travel
Home & Family
Health & Science
Food
Outdoors
The Mix
Faith
Entertainment
Lifestyle
Shopping
Classifieds
Retail Ads
Cars/RVs
Real Estate
Jobs
Education Guide
Bride Guide
Utah City Guide
Hotel Rooms
Grocery Guru
Fantasy Sports
Buy/Sell Tickets
Advertising Info
Bus./Industry
Extras
TribTalk Forums
Not in Print
NIE
Reader Panel
Crossword
Services
Help Desk
FAQ
Contact Us
Subscribe
Privacy Policy
Food
Health & Science

Link To Article   Print Article   Email Article

Bitter struggle to control company
Canopy: Executives face off against founder Noorda and his family in a $100M court action
By Bob Mims
The Salt Lake Tribune

Ray Noorda, Unduly influenced?
A bitter struggle for control of The Canopy Group has erupted in dueling allegations of greed, deceit and manipulation of its aged and purportedly failing founder, Utah technology legend Ray Noorda.
    On one side is Ralph Yarro, ousted chairman, president and chief executive of the Lindon-based Canopy, an investment firm whose extensive holdings include SCO Group, a company now widely known for its Linux-related lawsuits against IBM and others. Yarro is joined by ex-chief financial officer Darcy Mott and former corporate counsel Brent Christensen.
    The three are suing for at least $100 million, alleging they were illegally ousted in December by a group led by Noorda's daughter, Val Noorda Kriedel of Orange County, Calif.; longtime Canopy investment adviser Terry Peterson, and William Mustard, an independent senior executive consultant appointed CEO in Yarro's place.
    Meantime, Canopy has countersued, along with Ray Noorda and wife, Lewena,
Previous SCO stories
  • Court ruling is a plus for SCO vs. IBM (1/20)
  • SCO shares plunge (12/22)
  • as officers of the Noorda Family Trust, Canopy's founding and primary investor. They accuse Yarro, Mott and Christensen of siphoning off at least $20 million via "a series of self-dealing and wasteful transactions."
        Yarro attorney Stanley PresÂton insists the board approved - and in several cases Noorda personally signed - all compensation challenged by Canopy.
        In competing lawsuits filed in Provo's 4th District Court, both sides allege the other took advantage of the elderly Noordas.
        Canopy attorney David B. Watkiss declined Friday to discuss Ray Noorda's current mental acuity. However, the lawsuit he filed acknowledges that, "consequences of age and associated health issues" had limited Ray Noorda's involvement in Canopy affairs for the past six years.
        "As the Noordas aged . . . [they] increasingly relied on and deferred to Yarro's counsel and advice in all matters relating to Canopy," the company's suit states. Ray Noorda is 80 and
      Lewena Noorda is 81.
        Canopy charges that Yarro used his longtime friendship with Ray Noorda to assume effective control of Canopy and its finances. Noorda was Yarro's mentor dating back to the early 1990s when Noorda - hailed as the father of network computing - ran Novell and employed Yarro.
        Yarro's lawsuit states he had worked with Noorda guiding Canopy since 1995, and that Noorda had repeatedly made it clear he did not want his children involved in the venture capital firm that also holds interests in Altiris Inc., FatPipe Networks and Linux Networx.
        Yarro's suit further contends that from 2003 on, Ray Noorda's "memory and health deteriorated to the extent that he became incapacitated and/or subject to undue influences."
        Yarro contends it was during this period that Val Noorda Kriedel, rebuffed in her Canopy-related inquiries by Yarro, joined with Peterson - who was allegedly upset over diminished control of Canopy-related

    Advertisement

      investments -and Mustard in a campaign to "disparage" Yarro, Mott and Christensen and "exercise undue influence" over the Noordas.
        A Canopy board meeting was called Dec. 17, but according to Yarro, the Noordas did not personally attend.
       Instead, Yarro was met by attorneys who informed him the Noordas would participate by speaker phone from another location.
        Allegedly reading from a script, Lewena Noorda moved for termination of Yarro, Mott and Christensen and appointment of Mustard as CEO. A purportedly prompted Ray Noorda seconded, providing the needed 2-1 majority.
        Yarro told The Salt Lake Tribune Friday that, "based on our long and close association, as well as the long-standing mutual trust and respect between us and Mr. Noorda over many years, we do not believe that the actions taken on Dec. 17 reflect the mind and will of Ray Noorda."
        In addition to monetary damages, Yarro's suit seeks a court
      declaration that the board meeting and its results are invalid, and that Yarro, Mott and Christensen regain their positions; removal of the Noordas from the three-member board; and appointment of a neutral overseer for Canopy until litigation is resolved.
        The Canopy suit, meanwhile, adds to its damage demands the voiding of Yarro's, Mott's and Christensen's stock options; and removal of Yarro from the company board.
        No hearings have been set for either suit. Both have been assigned to Judge Anthony Scofield.
        Efforts to reach the Noordas, Peterson and Mustard were unsuccessful. However, Watkiss did confirm Yarro, Mott and Christensen were notified they had been fired for cause, the reasons echoing those later laid out in Canopy's lawsuit.
        Other than stating charity, not the Noorda children, stand to eventually benefit from the family trust, Watkiss declined to discuss the state of the elder Noordas' relations with their offspring.
        "We strongly believe
      the allegations in our complaint have merit and we look forward to the opportunity to prove those allegations," Watkiss said.
        Yarro, too, is confident, though emphasizing the decision to sue was a painful one.
       "We would not have filed this lawsuit if we thought there was any other way to resolve this matter and to preserve Canopy, its related companies and the jobs of many people," he said.
        bmims@sltrib.com
       
       
         

    RETURN TO TOP

    © Copyright 2005, The Salt Lake Tribune.
    All material found on Utah Online is copyrighted The Salt Lake Tribune and associated news services. No material may be reproduced or reused without explicit permission from The Salt Lake Tribune.



    Buy books at BestPrices.com
    Shopping Cart Software
    Nanny Agency Great AuPair
    Mexico Vacation
    Health Insurance
    DVD Recorders
    www.tinte-24.de
    Travel Insurance
    Ink Cartridge, InkJet
    Pass a drug test
    Home Equity Loans
    Moving Companies
    online MBA degrees
    Credit Repair
    Debt Consolidation
    Cosmoz Search Portal

    Front Page | Contents | Search | World/Nation | Utah | Business | Sports | Editorials | Public Forum Letters | Commentary | Lifestyle | Movies | Travel | Health & Science | Faith | Archives | Weather | Obituaries

    Columnists | Utah Politics | 2002 Olympics |
    Contact Us | FAQ | Privacy Policy | Print Subscriptions | Reader Panel | Newspapers In Education

    webmaster@sltrib.com