| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
Planned Down Time Tomorrow
posted by michael on Tuesday August 15 2006, @05:14AM
We will be down for a little while for some planned maintenance in early hours of Wednesday Aug 16 (that's tomorrow), US east coast time. Our ISP is going to do some work on our disk.
(
Read More...
| )
 |
|
Cameroon Gone Wild
posted by michael on Monday August 07 2006, @07:46AM
jberryhill writes "The .cm (Cameroon) ccTLD operators have discovered that since their TLD is simply one omitted letter away from .com, that there is a gold mine in the typo traffic that comes their way. Accordingly, Cameroon has now wild-carded its ccTLD and is monetizing the traffic.
The upshot is that, if the Neiman Marcus / Dotster lawsuit over 27 domain names was properly characterized as "massive", then the Cameroonians are now going well beyond massive, and are monetizing every conceivable typographic variation of "Neiman Marcus", as well as the correct spelling thereof at www.neimanmarcus.cm.
Colombia could learn a thing or two from these folks."
(
Read More... | 7 comments
| )
 |
|
.eu registry suspends 74,000 domains
posted by michael on Tuesday July 25 2006, @04:47PM
fnord writes "Keiren McCarthy reports in TheRegister that EURid, the registry for the .eu (the European Union's *TLD), has suspended some 74,000 domains suspected of being registered by phony registrars, presumably for warehousing and later resale at inflated prices. It is alleged that three entities (apparently from the US) set up some 400 dummy registrars, thus greatly enhancing their chances of registering desirable names. EURid also intends to sue the parties responsible. Their statement on the issue is here. Bob Parsons, CEO of ICANN registrar GoDaddy, first pointed out this practice in his blog last April. This EURID action is in start contrast to the ICANN .info and .biz gTLD rollout fiascos, in which ICANN accredited registrars and faux registrars such as BondiLLC (see my 2002 DNSO-GA post here on that farce), similarily gamed the system with apparent impunity, despite myself and others such as Richard Henderson first pointing this out to Vint Cerf et al over four years ago, with, so far as I know, no ICANN action to date. -g"
(
Read More... | 9 comments
| )
 |
|
VeriSign director charged with securities fraud
posted by michael on Friday July 21 2006, @12:15PM
GeorgeK writes "Bloomberg is reporting that Gregory Reyes is facing criminal and civil charges in relation to securities fraud. Reuters and the Mercury News also have coverage.
Mr. Reyes is a current director of VeriSign and thus the issues I raised in an earlier ICANNWatch story, regarding the ability of ICANN to terminate the VeriSign .com registry agreement using section 16.C appear to now be closer to reality. This is another reason for the DoC not to approve the new agreement, as it doesn't have similar termination provisions."
(
Read More... | 3 comments
| )
 |
|
NomCom Extends Deadline to Aug 1, 2006
posted by michael on Thursday July 20 2006, @12:13AM
If you're an ICANNWatch reader, you may be the sort of person who knows about the issues ICANN faces and who might be able to contribuite to the ICANN Board, The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council,
the Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), or
the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Council. And it turns out that you haven't quite missed the deadline to apply:
ICANN Nominating Committee Extends Deadline for Submissions to 1 August 2006
7 July 06
ICANN's Nominating Committee (NomCom) announced today that it has extended
its deadline for Statements of Interest to 1 August 2006 (23:59 GMT).
The 2006 Nominating Committee began its work in March of this year and is
actively seeking qualified candidates for the following key positions within
ICANN:
The ICANN Board of Directors
The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council
The Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)
The Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) Council
Those individuals selected by the Nominating Committee will have a unique
opportunity to work with accomplished colleagues from around the globe,
address intriguing technical coordination problems and related policy
development challenges with diverse functional, cultural, and geographic
dimensions, and gain valuable insights and experience from working across
these boundaries of knowledge, responsibility and perspective.
Selection criteria, eligibility factors, roles of each position, application
procedure, and contacts are posted at: http://www.icann.org/committees/nom-comm/formal-call-2006.html.
Statements of Interest may be sent to nomcom.submissions@icann.org. Submissions will be handled confidentially and should be received by 23:59 GMT on 1 August 2006 for full consideration. Statements of interest should be submitted as e-mail messages and NOT as attached files. Selections will be made in October, with service beginning in December 2006.
It seems that the previous nomcom also extended its deadline, so this is becoming something of a tradition...
(
Read More...
| )
 |
|
IGP Campaign Irritates NTIA
posted by Mueller on Friday June 30 2006, @07:54AM
Over a week ago, word reached me that the NTIA - the branch of the U.S. Commerce Department that supervises ICANN and approves its decisions -- was irritated with the Internet Governance Project email campaign in response to its Notice of Inquiry on the ICANN transition. IGP's email campaign, you may recall, encourages people around the world to email NTIA a simple message expressing opposition to U.S. government control of the root. It does so because most Internet users are not professional lobbyists or lawyers and lack the time to read the Federal Register and respond point by point to a governmental Notice of Inquiry in a language that may not be their own.
Response to the email campaign has not been that big, certainly nothing of .xxx proportions. Nevertheless, it currently accounts for almost all of the responses in the NTIA proceeding. In other words, so far most of the people who care to comment at all about the seemingly obscure topic of DNS management want to tell the U.S. to work cooperatively for a more global solution. That's not what the NTIA wanted to hear.
So now a counter-campaign to discredit the message begins. First shot is an article at the web site "Email Battles," (EB) which purports to be a source of expert news and opinion on "spam, security, phishing" and the like.
(
Read More... | 3947 bytes more | 3 comments
| )
 |
|
Site Maintenance Period Planned
posted by michael on Friday June 30 2006, @06:18AM
We'll be down for a little while commencing Saturday 12:01 AM, US east coast time. If all goes well, downtime should only be about 30 minutes as we switch to a larger (virtual) disk.
(
Read More... | 1 comment
| )
 |
|
Rita Rodin Joins ICANN Board
posted by michael on Wednesday June 28 2006, @02:15PM
ICANN Blog reports Rita Rodin Elected to ICANN Board.
Although many contributed, Rita Rodin has at least as good a claim as anyone to being the primary drafter of the UDRP we have today. At a critical point in the process, her draft replaced the one produced through the public process, although proponents tried hard to distract from the slight of hand afterwards. As Mark Lemley and I wrote in our article on ICANN's antitrust issues, Even before the first ICANN working group on domain name arbitration reported in late July 1999, a group of registrars quietly employed a Skadden Arps lawyer, Rita Rodin, to craft a dispute policy for them. On August 20, 1999, the registrars unveiled their proposed policy document. Four days later, the ICANN staff issued a report with its own detailed suggestions about what the dispute policy should look like, many of which followed the registrars’ lead. Two days after that, amidst much controversy, the ICANN Board resolved to use the registrars’ draft, rather than anything drafted through the ICANN consensus policymaking procedure “as a starting point” for the drafting of ICANN’s own policy. In practice this meant that the Registrars’ draft was accepted almost in toto, save that a few of the most controversial issues were referred to a ‘small drafting committee’ made up of representatives of the warring factions. source: ICANN & Anti-Trust, 2003 ILL. L. REV. 1, 28-29 (footnotes omitted).Ms. Rodin is clearly a very effective lawyer.
(
Read More... | 2 comments
| )
 |
|
VeriSign receives subpoena relating to stock option backdating
posted by michael on Tuesday June 27 2006, @06:31PM
GeorgeK writes "VeriSign has reported that they are cooperating with a grand jury subpoena and a SEC inquiry into their historical stock option grants. More can be found here. Backdating of options is essentially a fraud against existing shareholders, as noted in the press or simply searching Google for "backdating fraud".
Under the existing 2001 .com Registry Agreement, section 16.C would allow for termination of the agreement by ICANN in the event that VeriSign "is convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction of a felony or other serious offense related to financial activities, or is the subject of a determination by a court of competent jurisdiction that ICANN reasonably deems as the substantive equivalent of those offenses", or "is disciplined by the government of its domicile for conduct involving dishonesty" or "Any officer or director of Registry Operator is convicted of a felony or of a misdemeanor related to financial activities, or is judged by a court to have committed fraud or breach of fiduciary duty, or is the subject of a judicial determination that ICANN deems as the substantive equivalent of any of these, and such officer or director is not immediately removed in such circumstances."
The proposed New .com Agreement doesn't appear to contain similar termination provisions (see sections VI.1 and VI.2). Short of bankruptcy, it's nearly impossible for VeriSign to not have the .com agreement renewed perpetually, even if they are found to be fraudulent or dishonest.
Why would ICANN (and VeriSign) agree to remove those clauses? Does ICANN think that VeriSign is incapable of fraud or dishonesty? Perhaps ICANN hasn't noticed that VeriSign switched their motto from "The Value of Trust" to "Where it all comes together"....
This is yet another reason why the DoC should proceed with caution, and send the parties back to the negotiating table until they have an agreement that reflects the concerns of all stakeholders. If indeed the current .com agreement stays in force, and VeriSign is found guilty of fraud due to backdating options, it might be a dream scenario for ICANN and .com domain holders, allowing termination of the .com agreement, and forcing a proper tender for managing the .com registry."
(
Read More... | 1 comment
| )
 |
|
Open Letter to ICANN Community from NeuLevel on Renewal
posted by michael on Tuesday June 27 2006, @06:20AM
Keith Drazek writes "NeuLevel today submitted an Open Letter to the ICANN Community providing an update on .BIZ contract renegotiations with ICANN. A final agreement was reached last week and is expected to be posted for public comment today in Marrakech. NeuLevel has a team attending the Marrakech meeting and we look forward to discussing the agreement with any interested parties.
We also posted the open letter to the ICANN Wiki site.
(
Read More...
| )
 |
|
Did DoC Use the IANA Contract to Convince ICANN to Nix .XXX?
posted by Mueller on Sunday June 25 2006, @11:08AM
ICM Registry has issued a new Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request about the US Department of Commerce's role in prodding ICANN to vote down the .xxx domain. This one promises to yield information even juicier than the last one. ICM's Registry's FOIA request is based on the hypothesis that the Commerce Department may have used its power over the award of the IANA contract to shift the key ICANN Board votes (Twomey and Cerf in particular, who pull several others with them) against the .xxx contract. The request asserts, "Shortly before the [May 9 2006] ICANN Board meeting and the vote on the .xxx domain, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communication and Information John Kneuer and certain staff members reportedly met with Paul Twomey of ICANN and others to discuss, among other things, the interrelationship of " the IANA sole source contract, the .xxx vote, and the NTIA's Notice of Inquiry on the future of the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the U.S. Commerce Department.
A threat to shift the IANA contract to someone else, or to open it up to competitive bidding, would certainly light a fire under ICANN. But at this time, the hypothesis that DoC did this is just that -- a theory that remains to be tested. It will be interesting to see the evidence.
(
Read More... | 1 comment
| )
 |
|
|
|
| |
[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]
|
|
| | |
| |
If you are logged in, you can configure what appears on this page by editing your homepage preferences. The same page allows you to choose our "light" format or exclude certain types of stories (or ICANNWatch editors!). You can decide the content and order of the items in this column, choosing from several optional headline services.
The format comments page lets you set a default for how you view comments and how comments you contribute appear. Elsewhere you can review your karma and posting history, or set what information you would like other users to know about you.
You may want to change your messaging preferences. We can send you a daily email of our headlines, or perhaps you would like a message every time someone replies to one of your comments.
|
|
| | |
|