This forum sponsored by:
America's Rolling

Railroad.net Logo   Forums Photos Events Railroad.net Merchandise Contact Us
The Railroad Network
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

NYSW passenger service restoration
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RAILROAD.NET Forum Index -> NJT Rail
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Otto Vondrak
Site Admin


Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 3384
Location: White Plains, NY

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:23 pm    Post subject: NYSW passenger service restoration Reply with quote

What happened to the proposed restoration of NYSW commuter service?

-=otto=-
_________________
~Otto M. Vondrak~
~RAILROAD.NET Creative Director
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
JoeG
Guru


Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 1197
Location: Suffern, NY

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems to be in limbo. Apparently NJT and NYSW couldn't agree on terms. There are also NIMBY problems in Sussex County, and the route doesn't seem to have much of a constituency pushing for it. For my part, the proposed schedule posted for it, which was posted on a website a couple of years ago, seems much too slow to attract many riders. It would be nice to have the nysw passenger serviced restored, but it has to produce a reasonably fast commute to be worth it--not that NJT has any interest in speed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Irish Chieftain
Guru


Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Posts: 2284

PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chief factors are lack of money plus the debacle about NJT requiring yard space in Sparta (supposedly resolved in part by NJT finding such space available in Hardystown Twp).

The NYSW service was supposed to be divided into two halves, the eastern "Bergen Cross-County" half (with Paterson as western terminus), which involved proposals ranging from HBLRT extension to FRA DMU operation but not into Hoboken (instead connecting with HBLRT at Vince Lombardi P/R), and the western Passaic/Sussex County half, where commuter trains would switch off the Main Line in Hawthorne and continue westbound to Sparta via Wyckoff, Oakland, Pompton Lakes, Butler, Newfoundland, etc. The reason for the non-unified service was to afford people from between Sparta and Wyckoff access to Secaucus Junction.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
trainfreak
Contributor


Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Posts: 434
Location: Wantage, New Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just thought about this...the NYSW is getting welded rail on a couple portions of their line. So this might boost up speeds and this could help make the travel time shorter so maybe the start of NJT service on the NYSW could come soon like soon as in a few years not decades.
_________________
Jeff

"nothing beats flying across the country on a train"
-Homer Simpson
"its nice and quiet over the suburbs of north jersey"

View my photos here:
http://trainfreak.rrpicturearchives.net/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
hsr_fan
Guru


Joined: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 1359
Location: Hawley, PA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rt. 15 passes over an active rail line where the grade crossing was just replaced with an overpass. Is this the line that would have been used by NJT?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BlockLine_4111
Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 1050
Location: BN[SF] ex-C&S Front Range Subdivision MP21

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The project is fixated on service to Sparta or no service at all.

I say either go only as far as Butler or to NY State (warwick, middletown, or port jervis).

The Sparta or no service at all mentality is killing this project.

A yard already exists in Port Jervis plus there is plenty of space on the Graham Line since NS isn't running big, frequent freights.

It would be nice to have a station stop w/service to Vernon too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
n01jd1
Contributor


Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Posts: 305
Location: North Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its going to take more than welded rail to make speeeds on the NYSW acceptable for commuter service. A signal system would have to be installed and alot more surfacing work would be needed. The welded rail is being put in to replace the last segments of 110 pound four bolt rail that has been in place since the 1950's or earlier which will help cut maintainance costs. The rail taken up can be used on sidings elsewhere.

trainfreak wrote:
I just thought about this...the NYSW is getting welded rail on a couple portions of their line. So this might boost up speeds and this could help make the travel time shorter so maybe the start of NJT service on the NYSW could come soon like soon as in a few years not decades.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
BlockLine_4111
Guru


Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 1050
Location: BN[SF] ex-C&S Front Range Subdivision MP21

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me clarify a little. Some of the rail including that in pompton lakes, parallel to Colfax Ave & West Oakland Avenue, is 100 lbs. and pre-dates WWII. Some of it, in shabby locations, will flex under the weight of a 160 lb. person. I am amazed how these six-axle locos pulling autoracks and doublestacks doesn't crash through someone backyard.

You don't need welded rail for commuter service. NJT ran for years at 50+ MPH on 105 lb. rail (on M&E;) and 112 lb. rail (Main-Bergen lines). Welded rail can be high maintenance if not well anchored, fastened and ballasted. The compressive and expansive forces are amplified with welded rail versus stick rail.

I'd like to see them run from Port Jervis express to Campbell Hall depo then with stops at Warwick and Vernon skipping Sparta and stopping next at the juncture of 515 & 23. Local stops to Hawthorne and then blazing down the Main Line at high speed to Secaucus Transfer.

I think if one takes the current MN/NJT timetable and Bob Shuerle's proposed timetable an extrapolation can be made of the running time from Port Jervis to Hoboken via this routing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
NJTRailfan
Contributor


Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 484
Location: Dover, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I say NJT should just give those closed minded backwooded anti rail hicks in Sparta the finger and go ahead with rail service by passing them and terminating the service in Vernon. This would be good for the people of Vernon Valley esp Mountain Creek if they hope to beat Dorney Park,Camelback and Great Adventure since Mountain Creek would be the only amusement park/resort with direct rail service to Hoboken and rail service to NYP via the ST. Of course Camel back would get theirs when the cutoff finally comes on line.

But if NJT as usual doesn't have the guts then save the headaches for those that uses Rt 23 twice a day and surrounding roadways and have the service go far west as Stockholm.

I'm hoping that if the service goes as far as Vernon congestion on Route 23,15 and 80 wll be taken off and NJ wil become a more cleaner and safer place since there isn't as much cars,SUVs and accidents on the roads because possibly tens of thousands of cars would be off the road.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arti



Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why wasn't the service to Sussex co. never planned via Mountain View?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MSC34



Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 8:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did NJT conduct an EIS concerning the institution of rail service? I suspect it would have done so already. Just curious as this would factor into timing (assuming an agreement could be reached with NYS&W; on the right to use this line).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tri-State Tom
Veteran


Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 701

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

IIRC, around the time that CSX and NS were dividing up Conrail, they each also bought a major interest as MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS in the Suzi-Q. I believe Walter Rich remains a 51% owner in the company but both CSX and Noefolk Southern have a MAJOR say in the future operations of the railroad AND it's ROW.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CarterB
Contributor


Joined: 12 Mar 2004
Posts: 276
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As discussed previously, the best short term solution would be a yard in/around Newfoundland/Stockholm, a large Park & Ride there, and service via the Hawthorne connection to the Erie Main on in.

Sparta is a no starter, Butler is not sufficient for yard/terminus operations and parking.

Leave Sparta out of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Arti



Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
As discussed previously, the best short term solution would be a yard in/around Newfoundland/Stockholm


Where would you put a yard over there? IMHO the area is wetlands or something like that, with no development allowed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjvrr
Contributor


Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 301
Location: Butler, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The location of the old Morris County Central engine facility in Newfoundland has more than enough room for a yard. The area was also the location of new Green Pond Junction. INterchange between the NYS&W; and Jersey Central. It is surrounded by Newark Watershed, but it is not wetlands.

As I have posted before service beyond Sparta (or its environs) is senseless. To run trains all the way to Port Jervis would also be silly since the travel time between Port Jervis and Hoboken via the NYS&W; would be almost 1 hour longer than the current service.

Any proposed rail service on the NYS&W; will not be the "magic pill" to clear traffic along 23, 80, 15, etc. Some on this board are of the opinion that the traffic will just disappear once rail service begins on this line or the Cutoff. Its will not. It will not even make a noticeable difference.

Does anyone have a potential numbers for ridership?

Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    RAILROAD.NET Forum Index -> NJT Rail All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group