Friday, April 22, 2005

David Beckham and Flight 77 in Paris

Strange things afoot!

We had to run up to Paris on Monday last for a meeting and it turned out to be quite an adventure! The meeting was with the Rector of an European University who approached us some time back, offering my husband a teaching contract with VERY generous terms - so generous, in fact, that we were suspicious of the motives. This individual is the son of a former government Minister (I'm not naming the country for reasons that will become obvious as I proceed with the story) who presided over the downfall of an entire government, and who left with a LOT of money. And here I mean a "lot of money" in global terms, not just a "local rich guy."

So, this son grew up to be an academic with lots of money and very interesting government connections both inside his own country and within the governments of other countries, including France, where we live.

This leads us to HOW this offer came to us.

We have friends who move in French Government circles. It seems that they met the Rector (for so I shall call him) at a private party attended by quite a few French government officials, and during the course of the conversation, things turned to the problems of the university of which the Rector is head, and it's need to "beef up" its hard science department. And so, my husband was proposed as the ideal person to assist in this endeavor. Contact ensued, and an offer was made.

At the meeting, our friends who had made the initial contact were present, a French attorney fluent in the language of the country in question, the Rector, and several others not important to the story I'm going to tell.

Off to the side, I want to tell about an incident that happened just before the meeting.

When we were on the way to the hotel where the meeting was to take place, we had to pass the Ritz at the Place de Vendome. At that precise moment, there was a gaggle of paparazzi out front waiting for something, so we decided to stop and see what was going on. Everytime someone appeared at the door of the Ritz, the paparazzi started to buzz, but after the person would appear, not being the "right one" they were waiting for, the buzz died down. This happened several times and we watched from about 100 feet from the door.

Finally a young couple came out and all the flashbulbs started going off signalling to us that these were the folks that the paparazzi were waiting for. They ran up like a gaggle of geese going for a plump bug and surrounded this couple. I noticed the woman signing a couple of quick autographs before the Ritz doormen more or less pushed the little crowd back and helped the couple into the car. They then sped away and all the paparazzi jumped oto little motoscooters and raced off down the street following the car.

We had no idea who we had just seen. But, there were a few people standing around in the square so I went up and asked them "who was that?" They told me "David Beckham." I said "Who's David Beckham?" They looked at me like I was from Mars and said, "You know, the soccer STAR!" I said "Well, that explains it. I don't do soccer..."

It was then time to go to our meeting.

Now, the meeting, per se, wasn't terribly interesting. We discussed terms, schedules, and made a date to travel to the insitution to sign the contracts, (all expenses paid) and that was that. THEN we all piled into several taxis to go to dinner.

Reservations had been made at 'La Closerie des Lilas', Hemingway's favorite café. We were escorted to a large table in a quiet corner prepared for our party of 10. Everything was very nice, but we would never have gone to such a place on OUR budget!

The dinner itself was "normal" in every respect, and MOST of the conversation was also "normal." It only got strange when politics - including the subject of George Bush and 9-11 - was brought up.

Our friends who circulate socially among various government officials brought out some photos to show of a recent private party. Among the attendees of said party - which I reiterate, was private and not an "official function," was the brother of Vladimir Putin! There was the usual grouping of various ministers, AND one of the most powerful men in the Financial World (and here I don't mean America, I mean the GLOBAL Financial world!)

What was interesting about these photos was the obvious camaraderie of these individuals depicted in the photographs. There was Vlad's brother whooping it up with what were obviously close pals in France.

Hmmmm...

So, of course I asked about this. What came next was, in a sense, quite shocking. It seems that it is common knowledge in these circles that Russian satellites photographed a ship-launched craft (seems to have been a drone type plane rather than a missle) that ended up impacting the Pentagon on Sept 11, 2001, and that, for various reasons this information has been withheld from the public.

I was naturally startled to hear this even though I have long held the opinion that it was NOT a commercial jetliner that hit the Pentagon. I think the thing that startled me was the fact that, if Russia (and perhaps other countries with satellites?) had proof that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, why weren't they revealing this?

It was explained to me that during part of the time George Bush was "incommunicado" on September 11, 2001, he was on the phone to Putin "negotiating." That was a polite way of saying "blackmailing." Apparently, Bush, by way of MOSSAD and/or the CIA had enough goods on Vlad to keep him silent.

Now THAT explains why Putin has not responded publicly to the rather obnoxious criticisms of Russia made by Bush and Condi Rice.

In any event, it was explained to me further that these satellite photos HAD been revealed to Thierry Meyssan who was asked by either French or Russian intell to write his book "Pentagate" to "leak" the info that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon. His instructions were, apparently, that he had to "make the case" without recourse to official backing; he couldn't refer to the satellite photos.

Well, suddenly, a LOT of things began to make sense.

In doing some research on this subject, I came across "Comments On the Pentagon Strike" by Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Interesting that this woman seems to be at the center of so much controversy, even including the Da Vinci Code that I posted about recently!

Well, it seems that Knight-Jadczyk has really stirred up the pooh! Her research group is responsible for the Pentagon Strike video that cranked up the Washington Post!

All of this made me even more curious and my search turned up some fascinating items.

It seems that the Pentagon Strike video came out on August 23rd. Probably nobody really noticed it at that point, but it hit a chord of response in the hearts of millions of people. They began to madly download and forward the incredibly concise and well-done piece to their friends and relatives. Latest stats on how many people have viewed it to date are 300 MILLION!

Apparently it even landed in the email box of the Editor of the Washington Post. Or so the story goes as told by Knight-Jadczyk when I contacted her for clarification. She further told me:

What really gave me the creeps was the fact that George decided to make a previously unscheduled campaign stop in my little home town in Florida right after the post article came out. Nnotice the timing here:

August 23rd: Pentagon Strike Video which propagates wildly for a month

September 21st: First contact by Carol Morello of the Washington Post

October 7th: Washington Post article

October 19th: George Bush visits New Port Richey


What really gave us the creeps was knowing that, if they hadn't seen it before, certainly George and Dick and the gang were watching the Pentagon Strike video after the Washington Post wrote an article about it.

My initial feeling was that Dubya's visit to my little home town - certainly of NO importance on the campaign trail - was deliberately done to send a message to me.

As to exactly what Carol Morello wrote to me, here is the pertinent passage:

"A couple of editors here saw the video/film, and I was asked to find out what I could about it.

"As you can imagine, we continue to have an intense interest on the attack on the Pentagon and the people who were affected.

"I've just begun reporting, so it would be premature to tell you what "perspective" my story would have. My initial impressions are that the questions and theories expressed in the video got a spurt of attention in early 2002, after the publication of a best selling book in France, then the furor died down for a while, and now they have re-emerged with the extraordinarily wide dissemination of this video on the Internet.

"The 911 Commission report appears to have done little to dampen the controversy. I hoped to speak to you about how and why you posted it on your web site, what kind of response you've received and what you think about it. I'm also planning to speak to some academics, and groups representing survivors and families from 9/11. And I was wondering if you had any idea who put the video together, and how I might contact him or her. It appears it initially came out of the UK."

Notice that she attributes the resurgance of interest in the "Pentagate" problem to the Pentagon Strike video.

Can we say "damage control?"

And if there is damage control, then that means there is damage.

As Knight-Jadczyk pointed out to me in our phone conversation, if Meyssan is being funded by foreign intell services, that makes absolutely no sense. Why would Putin or Chirac help to create a false claim that could then be demolished to embarass the 9-11 truth movement?

She has a point.

In my interview with Laura, she also mentioned some other interesting events in the timeline of what she calls "damage control" one of which is Mike Ruppert and Peak Oil.

Another interesting event in this timeline was the creation of a website with the domain name oilempire.us. This site lists what it calls "Bogus 9-11 Websites" saying:
The three biggest stories used to alienate the public from 9/11 truth

1. No Planes on 9/11 (Pentagon, North Tower WTC, "pod plane" at South
Tower, Pennsylvania)
2. The Jews Did It (Israel had foreknowledge and possibly played a role,
but that doesn't justify anti-semitism and Holocaust Denial)
3. The Victims' Phone Calls Were Faked (a way to keep the 9/11 families
and the skeptics from working together)

why are there bogus 9/11 websites? a mix of malice and incompetence, but
both make real evidence harder to find
Considering the very good case for the involvement of MOSSAD in 9-11, the very good case that the victims phone calls WERE faked, not to mention what I have discovered about satellite photos on 9-11, it sure does look like the Oil Empire Website is a "plant," so to say. So I did a whois lookup. Here's what I found:

Domain Name: OILEMPIRE.US
Domain ID: D3770314-US
Sponsoring Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, INC.
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant ID: GODA-02538034
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains by Proxy, Inc.
[...]
Registrant Email:
OILEMPIRE.US@domainsbyproxy.com
Registrant Application Purpose: P3
Registrant Nexus Category: C21
Administrative Contact ID: GODA-22538034
Administrative Contact Name: Registration Private
Administrative Contact Organization: Domains by Proxy, Inc.
Administrative Contact Address1: DomainsByProxy.com
Administrative Contact Address2: 15511 N. Hayden Rd., Ste
160,
Administrative Contact City: Scottsdale
Administrative Contact State/Province: Arizona
Administrative Contact Postal Code: 85260
Administrative Contact Country: United States
Administrative Contact Country Code: US
[...]
Name Server: DNS.ENVIROWEB.ORG
Name Server: MASTER.IGC.ORG
Created by Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, INC.
Last Updated by Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, INC.
Domain Registration Date: Wed Feb 26 00:19:31 GMT 2003
Domain Expiration Date: Wed Feb 25 23:59:59 GMT 2009
Domain Last Updated Date: Wed Feb 02 07:06:30 GMT 2005

The site is claimed by a Mark Rabinowitz even if it was "prepared for use" as early as February of 2003. That, in itself, is rather suspicious. Seems that this was right about the time that the Meyssan book was making a splash.

Robinowitz was posting on usenet as far back as 1994 in regards to an auto free DC. He's on a few dc.biking threads on usenet.

Rabinowitz then did some reporting for the Institute of Global Communications based in MD.
[See: http://www.igc.apc.org/]

He then moved to Eugene, Oregon by the looks of things and is into permaculture. He appears to be coming from a "green" perspective. He got into the Y2K hysteria for a bit and now it appears he's onto the "Peak Oil deal" via Ruppert.

Do a Ruppert- Robinowitz search on google and you'll see what I mean in regards to the Ruppert promotion.

So it DOES look like Ruppert - who has been quoted as promoting the "no plane theory" but has now advised everybody to just "forget 9-11 and concentrate on Peak Oil" - has a strange bedfellow with Rabinowitz.

Shades of COINTELPRO!

1 Comments:

Brother of the Rock said...

Hi,

Interesting Google Image Search results when typing in the following keywords: "russia satellite pentagon".

It singles out this image: http://www.socialnerve.org/zine/nov2004/imperialism/desperate_imp.jpg

11:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home