Saturday :: March 18, 2006

U.S. News.Com on Secret, Warrantless Physical Searches

U.S. News & World Report's article on secret, warrantless physical searches, which many in the blogosphere, us included, anxiously have been awaiting since MSNBC's Keith Olbermann reported on it last night is online here.

The lawyer who believes his office and home were surreptitiously searched is Thomas Nelson of Oregon. Nelson represents Soliman al-Buthe, indicted in 2004 on charges he illegally took al-Haramain charitable donations out of the country. The Government charged al-Haramain had al Qaeda connections.

Nelson's story begins on the second page of the article and is frightening. In essence, he believes the FBI conducted "black bag searches" on his home and office to retrieve classified documents it had given al-Buthe by mistake. Nelson also thinks the documents may establish that al-Buthe was one of those subjected to NSA warrantless surveillance.

Nelson wrote to the U.S. Attorney with his suspicions (before the news broke of the NSA program) and was provided reassurances that the FBI and Justice Department respect attorney-client relationships. But Nelson was not reassured and filed an FOIA request with the NSA. If you read what he, his colleague and his wife observed, you'll understand why. The response he got back:

"The fact of the existence or nonexistence of responsive records is a currently and properly classified matter."

On another topic, there's the role of Cheney legal counsel (since promoted to Libby's position as chief of staff) David Addington.

White House lawyers, in particular, Vice President Cheney's counsel David Addington (who is now Cheney's chief of staff), pressed Mueller to use information from the NSA program in court cases, without disclosing the origin of the information, and told Mueller to be prepared to drop prosecutions if judges demanded to know the sourcing, according to several government officials. Mueller, backed by Comey, resisted the administration's efforts.

There's lot's more to the article and I've just skimmed the surface. I'll update in a while with more of my thoughts and reactions around the blogoshphere. [Hat tip to Patriot Daily for spotting the article.]

Update: Another warrantless search of a law office -- that of Don Rehkoph who represented Guantanamo translator al-Halabi.

Attorneys for spy suspect Senior Airman Ahmad Al Halabi accused government investigators of violating his attorney-client privilege by taking his legal files for "safe keeping," raiding a defense counsel office, and barging in on his meeting with a defense attorney without a warrant.

Espionage charges were later dropped against al-Halabi who pleaded guilty to minor charges in exchange for time served.

8 comments to "U.S. News.Com on Secret, Warrantless Physical Searches"

  1. Posted by wg
    March 18, 2006 08:48 PM

    US News & World Report published this? Highly unusual for them, their angle is normally that of Sens. Roberts and DeWine.


    (minor aside)

    Immergut doesn't run things in Portland, Jordan (local sac of rather questionable reputation) does so Nelson should have written him but I doubt he would have ever heard from them, FOIPA or not. Also I don't see a point of writing NSA regarding physical searches, NSA almost certainly doesn't do them. Jordan and his buddies on the local Joint Terrorism Task Force do.

  2. Posted by def
    March 18, 2006 09:16 PM

    It is very odd that the Executive Branch relies heavily on the notion of "war time" powers. All of these extrordinary measures, from warrantless searches to waterboarding suspects, have been justified by invoking "war".

    However, war is defined in our constitution as something other than a "use of force resolution". So, are we really at war in a legal sense. (Of course we are for all practical purposes. I have friends being shot at in Iraq as I type this.)

    If the Democrats wanted to put the lie to this executive power grab, someone should introduce a formal declaration of war on the floor of the House or Senate. Let's see how many "hawks" would put their votes where their mouths are.

  3. Posted by The One True b!X
    March 18, 2006 09:34 PM

    Robert Jordan is a toad.

  4. Posted by scarshapedstar
    March 19, 2006 04:58 AM

    So now our government can take anything they don't like, even out of your house, and throw it down the memory hole, and declare it a classified operation.

    Good job, Bush voters.

  5. Posted by Fred Dawes
    March 19, 2006 10:15 PM

    if people don't stand up people will be used.

  6. Posted by kdog
    March 20, 2006 10:42 AM

    We need a couple brave patriots to sneak into the Crawford Ranch, and the Beltway homes of congressman, take a bunch of stuff and leave without a trace. See how they like it.

    Sneak and peek and take searches? That's funny, I call that burglary. The age of doublespeak is at hand.....Repent! Repent you sinners!

  7. Posted by zak822
    March 20, 2006 01:49 PM

    "..are we really at war in a legal sense."

    Finally, someone is asking this very important question!

    Now if we can get someone in Congress to ask the same question...

  8. Posted by charliedontsurf1
    March 20, 2006 02:28 PM

    Not until late next January at the earliest.

Leave a Comment

HTML Tags:
<b>Bold</b> = Bold
<i>Italics</i> = Italics
<a href="http://www.url.com">linked text</a> = Linked text

Please Only Click The "Post" Button One Time.
URLs Within Comment Body Not In HTML Format Will be Deleted

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Remember me?