Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories, Volume 1, Issue 1
Peer-Reviewed Papers:
Fleas under a Microscope: Evidence there was no third jet involved in the World Trade Center attacks
Debunking911The PNAC and Other Myths: A Short List of Observations
JamesBEvidence of Controlled Deception: A long list of observations - Part I
Debunking911Evidence of Controlled Deception: A long list of observations - Part II
James Bennett
Giulio Bernacchia
Executive Editor: ScottS
Advisory Board:
David B. Benson
Shagster
Len Brazil
Mike Williams http://www.911myths.com
Debunking911 http:www.debunking911.com
JamesB http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com
The Journal of Debunking 911 is a free online publication dedicated to educating the public on the collapse of the three World Trade Center structures on September 11 2001.
SUBMISSION OF PAPERS Submit a PDF or Microsoft Word Document to the Journals E-mail address. Check manuscript length limitations listed below. Papers under review, accepted for publication, or published elsewhere are not accepted. E-mail the Journals Department for JD911 for complete instructions for manuscript preparation. Submit your documents for review at submissions@jod911.com
Types of Submissions
Technical Papers. Technical papers are full-length papers of value and interest to 9/11. They must be original reviews of past practice, present information of current interest, or probe new fields of 9/11 research. They should report results of thought-provoking studies that contribute to 9/11 works.
Technical Notes. Technical notes present (1) original, practical information; (2) preliminary or partial results of research and (3) concisely presented research results.
Discussions. Discussions are papers that present significant comments or questions about the technical content of a technical paper or note published in an JD911 journal, or a paper presented at a specialty conference or other meeting that has been published in an JD911 proceedings. They are limited to 2,000 words. They may be submitted during a 5-month period following the date of publication of the paper or note but may be extended by 1 month by written request by the discusser. Discussions should not contain matter readily found elsewhere, advocate special interests, contain obvious commercial intent, controvert established fact, or be purely speculative. Discussions follow the requirements for other manuscripts except that they do not have abstracts, introductions, or conclusions. Separate discussions must be submitted for companion papers (a study presented as Parts 1 and 11).
Closures. Closures are responses written by the author(s) of the original paper or note. The author(s) addresses and clarifies issues raised in Discussions and provides conclusions to the issues. Closures and discussions are published together.
Forums. Forums are essays of opinion and founded in fact, often on thought-provoking topics, which generate further discussion. They normally do not exceed 5,000 words and are carried in several JD911 journals.
Book Reviews. Book reviews assess new books whose content is judged important. They summarize the work, illuminate its strengths and weaknesses, and place it in context with existing literature. Reviews are limited to 1,200 words and are usually written upon request by a journal’s book review editor or editor. Not all JD911 journals publish book reviews.
Errata. Errata are corrections of errors that appear in print. If errors are serious enough to impair understanding or mislead readers, authors should submit errata to the JD911 Journals Department. Errata are published in earliest available issue.
Length Requirements
For most JD911 journals, the maximum number of words or word-equivalents is 10,000 for papers, 3,500 for notes, and 2,000 for discussions. The editor may waive these restrictions to encourage papers on topics that cannot be treated within these limitations. Such topics may include state-of-the-art reviews and detailed case histories. However, authors are advised that most topics can be covered within these limitations, and that the editors of this journal require clear justification for longer manuscripts.
SI Units
The use of System International (SI) units as primary units of measure is mandatory. Other units may be given in parenthesis after the SI unit if the author desires. More information about SI units can be found at the NIST.
Disclaimer
Any statements expressed in these materials are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of J911, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein. No reference made in this publication to any specific method, product, process or service constitutes or implies an endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by J911. The materials are for general information only and do not represent a standard of J911, nor are they intended as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal document. J911 makes no representation or warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or utility of any information, apparatus, products, or process discussed in this publication, and assumes no liability therefore. This information should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application. Anyone utilizing this information assumes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infringement of any patent or patents.
JOURNAL OF DEBUNKING 911
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSThe purpose of JOD911, is "to foster activity which leads to the truth about the events on 9/11." Consistent with this purpose, the Journal of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theorist reports original research relevant to any part of the 911 controversy. Papers may be of either applied or basic character. They must contain work that has not been published and is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere, and they should be clearly written and as concise as is consistent with communication of understanding of the subject. They must not be bias for "normal collapse by impact and fire," in keeping with our goal to "Debunk" in general.
The authors must identify clearly their original contribution (a new concept, method, result, or interpretation, or a state-of-the-art review from a new viewpoint, etc.). This contribution must be reflected in the abstract and conclusions. If there are several results, the conclusions should consist of numbered items. The paper must be adequately correlated to previous publications and very specialized or abstract results must be interpreted for a broader readership.
The authors must not include events which took place previous to 911 (political policies, statements, folded money, Album covers, etc.) which are logical fallacies and have nothing to do with the mechanics of collapse.
The authors must indicate a desire to stay anonymous and provide an anonymous ID which can be published on the internet. Anonymity is provided to prevent harassment from fringe members of the 911 conspiracy movement.
© 2006 Journal Of Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theories. All rights reserved.