A great nation
 deserves the truth

AMERICAblog.com
http://AMERICAblog.blogspot.com

by John Aravosis & friends

"Peppered with obscenity" - Concerned Women for America
"A particularly angry activist" - Family Research Council
"Bunch of wackos" - Rush Limbaugh

Shop AMERICAblog!

Check out our two online stores here and here



Powered by FeedBlitz

Donate to AMERICAblog

  OPTION 1: One-time donation
You're billed once, that's it.
$   
OPTION 2: Recurring Monthly Donation
You're billed monthly for the amount entered below.
$


Buy an ad on all the top liberal blogs with one click, over 2 million page views a day.

AMERICAblog RSS feed:

Add to Google
Add to My AOL

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines






My side-by-side comparison of religious right anti-gay speech and Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda. Is it similar? You decide.

Jeff Gannon Links
- Gannon linked to male prostitution
- Washington Post
- NBC Nightly News, video
- CNN's Reliable Sources, video and transcript
- NY Daily News
- The Daily Show, video
- Bill Maher, video
- Gannon on CNN's 360, video and transcript
- CNN's Aaron Brown, video
- Salon on Gannon escort sites
- Maureen Dowd
- Frank Rich
- Salon: More questions about Gannon's incredible access
- Court TV, video

- Why this story matters
- Joe Conason on Gannon
- Examples of Gannon's softball questions
-
Story ideas for journalists
  
Microsoft Abandons Gays (or Gates-gate)

- Microsoft reverses position, pro-gay again
- Microsoft's email re-endorsing civil rights for gays
- Editorial supporting Microsoft's support for gays
- Editorial from the Seattle paper
- Microsoft abandons gays (4/20)
- The Stranger article that broke the story (4/20)
- Microsoft messed with the wrong faggots (4/21)
- Gay rights bill loses by one vote - Where was Microsoft? (4/21)
- Microsoft caught lying to NYT (4/22)
- HRC blasts Microsoft (4/22)
- LA Gay Center asks for its award back (4/22)
- Microsoft lies to MSNBC (4/22)
- CEO email confirms Microsoft is abandoning gays because of religious right (4/23)
- Micro-too-soft (commentary) 4/25)
- Microsoft's own employees fight back (4/25)
- Microsoft paying Ralph Reed $20k/month retainer (4/26)

Blog Flux Directory

 

Contribute to AMERICAblog (Why? Here's why)
We prefer online contributions via the yellow "donate" box in the left-hand column, but you can also use snail mail: John Aravosis, PO Box 21336, Wash, DC 20009. Make checks payable to "John Aravosis." Contributions are NOT tax-deductible.

check to have links open new windows

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Open Thread

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 11:31:00 PM

Keep stirring the pot.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Bush's new Iraq spin is back to the old Iraq spin: It's Saddam's fault

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 10:37:00 PM

Bush has run out of excuses for the failure in Iraq. He's gone back to blaming Saddam:
In his third speech this month to bolster public support for the war, Bush worked to counter critics who say the U.S. presence in the wartorn nation is fueling the insurgency.

Bush said that Saddam was a tyrant and used violence to exacerbate sectarian divisions to keep himself in power, and that as a result, deep tensions persist to this day.

"The enemies of a free Iraq are employing the same tactics Saddam used, killing and terrorizing the Iraqi people in an effort to foment sectarian division," Bush said.
Yes, this mess has nothing to do with Bush's obsession with invading Iraq without a plan. It's easier to blame Saddam than think about a solution. Still using Saddam as the excuse for the mess in 2006 is so weak.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Ann Coulter's legal troubles continue

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 09:41:00 PM

Oh, this is almost too good....Crooks and Liars has an update on Ann Coulter's legal trouble -- for voting irregularities -- down in Palm Beach County. If she broke the law, throw the book at her. Put her in jail. Surely, that's what tough talking Ann would recommend. Keep your fingers crossed -- she could end up being someone's bitch.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


McCain: I was against the anti-gay amendment til Jerry Falwell said I was for it

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 08:44:00 PM

You know how the press makes it seem like John McCain is somehow a moderate, despite his very conservative voting record? One issue that did set McCain apart from the other right wing whackos was his opposition to the anti-gay constitutional amendment. Those days may be over now that he's making nice with renowned gay basher Jerry Falwell.

Well, that is if Falwell is believable. Think Progress has the details via ABC News:
When McCain accepted an invitation to be Liberty University's graduation speaker, he spoke with Falwell by phone about the marriage issue. According to Falwell, McCain is not pushing for a federal marriage amendment at this time. But McCain "reconfirmed" to Falwell that he would support a federal constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman if a federal court were to strike down state constitutional bans on gay marriage.
If Falwell is right then McCain is willing to throw the gay and lesbian community under the bus just to to get an invite to speak at Falwell's college.

McCain isn't quoted in the ABC News article which was posted yesterday. I just did a google news search and didn't find any articles that have McCain saying anything to contradict Falwell. "Straight Talk" McCain sure knows a lot of the traditional media. One of them needs to ask what his version of this story is. Otherwise, McCain is letting Falwell speak for him.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Update from John

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 08:02:00 PM

So John made it to the big Radio and TV Gallery dinner. There were some glitches getting him there -- including a wardrobe malfunction, but it all worked out.

He just called with a few fun updates already. The best one is that he just introduced himself to Wesley Clark. They'd never met, although John did call him before he put up the post about buying Clark's cell phone records. That's what blew that story wide open. John said Clark could not have been more gracious...even said "sometimes you just have to take one for the cause." Class act. There's also been some mingling with Paula Zahn (their mother's know each other).

To me, the whole event isn't worth it if Anderson Cooper isn't there. (But, if Anderson is there, he should know that I live right around the corner from the Hilton.)

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Iraqi leader defies Bush, will stay in power

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 07:12:00 PM

The Iraqi Prime Minister wants to keep his job. The Bush administration wants him gone. He says he's staying. He should probably keep in mind what Bush did to the last leader of Iraq. Bush only has so much respect for sovereignty, especially when his poll numbers are tanking:
Facing growing pressure from the Bush administration for him to step down, Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari of Iraq vigorously asserted his right to stay in office today and warned the Americans against undue interference in Iraq's political process.
It's actually almost quaint. The Iraqi PM actually thought Bush really meant that he wanted the Iraqi people to pick their own leaders.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open thread

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 05:38:00 PM

Heading off to the Radio and TV Correspondents Dinner in an hour. Ugh. Shower, shave, tux. I'm a mess cleaning up.

Oh my, I just googled the dinner. This is the dinner that Bush made his WMD jokes at the other year. Oh my. Unfortunately he's on a plane to Mexico, so I'm thinking we may get Cheney. Which means Mary might be there. Now that's a photo op that'll be priceless.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


It's confirmed, GOP congressional candidate faked photo of Baghdad

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 03:33:00 PM

Then again, he is running for a felon's seat, so maybe he felt the need to fit it. More from E&P;.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Gallup: In Shift, More Americans Now Call Themselves Democrats than Republicans

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 02:37:00 PM

This is, as E&P; says, potentially historic. For years now we've been bemoaning the fact that more people called themselves Republicans. Now, Republican has become a bad word.

God bless George Bush.
In a (perhaps) historic shift, more Americans now consider themselves Democrats than Republicans, the Gallup organization revealed today.

Republicans had gained the upper hand in recent years, but 33% of Americans, in the latest Gallup poll, now call themselves Democrats, with those favoring the GOP one point behind. But Gallup says this widens a bit more "once the leanings of Independents are taken into account."

Independents now make up 34% of the population. When asked if they lean in a certain direction, their answers pushed the Democrat numbers to 49% with Republicans at 42%. One year ago, the parties were dead even at 46% each.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Abramoff gets almost 6 years in jail

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 02:29:00 PM

I swear, it always happens when I'm at lunch or on travel. All the big news, it waits for me, until I leave. The only time I got asked to be on CrossFire? And this was when CrossFire was still a big deal, the hour long format. I was at lunch, no cell, buh bye.

Anyway, Jack is toast.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Fed raises rates again

by Chris in Paris - 3/29/2006 02:27:00 PM

Sounds like Bernanke is taking a page out of the Greenspan book by raising the rates and suggesting more to come. With the housing market showing signs of severe decline and the jobs market still delicate this may be a Greenspan-like overreaction. The market reaction to the news was decidedly negative, with stocks declining.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Scalia denies making "obscene" gesture. Great, then release the photo

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 12:21:00 PM

No problem. Release the photo that was taken of you at the exact moment and prove it. And then explain why you ordered the photographer not to publish the photo.

Release the photo.

Release the photo.

Release the photo.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Funniest. Commercial. Ever.

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 12:01:00 PM







Of course, the major networks are refusing to show it because it's an ad about tolerance, it's an ad about a - shhhh! - LIBERAL church. A church that isn't all about hate and bigotry. The networks, like ABC, run ads by the hateful people like the religious right group Focus on the Family - yes, ABC had no problem running a Focus on the Family ad. But ABC and the networks won't run ads by the United Church of Christ which simply talk about their church's main message, inclusion.

If that isn't a civil rights law suit, I don't know what it. The religious right would be suing these networks for violating the civil rights act, in a flash. TV networks like ABC simply cannot pick and choose which religious groups they let advertise - religious right good, United Church of Christ bad. Where are our lawsuits?

Anyway, check out this ad. Then go to the action alert and tell ABC and the other networks to stop the war on Christians.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


I [heart] CBS' Lara Logan

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 11:40:00 AM

Wow. Stunningly smart, stunningly beautiful. Just wow. Watch this piece about whether the media is being too mean on Iraq. And do watch the entire piece, she gets better and better as she goes on. The priceless moment is at the very end...

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


How alcohol works

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 11:16:00 AM



Hat tip to Aaron, who caught it and TiVo'd it.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open Thread Question

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 09:57:00 AM

So, we know members of the White House press corps are being invited to have lemonade and a little private chat with the President. They are all making nice with each other.

But that's not what they should be doing so let's give those reporters some help. What should they ask George Bush?

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


The Wash. Times reporter really, really liked the President

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 08:33:00 AM

E&P; has more on the private chit-chats Bush is having with select members of the White House press corps. Most of the reporters who went to the meeting are keeping it private. But, not the reporter from Reverend Moon's right wing rag. He not only went, he went on the record to say just how wonderful Bush is:
Several correspondents confirmed to E&P; either participating in such meetings or being invited to them, noting that at least two have been held in the past week, with one scheduled for Tuesday. Most have lasted more than an hour and at least one took place in Bush's private residence.

"It was very pleasant, he seemed very thoughtful and frank," said Stephan Dinan, a Washington Times reporter and one of about six reporters who took part in a session Monday afternoon. "It was on a wide range of stuff."

Monday's gathering also included reporters from the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, Associated Press, and Cox Newspapers, according to sources.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


FISA Judges doubt Bush had authority for domestic wiretapping

by Joe in DC - 3/29/2006 07:51:00 AM

The judges want the President to act in a constitutional manner. What a concept in George Bush's America:
In a rare glimpse into the inner workings of the secretive court, known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, several former judges who served on the panel also voiced skepticism at a Senate hearing about the president's constitutional authority to order wiretapping on Americans without a court order. They also suggested that the program could imperil criminal prosecutions that grew out of the wiretaps.

Judge Harold A. Baker, a sitting federal judge in Illinois who served on the intelligence court until last year, said the president was bound by the law "like everyone else." If a law like the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is duly enacted by Congress and considered constitutional, Judge Baker said, "the president ignores it at the president's peril."
Congress can't and won't deal with the simple fact that Bush broke the law. To paraphrase Judge Baker, since the president ignored the law, he should be in legal peril.

Bush broke the law. It's that simple.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Olmert and Kadima win Israeli elections

by Chris in Paris - 3/29/2006 02:16:00 AM

With most of the results in, Kadima has picked up 28 of 120 seats so while they have won, passing anything is not going to be easy. I had figured that the voters would be out in force but turnout was low and those who did vote were supporting a wide cast of parties outside of the traditional groups. It sounds like voter fatigue and a failure to ignite the country...something we can all relate to.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Strikes in France generate more hype but limited impact, for now

by Chris in Paris - 3/29/2006 01:40:00 AM

Traffic on the Metro was hardly bothered yesterday and the rains, which were very heavy at times, also seemed to limit the impact of the one day strike. With more and more people able to work from home, that probably also helped to limit the impact of the events as well. The center-right party of Chirac is in disarray, but that's nothing unusual for them and they looks ready to fold.

Villepin, the never-elected, silver-spoon-in-the-mouth PM was hoping to build his resume for the elections next year but his actions have been so incredibly unpopular that he will be lucky to maintain even a Cabinet position next year. Sarkozy, the leading candidate for next years election, has questioned Villepin's latest policy and has suggested shelving the deal until negotiations have been finished. Chirac, always in search of love from the people and sitting on approval rates in the range of Cheney's rates, has somehow managed to support both sides in the struggle. The end result is going to be the standard collapse in the face of opposition that is the hallmark of French politics.

The government is half right in the need to change the heavy employment system but like I said before, it needs to be fair to all workers, not just isolating the weakest and overlooking the large companies. The students are also half right because maintaining the status quo is not a long term strategy and looking at the demographics, they are going to be shafted even more in the coming years as the boomers retire. They have every right to be mad with the new law because they are being unfairly selected for this trial. If the government had any spine at all, this would be for everyone and not just a few slices of the economy.

Add into the mix the failed policies and post-riot reaction to the suburban problems and you have a real mess with the potential for the perfect storm. The government, with Villepin directing the show, has provided little more than talk for addressing the underlying problems with the suburban poor so that situation alone can easily trigger street problems. At this point I will be completely shocked if Villepin doesn't completely collapse on this program and Sarko will be even stronger than ever, poised to take over for the 2007 elections.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open thread until Paris wakes up

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 12:54:00 AM

Or at least until Chris does.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Maryland anti-gay marriage ban fails

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 12:12:00 AM

What if you threw a jihad and nobody came. I don't think any of this bodes well for the Republicans' plan to use gay-bashing - I'm sorry, I mean Mary-Cheney-bashing - to help get out the Republican vote in the fall elections.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Media Matters action alert against the WashingtonPost.com

by John in DC - 3/29/2006 12:01:00 AM

Any chance to take on Jim Brady, the head of WashingtonPost.com, is a-okay with me. Apparently he's not a real big fan of Jane over at Firedoglake. well, you know what, if it's a choice between Jane and the guy who hired the Republican activist plagiarist, well, I'm comfortable saying that we choose Jane.

Sic him.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Dems to announce defense plan: Get Osama; redeploy from Iraq

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 11:30:00 PM

Yes, and yes.
Overall, the Democratic position paper attempts to make the case that the Bush administration's "inadequate planning and incompetent policies have failed to make Americas as safe as we should be."
Incompetence. Good word.
Republicans have sought to use that division to their own political advantage, claiming that Democrats simply attack the president and his fellow Republicans without presenting proposals of their own.
Funny, but if you go to the doctor for a tonsillectomy and he cuts off your leg, you don't go back to the same doctor. And it doesn't matter if the other doctors tell you that you're screwed, they can't glue your leg back on. You still don't go back to the same quack to fix your tonsils.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Blogwhoring

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 11:28:00 PM

What she said.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open thread

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 10:45:00 PM

Mmm... thread...

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Supreme Court mulls legality of military tribunals for enemy combattants

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 09:39:00 PM

The thing that's most amazing is that the Bush administration and the Republican congress tried extra hard to get this case out of the courts. The Republicans even passed legislation last year trying to take away the rights of the combattants to go to court:
The Bush administration has tried to scuttle the case on grounds that the new law stripped the justices' authority to consider it. The law passed late last year bars Guantanamo prisoners from filing petitions to fight their detentions, and the administration claims this law retroactively voided hundreds of lawsuits.

Justice David H. Souter said it would be "stupendously significant" for Congress to retroactively close courts to constitutional challenges.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said "it's an extraordinary act, I think, to withdraw jurisdiction from this court in a pending case."
A government that routinely tries to take away our rights based on the theory "what do you have to hide?" needs to be asked the same question. In a democracy, it's not quite clear why the Republicans and their friends on the religious right are always so afraid of the courts finding what they do to be illegal and/or unconstitutional. Unless of course, so much of what they propose is just that, un-American and illegal.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


House member asks why Bush twins haven't enlisted

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 08:58:00 PM

Oh yes he did.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


A profanity poll, huh

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 08:13:00 PM

Screw that.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Religious right equates gay student groups with conservative student groups

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 07:48:00 PM

Fine with me. The day the religious right is fighting to argue that conservative students have the same stature as gay students, well, that's the day we've won folks. Their victory? They've made a moral equivalence between the two groups - being gay is just like being conservative, it's just another thing that defines American high school students.

Like I said, we won.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


One million protest in France

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 07:15:00 PM

To think what we could do with a million...

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


George Bush's disease

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 07:00:00 PM

Funny if it weren't so true.
He's a drunk. Doesn't matter what his particular poison is, it's how he lives his life.

He's always broke. He has to borrow money to finance his nights out on the town. He tells the people he borrows from that he'll get them back sometime in the future.

He spends money he doesn't have on shit he doesn't need. And then tells his kids that he can't afford to send them to a good school or a good doctor because times are tough.

He's been known to get drunk and attack people who haven't done anything to him. Invariably, this gets him in fights that he can't win....

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Dan Savage launches Bush impeachment site

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 06:57:00 PM

ITMFA

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


RNC warns in memo, congressional Republicans better not criticize Bush

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 06:04:00 PM

Hotline has the memo here.

I think the memo is right and wrong. It claims that W "is" the party, he "is" their brand, and that if he gets further diminished they all go down with him.

First off, yes, Bush is your brand, and we're all quite happy about it. Please do wrap yourself in him as often as possible.

The problem is that Bush is already damaged goods and he is ALREADY taking other Republicans down with him. There is nothing GOP congressmen can do to get Bush's numbers up. But there is a lot they can do to bring THEIR numbers down. Sticking their necks out to defend Bush at this time will only suggest to the public, including their own base, that they don't get it. That they think, incredibly, that all is well in Washington, and that Bush, like Brownie, is doing a heck of a job.

You turn voters around by proving to them that you deserve their loyalty, and that's through your own actions. It's a message Democrats need to learn as well.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


More judge bashing from Tom DeLay, voice of moral authority

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 05:34:00 PM

Tom DeLay, Christian spokesman:
"Didn't you see the comments of Sandra Day O'Connor and Ruth Ginsburg over the last couple of weeks?" DeLay, R-Texas, asked reporters after a speech to a group of Christian conservatives. "There's still a problem, they don't get it. There are three branches of government. All wisdom doesn't reside in ... people in black robes."

Earlier, the former House majority leader told activists he agreed with their premise that there is a "war on Christianity.

"Our faith has always been in direct conflict with the values of the world," DeLay said. "We are, after all, a society that provides abortion on demand, has killed millions of innocent children, degrades the institution of marriage, and all but treats Christianity like some second-rate superstition."
Amazingly santicmonious for someone so amazingly unethical.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open thread

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 03:48:00 PM

I'm eating fruit and yoghurt all day as I have to fit into my tux that I haven't worn in 2 years. I got invited by radio honcho Ellen Ratner of Talk Radio News Service to sit at her table at the Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner tomorrow, which is a great thrill if you're into the DC political/journalist thing. It's my first time, so it might end up boring, but at this point I think it'll be fun. And I doubt anyone will have a clue who I am. Blogger? How do you spell it?

Of course the tux is a wee bit tight, and that settles it. Need to lose a few by summer, the age creeping waistline thingy is not acceptable.

Oh yeah, and I can comment on my weight but you can't. Kind of like talking about my mom.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Bush says Iraqi prime minister is no longer acceptable, and that he'd better not remain prime minister for long

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 02:38:00 PM

That's funny since 66% or so of Americans feel the same way about Bush.

As always, it's difficult to know where to begin with such news. George Bush is telling Iraq's "democracy" that HE doesn't like who they've selected as prime minister and that HE will no longer accept or support the current guy staying in the job.

Pardon me, but why should anyone care? And more importantly, is Bush nuts?

How do we, with a straight face, claim that Iraq is a new democracy when we are hand-picking the leader of said democracy? And how does Bush expect any leader of Iraq to have any credibility at all if we're the ones picking him? And finally, we are lucky the shi'ites are so far NOT a party to the resistance taking on American troops. That could change in a snap, and according to, I believe it was ABC News the other night, if the Shi'ites decide to rejoin the resistance, that will DOUBLE the number of resistance fighters taking the US on.

Clearly Iraq is such a mess that Bush is now getting desperate. There is no other way to explain why he would take such a drastic, heavy-handed, and full-of-potential-backfire approach to dealing with the Iraqi prime minister. I think the administration has decided that it's going to be all out civil war - well, it already IS all out civil war, but what Bush now has decided is that Iraq is LOST if the current guy remains in power, and thus they aren't worrying about harming Iraq's democracy, or provoking the shi'ites into joining the anti-American insurgency, simply because Bush already knows we're toast, Iraq is toast, if we stick with the status quo.

Basically, the patient has terminal cancer and Bush is going to Mexico to buy some last-minute Laetrile. Hardly a sign of optimism.

From the NYT
:
Senior Shiite politicians said today that the American ambassador has told Shiite officials to inform the Iraqi prime minister that President Bush does not want him to remain the country's leader in the next government.

It is the first time the Americans have directly intervened in the furious debate over the country's top job, the politicians said, and it is inflaming tensions between the Americans and some Shiite leaders.

The ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, told the head of the main Shiite political bloc at a meeting last Saturday to pass a "personal message from President Bush" on to the prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, who the Shiites insist should stay in his post for four more years, said Redha Jowad Taki, a Shiite politician and member of Parliament who was at the meeting.

Ambassador Khalilzad said that President Bush "doesn't want, doesn't support, doesn't accept" Mr. Jaafari to be the next prime minister, according to Mr. Taki, a senior aide to Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, the head of the Shiite bloc. It was the first "clear and direct message" from the Americans on the issue of the candidate for prime minister, Mr. Taki said.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Open Thread

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 01:53:00 PM

Another busy day....what's the latest?

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Mr. Iran-Contra dies

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 12:07:00 PM

Casper Weinberger, Reagan's Defense Secretary, died today. And from the AP story you'd think he was a saint. In fact, Weinberger was one of the principles behind Iran-Contra, and was indicted for it until George Bush's dad pardoned him. The Republicans really have brought new meaning to the word "neo-con" - as in convict.

Let me remind you who Casper Weinberger REALLY was:
Walsh's team had discovered that Weinberger's handwritten notes disproved Bush's claim that he had been "out of the loop" and proved that Weinberger knew full well about $25 million in Saudi contributions to the contras, even as he told Congress in 1986 that the charge was "so outlandish as to be unworthy of comment."

According to Brosnahan, the trial would have shown that Weinberger knew as early as summer 1985 that President Ronald Reagan had personally authorized missile shipments to Iran in violation of the Arms Control Export Act, and that this potentially impeachable act was concealed by constructing a false record. "The August [1985] meeting [of Reagan's National Security Council] discussed having Israel send the missiles to Iran and replenishing them out of U.S. stocks," says Brosnahan. "Weinberger is responsible for all missiles. The secretary of defense is the guy."

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Rumsfeld again links Iraq to September 11. Surprise.

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 11:55:00 AM

At this point it's become a cliche.

No, Rummy, Iraq had nothing to do with September 11 and it had nothing to do with the global war on terror. You invaded because the conservatives in your government had a plan for the past ten+ years to take out Saddam. It wasn't because of terrorism, it was because other issues, including US access to oil, threats to Israel and Iraq's neighbors, and more. Al Qaeda - the actual folks behind the 9/11 attacks, the folks you seem to have forgotten, the leader of which, Osama bin Laden, is still at large four years after he attacked us - had no substantial presence whatsoever in Iraq BEFORE we invaded. Saddam had no ties with them at all. But once you invaded and Iraq fell to pieces, Al Qaeda came waltzing in because YOU couldn't stop them, YOU couldn't control Iraq's borders, YOU couldn't keep the country secure or peaceful.

If we're really serious about the war on terror, and really need to act preemptively to stop the people who are enabling the terrorists, then someone need to fire you and this entire incompetent administration for doing more to enable international terrorism than Saddam ever did.

Iraq is the biggest training ground for Al Qaeda in the world - now. Thanks to you. Funny, but I have a hard time believing the September 11 dead are resting comfortably, as you're now claiming, with the fact that you've used their deaths for political purposes and have made a mockery of the very battle that was launched in their name.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


IRS rule proposal raises privacy alarms on Hill

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 11:38:00 AM

Bush is trying to make it easier for tax preparers to sell your tax info. Fortunately, the Hill is freaking out. This is a great issue, especially right before Tax Day.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Right Winger McCain to speak at Falwell's college

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 10:53:00 AM

Via Talking Points Memo,
John McCain once called Jerry Falwell an "agent of intolerance." Now he's going to be the graduation speaker at Jerry's Liberty University.
How long will it take for the traditional media to figure out that their pal, John McCain, is really just another run-of-the-mill hard core right winger? He's NOT a moderate just because he pals around with the press.

McCain is Liberty's commencement speaker on May 13th. The college announced in the same press release that Gary Bauer is the keynoter at Liberty's baccalaureate on May 12th.

Falwell and Bauer -- that's the company McCain keeps these days.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Scalia asked to recuse himself from case where he already stated his opinion

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 10:11:00 AM

Scalia's been getting a lot of press for himself lately. When he goes public with his personal opinions on a case that's coming before the Court, he shouldn't sit in judgment:
On the eve of oral argument in a key Supreme Court case on the rights of alleged terrorists, a group of retired U.S. generals and admirals has asked Justice Antonin Scalia to recuse himself, arguing that his recent public comments on the subject make it impossible for him to appear impartial.
Scalia's behavior has been erratic lately. For a justice to speak publicly about a pending case is highly unusual. For a Catholic to make an obscene gesture in church -- right after communion -- during lent -- is almost unheard of.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Bush, White House Press Corps make nice "off-the-record"

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 09:03:00 AM

Over the years, members of the White House press corps have been lap dogs for the Bush administration. Oh sure, once the poll numbers dropped, some of them managed to get a spine. But, over the years, many of them have just not been not done the job. Basically, the White House lied to them for years and the reporters let it happen.

Now that even the WH press corps has to acknowledge Bush is a failed president, the WH staff have come up with a new strategy for dealing with them. They know that the reporters who cover the White House love the one-on-one contact with the big guy. So, the Bush team is giving them face time. The press are taking that time even though it means keeping it secret from the viewers and readers:
President Bush has been holding informal off-the-record sessions with major news organizations over the last several days.

Starting Thursday, he began meeting with groups of about a half-dozen reporters from newspapers, television, news agencies and magazines. They have discussed a variety of issues including the war in Iraq, said a reporter who attended a session.

The meetings, which the journalists have agreed not to describe publicly, have been in the White House residence. They come as several news organizations have assigned new reporters, who had no relationship with Mr. Bush, to cover the White House.
Give them a tour of the White House, tell a few jokes, serve some lemonade. They can't report on it, but they can tell their friends. No wonder Karl Rove thinks the media are a bunch of patsies.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Andrew Card resigned

by Joe in DC - 3/28/2006 08:04:00 AM

NBC News just reported that White House Chief of Staff Andy Card has resigned. He's being replaced by Budget Director Josh Bolten. AP now has the story, too.

This just means Karl Rove is still running the place.

UPDATE: Was the President's announcement really worthy of "BREAKING NEWS" and live coverage on all the networks? The media, of course, lapped it up. Someone at CNN should tell Soledad O'Brien that it's not a "press conference" when the press doesn't get to ask any questions.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


More cuts from GM this week

by Chris in Paris - 3/28/2006 04:36:00 AM

These sure are tough times for the US auto industry. It looks like there is plenty of pain to go around with the deep cuts at GM. I don't think that Washington ought to get involved in bailing out these companies but putting more scrutiny on corporate executives who continue to be paid handsomely while cutting below is certainly in order. I just don't see the value-add that these so-called corporate leaders are bringing to the table that can justify the skyrocketing executive salaries or worship that they are receiving.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Nationwide strikes return to France

by Chris in Paris - 3/28/2006 02:17:00 AM

I had been almost completely removed from news for the past two weeks while in the US for a family issue though I did have questions from just about everyone regarding the strikes in France. The day before my wife joined me in the US she had been riding the Metro home from work and had to cover up as she passed through Odeon station because police tear gas made its way underground. In what appears to be all too common here, the police have not shown much restraint in reacting to student protests. Police over-reaction led the problems in the suburbs just a few months ago and I have limited expectations on their desire to react calmly this time.

This new round of nationwide strikes is complicated and in a land that loves to argue ideas, I suspect this is not going to be solved any time soon. The government rammed through a law just before summer holidays last year that allows small companies to hire and fire without notice, much like the under-26 law, but few noticed because of the timing not to mention the inability of small company workers to organize.

My own feeling is that change is necessary and inevitable but the government has backed down from an equal distribution of the pain by focusing on select groups. The students are not facing reality if they think that the existing system can continue where it's impossible to fire a bad worker but they have a legitimate point that it is not fair to pick on them, especially considering how high unemployment already is for the youth in France. It's all stick and no carrot and shows once again how un-creative the regime is. If the government is going to
stick the youth with such a policy they ought to somehow lessen the blow and give the youth tax advantages of something else. If they get the worst of everything, why not something to benefit them?

Since I live just steps away from one of the major protest march boulevards I should be hearing the protests soon enough. After a tough few weeks in the US I am glad to be back but I'm not exactly thrilled at what is coming here, with both sides itching for such a fight.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 


Religious right files FCC complaint against FOX's broadcast of NASCAR

by John in DC - 3/28/2006 12:25:00 AM

I think that's what you call a trifecta. I love it when they eat their own.

From the gay-hating, and not-so-much Jew or Muslim loving, hate group the American Family Association:
March 27, 2006

Fox allows 's' word. Take a stand for our children!

Dear xxxxx,

Tired of all the profanity on TV? Want to do something about it? Here is your opportunity.

File a complaint with the FCC against Fox Network for using the "s" word.

This past Sunday afternoon, Fox network broadcast the NASCAR "Food City 500" race. During the course of the race, driver Martin Truex, Jr. crashed his car after being bumped by another driver.

Fox network aired a conversation between Truex and his crew chief, Kevin Manion. During the course of the conversation, Manion told his driver, "We missed the set-up today. It (the car) was a piece of s**t.

Fox had been warned about allowing the "s" word on the air. The network could have used a delay and bleeped the profanity. But they chose not to. The network chose to air the segment live. Millions of viewers, including children, were offended by the crude profanity.

Comment   |  Permanent Link | 

    


Send me your tips/comments:



Why AMERICAblog?
Because at some point you tire of the lies.

What issues do you cover?
US politics overall with a particular focus on the Bush Administration, the radical right, and gay civil rights.

Who are you?
John Aravosis is a Washington DC-based writer and political consultant, specializing in using the Internet for political advocacy. He is the creator of StopDrLaura.com, Matthew Shepard Online Resources, and DearMary.com, among other activist Web sites. 

John has a joint law degree and masters in foreign service from Georgetown, where he studied under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. He is an avid writer, and in addition to writing THE LIST, he has worked as a stringer for the Economist magazine, and for years was the US Politics Guide at About.com. 

John's policy experience includes stints in the US Senate, the World Bank, and the Children's Defense Fund. John is also an occasional TV pundit, having appeared on The O'Reilly Factor, Hardball with Chris Matthews, ABCNews World News Tonight, CNN, Court TV, and more. John speaks five languages and has visited or worked in 28 countries.

Who are your guest bloggers?
- Joe in DC

is actually Joe Sudbay, a DC-based political consultant with over twenty years of experience at both the state and federal level. Joe has managed political operations and legislative efforts for both candidates and issues-based organizations. For seven years, he was the Director of State Legislation at Handgun Control, Inc. He served as that organization's first Political Director during the 2000 cycle where he designed the television ad featuring the NRA's Vice President claiming the group would work out of the Oval Office.

Joe has appeared on numerous national and local television and radio shows including the Diane Rehm Show, CNN's Crossfire (when Lynne Cheney was the co-host), and even Hannity and Colmes.

Joe is a graduate of the University of Maine School of Law. In addition, he has a Masters in Public Administration from Lehigh University and received his B.A. from the University of New Hampshire. He also has a great dog named Boomer, and is a world class athlete who finished the Chicago Marathon in the time of 4:10.

- Chris in Paris
is a good friend who lives in Paris, France.  An ex-pat American with an expertise in helping tech companies establish a foothold in Europe, Chris follows US and European politics avidly. Chris has a wife and two cats, and a fabulous garden that's the envy of all Paris.

- Rob in Baltimore
is another close friend and has one of the sharpest political minds out there. Rob's specialty is the Internet and elections, and he also has a gift for reading polls.

- Michael Giltz
is an even older (but not old) friend and freelance writer based in New York City who covers politics, sports, religion and especially pop culture (including movies, music, books, theater, TV, and DVDs). He's written more than one thousand reviews, features, opinion columns and cover stories for The Advocate, the New York Post, Entertainment Weekly, Premiere, New York magazine, Out, The Weekly Standard, Disney Adventures, In Theatre, USA Today, the Denver Post and many others. He can be found on the web at www.michaelgiltz.com, and at his new blog, Pop Surfing.

- Cliff Schecter
is a new friend and author of Cliff's Rant, appearing on AMERICAblog every Friday. Cliff is a political satirist, columnist and consultant based in Washington D.C. He’s consulted for numerous candidates and organizations including former President Bill Clinton, Virginia Governor Mark Warner, the DNC and U.S. State Department.

Cliff was a political analyst for the Sinclair Broadcast Group (yes, THAT Sinclair) in 2004, debating Armstrong Williams at significantly less cost to the White House. He’s appeared on over 150 programs on CNN, CNBC, NPR, FoxNews and other stations, and has written for Knight Ridder, The American Prospect, Salon.com, The Miami Herald and The Fordham Urban Law Journal, among other outlets. Cliff blogs at www.gadflyer.com

Cliff’s a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania and received an MA in International Affairs from Columbia University. He’s currently a Graduate Honors Fellow at American University, getting his Ph.D. in American History.

This page is powered by Blogger.
Copyright 2005 - John Aravosis