Red State Red State
ABOUT - POSTING RULES - HELP/FAQ - CONTACT US
Recommend Diary

Who has recommended this diary?

Your Account

Recommended Diaries
Latest Comments
Member Diaries
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Subscribe in NewsGator Online


Blog Roll

The midgets' fury.

From the diaries...

From Spot-On.

What does it say about the "reality-based community" that a fundamental tenet of its world-view is profoundly unreal? The belief that the mainstream media is set against the American left has emerged since roughly 1998 as a cornerstone of the embattled paranoia that animates the masses from Beacon Hill to Berkeley who cannot grasp why they are out of power. This much ought to be obvious: in a democratic system, one is out of power because one is unpopular -- and one is out of power for a long time because one is profoundly unpopular. But like the preening egomaniac for whom admission of a fundamental flaw will collapse the entire psyche, the American left clutches at any proffered external cause for its misfortune: The war is manipulated for electoral purposes. The Supreme Court is nakedly partisan. The voting machines are rigged. The American media is against us.

It's a stupefying conceit for media professionals, who know their milieu -- and for conservatives, who spent the prior generation asserting that the media was against them. That conceit was certainly fueled by conservatives' own share of paranoia and persecution complexes, but it was still eminently more defensible than the left's descent into the same fear now. Conservatives then pointed to avowed leftists anchoring network newscasts, Communist-friendly reporting verging on genocide apologetics, and a journalism profession shot through, post-Watergate, with a generation of eager anti-establishmentarians. Leftists now point to....Ben Domenech.

Read on.

Print This Story
Mar 22nd, 2006: 09:45:23
Oh, how they have shrieked since Domenech took the helm at the Washington Post's newest blog. Back in the day, conservatives wanted a fair shake from the media: today, leftists reveal that they want their media back -- and back under their full control. The resultant outrage at the mere existence of a right-wing blog at the website of Dan Froomkin and Dana Milbank has made them, well, stupid. It's impossible to catalogue all the dumb things written in the past 24 hours as a result of the left's frenzy, but a representative sample is worthwhile:

First up is David Brock, who rather amazingly believes that the characterization of Froomkin as a "liberal" is "debatable." Then there's John Aravosis, who, after declaring Domenech's hire an "atrocity" and managing to forget Froomkin's existence, is reduced to utter wordlessness. (NB on the death of language: I've been to Rwanda, Yad Vashem, and Auschwitz; and those had something to do with atrocity.) Next up is the staff at Editor & Publisher, who nicely buttress the thesis of general media leftism by revealing an ignorance of any distinction between conservatives, Republicans, and supporters of the President. Garance Franke-Ruta of The American Prospect takes her own swing, denouncing Domenech's first post as "vitriolic, almost hysterically nasty," and then, immune to irony, goes on to opine about "responsible journalist[s]." Chris Bowers of MyDD, apparently unaware that his thesis is more or less one of crushing defeat for his side, announces the right-wing blogosphere's Gotterdammerung and claims real authenticity (whatever that means) for the left. Brad DeLong sneers at the pretense of young whippersnappers without credentials trying to play his game. On a Washington Post online chat, Tom Edsall is straightaway ambushed by irate lefties, the first of whom doesn't know what "defame" or "slur" mean. And "Skippy" seethes that the netroots are only mostly losers, not total losers. Take that, DomeNazi.

This list could easily be a lot longer.

So what, again, does this say about the "reality-based community"? What does their anger tell us? What does their enraged realization of not owning wholesale the Washington Post tell us? What does their sense of persecution tell us? What does the profound threat they feel from a mere blog by Ben Domenech tell us? It is, certainly, an anger at not having a thing they never had a right to expect. So are they really ethically opposed to a swift crossover from political operative status to journalism? Or are they, despite their self-appointment, despite their pretense, and despite their arrogation, fundamentally unreal?

< Only YOU can fix this, Governor Romney. (3 comments) | It's all Mom's fault (1 comments) >


Gotta admit, this could only be funnier By: Thomas
If one of those savants had written "...and I broke my goldenrod Crayola, I was so mad!"

If this is mastery, then I'm a donut. - Mike Krempasky


It's Nothing That New By: horaceox
Andrea Dworkin was writing about the conservative media in the early '80s.  And that was in many ways the theme of Faludi's "Backlash" in the early 90s.

I suppose if you get far enough to the left, the media fairly can be described as right-leaning.  Kinda the analogous to the way that former GA Rep Bob Barr's mom thought he was a socialist.



One other thought By: horaceox
This reinforces my oft-stated belief that the Right has no parallel to the Lefty blogosphere.  The Right-blogosphere has been composed mainly of libertarian-oriented professors (eg Volokh, Reynolds) or journalists who dabble in blogging (eg Malkin, Sullivan).

The Left, on the other hand, grew out of the "Battle-of-Seattle-Elect-Howard-Dean-ANSWER-ACORN" wing of the Democratic party -- the wing that only reluctantly is in the Democratic party.  Seriously, how else can you explain the belief that doing something that gains a wider audience for your blog is "selling out" or "inauthentic" or whatever.  Stick it to the man, Bowers!

This also accounts for their relative ignorance about anything that happened in politics pre-2001, eg the fact that Malkin and Sullivan have always been mainstream journalists, there was a time not so long ago that FoxNews didn't exist, etc.

Don't get me wrong, I think this lack of paralellism is a GOOD thing; I'm glad the conservative blogosphere isn't dominated by militias or whatever you want to define the Hard Right as.



It tells us By: johnCV
that the Left is truly, deeply afraid of a challenge to thier orthodoxy.
It tells us that they themselves will not respond to a logical fact-based challenge with logic or facts. Instead they must resort to a change of venue, and emotional bleatings of 'fairness'and 'bias'. This proves that they do not believe in, at the core, thier own doctrine. They are incapable of defending it.
It tells us that an emotional victory is as, if not more important than an actual victory.
It tells us that the Leftists are retreating into a fantasy world where they alone control 'reality'. A place where the 'good guys' always win against evil Haliburton created demons and the Rovian mind probe. They are abdicating this dimension for one of thier own making.
It tells us that they believe paper mache puppets and cardboard tanks are the true weapons of war. And naked lesbians in San Fran are the true warrior class.

But mostly, it tells us we are winning.



I had this precise thought By: NotSoBlueStater
Next up is the staff at Editor & Publisher, who nicely buttress the thesis of general media leftism by revealing an ignorance of any distinction between conservatives, Republicans, and supporters of the President.

One of the the many mistakes the left is making is its assumption that beating down Bush is the equivalent of defeating conservative ideas.

"Hindsight alone is not wisdom, And second-guessing is not a strategy." - GWB



Amazing By: jsteele
Then there's John Aravosis, who, after declaring Domenech's hire an "atrocity" and managing to forget Froomkin's existence, is reduced to utter wordlessness. (NB on the death of language: I've been to Rwanda, Yad Vashem, and Auschwitz; and those had something to do with atrocity.)
I am constantly amazed at liberals, and especially those whose profession is writing.

Of all of the people in the world that one would think have an appreciation of the meaning, value and import of words, one would think it woould be a professional writer. Yet they blithly toss out "atrocity", "war crime/war criminal", "torture", etc., with seeming little regard for not only the truth but for the sheer value of those words.

Historically those words and phrases carry enormous weight. Time has caused those words to conjure up images of great menaing, which of course is exactly why those on the left like to use them so freely in attacking the west, America and our current administration. But in doing so, in applying them to situations so far removed from actual atrocities, torture, war crimes, they devalue the word.

Babi Yar, Auschwitz, Rwanda; those were atrocities. Pol Pot, Hitler, Karodich; those are war criminals. Dachau and Darfu are crimes against humanity. Yet by using those highly charged, highly meaningful words in talking about Abu Grahib and Guantanamo we risk reducing Bergen-Belsen to the level of a fraternity prank.

Of all the people in the world who should understand the value of words the liberal journalists and writers are the worst offenders. What words will they use when the next true atrocity occurs; when the next true war criminal crawls out into the world from under his rock?

"Do you know why God invented whiskey? To keep the Irish from ruling the world."



Don't underestimate envy By: jannelsen
'Cause Ben's pretty young. I mean, I envy him, and I'm a conservative.

On a broader note, I, too, marvel at the hysteria and hyperbole the new blog induces among the left. However, I worry that the right tends to make overreaction a sign of success in and of itself, i.e., hey, the Kossites went nuts, therefore my argument must be right.

The arguments have to stand and fall on their own merits. And, to the extent they reflect the real world, that's a big advantage in those arguments' favor.

In Ben's favor, I should add.

P.S. Speaking of the Kossites, I note this event at Politics and Prose, my local commie bookstore, next week:

*NEW EVENT *
Monday, March 27, 1 p.m.
JEROME ARMSTRONG and MARKOS MOULITSAS ZUNIGA
CRASHING THE GATE
(Chelsea Green, $25)
Two prominent political bloggers (MyDD and Daily Kos) diagnose the country's current political malaise: Republicans who can't govern and Democrats who can't get elected. As spokesmen for a new generation of activists who are challenging a moribund Democratic Party, the authors argue that a growing online community will shape future platforms capable of defeating a Republican government.
Near the corner of Nebraska and Connecticut, Washington, D.C. Directions: Imagine world peace, and then take a left.



The left is nothing if not By: hunter
derivative.

Seeking truth with confidence


"But like a preening egomaniac By: johnt
-------will collapse the entire psyche".  Damm, I wish I had written that.  The left's warped little souls and atrophied brains are wrapped around dafedralguvmint like a dying vine reaching for the sun. A perceived threat to the gospel of centralized power is a threat to their quasi-human existence and their insecurity guaranty's their hysteria.  The intolerance is such that unless the MSM expresses themselves like Daily Kos or Move On they're on the other side.  You may note similar attitudes towards schism in pre war Germany, pre revolutionary Russia, and amongst the disputants in The Religion of Peace.



Those morons on the left... By: One more
Actually BELIEVE that the people in this country take their antiquated notions about fairness in media seriously. Jeez...what a bunch of moonbat idealists.



The best part is when georgia10 accuses By: neodanite
RedState of being a "racist blog".  Because, um, someone on RedState pointed out that so-called "black leaders" like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are self-serving and exploitative.

Wouldn't the same logic make dKos anti-semitic for allowing Cindy Sheehan to post there without any retraction of her anti-semitic views?

Christians who vote for democrats are stupid.


Come to think By: ConservativeMutant
Isn't that exactly what ANSWER did? I seem to remember reading about a dustup between ANSWER and UFPJ, in which ANSWER was going on about UFPJ's association with Jackson, Sharpton, etc., who were described as amoral and willing to take Zionist money.

[ Parent ] (User Info) (#12)



Re: Major Event By: DEagle
I believe that allowing a conservative to speak (even via blog) at the Washington Post is a major event that will not go unnoticed among the liberal establishment...and rightfully so.  I believe this marks an end to the liberal (only) control of the press and opens up news opinion to both sides of the isle.  Those who allow discourse will survive, those that don't will be subjected to a minimal audience.

Golf is a way of life...

Yeah, but it's just a blog <nt> By: jannelsen


[ Parent ] (User Info) (#14)



create account | faq | search