Monday, September 26, 2005

Perhaps it is the hidden charismatic flavour, but Piper's newest book God is the Gospel is causing some controversy online- Eternal Perspectives dislikes the book almost as much as I loved it.

Righteous sinner loves the first chapter, and Coffee swirls like me feels convicted of not sufficiently loving the God of the Gospel.

Meanwhile over at parableman, Wink slightly confusingly has both a generally positive review, and a post where he explains he is no longer a Piperite. Incidently Blogotional feels that in a sermon I quoted elsewhere, Piper is attempting to redefine the concept of Holy Spirit Baptism, and is not so sure that this is a good idea. It is fascinating to me to hear Piper sounding like he could almost be a member of a charismatic or pentecostal church like the one I attend!

So what do you think. Is God the gospel?

Sunday, September 25, 2005

With this book Piper raises the bar. It is clearly his argument that Joy in God is the goal of the gospel itself. He really did mean it when he said the chief purpose of man is to glorify God BY enjoying him forever. Now, he makes plain that it is God himself who makes the gospel good news. Before we get into the review proper, why not

Piper's book opens as follows:

From the first sin in the Garden of Eden to the final judgment of the great white throne, human beings will continue to embrace the love of God as the gift of everything but himself. Indeed there are ten thousand gifts that flow from the love of God. The gospel of Christ proclaims the news that he has purchased by his death ten thousand blessings for his bride. But none of these gifts will lead to final joy if they have not first led to God. And not one gospel blessing will be enjoyed by anyone for whom the gospel's greatest gift was not the Lord himself.

"Gospel" means good news ?but what makes the good news good? What is the goal of the gospel, without which it is no longer good? It is that Christ's death brings sinners to God! Were it to bring us anywhere else we would be left hopeless. But the gospel is that God gives us himself Christ died to give us Christ, and this self-giving is his highest mercy to us and the best news for us! The most profound, most exceedingly gracious, final and decisive good of the good news is Christ himself as the glorious image of God revealed for our endless satisfaction."

This morning my pastor Tope preached on a similar theme. He said that the "one thing" that is necessary is God. We must seek presenceense and worship more than everything else. When we do this everything else will fit into its own place. By the end I was convicted. He challenged his hearers to respond by raising a hand if they wanted to recommitt to putting God first in their lives. It was only my foolish pride and the fact that he used the word "backslidder" in his description of the people he wanted to respond that stopped me from raising my own hand.

Foolishly we put many things above the "one thing" - work, family, even Gods good gifts can take the place of God. We can busy ourselves with much serving and miss the real presence of God in hurry. Even salvation itself is not the goal.

Piper says "The gospel is not a way to get people to heaven; it is a way to get people to God."

    When we have experienced the good news like this, it will thrill us and change our lives. Piper is eager that this gospel is proclaimed in all its fullness, and says that if we have heard it right it is inevitable we will want to share it. "That is what a person does who has heard good news. He tells it"

    In support of his central thesis, Piper examines the use of the greek word euangelion and highlights that the biblical gospel includes at least the following (you may recognise some of this from my own attempts at summarising the gospel here and here.

    • There is a God who created the world (Acts 14.15)
    • God God reigns and his sovereign rule is being revealed (Ro 10.15, Mk 1.14)
    • Jesus has arrived on planet earth (Lk 2.10-11) it is the gospel of Christ (Gal 1.7)
    • Jesus paid a ransom for us with his life (Mk 10.45)
    • Jesus was raised from the dead (1 Cor 15.1,3-4)
    • The Holy Spirit has been sent to guarentee what is coming. (Lk 3.16,18)
    • Salvation is available by the power of God for everyone who believes (Ro 1.16)
    • True peace can be found only through Jesus (Acts 10.36)
    • All types of people are to be blessed through the gospel (Gal 3.8)
    • It is the gospel of the undeserved grace of God (Acts 20.24)
    To Piper two 2 Cor 5.21 makes it very clear that substitutionary atonement and justification is the heart of the gospel. As it also says in 1 Pet 3.18 "Christ suffered once for sin, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God"

    Piper is very clear in his statement though that "Until the gospel events of Good Friday and Easter and the gospel promises of justification and eternal life lead you to behold and embrace God himseld as your highest joy, you have not embraced the gospel of God"

    He seems to imply that our churches might be full of false converts- something which obviously concerns Mark Dever as well.

    To Piper, the The gospel of Galatians and the rest of the New Testament can be summarised
    by the declaration of Is 40.9 which in the LXX has two uses of the word we translate "evangelist". Thus, the whole Gospel can be summed up in one catchphrase: "Behold your God"

    The gospel is only good news because it brings us to God.

    Piper puts his cards firmly on the table, declaring that he believes those who do not prize God above all things have not been truly converted. The gospel is only good news he says because it is the way back to a relationship with God.

    Piper also refers to 2 Cor 4.4-6 to support the notion that the gospel is about seeing the glory of God. The gospel is the glory of Christ and a work of creation has occurred in our hearts causing us to see the light of Gods glory in the face of Jesus. Seeing that light is according to Piper
    what liberates us from the power of Satan.

    Says Piper "The gospel is Gods instrument for liberating people from exulting in self to exulting in Christ."

    Piper goes onto explain the work of the Holy Spirit in pursuading us of the truth of the gospel. Today many exponents of rerformed theology are curiously silent about the work of the Spirit. Not Piper, who quotes Calvin as follows "...the Word will not find acceptance in mens hearts
    before it is sealed by the inward testimony of the Holy Spirit".

    He also believes that the work of the Holy Spirit in causing us to value Christ is essential to our lives as Christians. "The work of the Holy Spirit in changing us is not to work directly on our bad habits but to make us admire Jesus Christ so much that sinful habits seem foreign and distasteful"

    Although in this book he doesn't explicitly mention the Baptism in the Holy Spirit, he certainly has elsewhere. Like many others, it is clear he believes we need a clear, conscious and distinct experience of the Holy Spirits work in our lives.

    As I read all this, it made me think of hero-worship. We have a natural tendancy to value our heroes so highly that we want to be like them. Thus, if we value Christ we will also want to be like him. This puts an interesting perspective, not explored by Piper on how we should relate to
    those more mature than us in the Christian faith. Where our admiration of them points behind them to an admiration of Christ it would seem entirely reasonable to use the understandable desire to be like them as a motivation for life change. After all Paul says to his hearers "follow me as I follow Christ"

    The passion that Piper feels is infectious. He could almost be a member of a pentecostal or charismatic church like mine. Yet, in his wisdom he ensures that his writings have a much wider impact than merely appealing to that growing section of the church. You will not feel alienated if you are a cessationist, although I challenge any "strict" cessationist to demonstrate the reality of a relationship with God as outlined here.

    Piper is eager to point out, however, that with all his talk of delighting in God he is no triumphalist. He believes that for the Chrisitan sorrow and joy are actually entwined. Our joy in Christ produces regret and sorrow over sin which in turn produces the joy of forgiveness. According to Piper "life is a battle for joy in the midst of sorrow". We are in the words of 2 Cor 6.10 "Sorrowful, yet always rejoicing"

    A true understanding of the gospel "does not make a person presumptuous-it makes him meek. It produces brokenhearted joy."

    There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this book is the most important I have read this year. I would urge everyone who can to read it. I feel it is the best book that Piper has written so far. Reading it will cause you to understand in a fresh way the gospel of Christ. No matter where you are on your Christian journey this book will be of great assistance.

    I pray the book may unsettle us from our passivity and cause us not to want to settle for a flat, emotionless Christianity. I come away from this book, and my pastors sermon this morning with a fresh hunger for an encounter with the God I say I believe in.

    It is a real challenge to us. Can we say truthfully to people who we meet that they should come to our church, or even look at our lives and in so doing see God's activity. Is there a sense of awe in our meetings so that we could turn to each other and say "Behold your God".

    Do we really believe in a God who acts today? If so, lets cry out to God for more of his active presense in our personal lives, and in the lives of our churches.

    I have no hesitation whatsoever in commending this book in the highest possible terms. It has been added to my list of books I feel every Christian should read. Go and buy yourself a copy as soon as you can. This book review was organised by diet of bookworms where you can read other bloggers views.


    Books every Christian should read

    Saturday, September 24, 2005

    I was surfing the net tonight looking for information about churches in london. I stumbled accross and most alarming link to the Evening standard which alleged that African Christians were performing 'Child sacrifices in London'. This article had been published in the Evening Standard and the story widely covered. Christianity Today even has an interesting round-up post with links to an audio interview on Radio 4 and several newspaper sites citing the story online.

    I had never read any of this and so it came as somewhat of a surprise tonight! Now, due to the wonders of technology, three months on the story still exists online and can be stumbled upon by anyone. It still has great power to disturb and shock. If true, then clearly there should be much uproar and great efforts to stamp out the shocking practices described.

    An initial search for more information throws up what seems to be very alarming information "300 African Boys missing", "child exorcisms are commonplace" and indeed, three people were sentanced in June for a cruel child excorcism. Are such cases isolated or are they widespread?

    A little more delving reveals some serious doubts about the authenticity of the original story. First, a BBC account in Jume suggest that the report was "racist witch-hunting". Second, when a story that big just goes quiet and there is no follow up you know people must have realised it was not quite the real thing. Where exactly is this report- why hasnt it been published as the story stuggested it would?

    Then, on a non-newspaper site I found the claim that the Evening standard had been foced to apologise for london child sacrifice claims.

    If a blogger gets caught out, the ususually will stick an "Update" notice on the bottom of the post that was shown to be in error. Since online versions of newspapers are present for ever, and can go on misleading, shouldnt they have to do the same?

    It seems to me that not everyone will go to the trouble I have tonight when they encounter an errant news report and that better accountability is required in online reporting. Newspapers could learn a thing or two from blogs.

    Of course, it is a bit disturbing that the "retraction" got so little coverage, and it is at least possible that some of these reprehensible practices are going on under our noses. There should be more coverage of a matter like this either way- to reassure us, or to further alert us.

    All this is just one more reason why it is so important to go to a church which is part of something bigger than itself- mainstream churches would of course have nothing to do with any of this kind of thing. If a church is lead by one charismatic leader who does not have any accountability externally then the concerns raised by this material are in fact only one reason why you as a churchgoer should be concerned.

    I am not convinced that any church should be wholly independent, but that is a matter for another post.....

    I hope you don't mind but this is so cool I took the liberty of including it in its entirety. Be sure to pop over to the Reluctant Puritan and tell him how funny it is!





    Its influence grows in this postmodern age
    Its heroes are brave; their sword - the webpage

    I wrote as I ducked to be safe from the fight
    at the Boar's Head Tavern late last night

    I visited Pyromaniac but left in despair
    Because Phil Johnson didn't link to me there

    Frank Turk is quite witty, but doesn't he know
    That his site has a "zero" instead of an "o"?

    Jonathan Moorhead's a scholar, his writings profound
    Modalists cower, with their heresies unwound

    There's Adrian Warnock, the Prince of the Blog
    Writing from London, the city of fog

    Andrew Jones is emerging, he's also quite tall
    Matt Brown is a pundit in the political squall

    Steve Camp is a minstrel, a singer of songs
    And also a herald, calling out tragic wrongs

    I go to Peter Bogert, the wise bearded sage
    His quest is to teach, a stronger church to engage

    And, of course, there's James Spurgeon with plenty to say
    Helping IFBx'ers to escape from Bob Gray

    Big Chris Meirose is friendly, a blogger most kind
    A student, a pastor, with a heart for mankind

    In Alabama, is Paul Lamey, a man of good cheer
    He's teaching in Russia, halfway 'round the sphere

    And Justin Taylor, of course, caught between worlds is he
    A blog most will visit, a blogger Marquis

    Tim Challies is prolific, his blog is well known
    His influence with bloggers has steadily grown

    Then there's the Reluctant Puritan, that's me don't you know
    Of no great import, but still learning to grow

    Well the verse grows stale, but I don't know where to end
    So I think I'll just link to Phil Johnson again.


    Nancy's acclaimed book has hit the shelves with a new study guide eddition. Here is my previous interview with her, and here's the press release:

    World Journalism Institute is happy to announce that the study guide edition of Total Truth:Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural Captivity is now in bookstores. Total Truth is an award-winning book on Christian worldview by Nancy Pearcey, WJI's Francis A. Schaeffer Scholar.

    The new study guide edition is a great resource for Sunday School classes and study groups. It goes far beyond the typical guide by offering 30 pages of significant new content--fresh stories, examples, and illustrations to bring the book's themes to life. Each chapter also suggests on-going activities to guide readers in detecting worldview themes in their work and daily experience.

    Nancy Pearcey has "road-tested" the material with students in WJI's journalism courses and their feedback has been highly enthusiastic. Many say it greatly enhanced their reading of the book.

    "Virtually every day I get emails from readers who want to know if there is a study guide available for Total Truth," Pearcey told WJI. "The book is being used by churches, schools, and study groups around the country--even by reading groups among Capitol Hill staffers."

    The study guide edition is an outstanding tool to help readers dig deeper into the text and learn how to be equipped with a Christian worldview. It is available from your local Christian bookstore or Borders, or online from Amazon, Christianbook.com, Barnes & Noble, and other bookstores. Total Truth won the Award of Merit in the Christianity & Culture category in the Christianity Today Book Awards for 2005, and the ECPA Gold Medallion Award for best book of the year in the Christianity & Society category.


    Friday, September 23, 2005

    Piper back in 1984 said some remarkable things about the Holy Spirit. which I think are of great interest and are surprisingly consistent with the veiws on the Holy Spirit I have quoted and outlined previously. Saying things like this Piper could almost be confused for a member of the charismatic church I attend

    Now the positive thing I want to say about the moderate Pentecostal teaching (represented by the Bennets) is that it is right to stress the experiential reality of receiving the Spirit. When you read the New Testament honestly you can't help but get the impression of a big difference from a lot of contemporary Christian experience. For them the Holy Spirit was a fact of experience. For many Christians today it is a fact of doctrine. Surely the Charismatic renewal has something to teach us here. In sacramental churches the gift of the Holy Spirit is virtually equated with the event of water baptism. In Protestant evangelicalism it is equated with a subconscious work of God in regeneration which you only know you have because the Bible says you do if you believe. It is easy to imagine a spiritual counselor saying to a new convert today, "Don't expect to notice any difference: just believe you have received the Spirit." But that is far from what we see in the New Testament. The Pentecostals are right to stress the experience of being baptized in the Spirit.

    Here are four reasons from Acts. 1) The very term "baptized in the Holy Spirit" (1:5; 11:16) implies an immersion in the life of the Spirit. "John immersed in water; you will be immersed in the Spirit." If the Spirit overwhelms you like a baptism you can't imagine him merely sneaking in quietly while you are asleep and taking up inconspicuous residence. That may be the way it starts (Paul may have this early movement in mind in 1 Cor. 12:13), but if it ends there Jesus and Luke would not call it a baptism in the Spirit.

    2) Jesus says in Acts 1:5 and 8 that baptism in the Spirit means, "You shall receive power … and you shall be my witnesses." This is an experience of boldness and confidence and victory over sin. A Christian without power is a Christian who needs a baptism in the Holy Spirit. I am aware that in 1 Cor. 12:13 Paul says that baptism in the Spirit is an act of God by which we become a part of the body of Christ at conversion, so that in his terminology all genuine converts have been baptized in the Spirit. But we have done wrong in limiting Paul's understanding of the baptism in the Holy Spirit to this initial subconscious, divine act in conversion and then forcing all of Luke's theology in Acts into that little mold. There is no reason to think that even for Paul the baptism in the Holy Spirit was limited to the initial moment of conversion. And for sure in the book of Acts the baptism in the Holy Spirit is more than a subconscious divine act of regeneration—it is a conscious experience of power (Acts 1:8).

    3) In fact the third reason I think this is that when you take your concordance and look up every text in Acts where the Holy Spirit works in believers it is never subconscious. In Acts the Holy Spirit is not a silent influence but an experienced power. Believers experienced the baptism in the Holy Spirit. They didn't just believe it happened because an apostle said so.

    4) The fourth reason we should stress the experience of baptism in the Holy Spirit is that in Acts the apostles teach that it is a consequence of faith not a subconscious cause of faith. As a convinced Calvinist I believe with all my heart that the grace of God precedes and enables saving faith. We do not initiate our salvation by believing. God initiates it by enabling us to believe (Eph. 2:8-9; 2 Tim. 2:25; John 1:13). But this regenerating work of God's Spirit is not the limit of what Peter means by baptism in the Spirit. In Acts 11:15-17 Peter reports how the Holy Spirit fell on Cornelius just as on the disciples at Pentecost. "As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell on them just as on us at the beginning. I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said, 'John baptized in water, but you shall be baptized in the Holy Spirit.' If then God gave the same gift to them as he gave to us, when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I should withstand God?" Notice that the gift of the Spirit, or baptism in the Spirit, is preceded by faith. The NASB correctly says in v. 17 that God gave the Holy Spirit after they believed. So the baptism of the Spirit (v. 16) or the receiving of the gift of the Spirit (v. 17) cannot be the same as the work of God before faith which enables faith (which Luke speaks of in 2:39; 5:31; 16:14; 11:18; 15:10; 14:27). The baptism in the Spirit is an experience of the Spirit given after faith to faith.

    This is why Paul can say in Acts 19:2 when he meets the confused disciples of John the Baptist, "Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?" What would a contemporary Protestant evangelical say in response to that question? I think we would say something like, "I thought we automatically received the Holy Spirit when we believed. I don't understand how you can even ask the question." How could Paul ask that question? He could ask it, I think, because receiving the Holy Spirit is a real experience. There are marks of it in your life. And the best way to test the faith of these so-called disciples is to ask them about their experience of the Spirit. This is no different than what Paul said in Romans 8:14, "All who are led by the Spirit are the sons of God" (see 2 Cor. 13:5 and 1 John 3:24; 4:12-13). I sometimes fear that we have so redefined conversion in terms of human decisions and have so removed any necessity of the experience of God's Spirit, that many people think they are saved when in fact they only have Christian ideas in their head not spiritual power in their heart.

    So you see, the real issue the Charismatics raise for us is not the issue of tongues. In itself that is relatively unimportant. The really valuable contribution of the Charismatic renewal is their relentless emphasis on the truth that receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit is a real, life-changing experience. Christianity is not merely an array of glorious ideas. It is not merely the performance of rituals and sacraments. It is the life-changing experience of the Holy Spirit through faith in Jesus Christ the Lord of the universe.

    We could talk for hours about what that experience is. In fact, most of my messages are just that—descriptions of the experience of the Spirit of God in the life of the believer. But I'll mention two things from the book of Acts—things that mark the experience of being baptized in the Holy Spirit or of receiving the gift of the Spirit. One is a heart of praise. In Acts 10:46 the disciples knew the Holy Spirit had fallen because "they heard them speaking in tongues and extolling (or magnifying) God." Speaking in tongues is one particular way of releasing the heart of praise. It may be present or may not. But one thing is sure: the heart in which the Holy Spirit has been poured out will stop magnifying self and start magnifying God. Heartfelt praise and worship is the mark of a real experience of the Holy Spirit.

    The other mark I'll mention is obedience. In Acts 5:29 Peter and the apostles say to the Sadducees who had arrested them, "We must obey God rather than men." Then in verse 32 he says, "We are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit whom God gave to those who are obeying him." ("Gave" is past tense; "obey" is present ongoing tense.) It is inevitable that when the object of your heart's worship changes your obedience changes. When Jesus baptizes you in the Holy Spirit, and infuses you with a new sense of the glory of God, you have a new desire and a new power (1:8) to obey. Whether or not you speak in tongues these two things will be your experience if you have been baptized in the Holy Spirit—a new desire to magnify God in worship and a powerful disposition to obey God in everyday life.

    Thursday, September 22, 2005

    D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones on Preaching the Gospel: ". . . If it is true that where sin abounded grace has much more abounded, well then, ‘shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound yet further?’

    First of all, let me make a comment, to me a very important and vital comment. The true preaching of the gospel of salvation by grace alone always leads to the possibility of this charge being brought against it. There is no better test as to whether a man is really preaching the New Testament gospel of salvation than this, that some people might misunderstand it and misinterpret it to mean that it really amounts to this, that because you are saved by grace alone it does not matter at all what you do; you can go on sinning as much as you like because it will redound all the more to the glory of grace. If my preaching and presentation of the gospel of salvation does not expose it to that misunderstanding, then it is not the gospel. Let me show you what I mean.

    If a man preaches justification by works, no one would ever raise this question. If a man’s preaching is, ‘If you want to be Christians, and if you want to go to heaven, you must stop committing sins, you must take up good works, and if you do so regularly and constantly, and do not fail to keep on at it, you will make yourselves. So that misunderstanding could never arise . . . . . .

    Nobody has ever brought this charge against the Church of Rome, but it was brought frequently against Martin Luther; indeed that was precisely what the Church of Rome said about the preaching of Martin Luther. They said, ‘This man who was a priest has changed the doctrine in order to justify his own marriage and his own lust’, and so on. ‘This man’, they said, ‘is an antinomian; and that is heresy.’ That is the very charge they brought against him. It was also brought George Whitfield two hundred years ago. It is the charge that formal dead Christianity – if there is such a thing – has always brought against this startling, staggering message, that God ‘justifies the ungodly’ . . .

    That is my comment and it is a very important comment for preachers. I would say to all preachers: If your preaching of salvation has not been misunderstood in that way, then you had better examine your sermons again, and you had better make sure that you are really preaching the salvation that is offered in the New Testament to the ungodly, the sinner, to those who are dead in trespasses and sins, to those who are enemies of God. There is this kind of dangerous element about the true presentation of the doctrine of salvation.

    HT: David Wayne This is from Lloyd-Jones commentary on Romans 6, pp 8-9, and was quoted by Chuck Swindoll in his book The Grace Awakening, pp. 39-40.

    THE Church of Nigeria seems to have excommunicated the Archbishop of Canterbury. In what would seem to be the first move in the gradual unravelling of the Anglican movement, the "Church of Nigeria" has been born and will have branches around the world.

    "CHURCH OF NIGERIA REDEFINES ANGLICAN COMMUNION

    With a careful rewording of her constitution, the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion) redefined her relationship with all other Anglican Churches.

    All former references to ‘communion with the see of Canterbury’ were deleted and replaced with another provision of communion with all Anglican Churches, Dioceses and Provinces that hold and maintain the ‘Historic Faith, Doctrine, Sacrament and Discipline of the one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church’.

    Emphasis was also placed on the 1662 version of the Book of Common Prayer and the historic Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion.

    The Constitutional change also allowed the Church to create Convocations and Chaplaincies of like-minded faithful outside Nigeria. This effectively gives legal teeth to the Convocation of Anglican Nigerians in Americas (CANA) formed to give a worshiping refuge to thousands in the USA who no longer feel welcomed to worship in the Liberal churches especially with the recent theological innovations encouraging practices which the Nigerians recognize as sin."

    Wednesday, September 21, 2005

    The following post has been crossposted at theologica and submitted to the "God or Not" carnival which is a unique opportunity for dialogue between atheist and christian blogs. Do consider submitting your own posts on sin to their first "carnival".

    Sin is not a popular word these days. We might talk about mistakes, even failures but sin seems like such a strong word. Are we really “evil” ? Our culture today likes to believe that people are essentially good. The Christian doesn't share that optimism.

    When you really get to know what is inside people's hearts you realise that “sin” is possibly the best word for it.

    Historically “sin” has been seen as both acts of commission and acts of omission. Thus, the total failure to evacuate elderly and poor residents of New Orleans prior to the hurricane and in the immediate aftermath can be seen as a result of sin. Somewhere, somehow the system didnt value the lives of the vulnerable highly enough to provide them with free transport. Such an omission would classically have been defined as a sin.

    It is easier for many to identify the violence and looting seen in New Orleans as sin. What is less clear to us is that such extreme behaviour is merely at one end of the spectrum of normal human behaviour. We may have society that restrains our natural impulses but to the bible certain thoughts and impulses are defined as sin.

    Sin destroys relationships by the recriminations it prompts. Sin destroys people by the guilt they feel. Sin kills, steals, hurts, and divides. To Christian theology sin is something to be battled against in our own personal minds, and indeed this war never stops. John Owen said "Be killing sin, or it will be killing you."

    The concept of the seven deadly sins in less spoken about these days but in December 2003 the times did a series of articles on them. These sins are as real today as they have ever been.

    Christianity is at its heart a message about sin and how to deal with it. We are like the doctor telling their patient they have cancer in order to cure them. It may be uncomfortable to realise that we have fallen short and are all sinners. But before we can understand the good news that Christ died for our sins, we have to understand that we have sins in the first place.

    Sloth

    Many a life is ruined by sloth. These days there are many who live their lives from one holiday to the next. There is no doubt, however that people are not meant to be gainfully employed. Rseearch published in the BMJ in 1992 showed "Without work all life goes rotten....unemployment is associated with early death, divorce, family violence, accidents, suicide, higher mortality rates in spouse and children, anxiety and depression, disturbed sleep patterns and low self-esteem’

    The continual desire for laziness and the wish that we didnt have to work is foolishness. Work, as hard as it is, generally does us good. God has a purpose for our lives, if we are lazy and slothful we will fail to achieve it. The Times said:

    To the medieval theologians, however, sloth was more than simply lazing around. It was the self-indulgent desire for ease, ignoring God’s known will. Thomas Aquinas defined sloth as “sluggishness of the mind which neglects to being good”, and said it drew man away from good deeds. A slothful person, the moralists concluded, was not only morally deficient, but knowingly perpetrated evil by failing to make the effort to do good.”

    Pride

    Pride is the opposite of meekness. When I preached on meekness a couple of years ago I said the following-

    Once you know just how hopeless you are on your own, how can you stand up for yourself anymore. How can it bother you that God or man has seemingly unfairly treated you? Does it matter that people have said horrible things about you for you know that there are many more horrible things that could be said. How can you hold yourself as an example of virtue when you truly know the natural evil of your heart and that in the right circumstances you would have been as big a sinner as anyone alive!

    A dead man cannot complain at being mistreated, for he is dead. 'He who is already down cannot fall'. Bunyan To the truly meek the cry 'its not fair' should probably not issue their lips.

    As the Times puts it:

    Pride makes the confident reckless, the charismatic manipulative and the compassionate careless. It is one big puffed-up chest. The perfect target to be shot down......Pride is the most antisocial sin, and the seed of all others. It is the mistake of forgetting your flaws while remembering everyone else’s”


    Envy and greed

    One could argue that the whole market economy rests on generating and pretending to satisfy greed and envy. Of course the trouble is our appetite for more never goes away. As the Times put it:

    Charity rejoices in our neighbour’s good, while envy grieves over it,” said the medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas......

    Envy is green-eyed, the sin of focusing on others to the detriment of oneself. It is impossible to cure with material things, without self-belief.”

    Gluttony

    It is not possible to improve on what the Times says about gluttony in my view:

    It is a curious fact that no man likes to call himself a glutton, and yet each of us has in him a trace of gluttony, potential or actual. I cannot believe that there exists a single coherent human being who will not confess, at least to himself, that once or twice he has stuffed himself to the bursting point...... unlike pride, envy, wrath — sins we can wholeheartedly condemn, sins that are hard to love — there’s something about the serious glutton (or some serious gluttons) that inspires a respect for the life force — the appetite — asserting itself in all that prodigious feasting. It’s not unlike our secret feelings about Don Juans and Casanovas; even as we understand the compulsive quality of their behaviour and the destructive effects it has on their hapless lovers, we can’t help feeling a grudging regard for so much sheer sexual energy.”


    Lust

    Lust is the big liar of our day. By destroying the opportunity for long-term loving relationships lust can produce lonely old people. It promises much but delivers nothing except a continual desire for more. The Times said:

    Such is the peculiar status of lust in our society that one could be forgiven for thinking that it had been transformed into a cardinal virtue rather than a deadly sin. Contemporary culture is saturated with lust in the most banal of ways. So pervasive is this most shapely of sins that it is difficult to think of a sphere in which lasciviousness does not make its presence felt. Sex sells and everybody, it seems, is selling sex......

    Yet lust does not merely describe a state of erotic rapture, but a desire so compulsive that one or both participants objectifies the other, using their body as a means to a bathetic end. Sex in this context is a curiously isolating experience, rendering lovers stripped of their humanity, reduced to a beguiling assembly of limbs.......

    With the possible exception of gluttony, lust is accepted as the friendly face of the deadly sin line-up — a soft sin, its perpetrators roguish at worst. Even Gregory the Great considered it least problematic. Yet lust is not a victimless sin.

    It is a painful paradox that a vice that children are uniquely free of should so often make children its victims, as families topple where marriages fall apart. The causes of such personal tragedies are impossible to explain to the young because there is no rational cause.”


    Wrath

    It is possible to be angry and not sin, but hard. Our own sense of our violated “rights” drives much anger. How often do we meditate on the wrongs we have done to others rather than the wrongs they have done to us? How much does anger contribute to sadness in the world? Recriminations, and a tit-for-tat mentality lead to conflict in the home and on the world stage. Sooner or later someone needs to stop the cycle and forgive.

    The sad truth is that sin produces wrath partly because it should do. We are right to be angry at the damage sin has done. So is God. It is just for sin to be punished. So, a consideration of sin should leave us slightly despairing of ourselves. It should leave us aware that we deserve nothing but punishment from the hands of God.

    The Christian message starts with bad news. This bad news should cause us to cry out to God for a solution. The good news is that in Jesus death, the one who had never sinned took the punishment for out sin.

    The good news is as follows:

    Gal 1:3-4 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave himself for our sins to deliver us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father


    Tuesday, September 20, 2005

    It is amazing the untapped power of blogs. If I was a marketer right now or a website designer I would be working out how I could best leverage blogs to help me in my quest to shape the way consumers feel about my product. I wonder if at some point in the future, significant amounts of money might begin to change hands, and the nature of blogging may change, at least for the most prominent of blogs.

    It is almost inevitable that blogs will become a real force in the advertising world. My blog has had 38,500 unique visitors this quarter, and many blogs have had many more than that. Certainly the readership of some specialist blogs looks set to overtake that of specialist magazines in that field- this may even be the case already for some. Advertisers will at some point want to fall over themselves to get access to their dream- demographically targeted advertising. With the right approach, advertisers should be able to target the appropriate segments simply by placing adverts on certain sorts of blogs.

    It seems inevitable that with the potential a blogstorm has to shape marketplaces, companies are going to start to spend a lot of money on getting their message across on blogs in one way or another.

    How much will the bloggers be directed by those with the most money to induce them? For me, my recent brief foray into google adverts put me off anything that doesn't give me total control of what appears on my blog. I am however sure that if I was approached to run a specific advert that I thought my readers would be interested in and the price was right I would be tempted.

    I suspect, however, that traditional online advertising may be just the beginning. It seems to me that the following are all potential growth areas for bloggers, if they aren't happening on a widespread basis already.

    1. Text adverts
    An organization may decide to sponsor a blogger to place a text link to a specific site either in a post or in a list of links. This can of course be simply to gather traffic, or if done wisely may help to boost the site you have linked to in its google rankings for certain keywords.
    2. Sponsored reviews
    Blog critics are definitely the rage at the moment, and I for one have already got to the point where I cannot review as many books as I am asked to. I am delighted to get the majority of my reading habit supported out of free review books.

    By all accounts, blog reviewers are a scarce resource, however. Will competition in the market for blog reviews by prominent bloggers lead to publishing houses paying certain bloggers money to review their books?

    3. Sponsored PR work
    Blogs are the new magazines. I predict that in some fields their popularity and readership may lead to organizations being keen that press releases are covered. A single blog entry can often lead to many more, especially if the item is newsworthy. A blog storm can definitely influence google results so that people get to hear about your new product or whatever.

    I wonder if companies may in the future be willing to pay bloggers so that they would write a post about their press release, quoting it and linking to it . Provided editorial freedom remained with the blogger, I suspect many would be only too happy with such an arrangement.

    4. Bloggers as consultants
    Prominent bloggers are riding the crest of a wave. Many of them know exactly how to drive links, traffic and search engine rankings their way. Bloggers understand the new media and the benefits and pitfalls it presents to organizations. Hiring a blogger as a consultant to assist in a publicity campaign or even start a company blog may become quite popular.

    Many bloggers and website designers wonder when companies and other organizations will get serious about things like google-optimization of their websites. There are so many simple tweaks that are familiar to some of the well-known bloggers that can sometimes dramatically increase the traffic achieved from search engines. There are plenty of companies out there who will take your money, but who better to advise you than a blogger who's own site demonstrates that they know how to succeed in the "google wars"?

    5. Bloggers as market-shapers
    Some bloggers may even find themselves courted as almost a virtual salesforce. Sponsored by one or more companies certain blogs may be used to spread the company view of a product or service. If a blogger is genuinely enthusiastic about a particular product or service already, being sponsored to say what they believe with a view to persuading others in the blogosphere may seem attractive.

    Of course the good news for companies is, that if their product is any good they are likely to have a small army of word-of-blog evangelists for it who will not need to be paid. Bloggers may well advise compaines on how to shape this volunteer army, however.

    Some of these ideas may seem somehow inherently "unfair" or ethically inappropriate. I am sure some bloggers will ruin perfectly good reputations by making foolish business choices. I am also sure that some bloggers will be able to navigate the stormy seas of sponsorship in a way that is beneficial to all, including their readers.

    I doubt that many successful bloggers will ever allow their opinions to be on sale to the highest bidder. Somehow I suspect that other bloggers would quickly smell a rat in any case, and that traffic will flow to genuinely independent thinkers- even if they do happen to receive some form of sponsorship from time to time.

    Monday, September 19, 2005

    "Most of all Jesus loves you" by Noel Piper is simple and to an adults eye I initially thought it would not interest many of my kids. With four kids ranging from 4-8 we have a fairly good laboratory to test books out.

    When I first read this book to our two year old Joel and our four year old, Charis it was a real hit. Charis asked all kinds of questions about God, and we had one of the best chats yet.

    After having it read to him, our six year old Henry asked to take this book to bed with him. For several nights he read the book to himself after we had said goodnight. He said that he sometimes thought about bad or scary things and that this book helped him to feel better. Reading Jesus loves him helped him to conquer some of these fears which he hadnt even told us about.

    Even our eight year old likes to read this book to her younger brothers and sister. It is colourful, engaging, simple but taught an important truth to my kids. I cant recommend it highly enough, especially for the 6s and under age group.

    This book review was organised by diet of book worms where you can read what other bloggers thought.

    Sunday, September 18, 2005

    The Audio of the sermon I preached this morning is online. My notes follow:

    Good news when doubts attack (Galatians 1:1-12)


    Intro

    Doubts are a feature of life. Does he really love me? Will I ever meet someone? Is this the right job for me?


    There is not one aspect of the Christians message that isn’t under attack from outside and within the church


    Was Jesus who he said he was? Was he born of a virgin? Who made the world? How can a loving God allow suffering? Why has this happened in my life?


    The world is full of bad news, and if we are honest we do wonder sometimes when the next bit of bad news that will affect us will come. We know it will come.


    The world is crying out for good news, even though when it happens the papers rarely report it. Possibly because the good news sometimes seems so pale in comparison to the bad. News of a royal wedding excites, but not as much as the juicy details of gossip surrounding its almost inevitable demise.


    Is there any good news that can change lives?


    The answer is YES, its here in this book. Good news for the poor, good news for the sick, good news for the ones struggling with feelings of guilt. Good news for the lonely. Good news for those full of doubts and anxiety. Good news for the outwardly successful but inwardly living lives of quiet desperation.


    It is the Good News that will change the world by changing one person at a time (CF Acts series)


    What do we do when doubts attack?


    Go back to the only truly good news in the world and get more certain about it


    SLIDE


    I am going to be preaching a series on good news

    1. Good news when doubts attack

    2. Good news when you feel rejected

    3. Good news: the end of rules

    4. Good news for the powerless

    5. Good news when you feel like giving up


    The bible has another word for good news- The Gospel. When the bible speaks of the gospel it uses a word- evangel that actually means good news. When it uses the word evangelism it simply means the process of sharing the evangel, the good news. When it uses the word “evangelist” it simply means one who is particularly good at sharing that good news!


    Why is it that the world doesn’t immediately think of Christians as those with good news to share?


    If the good news has gripped our lives, we will not be able to anything but share it.


    Can you imagine “I just got married, but Im not going to tell anyone”, “I just had a baby, but lets keep it private and personal” “I won the lottery but its not going to change my life”, “I have had the all clear from my cancer- the operation was a success but health is a private personal matter, I don’t want to get in other peoples face about it”


    “My football team won, but I am not going to gloat to others”


    “The war is over but I don’t want to go to the victory party”


    We have a simple message of good news that should thrill us and excite us- how can we not share it?


    Can the message that changes the world really be that simple? Theologians make their living by assuming it isn’t!


    We will be going back to the simple gospel here both for the sake of our visitors- please do invite people who are not yet Christians- but also for ourselves. For, as Luther says of the gospel it must “[sound] in our ears incessantly because the frailty of our flesh will not permit us to take hold of it perfectly and believe it with all our heart” (Gals commentary)


    MY GOALS FOR THIS SERIES

    1. SALVATION

    2. GOSPEL TO TRANSFORM OUR LIVES ALSO

    3. CLEAR UNDERSTANDING SO WE ALL FEEL CONFIDENT SHARING THE GOOD NEWS


    The world says “it doesn’t really matter what you think”

    The lesson of 911 and 7/7 is “Ideas matter after all.”

    It sounds like the middle ages all over again.


    People die in the 21st Century in England because of a war of ideas between legalistic radical Islam and secular western life which itself arose from the philosophy of a Christian worldview it now desperately tries to forget.


    What does the bible have to say in the middle of the war over ideas that rages in our own heads, and the one that engulfed our tubes and buses?


    We are going to address one short book which has done more than almost any other to shape the church. This book was the spark which led to the reformation which engulfed the church. Luther claimed he was practically married to this book.