Pelobatidae Bonaparte, 1850
Class: Amphibia > Order: Anura > Family: Pelobatidae

Pelobatidae Bonaparte, 1850, Conspect. Syst. Herpetol. Amph.: 1 p. Type genus: Pelobates Wagler, 1830.
Pelobatina — Bonaparte, 1850, Conspect. Syst. Herpetol. Amph.: 1 p.
Pelobatoidea — Stannius, 1856, Handbuch Zootomie Wiebelthiere, 2: 4. Laurent, 1967, Acta Zool. Lilloana, 22: 207; Lynch, 1973, In Vial (ed.), Evol. Biol. Anurans, : 162; Duellman, 1975, Occas. Pap. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 42: 5; Laurent, 1980 "1979", Bull. Soc. Zool. France, 104: 417.
Pelobatoidei — Lichtenstein and Martens, 1856, Nomencl. Rept. Amph. Mus. Zool. Berol.: 40.
Pelobatides — Bruch, 1862, Würzb. Naturwiss. Z., 3: 221.
Pelobatida — Knauer, 1883, Naturgesch. Lurche: 107. Bayer, 1885 "1884", Abh. K. Böhm. Ges. Wiss., Prague, 12: 18.
Pelobatina — Schultze, 1891, Jahresber. Abhandl. Naturwiss. Ver. Magdeburg, 1890: 174.
Pelobatidae — Bolkay, 1919, Glasn. Zemaljskog Muz. Bosni Hercegov., 31: 348.
Pelobatinae — Fejérváry, 1922 "1921", Arch. Naturgesch., Abt. A, 87: 25.
Pelobatidae — Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926, Arq. Mus. Nac., Rio de Janeiro, 27: 19.
English Names
Spadefoots (Cochran, 1961, Living Amph. World, : 56).
Spadefoot Toads (Frank and Ramus, 1995, Compl. Guide Scient. Common Names Amph. Rept. World, : 96).
Europe, western Asia, and northwestern Africa.
Some workers have included the Pelodytidae as a subfamily of the Pelobatidae and most workers before Griffiths, 1960, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 13, 2: 626-640, and Griffiths, 1963, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 38: 273, considered the Sooglossidae to be included in the Pelobatidae (in the sense of including the Megophryidae of this list). Almost all workers regarded the Scaphiopodidae as in the Pelobatidae prior to the study of García-París, Buchholz, and Parra-Olea, 2003, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 28: 12-23, who suggested a relationship of Scaphiopodidae (Pelodytidae (Pelobatidae + Megophryidae)). Nevertheless, Rocek, 1981 "1980", Acta Univ. Carol., Prague, Biol., 1980: 140-156, discussed the relationships between the living and fossil taxa and suggested the independent evolution of the Pelobates group and the Scaphiopus group, which he treated as separate families, the Pelobatidae and Scaphiopodidae. See Sage, Prager, and Wake, 1982, J. Zool., London, 198: 481-494, for immunological evidence. Dubois, 1983, Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Lyon, 52: 271-272, and Dubois, 1987 "1986", Alytes, 5: 13, arranged the Pelobatidae into four subfamilies (Pelobatinae [for Pelobates], Scaphiopodinae [Scaphiopodidae of this list], Megophryinae [now part of Megophryidae], and Leptobrachiinae [now part of Megophryidae]). See Ford and Cannatella, 1993, Herpetol. Monogr., 7: 94-117, for separation of Pelobatidae (sensu lato) from Megophryidae. Maglia, 1998, Sci. Pap. Nat. Hist. Mus. Univ. Kansas, 10: 1-19, suggested a relationship of (((Pelobatidae) (Pelodytidae)) Megophryidae). Xie and Wang, 2000, Cultum Herpetol. Sinica, 8: 356-370, considered the Megophryidae to be a subfamily of the Pelobatidae and discussed the history of taxonomy of the group. See also and
Contained Genera
Pelobates Wagler, 1830
External Links
Please note: these links will take you to external websites not affiliated with the American Museum of Natural History. We are not responsible for their content.
Google images

© 1998-2004, Darrel Frost and The American Museum of Natural History. All Rights Reserved.
Send questions about taxonomic data to Darrel Frost <frost at amnh org>.
Send technical inquiries about functionality of site or database to Mark Breedlove <markb at amnh org>

Valid HTML 4.01!