First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
Three Stooges' heirs get last laugh as high court refuses appeal

By The Associated Press
01.08.02

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court gave a poke in the eye to an artist who profited from posthumous depictions of the Three Stooges.

Los Angeles artist Gary Saderup lost his appeal in a case seeking First Amendment protection for photographers and artists who specialize in celebrities. Justices refused yesterday to hear the case.

Now Saderup must pay the $75,000 he made from depictions of Curly, Moe and Larry to some of their heirs and cover their legal fees.

The case, which originally teamed Shaquille O'Neal and the Stooges' heirs against Saderup, had been closely followed by the licensing industry.

"It's wonderful news for all celebrities and all celebrities' heirs," Robert N. Benjamin, the attorney for the Stooges' heirs, said yesterday.

The California Supreme Court ruled last spring that Saderup violated a state law by not getting consent before putting a picture of the slapstick comedians on shirts and lithographs. O'Neal had already settled his claims out of court.

Saderup's attorney, Stephen R. Barnett, told the justices the California ruling "offends not only the proverb that 'one picture is worth a thousand words,' but also the First Amendment's prohibition on legal monopolies over facts."

"It's too bad the court wasn't interested in it," Barnett said yesterday. "The claims of celebrities and dead celebrities like the Three Stooges are eating into the First Amendment while the court looks the other way."

Benjamin said the California ruling will ensure celebrities' images are protected. California is one of 17 states that give heirs some right to control publicity, the Supreme Court was told. In that state, heirs have rights to likenesses, names, voices, signatures and photographs for 70 years after the celebrity's death.

The Three Stooges began on the vaudeville stage in 1923, then moved on to feature films and shorts. Jerome (Curly) Howard died in 1952, and Larry Fine and Moe Howard died in 1975. Shemp Howard, Joe Besser and Curly Joe DeRita took Jerome Howard's place in some later ensembles.

Fine, Moe Howard and DeRita formed a management company in 1959 that owns rights to the Three Stooges. That company is now controlled by some of the actors' heirs.

Saderup created a charcoal drawing of the original trio and sold lithographs for between $20 and $250 and shirts for about $20 out of a temporary booth in a suburban Los Angeles shopping mall. The state court said Saderup's renditions of three unsmiling stooges, including two with their eyes open wide, were merchandise, not art.

The case is Gary Saderup v. Comedy III Productions Inc.


Previous
Artist slapped for Three Stooges shtick
California Supreme Court says T-shirt maker’s images of Larry, Mo, Curly are merchandising, not art. 05.01.01

Related

Hockey player loses fight with comic book

Appeals court says former NHL brawler Tony Twist's rights were not violated by use of his name for a character in 'Spawn.' 07.26.02

Comic-book villains modeled on brothers ruled protected speech
Reversing lower court, California Supreme Court says characters based on musicians Johnny and Edgar Winter 'are distorted for purposes of lampoon, parody, or caricature.' 06.03.03

Schwarzenegger gives nod to bobblehead lawsuit
Ohio company owner sued by California governor says former movie star is a public political figure and therefore has lost right to control his image. 05.05.04

Court bars T-shirts that name boat company, mock Vikings
'Use of another's trademark in a humorous fashion to sell a product,' is not protected, Minnesota county judge rules. 12.08.05

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

print this   Print


Last system update: Friday, August 25, 2006 | 10:06:13
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Flag-desecration report
Supreme Court
Experts
Columnists
Podcasts
First Amendment publications
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links