Contribute to the cause!


Sign up for updates



Upcoming Events

Meet Jamie Raskin!

Where's my district?
Do I live in district 20? Find out here.

Where do I vote?
Find out here.

In the News

June 15, 2006
Going to the Mat Blog
Blogger criticizes Ida Ruben's attempts to trample on journalistic freedom at Blair High School.


June 15, 2006
Washington Post
Ida Ruben attempts to interfere with Blair High School students' first amendment rights.


May 25, 2006
Silver Chips
Raskin wins endorsement of Blair High School student newspaper.


May 18, 2006
Washington Post
Raskin reels in big names while his opponent struggles for support.


May 10, 2006
The Gazette
Candidates don't fear shadows of state races


April 19, 2006
The Gazette
Seth Grimes: "Jamie Raskin has creativity lacking in Annapolis"


April 1, 2006
The Silver Spring / Takoma Voice
Local pundit, Mike Tabor, says incumbents running scared, while Raskin runs strong.


March 15, 2006
Political Cortex
Jamie Raskin is emerging as a national leader on marriage equality, all while he is poised to pull off a remarkable political upset.


March 3, 2006
Silver Chips
Silver Spring high school students support Jamie Raskin's campaign.


March 2, 2006
Baltimore Sun
Jamie Raskin testifies against anti-gay marriage amendment in Annapolis.


Feb 14, 2006
TomPaine.com
Jamie Raskin Discusses the Role of Movement-Building in Presidential Impeachment


Feb 8, 2006
The Silver Spring / Takoma Voice
Progressive Politics Heats Up


Feb 1, 2006
The Gazette
The Gazette profiles Jamie's campaign.


Feb 1, 2006
The Washington Post
Raskin testifies against gay marriage ban.


Jan 26, 2006
The Washington Post
Radio commentator Mark Plotkin on Jamie's campaign.


Jan 6, 2006
Silver Spring / Takoma Park Voice
Tenants secure safe and affordable housing... for now


Jan 4, 2006
The Gazette
District 20 race begins to heat up


Dec 5, 2005
The Takoma Park / Silver Spring Voice
Jamin Raskin: Constitutional law professor / community activist considers run for state senate


Dec 1, 2005
The Washington Post
Law Professor vs. lawmaker?




Home
Biography
Profile
Issues
In the News
Endorsements
Publications
For Press
For Bloggers NEW!
Contact
Voter Guide
District Map
Internships
En EspaƱol
Chinese



Read further comments by Plotkin in the Washington Post.


Baltimore Sun

Emotions flare over same-sex marriage

Capital Notebook
March 2, 2006

"People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible," -Jamie Raskin
Despite rejection of a similar bill by House lawmakers last month, a Senate committee took up yesterday the emotionally charged debate over whether Maryland should ban same-sex marriage in its constitution.

Clergy, constitutional law experts and children of gay parents were among those who packed the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee room to speak out on the issue.

The marriage debate dominated the opening weeks of the legislature after a Baltimore judge sided with 19 gay men and women, ruling that Maryland's 33-year-old law defining marriage between a man and a woman was unconstitutional. The discussion shows few signs of dying down.

Sen. Nancy Jacobs, a Republican who represents Harford and Cecil counties, engaged in an impassioned debate with Jamie Raskin, a constitutional law professor from American University, over the influence of the Bible on modern law.

"As I read Biblical principles, marriage was intended, ordained and started by God - that is my belief," she said. "For me, this is an issue solely based on religious principals."

Raskin shot back that the Bible was also used to uphold now-outlawed statutes banning interracial marriage, and that the constitution should instead be lawmakers' guiding principle.

"People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution; they don't put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible," he said.

Some in the room applauded, which led committee chairman Sen. Brian E. Frosh, a Democrat from Montgomery County, to call for order. "This isn't a football game," he said.

While the failed House measure included a ban on civil unions, which opponents argued was too broad, the Senate bill would ask voters only whether same-sex marriage should be banned.

Some proponents of the Senate bill, which would allow voters to decide in the November election whether to prohibit same-sex marriage, said it has a better chance than a House measure killed earlier this session.

But the sponsor, Sen. Larry E. Haines, a Republican representing Baltimore and Carroll counties, said he believes Democratic Senate leaders would prefer to ignore the bill because placing the question of gay marriage on the ballot in an election year could drive up turnout from conservatives, possibly helping Republican candidates in the fall.

"We have the support. The key is getting a vote," said Haines.



Send me an email
By Authority: Friends of Jamin Raskin. Chair: Marlana Valdez. Treasurer: Sam Agger.