This article is premium content. In order to gain access to it please either Log in, Activate your complimentary web account if you are a print subscriber, or Subscribe now

Charlemagne

Restricting free speech is wrong

Oct 19th 2006
From The Economist print edition

IN 1999 Jack Straw, then Britain's home secretary, was attacked for being rude about an ethnic minority. There were demands for criminal investigations, appeals to various commissions and public agencies, a fevered debate over whether Mr Straw was racist. On that occasion, he was accused of demeaning gypsies by saying that people who masqueraded as travellers seemed to think they had a right to commit crimes. In the past few weeks Mr Straw, now leader of the House of Commons, has triggered a similar response by arguing that the Muslim veil (ie, the full, face-covering niqab) is an unhelpful symbol of separateness. This week he won the backing of his boss, Tony Blair.

These episodes are reminders not that Mr Straw is hostile to minorities (he isn't) but that any debate in Europe about minority rights soon degenerates into a fight between self-proclaimed community leaders, public agencies, the police, courts and the law. It may be hard to reconcile militant Islam with secular Europe. But Europeans have fostered a culture, legal system and set of institutions that have a chilling effect on public debate, making it hard to discuss the subject honestly.

Login

If you hold unused Pay Per View credits, or you already have an active subscription, please log in to view the article:



 Yes