Ace of Spades HQ
Alarming News American Digest American Thinker Amy Ridenour AnalPhilosopher Anchoress Angry in the Great White North Ankle Biting Pundits Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler Art of the Blog Atlantic Blog Austin Bay Babalu Blog Backcountry Conservative Baldilocks Basil's Blog Belmont Club Betsy's Page Blackfive Brainster's Blog Broken Masterpieces BuzzMachine California Conservative Cam Edwards Captain's Quarters Clayton Cramer Commonwealth Conservative Conservative Life Conservative Outpost Counterterrorism Blog D.C. Thornton Daily Pundit Daniel Pipes David Frum David Limbaugh David Orland Dean Esmay Debbie Schlussel Decision '08 Deltoid Democracy Project Digger's Realm Donald Luskin Donald Sensing Drink This Drudge Report Drumwaster's Rants Dust in the Light Florida Cracker FullosseousFlap Hobbs Online Hot Air Huckleberries Online Hugh Hewitt IMAO In the Agora INDC Journal Indepundit InkWell Instapundit Iowahawk Jawa Report Jihad Watch Jim Miller on Politics John and Ken Junkyard Blog JustOneMinute Kelly Jane Torrance Kim du Toit LaShawn Barber Little Green Footballs Little Miss Attila Lonewacko Mark in Mexico Mary Katherine Ham Matt Margolis Memeorandum Meryl Yourish Michael Fumento Mickey Kaus Moderate Voice Moxie Mudville Gazette My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Mystery Pollster Neal Boortz Outside the Beltway Overlawyered Pajama Hadin PalmTree Pundit Pardon My English Patterico Paul Cella PoliPundit Power Line Prestopundit Protein Wisdom QandO Radio Equalizer Real Clear Politics Red State Res Ipsa Loquitur Resurrection Song Right Wing News Right Wing Nuthouse Rodger Morrow Rony Abovitz Rosenblog Secure Liberty Seven Inches of Sense Sharp as a Marble Showcase Sierra Faith Sissy Willis Solomonia Sound Politics Spoons Stephen Bainbridge Steve Sailer Sundries Shack Tapscott's Copy Desk Tempus Fugit The Corner The Remedy The Right Report TKS Truth Laid Bear TV Newser UNCoRRELATED VDARE View from the Right Villainous Company Watcher of Weasels Wizbang World Magazine Xrlq Yorkie |
The Foley mess: deal with it
***scroll for updates*** I've been absorbing as much commentary on the 'net and radio about the Foley mess as I can stand today. What I am hearing from some conservatives inclined to pooh-pooh Foley's behavior and carry on about Barney Frank instead does not sit well with me. You can't possibly read Foley's communications with minors that have been disclosed so far--including his attempts to rendezvous with one--and dismiss them as merely "naughty e-mails." Yet, that's how White House press secretary Tony Snow described some of them this morning. Though he admitted to being too "glib" and "clarified" those remarks with tougher words this afternoon, the damage has been done. Fair or not, it makes the White House look flippant about sexual predation. Parents of all political persuasions are not going to be receptive to that. At this point, I think the GOP is making a mistake banging the drum so hard over the apparent far left/MSM orchestration of the story. However long the other side sat on the e-mails and IMs, the fact is that Mark Foley--and Mark Foley alone--is responsible for giving his enemies something to spring upon his campaign in the first place. It is also impossible to ignore the appearance of calculated grooming by Foley of potential young targets. AP: Former Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., told House pages in warm farewell speeches over the years that he took "a special interest in each and every one" of them, identifying many of the youngsters by name and thanking them for their service. Here's a fuller excerpt of his speech to the pages in June 2002 via the Congressional Record: Mr. FOLEY. I warn all of you not to cry in front of me, please, so I can get through this very important day with you without shedding tears as well. He was going to slip graduation money to a male page? He took another out for a cruise in his BMW? Ugh. There is a time and place for attacking the Dems and the MSM. Now is not that time. Parents need assurance that their kids are safe on Capitol Hill. If Beltway GOP elites can't understand this, they are beyond hope. *** Mary Katharine mirrors my thoughts on those pushing the "technically, the pages were of age in Florida" excuses: ...there remains some question as to whether Foley's actions were illegal. Regardless of the legality, I'm glad he's gone. Back when Democrat Gerry Studds and Republican Dan Crane were cavorting with 17-year-old male and female pages, respectively, the fact that they got out of the situation with mere censure to their names is astounding to me. Both of those illicit relationships were allegedly consensual, and the pages in questions were of the age of consent. Studds turned his back on the House as it read his censure, and was reelected to his seat multiple times. Crane was tossed out of office by voters, as he should have been, after a tearful apology. Michael Reagan, who was a victim of a sexual predator as a child, and grass-roots conservative activist/documentarian David Bossie weigh in via Human Events Online: House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R.-Ill.) is coming under fire from conservatives for his failing to take action against disgraced Rep. Mark Foley (R.-Fla.), who resigned last week for inappropriate communications with teenage pages. One of blogger/teacher Betsy Newmark's former students was a page interviewed by the NYTimes. He has created an informational site about the page program to try and convince parents that their kids will be safe: On Friday, September 29, 2006, Congressman Mark Foley resigned from Congress after news media outlets revealed inappropriate emails and sexually explicit instant messages between him and former male House pages. This news is very disheartening. Unfortunately, it's not just one incident. And in too many quarters inside and outside the Beltway, Foley's "outlandishness" has been given too short shrift. *** Reader Wayne e-mails: Ms Malkin, *** Update: Here's video of our discussion on The O'Reilly Factor tonight. See also the comments section. I'm not arguing with Allah Pundit about this: "If someone knew what [Foley] was up to and didn’t act to stop it immediately, they’re complicit in child abuse." Well, of course. As you'll see, we all agreed on that point on the show tonight. What I am saying, simply, is that there are some operatives and apologists on my side going overboard in blaming the messengers--and the victims. Reader Will: I saw your appearance on O'Reilly and read your comments about the Foley disaster. You are 100% correct: I see too many Repubs and conservatives downplaying the Foley situation by pointing to past Democrat messes, such as Gerry Studds and Barney Frank. That's not a good defense. Frankly, I'm quite surprised that more conservatives aren't focusing on the extent of Foley's grasp (pardon the pun) regarding the congressional pages. And there are questions as to what was known and by whom. When something like this occurs, the "family values" and "law and order" party should be addressing the page program and ensuring that kids are safe, not worrying about the timing and source of the emails or whether Barney Frank ran a brothel out of his apartment many years ago. I'm with you on this one... Will Update: Here's the Washington Times editorial. I need to sleep on this one. |