Poynter Online Poynter Online
New UserLogin
Poynter Online Main Page
Design / Graphics
Diversity
Ethics
Leadership
Online
Photojournalism
Writing / Editing
TV / Radio
About Poynter
Seminars
Faculty
Columns
Resource Center
The Poynter Store

Help Poynter


Create Your Personal Page
Add Your Bio
Add Your Photo
Share Your Favorite Links

Signup for Poynter Newsletters
Get Poynter Delivered to Your PDA

ASNE Online Ethics Tool



Posted, Sep. 22, 2004
Updated, Sep. 22, 2004


QuickLink: A71147

Writing Tool #24: Name the Big Parts
Seeing the structure of a story is easier if you can identify the main parts.

By Roy Peter Clark (more by author)
Senior Scholar, Poynter Institute

E-mail this item
Print this Page
Add/View Comments on this Article (3)

More in this series

Name the Big Parts

All good stories have parts: Beginnings, middles, and endings. Even writers who achieve a seamless tapestry can trace the invisible stitching. A writer who knows the big parts of a story can name them for the reader, using such techniques as sub-headlines. The reader who sees the big parts is more likely to remember the whole story.

The best way to illustrate this effect is to reveal the big parts of a short, and seemingly simple, children's song, "Three Blind Mice."

Part I is a simple musical phrase repeated once:

Three blind mice, three blind mice

Part II builds on that phrase but adds something:

See how they run, see how they run

Part III adds three more complex phrases:

They all ran after the farmer's wife,
who cut off their tails with a carving knife,
did you ever seen such a sight in your life

Part IV repeats the first phrase, Three blind mice, closing the song into a tight circle.

We remember songs, contrasted to stories, because of their transparent structure: verse, chorus, verse, chorus, bridge, instrumental, verse, chorus, coda. The delightful sounds of songs often distract us from the mechanics of structure, but the architecture of music becomes perceptible with more careful listening.

Which brings me to the dreaded O-word. 

Many writers of the Old School were required to hand in outlines of our work with drafts of our stories. Such outlines looked something like this:

I.
   A.
   B.
        1.
        2.
        3.
             a.
             b.
   C.

II.

And so on.

Here was my problem: I could never see far enough ahead to plot what the third part of section C was going to be. I had to write my way to that point in the story. In other words, I had to discover what I was going to say. 

So, as a survival mechanism, I invented the "reverse outline." I would write a full draft of the story, and then I would create the outline. This turned out to be a useful tool. If I could not write the outline from the story, it meant that I could not discern the parts from the whole, a symptom of disorganization.

RELATED RESOURCES

Wanna learn more? Check out our reporting, writing, and editing seminars.

Click here to receive Writer's Toolbox each week by e-mail.


Although I still can't write a formal outline in advance of a story, I can write a plan, usually a few phrases scribbled on a yellow pad. And here's another tool I discovered: An informal plan is nothing more than the Roman Numerals created by a formal outline. In other words, I can see the big parts of the story.

Here's a plan for an obituary of entertainer Ray Bolger, the beloved Scarecrow of "The Wizard of Oz":

I. Lead with image and dialogue from Oz.
II. Great moments in his dance career other than Oz.
III. His signature song: "Once In Love with Amy."
IV. His youth: how he became a dancer.
V. His television career.
VI. A final image from Oz.

I constructed this reverse outline from a close reading of Tom Shales's award-winning obituary of Bolger in The Washington Post.

When a story grows to any significant length, the writer should label the parts. If the story evolves into a book, the chapters will have titles. In a newspaper or magazine, the parts may carry subtitles or sub-headlines. Writers should write these sub-headlines themselves -- even if the newspaper or website does not use them.

Here's why: The sub-headlines will make visible to the busy copy editor and time-starved reader the big parts of the story. The act of writing them will test the writer's ability to identify and label those parts. And, when well-written, these sub-heads will reveal at a glance the global structure of the piece, indexing the parts, and creating additional points of entry into the story.

In 1994, the great American editor Gene Patterson wrote an essay for the St. Petersburg Times titled, "Forged in Battle: The Formative Experience of War." The occasion was the 50th anniversary of the Invasion of Normandy. Patterson fought in World War II as a young tank commander in Patton's Army.

Patterson's mini-epic begins in medias res, in the middle of things:

I did not want to kill the two German officers when we met by mistake in the middle of the main street of Gera Bronn.

They somersaulted from their motorcycle when it rounded a corner directly ahead of my column of light armor. They scrambled to their feet, facing me 20 yards in front of the cannon and machine gun muzzles of my lead armored car, and stood momentarily still as deer. The front wheel of their flattened motorcycle spun on in the silence.

This passage introduces a meaty memoir of war. Five strong sub-headlines index the body of the work:

  • A Man of the 20th Century
  • Lead with the Heaviest Punch
  • From the Georgia Soil
  • Senseless Dying
  • Two Certainties about War

Notice how the reader can almost predict the structure and content of Patterson's essay from these subtitles alone. They divide the story into its big parts, name the parts, and make visible a movement of theme, logic, and chronology that readers can perceive and remember.

Bug - Writer's Toolbox
Workbench:

1. Shakespeare's plays are divided into five acts. The acts are then divided into scenes. Read a comedy and a tragedy, such as "As You Like It" and "Macbeth," paying special attention to the structure of the play and what Shakespeare tries to accomplish in each of the big parts.

2. Find the longest story you have written in the last year. Using a pencil, mark up the story according to its parts. Now label those parts using headlines and sub-headlines.

3. Over the next month, pay more attention to the structure of stories you read. Notice the point in your reading where you begin to perceive the global structure of the piece. Notice any differences between stories that have sub-headlines and those that don't.

4. Listening carefully to music helps writers learn the structures of composition. As you listen, see if you can recognize the big parts of songs.

5. For your next story, try working from a plan, an informal outline that attempts to plot the three to six big parts of the work. Revise the plan if necessary.


More in this series:

E-mail this item
Print this Page
Add/View Comments on this Article (3)

Back to Top

  • Half-Way There
  • Is this going to be a book?
  • Forged in Battle?

  • --VIEW ALL--





    Search Poynter Online
    Search Poynter Online
    Search 221 Journalism Sites
    Search 221 Journalism Sites
    Search Poynter Online

    Resolving to Be More
    Resolving to Be More
    New On Poynter
    Week 1 of New Medicare
    Al's Friday Meeting

    Pg.1: Ariel Sharon
    Haaretz (Israel)

    The Time Lapse & More
    Mining Coverage

    Headlines on Deadline
    Q&A with Andy Barnes

    Best Tips, Part II
    By Jonathan Dube

    Design Desk Highlights
    By Anne Van Wagener

    Caught in a Riot
    by Mary Sanchez

    Custom-Tailored Time
    By Jill Geisler

    Related Faculty
    Related Seminars
    Sports Journalism Summit: Writing
    Apr. 12-14, 2006
    App. deadline: Feb. 13, 2006

    Newspaper Reporting, Writing & Editing
    Aug. 20-25, 2006
    App. deadline: Jun. 19, 2006

    Narrative Writing on Deadline
    Oct. 8-13, 2006
    App. deadline: Aug. 7, 2006

    Beat Reporting: Covering Children
    Nov. 5-10, 2006
    App. deadline: Sep. 5, 2006

    The Complete Assigning Editor
    Nov. 12-17, 2006
    App. deadline: Sep. 11, 2006

      Site Map | Search Poynter | Contact Poynter | FAQ | Our Guidelines QuickLink  
      Copyright © 1995-2006 The Poynter Institute
      801 Third Street South | St. Petersburg, FL 33701 | Phone (888) 769-6837
      Site developed & hosted by DataGlyphics, Inc.