Media Mythmakers
/MM_banner.jpg

Home | Intro | Excerpts | Author | Buy it


About the book
Contents
Excerpts
Author
Buy it
/images/MM_medium.jpg

CSI TV: Science or Psychics?

Psychics claim to guide us in matters of romance and money, predicting handsome strangers or future fortunes. (If anyone finds a psychic who correctly predicts lottery numbers, please let me know.)

But what happens when psychic powers are used for much more important and practical purposes, such as solving crimes? Psychic detectives have a long and glaring track record of utter failure in criminal cases; from Elizabeth Smart to Laci Peterson to Chandra Levy, Jimmy Hoffa, and countless others, psychic information has been worthless in leading police to missing persons. Still, when crimes remain unsolved and families are desperate, psychics will offer to help. And sometimes entertain.

Following the success of Court TV’s series Psychic Detectives, the network launched a new “reality TV” program titled Haunting Evidence. California “psychic profiler” Carla Baron and two other investigators spend 24 hours revisiting real-life cold case murders in the expectation that their powers will succeed where police have failed. Oddly, the team doesn’t tackle obvious missing persons cases known to many Americans, such as the 1996 murder of JonBenet Ramsey, or Natalee Holloway’s 2005 disappearance. Perhaps those cases are too high-profile, and might cause the public to wonder why America’s top psychic detectives hadn’t solved those long ago.

In a recent episode, the group went to Athens, Georgia, to look into the unsolved 2001 murder of college student Tara Baker. The investigators visited the Baker family, camera crew in tow, and asked them to relive their daughter’s life and death. The psychics then launched into very graphic, detailed descriptions of how they imagine Baker was murdered (based entirely on “feelings,” guesses, and conjecture). They later headed to Baker’s grave, though it’s unclear why, other than for dramatic effect. Ghost hunters usually claim that people’s ghosts remain not at the spot they were buried, but where they died (hence haunted houses, not haunted cemeteries). Apparently the group was unaware of this, but in the end it didn’t matter, since no information came of it.

One psychic stated confidently that the police already have the DNA evidence they need to find Baker’s murderer (which makes one wonder why the group was needed in the first place). The investigators also claimed that Baker knew her victim well, and that they had communicated with Baker’s ghost. If Baker knew her killer well, she would presumably know his name, address, and telephone number—-exactly the sort of information that would be useful to police. If Baker’s ghost confirmed to the psychics that she knew her killer, why would it refuse to just tell them who it was? Predictably, both psychics’ powers dimmed on that subject, and instead they provided only the usual ambiguous information that may (or may not) turn out to be true if and when the killer is found. The program concluded with the team giving their information to police and suggesting that they had helped solve the crime, when nothing of the sort happened. The murderer has not been caught and the crime remains unsolved.

If the trio truly were trying to solve the case (instead of simply make entertaining television), it seems odd that they would limit themselves to only 24 hours of “investigation” and supposedly request that they not be given information about the case. Real detectives want as much information as possible, but on Haunting Evidence this technique is meant to impress the viewers when the team “senses” information about the murder that would have appeared in news coverage or been obvious from common sense. The information they come up with might seem inexplicable—-unless, of course, they had spent a few minutes looking into the case before they showed up. If the psychics weren’t sure where to look, they could have consulted a memorial Web site for the victim, www.TaraBaker.com, which includes dozens of newspaper stories detailing the crime.

In a way, Haunting Evidence will be a good test case. If the team can come up with new evidence (based on psychic powers) that actually brings a criminal to justice, it would be the first in history, and revolutionize the criminal justice system. If psychics can provide valid, reliable information that leads police to bodies and suspects, they should be in every police department. The show may in fact end up helping solve the crimes it features-—not through psychic powers but simply raising the crime’s profile and encouraging the public to come forward to help the stalled investigation.

Despite claims that police departments routinely use psychic information in investigations, the relationship between police and psychics is an uneasy one. After all, across the country hundreds of professed psychics are arrested each year for fraud and theft by deception, usually after taking money from elderly victims in fortunetelling scams. (And just last month, a California psychic was convicted of murder.)

In the end, science, not psychic powers, has a proven track record of success in solving crimes. CourtTV’s slogan, which appears in ads for Haunting Evidence, is “Seriously Entertaining.” Yet the families of those murdered are desperate to find justice, not provide entertainment for CourtTV’s audience. If psychic detectives can really find missing persons and want to help, they should be in the hurricane-ravaged southern states, where nearly two thousand people are still missing from last season’s disasters. Instead of helping these families recover their loved ones, psychics are busy appearing on cable television shows.

Past Essays

Back to top

Announcements

New Web Site Launched!

I have created a new Web site, www.RadfordBooks.com, ( HERE for you hyperlinkers)to host information on my published books. Plus, there's a special bonus for you fiction fans: the first three chapters of my unpublished novel Thoreau's Bastard. It's got sex and scandal! Don Knotts! And a murderous dwarf! Want to find out more, or tell me to stick to my day job? Check it out! And thanks for visiting.


Reviews

In keeping with the spirit of fairness in my book, I will post all published reviews of my book, including any negative reviews. It's misleading when ads for films or books only show the good reviews and hide the negative ones. Valid comments—whether praise or criticism—are welcomed.

"With insight and wit, Benjamin Radford trains his skeptical eye on fearmongering journalists and activists. The result is a fascinating book that leaves no modern American myth unchallenged." - Barry Glassner, Ph. D., author of The Culture of Fear

"In the spirit of Vance Packard and Ralph Nader, Ben Radford delivers a blistering critique of the subtle media forces that vie for our hearts, minds, and wallets. A thoroughly enjoyable read-acerbic, witty, and right on the money. This would make an ideal book for college courses on mass media, journalism, and advertising." - Robert Bartholomew, Ph.D., author of Exotic Deviance

"This book should be required reading for all who are caught up in the thrall of U.S. mass media... Written in an appealing style devoid of academic jargon and pontification, this book peels away the myths that mislead and provides the facts. It should be on every library shelf. Essential!" - Choice - Current Review for Academic Libraries, April 2004

"A provocative, well-researched book... gives an apt overview of many problems facing modern society." - Oakland Press (Pontiac, Michigan), January 2004

"Radford offers hundreds of examples of deceptive practices in journalism, advertising, political activism, public relations, and charity appeals." - The Futurist, January/February 2004

"As entertaining as it is informative..." - Vermont Comic News, October 2003

"Many editors and TV news directors will find it uncomfortably close to the truth... it is unsparing in its criticism." - Sacramento Bee, December 2003


More reviews

More Reviews

     "In his provocative book Media Mythmakers, Ben Radford not only illustrates many instances of deceptive journalism, advertising, and political activism, but also explores the motives that can prompt individuals to present misleading claims, whether intentionally or unintentionally. At least as interesting and important are Radford's discussions of the troubling implications of media myths and the steps that we can all take to safeguard ourselves against misinformation. This book is a fascinating read of value to policymakers, educators, students, and those who wish to become better-informed citizens and consumers of information."
- John Ruscio, Ph.D., associate professor of psychology Elizabethtown College

Praise for Radford's previous book, Hoaxes, Myths, and Manias:

"...could easily fit into an introductory psychology course, or courses on social psychology and human cognition... a good entertaining introduction to critical thinking for the general reader and for undergraduates." - Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, Vol. 49, No. 6, December 2004

"...you are certain to be amused and amazed in equal parts...an entertaining and enlightening book."
- Psychology Today, March/April 2003

"...fast-paced and intriguing...anyone with an interest in the odd or in critical thinking should read."
- Statesman Journal, June 22, 2003

"For those who trust their own intellect, this book will prove refreshing, interesting reading."
- Bookviews.com, May 2003

Back to top


Ordering Information

Media Mythmakers: How Journalists, Activists, and Advertisers Mislead Us
by Benjamin Radford, 2003, Hardcover, 325 pages, $25.00 retail (see offer below)
Published by Prometheus Books; ISBN: 1591020727

Hoaxes, Myths and Manias: Why We Need Critical Thinking
by Robert Bartholomew and Benjamin Radford, 2003, Paperback, 229 pages, $20.00 retail (see offer below)
Published by Prometheus Books; ISBN: 1591020484
More about Hoaxes, Myths and Manias

Purchase autographed copies of Media Mythmakers and Hoaxes, Myths, and Manias from the author using PayPal

Stick it to giant corporations! Order directly from me, the author, and get your very own autographed copy of Media Mythmakers or Hoaxes, Myths, and Manias. Just click on the PayPal buttons below.

The cost is $22 for Media Mythmakers and $18 for Hoaxes, Myths, and Manias. That's below cover price, cheaper than Amazon.com (shipping added) and includes tax, book rate shipping, unspecified handling, pen ink, and PayPal fees. What? Still want more? Okay, each order will also get a free, autographed bookmark stuck somewhere in the first third of the book (page may vary). Whatta deal! I will get to orders as quickly as I can, but please allow up to 3 weeks for delivery. Offer only available in the United States.

Media Mythmakers ($22.00 US):

Hoaxes, Myths, and Manias ($18.00 US):

Available through Amazon.com. Try the following link:   /logo-no-border(1).gif

Or call (800) 421-0351.

Support your local independent bookstore! Send an original receipt from one of my books and receive an autographed Media Mythmakers bookmark. Contact me using the link provided under About the Author. (To locate an independent bookstore near you, try this link: http://www.newpages.com/NPGuides/bookstores.htm)

Media: To request a review copy or schedule an interview, please contact Lynn Pasquale at Prometheus Books, 800-853-7545 or  lpasquale@prometheusbooks.com

Back to top

All contents © 2003, 2004, 2005 by Benjamin Radford. All rights reserved.

Home | Intro | Excerpts | Author | Buy it

/MM_banner.jpg