Part
I. The People's President
Background
When Andrew Jackson became the seventh president of the
United States on March 4, 1829, he was best known as the hero
of the Battle of New Orleans. By the time he walked through
the doors of the Capitol rotunda, just before noon, 20,000 people
had arrived to cheer him. From among the throngs rose shouts
of "Huzza, there is the old man . . . there is the old
veteran . . . the general." Years before, in January 1815,
Jackson had led his troops to an unlikely victory in the largest
battle yet to be fought on the American continent. Never mind
that as the acrid smoke of cannon fire cleared from that triumph,
a peace treaty to end the war was already two weeks old, negotiated
in Ghent, Belgium, between American and British ministers. From
the viewpoint of the American people, whose capital had recently
been burned by the British, the victory in New Orleans restored
national pride and symbolized the collective belief that the
United States had finally broken away from a parent country
that had doubted their independence for decades. Jackson, who
had led an army made up of rough western volunteers with little
formal military training, became the personification of that
restored pride. Towns were named for him, songs were written
extolling his glories, and many began to imagine him as the
president. Now, on inauguration day, so enthusiastic were the
mobs of people who rushed him after his inaugural speech, he
had to take temporary refuge in the Capitol building.
Those who revered Jackson had been determined that their hero
would be elected in 1828, because, to many minds, Jackson had
been cheated of the presidency in 1824 by a "corrupt bargain."
Indeed, that election had proven one of the most difficult in
the nation’s young history. In 1820, James Monroe had
been elected president almost unanimously, so much so that his
administration was called "The Era of Good Feelings."
Yet those supporters in the Democratic-Republican Party were
not as single-minded as they seemed - factions were emerging
that suggested the increasingly diverse interests of the people
of the United States. Other factors came into play as well,
changing the political environment of that decade.
Playing by New Rules
In the early 1800s, as new states entered the Union, the
requirements that their legislatures placed on the right to
vote were less strict than in the original thirteen states.
Furthermore, over time most of the older states relaxed laws
that made property ownership a prerequisite for voting, so that
by the election of 1824, most white males who were 21 or older
could vote. The method for choosing the presidential nominees
was changing too. Previously, a congressional caucus, made up
of a small number of political leaders, had determined the candidates.
By 1824, this system was breaking down. Several men aspired
to the presidency, and neither they nor their followers were
willing to let a small group of congressmen determine their
fate. True, a congressional caucus did meet in 1824, though
only about one-third of the Congress showed up for the meeting,
and true, the caucus did select a candidate, William H. Crawford
of Georgia, then secretary of the treasury. Crawford's opponents
immediately attacked this method of candidate selection as undemocratic,
dictatorial, and unconstitutional. The erosion of this selection
approach was further indicated when three other candidates received
nominations from state legislatures, and endorsements from irregular
mass meetings throughout the country. John Quincy Adams, Monroe's
vice president, was named, as was Speaker of the House Henry
Clay of Kentucky, and General Jackson, a Tennessee senator who
would, as he said, speak for "the humble members of society
- the farmers, mechanics and laborers."
An Unusual Election
Another
element shaping a broader political base for the common man
had to do with changing methods for choosing electors. Rather
than leaving the decision to a small group of state legislators,
the states - one by one - had begun to allow the people to elect
electors. Perhaps electors chosen by this liberalized method
would more closely reflect the interests and desires of the
common folks. The 1824 popular election mirrored this change,
with Jackson gaining a plurality of the vote. Though Jackson
had the most electoral votes as well, with so many candidates
competing, he did not receive the electoral majority
required by the Constitution. Thus, the election would be settled
in the House of Representatives from among the top three candidates:
Jackson, Adams, and Crawford. Since Crawford had suffered a
serious illness, the real election came down to Jackson and
Adams. Henry Clay of Kentucky, now out of the running, would
control the outcome, since he controlled the vote of the three
states that he had carried in the general election. A powerful
voice in the House of Representatives, Clay apparently persuaded
a single New York congressman, Stephen Van Rensselaer, to support
Adams over Jackson. That sealed the New York delegation’s
vote, and the election. In terms of political beliefs, Clay
was closer politically to Adams than Jackson, finding the Tennessee
senator inexperienced in public office, a bit vague on what
he called "reform issues," and lacking in restraint
as a military commander. When Adams appointed Henry Clay to
the prestigious secretary of state position only days after
the House election "squeaker," it was easy enough
for Jackson supporters to cry "foul" and "corrupt
bargain." Jackson himself called Clay "the Judas of
the West," who received his "thirty pieces of silver"
as the reward for his "betrayal" of the people's will.
No matter what Clay's motivations, the "corrupt bargain"
became a part of the campaign fodder that would put Jackson
in the White House in 1828.
An Emerging Party and a Long
Campaign
John Quincy
Adams - White House Collection
|
|
Almost
from the time Adams became president in the spring of 1825,
the drive began to send "the people's choice" to Washington
by 1828. Jackson resigned his senate seat and went back to Tennessee.
By October 1825, the Tennessee legislature had already nominated
Jackson for president with the next race three years away. Supporters
got aggressive in advancing their candidate. In Nashville, Tennessee,
Jackson's backers formed a new party, soon to be called the
Democratic Party, and developed an impressive organizational
structure to promote their man. In Washington, Martin Van Buren
- a savvy New Yorker with a reputation as a political wizard
- applied new campaign strategies. Van Buren was among the first
leaders of the time to see political parties as a legitimate
means for providing voters with opposing views on political
issues, not as dangerous tools of division. Especially in this
environment of one-party dominance, Van Buren believed that
competing parties could curb the tendency for those in power
to become corrupt and tyrannical. He put into place a campaign
headquarters in Washington that would be impressive even by
today's standards. The themes he emphasized were simple: 1)
Adams was not a legitimate president; 2) only Jackson could
bring the citizenry a "true democracy."
Marketing a Candidate
Van Buren and the Nashville men knew how to market Jackson's
popularity as a war hero and to fan the anti-Adams fires with
the fuel of a "stolen presidency." They organized
parades and barbeques where the liquor flowed, and gave out
thousands of buttons and hats. Earlier in his career, Jackson
had been given the name "Old Hickory," because as
a leader, especially during battle, he was "as strong as
a hickory stick." Hickory canes became the rage, with Democrats
proudly carrying them to show support for the hero of New Orleans.
Identifying friendly newspapers, Jackson promoters courted editors,
feeding them prepared speeches and reports, and leveling accusations
against Adams as a "stingy, undemocratic aristocrat."
Jackson's opponents fired their own shots: Jackson was violent,
they said, a temper-driven dueler, a slaveholder, and a general
who had overstepped the orders of his president during military
raids into Spanish Florida. The Jacksonians countered with "select"
public opinion polls and circulated their favorable results to newspapers, along with neatly finished rebuttal
articles.
President
Jackson's inauguration celebration at the White House -
WHHA
|
|
The
People Have Ruled
By the time the inauguration of 1829 rolled around, everyone
understood that Andrew Jackson was to be considered the
"democratic president." Jackson himself saw
it that way, telling a political supporter in a letter
that the verdict of the people "has pronounced to
an admiring world that the people are
virtuous, and capable of self-government, and that the
liberty of our beloved country will be perpetual."
That judgment would be tested and questioned during the
next eight years of his two-term presidency.
|