« Hil's Pals Say She Flipped On Iraq | Main | Yvette Clarke: How Do You Like Her Now? »

Conspiracy Types Lecture Regular Folks at Ground Zero

The fifth anniversary of 9-11 brought more sorrow and anguish to New York, but also more questioning of the official narrative of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

Hundreds of 9-11 conspiracists paraded across the street from ground zero Monday with their brazen signs—"9-11 WAS A U.S. BLACK OP"—during the solemn reading of the names of the 2,749 who perished in the twin towers. A surprising many people stopped to listen and seriously consider the "proof" offered by members of the so-called 9-11 truth movement, who spent the day lecturing people about how the towers were felled by explosives. (See the photo slideshow here.)

secondweb.jpg
Whoa, no offense: Conspiracy guy has to back off

"Well, I do have questions," remarked one woman who came by on her lunch hour. "Like how were these hijackers who could barely fly a Cessna supposed to have piloted big planes into these buildings?"

A manic guy with bleach-blond hair seized on that to launch a rant about the maximum flame temperature of jet fuel and the physics of molten steel, dismissing recent efforts by the U.S. State Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to counter such rampant, freeform "expertise" as yet more "propaganda."

"Idiots!" shrieked a man overhearing him. "You guys probably believe Elvis is still alive."

But if people have doubts about what happened, it shouldn’t be surprising considering the lengths the Bush administration has gone to manipulate 9-11 and distort pre-war intelligence to justify the war in Iraq. And when people needed clear information about the air quality downtown, the feds instead gave them false assurances.

If truth is the first casualty of war, the Bush administration committed a massacre. A startling 36 percent of Americans now believe the Bush administration either perpetrated the attacks or failed to stop them because it wanted to go to war in the Middle East. 

otherweb.jpg
Taking their message straight to ground zero

Forty-two percent of Americans believe the U.S. government and 9-11 commission are in some way covering up the truth of 9-11, according to a Zogby poll in May. 

Particularly egregious is that the Republican co-chair of the 9-11 Commission, Thomas Kean, agreed to be a paid advisor to ABC’s myth-making docudrama "The Path to 9-11," which was scripted by conservatives, and which aired last night amid frequent references to its containing "composite" characters and incidents, and "time compression . . . used for dramatic purposes." 

If the person charged with investigating the "truth" of 9-11 lends his name to a partisan, fictionalized version, what are people supposed to believe?

Now the conspiracy crowd is using the missing WMDS and numerous other omissions and distortions pushed by the Bush administration to justify all sorts of crackpot theories. 

 "Go and research it, find out the truth, 9-11 was an inside job!" syndicated radio host Alex Jones bellowed from a bullhorn during a 2 p.m. rally across the street from ground zero that drew more than 300 people. 

With his folksy baritone and evident love of the spotlight, Jones is the conspiracy left's version of Rush Limbaugh. "The U.S. is being looted by the globalists," he shouted from inside the protest pen, as police commanders grimaced. "They needed the terrorist attacks to get the people behind their agenda. I wish it wasn’t true, that it was just a conspiracy theory. Because it's scary as hell, but it’s the truth. This country is too great to be taken over by a bunch of murderous thugs."

After about an hour, Jones led the crowd on a march to New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer’s office to lambaste him for supposedly refusing to investigate why the rubble and remains of the World Trade Center were so hastily carted away. 

"The sleeping giant has arisen—we won’t be silenced," declared Jones. He went on to explain to the media how the decision to stage a new Pearl Harbor on 9-11 was made not by Dick Cheney and the neocons, but was dictated from on high by David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Queen Elizabeth of England, and the other financiers of the secretive Bilderberg Group that controls world resources from behind the scenes. 

Back at ground zero, the mood had shifted from a solemn ritual to something more akin to a street fair. Evangelicals preaching Armageddon competed with a string quartet, a Japanese Kabuki dancer, and a rally for the "forgotten" undocumented workers who died during the WTC attacks or were sickened cleaning contaminated office buildings. There was even a group lobbying to "free Pakistan." 

It was all too much for Craig Laitta, a contractor from the Upper East Side who balked at a born-again Christian woman bearing a sign proclaiming her support for President Bush.

"I have a personal memory here, at this spot, and you just destroyed it," said Laitta, who lost a friend on 9-11 and helped clear rubble from the pile. "You don’t go to a funeral and make political statements." 

Later, a guy in an FDNY cap nearly punched an anti-war activist parading though the crowds of mourners and onlookers with a neon green sign that shrieked "LIARS!"

But overall, there seemed more willingness from grieving New Yorkers to tolerate dissent, either because people have grown more used to it, or because the "truth" of 9-11 has never seemed more muddied. 

"Everyone is coming out with their own investigations, their own documentaries. At this point, I don’t know what to believe," sighed Claudette, a Jamaican woman from the Bronx who declined to give her last name. 

"It took me five years to come here and stand here. That’s how hurt I am," added Claudette, an insurance claims adjuster who works less than a block away, and who said she lost friends in the collapse. 

Claudette wasn't troubled by the political sniping around her as she stared up at the twin columns of light projected into the night sky during Monday's closing ceremony. "I worked down here for 18 years. This is where I used to shop. Here will always be my towers. I’m still imagining my towers," she said, her eyes glistening.

Posted in In the Streets

Comments

There are sensible and unsensible conspiracy theories. Some like the 'NO-PLANES' are rubbish. Some are more cautious and sensible. Check out 9/11 Press for Truth by the Vicitims families. Its a good starting point.

Posted by: Jane at September 12, 2006 12:51 PM

Why were there no carriers at Pearl Harbor?
Hillary had Vince Foster Killed because they were long time lovers and he knew too much about all the Clinton's dirty deals.
No one ever walked on the Moon, but Tiger Woods did hit a golf ball that landed up there once.
The CIA and Mafia got together and hired Cubans to kill kennedy. The whole think was paid for by Texas Oil Barons out of petty cash.

"Kenneth, what is the frequency?"

Posted by: gupdog at September 12, 2006 1:05 PM

Pathetic. Using the grieving on behalf of the official story. Why don't you cover that the September 11th families who fought for the 9/11 Commission held a press conference in DC yesterday to reject its findings, accuse it of stunning omissions, and endorse the new film 9/11 Press for Truth (http://911pressfortruth.com)? Many, many of those who lost people on September 11th think 9/11 was an inside job, and saying so or calling for a real investigation in no way disrespects the memory of the dead. Shame on you.

Posted by: Nicholas at September 12, 2006 1:07 PM

Check out the following for info on this:

http://counterpunch.com/cockburn09092006.html
http://counterpunch.com/frank09112006.html

Posted by: Brian at September 12, 2006 1:25 PM

Do not deride the 9/11 Truth movement. They are doing what everyone else should be doing-particularly the newsmedia- namely asking hard questions.

Everything points to there being much moreto the story than has yet come out.

When greed and lust for power are involved humans are capable of pretty much anything. The 9/11 conspiracy (if there was one) would be small potatoes compared to past sins of humanity when motivated by greed and power. Look at Nazi Germany, do you think the people there wanted to accept the fact their rulers were so evil, bloodthirsty, and craven?

Bush talked violent talk in his speeches from long before 9/11. When he says he doesn't want war it's a straight lie.

Another thing, when people say FOX is much worse than CNN , that's nonsense. Both networks are nothing but propaganda channels. Watch CSPAN if you want to get the facts and make your own judgment as to who's telling the truth, or at least, trying to.

Posted by: concerned citizen at September 12, 2006 1:46 PM

www.infowars.com

Posted by: Benny at September 12, 2006 2:38 PM

Thanks to our evil Nazi-loving media there are a lot of humans that believe the people responsible for the attacks were learned the same day it happened! That alone is impossible unless it was known BEFORE the attacks. Wake UP! America is run by a disgusting Fascist group of pigs. It's time to install a new government! Get your brains out!

Posted by: Adam at September 12, 2006 3:24 PM

as Sarah point out: It is a very curious fact, that the Bush administration prides itself on good homeland Christian Values and that speaking the truth is a primary Christian value, yet more that 1/3 of the country believes that they cannot trust their government. What has happened to America? How can so few people trust their own government?
thanks
C. Patterson

Posted by: at September 12, 2006 3:33 PM

What about the put orders on United and American Airlines?

What about public officials being warned not to fly?

What about building 7?

Posted by: Jeff at September 12, 2006 4:26 PM

Great article Sarah, and we should all be thankful for you giving us some of the names and evidence of these obviously compassionate and dedicated people. We know for absolutely sure that the government and corporate media are lying to us on a regular basis; we don't know that at all about so-called "conspiracy theorists" - despite the fact the media teaches us to say that we're "smart" if we ignore them - or to ignore people asking "smart" questions about the corporate corruption they're hiding. With the incredible and incredibly unnoticed disappearance of whistleblowers in the mainstream media, it's left up to the alternative media to figure out the "conspiracies" that evil powerful people are up to, and I for one am glad their evidence is pushing through to the surface of our collective consciousness.

Posted by: Black Krishna at September 12, 2006 5:20 PM

Jeff, you ignorant moron, how many people would it take to carry out your pathetic conspiracy?

Why can't you idiots apply the sniff test to your asshat theories, such as: The conspiracies you allege would take hundreds or thousands of planners and participants. Why hasn't anyone talked in five years? Can any of you retards answer that simple question?

Posted by: Ras_Nesta at September 12, 2006 5:22 PM

People are becoming less foolish in believing George Bush - remember: you can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all the people all of the time-- well, the people who still believe George Bush fall in the 2nd category. Of course there is a cover up!
And to those who claim Alex Jones is a blowhard, - at least he's blowing in the right direction.

Posted by: al dasman at September 12, 2006 7:32 PM

GUP DOG GO BACK AND EAT AT GEORGES w. TOILET BOWL LEFTOVERS AND MAYBE YOU CAN GROW UP TO BE A LYING PUNK TOO LIKE HIM & DICK AND CONNIE.

Posted by: US at September 12, 2006 8:21 PM

funny that you call alex the rushbo of the left, because he can't stand socialism or communism, he's a paleoconservative, but I guess to neo-fascists, I'm sorry "neo-conservatives" he seems left.

Posted by: OWN-the-NWO at September 12, 2006 8:27 PM

if you see it on TV it is probably, most likely a damn lie.. from the psyops planes to the fake reports.
it all needs a huge independent investigation.( no not congress.) they never investigate themselves. hell they all know it was an inside job. who is profiting from it all. THEY ARE. look at them greedy war mongers and non constitutional thugs.
NO wait!!!
we the people have investigated. Now is the time for indictments!

was that another false flag attack on the AMerican Embassy in Syria?
numbers don't lie.
jordan 11/9, Madrid 3/11, bring out bogga man bin laden 1/19... September 11 Syria and 911 go figure it out. they love those numbers ...

they are sicko's! Indict, now!

Posted by: AB* at September 12, 2006 8:30 PM

this is a dangerous time betw now and novem. elections

moneychangers want to stay in power
and may have new plan larger attack then 911
to call for marshall law and suspend all elections.

they understand if they lose both houses of congress the witchhunt will begin that will make
clinton & nixon look like altar boys .

Posted by: capt. chesty puller usmc ret. at September 12, 2006 9:15 PM

THE HOLE IN PENTAGON ONLY 15FT WIDE

FIRE THERE PUT OUT IN ONLY 7 MIN.

ALL PRV. SEC CAMS TAKEN BY FBI FROM SHERATON HOTEL AND VIRG. TRANS. DEPT. AND NEVER SHOWN TO ANYONE 5 YEARS LATER.

1 BILLION IN GOLD BARS IS STILL MISSING FROM WTC 4 VAULT.

SILVERSTIEN ON VIDEO TAPE AMER REBUILDS PBS, SAYS THAT ON 911 AT 5PM HE ORDERED FDNY TO DEMO WTC 7 .

THE DEPT HAS NO DEMO TEAMS AND NO PRV PERSON CAN ORDER ANY CITY AGENCY TO DEMO A BUILDING AT A CRIME SCENE. SO WHO REALLY BLEW UP THE # 7 FOR HIM.

HOW DID WOLFOWITZ BECOME PRES OF
THE WORLD BANK WITH 0 BANK EXP.

CHENEY RUNNING NORAD EXER. ON MOURN OF 911 LEAVING ONLY 14 FIGHTERS TO PROTECT THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES HOMELAND.

WE BEG YOU ALL TO GO TO

REOPEN911.ORG AND ORDER THERE FREE * 4HR DVD

TO SEE WHO OUR REAL ENEMY IS !!!!

Posted by: at September 12, 2006 9:31 PM

To Ras_Nesta:

Hundreds or thousands? Try less than 100 if it came to a barebones, compartmentalized black op: http://www.rense.com/general73/ow.htm

Is it "idiotic" simply to ask for an investigation by individuals who weren't appointed by those who certainly had the admitted motives (see the 2000 report by the neoconservative think tank, PNAC, titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses") and who had the means and the opportunity? Isn't that what ANY criminal trial lawyer asks? Then why was the crime scene immediately disrupted and the evidence shipped to China or cleared from the grounds of the Pentagon--which is a federal crime.

We owe it to those who perished that day to ask the HARD, UNCOMFORTABLE questions based on scientific fact, government regulation (mainly NORAD, FAA, and Secret Service guidelines) and testimony UNDER OATH--not merely what allows us to sleep well at night and pat ourselves on a "job well done" with half-answered questions, omissions, distortions, and outright lies like the 9/11 (C)ommission served up.

Only the truth will set us free and restore our constitutional republic.

M.

Posted by: M. at September 12, 2006 10:22 PM

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9GCWPbhUB9s

Posted by: at September 12, 2006 10:27 PM

Videos Compendium of Excellent 9/11 Videos

WTC Building 7 Collapse (CBS) (9 seconds) http://tinyurl.com/f7ptf

David Ray Griffin: 9/11 Commission: designed for anything but the truth (8 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/eg5f9

Why did WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 collapse?: Were there explosives planted? (5 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/zwq4b

9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used? (1 hr.)
http://tinyurl.com/syrzy

David Ray Griffin ? 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions & Distortions ? Santa Rosa, CA Oct 3 2004 (1 hr.)
http://tinyurl.com/p724l

9/11: Press for Truth (1 hr. 24 min.)
This one is not for free ? it is a DVD For Purchase - You can also make a donation here to the producers for their expenses. Please donate $6 if you view it online. This movie is best for those who are highly resistant to any ideas of U.S. gov?t complicity. The movie focuses mainly on the families pointing out that the government has stonewalled and lied, and has not investigate 9/11 properly.
http://cooperativeresearch.org/911_press_for_truth.html
Also currently online at Google Video . Please donate $6 to the above site to reimburse the producers for their expenses if you watch it for free online on Google Video. They made the film on loan and need to pay back their expenses.

Operation Northwoods: US Generals Planned Terror in US and Fake Hijacking (3 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/e9vne

David Ray Griffin ? 9/11 and the American Empire (2005)
http://tinyurl.com/pd9tv

Terrorstorm ? Film by Alex Jones about history of US-sponsored terror operations (1 hr. 52 min)
http://tinyurl.com/s948q

Two prominent European politicians express serious doubts about 9/11 (16 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/oxf3h

Prof Steve Jones USVC 9-11 Scientific and Ethical Questions - Feb 1 2006 (1 hr. 48 min)
http://tinyurl.com/gtshy

American Scholars Symposium - 9/11 Truth Discussion Panel ? 2006 June
http://tinyurl.com/k3rho

9/11 L.A. Symposium - Webster Tarpley on 911 Evidence June 26 2006 (1 hr. 6 min)
http://tinyurl.com/moa7c

Alex Jones' American Scholars Symposium (Highlights) June 2006 (1 hr. 2 min)
http://tinyurl.com/otucs

9/11 Controlled Demolitions of September 11, 2001 (35 min)
http://tinyurl.com/hxksz

Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut
http://tinyurl.com/ebw7r

Lou Dobbs on CNN Wakes Up to 9/11 Lies
http://tinyurl.com/ze3ea

Unexplainable Military Failures and No Accountability on 911
http://tinyurl.com/mzrmz

CNN Jack Cafferty Questions the Story of 911 2006 Aug 02
http://tinyurl.com/lfc2p

Molten Metal At WTC Consistent With Thermite
http://tinyurl.com/pt8fu

Professor Evidence Thermite in WTC Towers
http://tinyurl.com/mq4da
and
http://tinyurl.com/m7tju

Video Unusual Evacuations in WTC Prior to 911
http://tinyurl.com/mmgye

David Ray Griffin in DC 9-23-2005 Omissions & Distortions in The 9/11 Commission Report: A Significant Pattern: (33 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/z2xjk

Paul Thompson at Confronting the Evidence ? Commission Report Glaring Omissions 2004 Sep 11 (1 min. 30 sec.)
http://tinyurl.com/llepa

Opening panel talks at Confronting the Evidence 9/11 (4 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/sxyn7

Kevin Barrett, University of Wisconsin-Madison lecturer TV interview 7/21/06
http://tinyurl.com/f7ek3

San Francisco International Citizens Inquiry into 9/11
http://tinyurl.com/oerqg

David Ray Griffin - Testimony at the Congressional Black Caucus (30 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/p3nvp

The Great Conspiracy ? Barrie Zwicker - 2004 Summer (1 hr. 10 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/j7kxd

Alex Jones at American Scholars Symposium June 25 2006 (1 hr. 31 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/sycgz

Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State (Alex Jones) - 2005 (2 hr. 35 min.)
Includes footage 2004 Republican Nat?l Convention.
http://tinyurl.com/o9c8m

911 The Road To Tyranny - Alex Jones ? 2002 ? about rising police state (2 hr. 22 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/kg9ak

Webster Tarpley - The 9/11 issue - How to stop World War III ? 2005 Jan 15
http://tinyurl.com/okaba

Webster Tarpley: The Invisible Government & 9/11 Synthetic Terror
http://tinyurl.com/pre9w

Barry Zwicker: NORAD on 9/11: what was the U.S. military doing that day?
http://tinyurl.com/ram5b

9/11 Symposium: Lt. Col. Bob Bowman
http://tinyurl.com/pnpv3

Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story ? 2004? San Francisco - (6 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/rg4n5

Thermite Explained, Substance used to bring down WTC Towers 1, 2 and WTC 7? (4 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/ngroh

Meria Hellers Keynote Speech in Chicago 2006 (1 hr. 8 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/mxjt5

Keith Oberman MSNBC Commentary on Rumsfeld 2006 Aug 30
http://tinyurl.com/zqqen

William Rodriguez: 9/11 Hero ? 9/11 L.A. Symposium ? 2006 June
http://tinyurl.com/jo295

An hour long smorgasbord of content from Louder Than Words
http://tinyurl.com/m55bx

Richard Grove talks with Webster Tarpley
http://tinyurl.com/p89dk

The Power of Nightmares 1 of 3 (59 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/hep6l

The Power of Nightmares 2 of 3 (59 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/fu67y

The Power Of Nightmares 3 of 3 (59 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/e4ssh

San Francisco International Citizens Inquiry into 9-11 ? 2004 (29 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/z6u32

SEPTEMBER 11: Evidence to the Contrary REDUX 2006 (1 hr. 26 min.)
http://tinyurl.com/nl9u5

Posted by: JJ at September 12, 2006 10:29 PM

Ferguson is still the same leftgatekeeper pseudo journalist picking up now also flagwaver slang merging conspiracy theorists with terrorists in a neologism "conspiracists".

Probably *she's listening too much to Rush Limbaugh or reads Ralph Peter's column every day in NY POST.

Also, even if still unpopular and attacked with hatred in this movement, it has to be pointed outm that Loose Change, Kevin Barrett, Alex Jones and the 9/11 Scholars are only
covering half of the truth, which turns it into a limited hangout.

Same to the Vanity Fair-NORAD negligence hangout.

The rest is documented here:
http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com
http://911tvfakery.net

If anyone agrees please sign the following petition at:
http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html

Posted by: Nico Haupt aka ewing2001 at September 12, 2006 10:32 PM

Ras_Nesta, 2 words: Manhattan Project*. Oh, 2 more... Stealth bomber. I could go on, but enough with that lame strawman argument, please.

*130,000 people - via wiki

Posted by: at September 12, 2006 10:35 PM

Alex Jones is not the "left's Rush Limbaugh". This is ridiculous, Alex has been involved in the Patriot movement since well before 9/11. He is pro-Constitution, Pro 2nd Amendment, anti UN and Federal Reserve. He is a Ron-Paul style "Peleo-Conservative" and Constitutionalist, much like myself and MANY MANY people in the 9/11 truth movement.

The 9/11 truth is not just a bunch of angry leftist Bush haters, as much as either party wants that to be the case.

More info at my myspace profile (link)

Posted by: Spencer at September 12, 2006 10:58 PM


The media uses the phrase "conspiracy theory" as a pejorative to silence anyone who suggests that *WOW* powerful people with lots of money might want to do harm to the people.

There are literally hundreds of anomalies in the official story.

http://911research.wtc7.net

Posted by: David at September 12, 2006 11:01 PM

9-11 Was carried out by the US GOVT!!!


Wake up People!! Go watch FREE http://www.loosechange911.com
"N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001 In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba."

"In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bushs approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administrations black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America."

War on terror is a scam!!

More info goto http://www.myspace.com/CONSPIRACYALERT

I am going to give reasons proving they did it and at the end I am going to give reasons why they did it.

1. Operation Northwoods: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page;=1http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page;=1

2. Alex Jones Predicts Attack: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1222445722544874066&q;=alex+jones+predicts+911&hl;=en

3. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2024198565295094630&q;=alex+jones+august+2006&hl;=en

4. At least 4 hijackers turned up alive, but i heard as many as 7

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

5. The melting Point of Steel is 3000F and Fire is around 500-700F with burning Jet fuel around 1200-1400F

6. An increase of 400% increase in put options on 9-6-01 and 9-7-01 on serveral airline stocks. An increase of 1100% Increase an in increase of put options on airline stocks on 9-10-01

7. FBI confinscated tapes at a nearby hotel and gas station minutes after the "plane" hit the pentagon.

8. Debris from the building was taken and illegally sold to china before anybody could really investigate.

9. If you watch the video of the towers coming down, You can notice bombs going off in the building.

10. Larry Silverstein Admitted blowing up WTC7 On a PBS Documentary.

11. Larry Silverstein got High Insurance on WTC7 Including terrosm insurance.

12. 6 Months Before 9/11 They passed laws saying No pilots can carry guns, when pilots were allowed to carry guns for 40 years.

13. As Charlie Sheen said, How can a plane make a 270 degree turn and drop 7000 feet in attitude in less then 2 minutes?

14. I heard it is impossible for cell phones to work on planes moving at 500mph and at 30000 Feet.

15. The "hijackers" said the wrong islamic message when approaching death.

16. Survivors and Eye witnesses Reporting seeing, hearing explosions.

17. Thermite was found at the scene.

18. survisors were bribed millions by the govt to shut up bacjk in 2001.

For more evidence watch these films:

1. www.loosechange911.com

2. 9/11 The Greatest Lie ever sold: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6952102263921897950&q;=the+greatest+lie+ever+sold&hl;=en

3. 9/11 the Road to Tyranny: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6517776133137328105&q;=alex+jones+9%2F11

4. Masters of Terror: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7752483415674202196&q;=masters+of+terror

5. Martial Law: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6495462761605341661&q;=alex+jones+9%2F11

6. C-SPAN conference: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5004704309041471296&q;=alex+jones+9%2F11

7. TerrorStorm: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&q;=alex+jones+9%2F11

Now I am going to give you why they did it, then i will share some links.

1. Patriot act

2. Patriot act 2

3. Eliminate the Consitution

4. Bring forth the NWO

5. Bankrupt the USA to bring forth a NWO

6. Scare americans to give up there right in exchange for "security" when you will just get tyranny and a police state.

7. Justify an Iraq War.

8. Bring forth a Real ID Act, which was passed on 5-11-05, and then the "mark of the beast"

Now if you want links goto http://www.911blogger.com/ and check that out and there are 50 links on the right hand side.

Also check out www.infowars.com http://prisonplanet.com www.jonesreport.com

Thank You for reading, We must fight this and expose this and resist The New World Order, and Resist the cashless society.

Posted by: steve at September 12, 2006 11:30 PM

Hey, you interviewed me, and i was right there standing next to Alex Jones when you gave the interview. You said you were going to report this fairly, now you're calling them "crackpot theories"?? You're making him out to be some sort of conspiracy nutcase, which couldnt be further from the truth. And for the record, I was RIGHT UP FRONT, police commanders never "grimaced". Actually, a police commander was very polite to Alex and helped him figure out the safest route to Spizter's building. Another ranked officer in a white uniform personally escorted Alex and his followers which included myself to 1 Police Plaza. If anything the police showed SUPPORT for Mr. Jones and the ones who didn't ignored him completely and showed no emotion whatsoever. And we were a hell of a lot more than 300 strong.

Posted by: Danny Roldan at September 12, 2006 11:46 PM

Finally, a 911 movie based on facts, not conspiracies or politics.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1016720641536424083&q;=press+for+truth

everything in this movie is based on real news and facts reported by real media sources all documented here
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Posted by: jared at September 13, 2006 1:09 AM

When I visited Ground Zero, I heard the man with the green sign say he supported the necessary war in Afghanistan to get the terrorists.

Why did the author of the blog describe him as anti-war?

Posted by: harold at September 13, 2006 11:35 AM

I agree I should not have cast Alex Jones as the Rush Limbaugh of the conspiracy "left". On closer inspection, he appears more of a nativist libertarian given his open support for the Minutemen. As for crackpot, yes, that's a strong word, but to say that 9-11 was ordered by Queen Beatrix and the Bilderberg group is pretty crazy. Anyone who believes the world is controlled by a tiny elite needs to travel more. I agree there are many unanswered questions about the causes and events of 9-11. But reading through what evidence there is, I remain profoundly unconvinced that that WTC towers were blown up. It is far scarier to acknowledge that there is an violent extremist Islamist movement that U.S. policies in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere helped foster, which we don't control, and which is fundamentally opposed to both Western secularism and US policies abroad. Indeed, al Qaeda's critique of globalism is in some ways very similar to the one espoused by Alex Jones. As for the size of the rally, it was very hard to gauge with all the other people there to visit ground zero. I originally eyeballed it at around 400 given there were people on both sides of the street. Another journalist said 300 so I settled for "more than 300." It certainly wasn't 1000, as some activists there were claiming. As for the guy with the neon sign, I thought he was opposed to the US war in Iraq, which puts him there as an antiwar protester, regardless of his position on Afghanistan, which I didn't hear, but which nevertheless many in the antiwar movement, to various degrees, share.

Posted by Sarah Ferguson

Posted by: Sarah Ferguson [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 13, 2006 12:43 PM

"Jones is the conspiracy left's version of Rush Limbaugh"

Get your facts straight jackass. Jones is a paleo-conservative libertarian far-right type. Get it straight.


Posted by: at September 13, 2006 12:48 PM

This comment is to Sarah Ferguson. Alex Jones is not a left wing conspiracy theorist, he is a right wing conspiracty theorist. If you listen to his show, you will see his personal beliefs are to the right of Ronald Reagan. These are the same guys in the eighties that built bomb shelters in their back yards for an impending nuclear war and beleive the united nations are taking over our country. He is very pro-gun and believes Terri Shivo was murdered by her own husband. Ultra right wing.

Posted by: Johnny at September 13, 2006 12:50 PM

Alex is left wing?! TOO FUNNY!

What is the media going to call the traditional conservatives, who make up the majority of this movement, when liberals are in control of the White House? Because unlike what the following article suggests... we aren't going to shut up just because Puppet Dubya only has 2 years left!

Canada had a Liberal government on 9/11 & Britain had & still has a liberal goverenment... They aren't innocent either!

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20377974-28737,00.html

This is not about an invasion of 1 country, Iraq... this is a conspiracy involving a World-Wide Cabal of Crazy Elites Hell bent on bringing in a Distopic Police State World Government!

Maybe if some "journalists" would actually read and post direct quotes from PNAC, Northwoods, The Grand Chessboard etc..., the just maybe they'd understand the situation we're really in.

Posted by: CanadianCraig at September 13, 2006 1:22 PM

This isn't about UFO's or elvis. This is about the joke investigation of 9/11 and the cover-up of what happened that day. If you have half a brain, you should have a question regarding what happened on 9/11. With over 100 "omissions and distortions" in the 9/11 report, everyone should have a question. Or is it now unpatriotic to ask?

Posted by: James at September 13, 2006 1:35 PM

I worked in the WTC in 1991 for 3 months as a consultant for a company called Fiduciary Trust (just about everyone employed there is dead). I hated that place. Whenever I came back from lunch, whatever I ate would try to egress from my throat when I rode the elevator to 78. On windy days you could hear the building creak and feel it sway. It was very unsettling. They were two very ugly souless buildings too boot. I quit for those reasons and vowed never to return. I saw the first tower hit on TV and realized that the plane would have come right thru my floor. I have always been lucky like that. I didn't see the second plane hit because I was late for my tee time but when I came back that evening and turned on the TV I saw that there was nothing left of those god awful buildings. I felt bad for the occupants and the people involved in the mess but I can't say I miss the buildings at all. I don't know if the government had something to do with taking them down (Maybe Silverstein did it to collect the insurance), but for anyone with any aestehtic sense, the empty hole is alot nicer looking than what was there before. In my opinion, they should just cover it up and make it a park with a monument. There are way too many buildings already. They could never rent all the space back then and who in their right monds are goning to work up that high after seeing something like waht happened that day. Can't we all just move on?!

Posted by: GupDog at September 13, 2006 1:37 PM

I do understand it is unfathomable, but it is true. The attacks on 9/11 were not committed by Arab Muslims, it was a psychological operation carried out by criminal elements in OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. The sooner we wake up, the sooner we save our world.

PLEASE research it for yourself.

Posted by: NewlyAwake at September 13, 2006 1:51 PM

Check out these stats for terrorism around the world:

http://www.congoo.com/web.aspx?query=terrorism


Posted by: Jack Murphy at September 13, 2006 2:03 PM

"I remain profoundly unconvinced that that WTC towers were blown up"

Really? Even though no plane hit Building 7 and it imploded at free-fall speed? Even though NIST now admits on their website that they are considering whether explosives might have been used?
I remain profoundly unconvinced that the WTC tower and buildng 7 could have all collapsed due to fire. The only difference is my profound disbelief is based in reality and evidence...

Posted by: at September 13, 2006 3:23 PM

To the Author Ms. Ferguson -- Thank you for covering the presence of 9/11 Truth at Ground Zero. As you are probably aware, the national media did not cover this and it deserves attention.

Until a few months ago I would have thought these were a bunch of conspiracy crackpots too -- now I know we were lied to and 9/11 was most definitely a false flag terror attack. Any research into this area will show that this is nothing new for our government. Just watch Alex Jones' documentary "Terrorstorm" on Google. It's all verifiable.

Also if you mention NIST, you should mention the fact that they are "considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse" in Building 7. It's right there on the webpage you hyperlinked at the very bottom. Planted explosives are no longer in the realm of "conspiracy theorists".

Posted by: Pete at September 13, 2006 3:47 PM

Why wasn't ground zero treated like a crime scene? Why was the steel from the wreckage sent to China to be recycled for scrap instead of being sent to every major academic/research institution in the country for analysis?

Posted by: MMIE at September 13, 2006 4:41 PM

The official account of the 9-11 attack on America is actually a conspiracy theory, given that it lacks much credible proof. It is therefore subject to being judged on the same basis as any other conspiracy theory. Unless the events of 9/11 are discussed openly and without apprehension, nothing else is real.

Posted by: Joseph at September 13, 2006 4:42 PM

Sarah Ferguson is a psuedo-journalist. Not only does she get Alex Jones completely wrong - (yea right, he's from the LEFT!?), she's completely biased and combines some verisimilitude with total bullshit to mislead the public. She also believes the NIST report adheres to the basic physical laws of science and hasn't herself bothered to check out anything beyond official sources, or to think for herself. She may be a good writer, but she doesn't write non-fiction. She writes fiction in the guise of non-fiction and most likely doesn't even realize it.

Why does Sarah Ferguson believe the official story without investigating it? How could it be a insult to the Dead and to the Mourners to try to bring the true perpetrators to justice and to inform the public of the hoax? Why does she parrot the government and mainstream Media talking points and lies? Why is fake journalism being promoted by the Village Voice - a supposedly "alternative" news source?

Many people who lost loved ones *know* the official story is a lie. (As would anyone who bothers to look and think beyond official sources.) Many mourners and those who lost loved ones were among the people Sarah Fergueson portrays as "[disrespectful] kooks."

Very few people there took exception to the presence of the questioners. I imagine they saw our respectful presense to be in the tradition of American independent political thought and tolerated our dissent. The reason she called our signs "brazen" could only be because she didn't and doesn't understand from were the genuine shamelessness of the situation comes.

We were allowed there. We did not disrupt. We were integrated into the activities of the day. Sarah Ferguson's reportage shows a mean-spiritedness characterized by a closed mind.

Posted by: Vasudha at September 13, 2006 4:50 PM


If you think Alex Jones "is the conspiracy left's version of Rush Limbaugh" then you need to do just a tad bit of research before you print stuff like this. Alex Jones is 10 times more conservative than is 99% of the Republican party. The only one who comes close is Congressman Ron Paul. Do just a little bit of research on some of these people befor eyou just start printing any witty comment that comes to mind. Even Alan Colmes can tell you he is no where near the left.


Posted by: Carey Brady at September 13, 2006 5:10 PM

Conspiracy theorists are mentally ill, or anonymous, powerless people who wish they knew secrets that would make their life exciting. So they create a meta-fiction and convince themselves it's factual. Conspiracy theories are inevitably simplistic, talking about the very basics (alleged motives and the "how" of the plotting) and nothing more. It's more terrifying to acknowledge that our country and society as a whole--and other "first world" nations--benefit from the downtrodden status of other nations. Perhaps some of you want to assign guilt to a dark cabal of black-ops agents and neocons and (lol) the Royal Family, but the truth is much more sinister: much of the middle east hates us because of our foreign policy and political alliances, so much so that many (in the words of Osama bin Laden) "desire death more than you desire life".

He also says, "It is saddening to tell you that you are the worst civilization witnessed by the history of mankind."

This is from bin Laden's "Letter to the American People". Read it here, to see his twisted but relevant point-of-view: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,845725,00.html

You theorists are so caught up in proving the alleged "evil" that rules us, you're incapable of tackling the complex questions of why this actually DID occur. It's absolutely pathetic and infantile that the lot of you are more concerned about explosive devices and the epherma surrounding the events of 9/11 rather than the questions that will actually change the world for the better:

- Why are we hated?

- What can we do to change this?

- How can we bring democracy to the Middle East?

- How can we do this without enraging the already-enraged extremists who want to destroy us?

Of course, we've gone about it all wrong over the past five years, and in the meantime you've all got your heads up your asses, claiming that the rest of us have our heads up ours. Your tone is not a generous, "You need to understand, let me show you!" tone, but rather the deluded, "I know the truth! You do not!" tone of those who would rather be living in an Oliver Stone picture, chasing shadows and plots that do not exist. I'd feel sorry for you if your words and invective weren't harmful, distracting, and destructive to the real issues at hand.

Posted by: Justin at September 13, 2006 5:26 PM

YOUR ALL TO NICE LETS START WITH WHO WE SHOULD HAVE THE ROPES FOR AT GRD ZERO TO START HANGING THE TRAITORS OF OUR HOMELAND.

CHENEY CONDUCTS NORAD EXER ON MOURN OF 911 AND LEAVES ONLY 14 FIGHTERS TO PROTECT THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES.
GUILTY

WOLFOWITZ NOW MADE PRES OF WORLD BANK [MONEYCHANGERS] WITH NO BANKING EXP. WAS REWARD

FOR 911 ATTACK PLAN .

GUILTY

RUDY PHONEY HERO OF 911 ONLY SAVED HIMSELF AND USED HIS FAME AND DEATHS OF 3000 TO MAKE MILLIONS AND IS SATANS SON W. HANDPICKED
SUCESSOR IN 08.
LET ALL CRIME SCENCE EVIDENSE BE DESTROYED AND SOLD TO CHINA.
PUT GAG ORDER ON FDNY.
HIRED A CROOK TO BE PD COMM. KERICK
FAILED TO UPDATE EMER RADIOS AFT.19 93 ATTACK. SENDING 343 FIREMAN AND 23 FROM ESU TO THERE HEROIC DEATHS .
TOLD US 40 DAYS AFTER 911 THAT 200 MIL. IN GOLD BARS WAS RECOVERED IN BSMT OF WTC 5 THAT WAS BEING STOLEN FROM WTC 4 VAULT THAT WAS CONNECTED BY AN UNDERGROUND TUNNEL.
BUT HE FAILED TO TELL US NOW EVEN 5 YEARS
LATER THAT 1 BILLION IS STILL MISSING.

GUILTY

LARRY THE ROTTEN JEW SILVERSTIEN BLAMED FDNY
FOR DEMOING WTC 7 AT 5PM ON 911.
TRIED TO MILK BILLIONS MORE FROM INSUR. CO.S
BY SAYING 2 PLANES 2 SEPARATE ATTACKS.
BOUGHT WTC 1 & 2 - 6 WEEKS BEFORE 911 WITH SPECIAL TERRIORSM CLAUSE ADDED.

GUILTY

ALL THE JOINT CHIEFS THEN AND PRESENT BECAUSE WITHOUT THERE HELP THIS COULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED.

GUILTY

AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST THE 5 MOUSAUD AGENTS THAT WERE FILMING THE ENTIRE ATTACK BEFORE THE PLANES HIT FROM A BKLN. ROOF
AND THEN CELEBRATED WHEN EACH PLANE STRUCK
OUR FBI ARRESTED THEM CROSSING THE GW BRDG. ONLY TO HAVE TO LET THEM GO IN LATE DEC. WHEN SHARON CAME FOR THEM.
GUILTY

Posted by: at September 13, 2006 9:59 PM

To the posters that think 911 truth folks feel safer to believe it's our gubment instead of the terrorists... I must disagree. I would MUCH rather believe the official version... at least then we'd have a fighting chance if our gubment was on our side instead of against us. I voted for Bush twice. I regret that more than I can say at this point. How can anybody listen to "HOMELAND SECURITY HOMELAND SECURITY HOMELAND SECURITY......." and then watch the borders stay wide open? We can send an army across the world but the borders stay wide open. That incongruence is what finally made me take the red pill.

I applaud all the 911 truthers for going to New York, I intend to join them next time.

Wake up America... we are the reason this government has gotten to this point... we have been so busy having fun that we lost sight our our responsibility to our beloved country.

Stop paying attention to gay rights and race issues and all the other distractions they cause for us to fight over.

I watch any news with the exception of Lou Dobbs and it is as if everything has become a tabloid distraction. On the level of Bat Boy meets Elvis tabloid. It is surreal how the NWO has separated Americans from what their own eyes, ears and common sense tell them.

Buildings made of steel don't fall from fire. Planes don't disappear. It doesn't take an hour and a half for fighter jets to intercept off-course planes. Secret Service don't let Presidents sit around when the country is 'under attack'. Good God our Father help Americans wake up.

Posted by: diana nickel at September 13, 2006 10:47 PM

9/11: Press For Truth
The Families' 9/11 Conference

both available at 911blogger.com

plus much more.

Get a clue. Don't use two people's sign as a general statement about everyone.

Posted by: DHS at September 13, 2006 11:55 PM

I find it telling that those who attack anyone who asks the hard questions about 9/11 quickly descends into name calling and insults. I saw the Popular Mechanics Editor on Democracy Now with Amy Goodman.

This "editor" of a major magazine was smearing Dylan Avery and the other producer of Loose Change, the 9/11 documentary, with names like "holacost denyer," and "JFK conspiracist," etc. This is childish and irresponsible behaviour by our so-called "media."

You'll note on this board and most boards, that the majority of those questioning the official story are responsible adults with probing questions, that must be investigated.

Those who attack them usually haven't looked into 9/11 very deeply, and simply call those of us that are demanding answers stupid names like "tin foil hat wearers."

Most of the people I know questioning 9/11 are well educated professionals who look at the Bush Admin's official conspiracy theory . . . and have to be honest and say it does not make sense. Controlled demolition of the WTCs and an orchestrated US Air Force stand down using multiple war games held mysteriously on 9/11, which confused FAA and DOD employees, points to an inside govt. job.

This wouldn't be hard to figure out. Who ordered the war games on 9/11? Why didn't that person call them off when the first plane hit the first tower?

Why did the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) which "supposedly" investigated the WTCs collapses not test for explosives in the debris?

Any forensics would have included those tests given that the WTCs were the first three steel reinforced skyscrapers in engineering history to completely collapse due to fire and/or external damage. WTC 7 wasn't even hit by a plane.

At the point NIST investigated the logical testing of explosives wouldn't even have been a "conspiracy theory." At that point one would have thought that perhaps the terrorists planted bombs, or had a truck near, or had explosives on the planes. It would have been professional forensic procedures to look for explosives traces.

The fact that NIST "DID NOT EVEN TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES" is very telling. Coupled with years of watching the Bush Administration try to stop the 9/11 investigations, and the way the Republicans in Congress treated the 9/11 widows like crap and tried to stop their creation of the 9/11 Commission.

Then the way Bush tried to get Henry Kissenger to run the Commission investigation, and then Philip Zelikow (Bush Admin and Rice confidant) ran it. The 9/11 widows demanded Zelikow step down and not head the Commission when they learned of his role in the Bush Admin. The Jersey Girls were ignored, and Zelikow steered the 9/11 Commission away from any of the hard questions.

Posted by: Bill Douglas at September 14, 2006 2:24 AM

Yes here we all are again just sitting on our backside's talking about 911, just like we'v been doing for five long year's, and that's five long years for these so called leader's to plan the next one. Enough said.

Posted by: at September 14, 2006 2:36 AM

I couldn't read or watch any mainstream media outlet that didn't do a story debunking 9/11 "conspiracy theories" around the five year anniversary. That's a momentous change, since heretofore pretty much only "Popular Mechanics" spent much effort going through the discrepencies point by point. --- When the corporate media acts in a swarm like this all of a sudden it automatically means there is a hidden meaning. In this case, it's not so much about any truth regarding 9/11, which will never be proven one way or the other in any event. It's about legitimacy of government. If that crumbles then the mid term elections would be even more likely to mark a change between parties. Say what you want about weak kneed, corporatist Democrats - they would at least slow this country's ongoing, pre meditated march to de facto martial law. --- Sarah Ferguson has nothing original, informed or relevant whatsover to say on the nature of 9/11 or these actual consequences of the growing controversy. It is of no import whether she knows who Jones is or whether she knows how many countries warned the US - in varying levels of specificity - prior to 9/11, etc.

Posted by: corrective unconscious at September 14, 2006 3:08 AM

Anybody who believes Alex Jones is anything saner than a crackpot should be sterilized.

Posted by: JimmyJimmy at September 14, 2006 5:14 AM

You know, looking back at what I actually wrote, I wasn't so wrong when I called Alex Jones the "conspiracy left's version of Rush Limbaugh." Paleoconservatives may claim him as their own, but there sure were lots of lefty folks cheering him on outside ground zero in NYC on 9-11. In fact, left-oriented "9-11 truth" activists seem to embrace him as much as the rightwing ones do--no doubt because he's good at broadcasting their theories.

The story I wrote was not intended as any blow-by-blow analysis of the many outstanding questions that surround 9-11. I was down there to report what I saw at ground zero on Monday, and I did, including grimacing police. I interviewed Jones on the street not to sandbag him, but with an open mind, to see what he had to say.

Obviously if you read what I wrote, I don't simply accept what the government or the 9-11 Commission says about 9-11. My point in the story was to say there's been such an abuse of truth by the Bush administration, the American public doesn't know what to believe. I referred to the numerous omissions of the 9-11 Commission report, as well as the manipulation and mistruths that Bush used to take us to war in Iraq. There are indeed many outstanding questions about NORAD's response on 9-11, why warnings of the attacks were ignored, why Bin Laden has not been caught. There is also a long history of official conniving to protect US oil interests abroad.

But I think people who obsess about the buildings being blown up are leading people down the wrong rabbit hole. I also agree with Alex Cockburn that those who believe Bush and Cheney masterminded the attacks woefully ignore the incompetence of this administration (and previous ones) --as well the bumbled response of Rudy Giuliani for citing the city's Emergency Command Center at WTC 7 in the first place and leaving the FDNY with inoperable Motorola radios, which Wayne Barrett's and Dan Collins' new book exposes.

Posted by: Sarah Ferguson [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2006 12:03 PM

These conspiracy nuts need to get therapy or get a life. They are children who crave attention. Every single "fact" they rely on -- every single one -- is false or grossly distorted. It's a free country so I would not deprive them of their right to let everyone know what a-holes they are. But to give them even the tiniest shred of credibility is to totally shed any pretense of reason.

Posted by: Steve Orel at September 14, 2006 12:20 PM

JimmyJimmy displays the frequent tendency, by the critics of 911truth, to have nothing better than, and to quickly descend into, emotional name-calling.

Posted by: Vasudha at September 14, 2006 12:39 PM

Miss Ferguson your assesment of Monday's situation is absolutley ridiculous. So ridiculous in fact the Mainstream Networks were forced to do a 95 percent BLACKOUT on what was taking place. Eight out of ten people took a DVD, 10,000 over the entire weekend, and 7,000 in the first hour at Ground Zero on Monday morning. Many firefighters and police thanked us for being there, many on duty. Family Members also stood side by side with us.

On top of that Dylan and I personally worked Popular Mechanics on Amy Goodman's Democracy earlier that morning. The book Debunking 9/11 Myths is a great example of Yellow Journalism that Hearst Publications is well known for. Don't take my word for it, let the people decide. They had to resort to comparing myself and other 9/11 truth activists with Holocaust Deniers, that is not only insulting but disgusting.

It disturbs me greatly that you still have not done your homework on 9/11 and False Flag Terror in general, especially seeing as that I spoke to you at length on 9/11 05. Remember I was on of the 3 guys handing out DVD's......this year I got 2,000 to join in the cause.

Keep calling us Conspiracy Nuts if you want, but it is us, not you Sarah, that are going to save this country.

Posted by: Jason Bermas at September 14, 2006 12:40 PM

there may have been 300 or 400 black 'investigate 911' shirts there that day, but plenty of people asked me where to get one for themselves. From the moment I put it on, a pair of ladies walked up to me and asked if they could get one too. I encountered probably a 70% acceptance rate from New Yorkers, who were either interested in hearing what I had to say, wanted to get a CD of loose change, distrusted the official story, etcetera. The yellers and screamers, though some were 911 truthers, were mostly a small few who disagreed with us. this is beyond right or left, this is patriots vs tories. Do you want revolution, or do you want to appease king george?
I used to love the village voice. Now its true corporate side is showing.

Posted by: David at September 14, 2006 3:51 PM

The one term that seems misplaced is that this exercise was accomplished as an "inside job." Dear friends, the perpetrators of these attacks will never represent the interior or foundations of our country. It is ONLY an external, alien, outsider who would attempt to bamboozle the American public with these grotesque fabrications. It may be a small faction operating under "color of law" as a shadow government - black ops. But these are NOT Americans, never have been and never will be. These events are the work of enemies from without - mostly without moral and ethical foundations.

Posted by: Without at September 14, 2006 4:25 PM

Here's the problem CT'ists.

125,000 structural engineers disagree with you.Not one structural engineer has spoken out for these theories. Where are all the structural engineers? Where are all the controlled deolition experts?

Conspiracy theorists can't even get along with each other. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds have left the Scolars for 9/11 because of their disagreement with Steven Jones. They claim Jones used no peer review for his research. They also believe no planed were involved in the attacks. That's right. All you people who saw a plane on 9-11...it was a hologram. I wish I was kidding.

The best part of these theories is the WTC7 controlled demolition argument. I actually worked there for three years up to and including 9-11. We were squashed together like sardines after the Smith Barney merger (I worked for Salomon) and a number of floors had activity 24x7 (trading floors) and most folks lived 6 to 7 days a week.

Here's the thng. I never saw any construction projects going on. In my job, I was working on a project that made me hit most floors(28-44)during the week. I never saw any evidence of construction besides the construction of a few meeting rooms.

On 9-11 WTC7 was hit with debris from the minute the first plane hit. After walking down from the 43rd floor 40 minutes later, we were forced to leave via the back because so much debris had hit the building and blocked the fromt entrance.

My question is this. Why won't Jason Bermas, Dylan Avery or Korey Rowe look to interview anyone who worked at the buliding? Because they won't like the answers, that's why.

You people can believe what you like. IF you want to believe that thousands of people can keep a secret like this and were able to hide their movements in WTC7 from a packed building, more power to you.

Posted by: Lets face facts at September 14, 2006 6:27 PM

Good God , Jason. You aren't calling for a revoluton, are you?

Posted by: NDB at September 14, 2006 6:29 PM

If it wasn't a conspiracy, "they" would have let "us" in on it.

Posted by: jieikobu [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 14, 2006 8:56 PM

Very good article, Sarah. Very informative. Even though, you pooh-poohed all the 9/11 nut jobbers, at least you have brought this to more people's attention. Now, you can prove that you are a real journalist and not one of the government's shills by writing more articles that address all of the additional points mentioned in the comments above.

The government of the US has waged war against it's own people on September 11, 2001. Simple. Wake up.

And also let us see if you are going to practice journalism and write another article addressing the questions raised here. There's the gauntlet, baby.

peace
peng

Posted by: peng at September 15, 2006 12:54 AM

as the "left" crouches toward centrism regarding conspiracy theories (taking consensus liberal Richard Hofstatder as their guiding light), we should look at the potential effects of knee-jerk denunciations of 9/11 skeptics.

Demonization doesn't just serve to unify a Left against an "evil deviant" like conspiracy theorists:

it leads to university investigations of profs who even discuss 9/11 CTs in the classroom:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060831/us_nm/rights_academic_dc_1

and it leads to increases in state powers, which now link terrorism to "subcultures of conspiracy theories"
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nsct/2006/sectionV.html

nice work, lefties. welcome to the terrordome.

Posted by: lee berkayas at September 15, 2006 1:59 AM

what do "peleo-conservatives" or "libertarians" contend is the cause/should be done about the existing wealth gap?
clealry "they" don't want political powers controlling them, but what about economic powers controlling them/others?!?

Posted by: question at September 15, 2006 3:43 AM


* LETS make next year 4000 strong black shirts *


ALL TRAITORS SHOULD BE HUNG AT GRD. ZERO....

Posted by: HELLS ANGELS FOREVER NYC at September 15, 2006 9:06 PM

Someone above lied when they wrote that they saw the 1st plane hit while having breakfast. No one but the French film crew documenting the NYFD saw video of that crash that morning (though Bush also lied when he said he saw the 1st plane hit).

Ms. Ferguson: please describe Iraq what it is: an occupation, not war. The war was won long ago, the U.S. lost the peace without a plan because D. Rumsfeld threatened to fire anyone who spoke of a post-invasion plan.

You do yourself a disservice by falling into the same camp as the NYPost & other right-wing outlets by swallowing the admin's rhetoric regarding an all-inclusive "war." Over 50% of Americans believe Iraq is different than the "war on terror." Yet our Pres. has disbanded the Osama Bin Laden unit and tells conservative writers that getting Osama is not "job number one" after claiming that we will "smoke him out of his cave..."

Posted by: Jack at September 15, 2006 10:05 PM

ALL theories about what happened on 9/11, including the official one are conspiracy theories BY DEFINITION. Unless you think one person was flying all those planes. Now that's nuts!

Posted by: Ray at September 16, 2006 10:48 AM

4 CLAIMS AND 4 FACTS ABOUT THE PLANES:

CLAIM 1: Photographs and video footage shot just before United Airlines Flight 175 hit the South Tower of the World Trade Center show an object underneath the fuselage at the base of the right wing. The film "911 In Plane Site" and the Web site LetsRoll911.org claim that no such object is found on a stock Boeing 767. They speculate that this "military pod" is a missile, a bomb or a piece of equipment on an air-refueling tanker. LetsRoll911.org points to this as evidence that the attacks were an "inside job" sanctioned by "President George Bush, who planned and engineered 9/11."

FACT: One of the clearest, most widely seen pictures of the doomed jet's undercarriage was taken by photographer Rob Howard and published in New York magazine and elsewhere. A digital scan of the original photo was sent to Ronald Greeley, director of the Space Photography Laboratory at Arizona State University, an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of formations based on shadow and light effects. After studying the high-resolution image and comparing it to photos of a Boeing 767-200ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod." In fact, the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear. He concludes that sunlight glinting off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look. "Such a glint causes a blossoming (enlargement) on film," he wrote, "which tends to be amplified in digital versions of images--the pixels are saturated and tend to 'spill over' to adjacent pixels." When asked about pods attached to civilian aircraft, Fred E. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, gave a blunter response: "That's bull. They're really stretching."

-----------------

CLAIM 2: No fighter jets were scrambled from any of the 28 Air Force bases within close range of the four hijacked flights. "On 11 September Andrews had two squadrons of fighter jets with the job of protecting the skies over Washington D.C.," says the Web site emperors-clothes.com. "They failed to do their job." "There is only one explanation for this," writes Mark R. Elsis of StandDown.net. "Our Air Force was ordered to Stand Down on 9/11."

FACT: On 9/11 there were only 14 fighter jets on alert in the contiguous 48 states. There is no computer network or alarm that automatically alerts the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) of missing planes - perhaps there should be, but that's another matter entirely. "They had to pick up the phone and literally dial us," says Maj. Douglas Martin, public affairs officer for NORAD. Boston Center, one of 22 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regional ATC facilities, called NORAD's Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) three times: at 8:37 am EST to inform NEADS that Flight 11 was hijacked; at 9:21 am to inform the agency, mistakenly, that Flight 11 was headed for Washington (the plane had hit the North Tower 35 minutes earlier); and at 9:41 am to (erroneously) identify Delta Air Lines Flight 1989 from Boston as a possible hijacking. The New York ATC called NEADS at 9:03 am to report that United Flight 175 had been hijacked--the same time the plane slammed into the South Tower. Within minutes of that first call from Boston Center, NEADS scrambled two F-15s from Otis Air Force Base in Falmouth, Mass., and three F-16s from Langley Air National Guard Base in Hampton, Va.

Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4500 identical radar blips crisscrossing the country's busiest air corridor. As to NORAD's radar, it rings the continent - looking outward for threats, not inward. Pre-9/11, flights originating in the States were not seen as threats and NORAD wasn't prepared to track them.

-----------------

CLAIM 3: On Sept. 11, FOX News broadcast a live phone interview with FOX employee Marc Birnbach. 911inplanesite.com states that "Bernback" saw the plane "crash into the South Tower." "It definitely did not look like a commercial plane," Birnbach said on air. "I didn't see any windows on the sides." Coupled with fuzzy photographs and videos of Flight 175 that lack the resolution to show windows, the "Bernback" statement has fueled one of the most widely referenced 9/11 conspiracy theories - specifically, that the South Tower was struck by a military cargo plane or a fuel tanker.

FACT: Birnbach, who was a freelance videographer with FOX News at the time, was more than 2 miles southeast of the WTC, in Brooklyn, when the plane flew over. He says that, in fact, he did not see the plane strike the South Tower; he says he only heard the explosion.

FACT: W. Gene Corley, a licensed structural engineer with Construction Technology Laboratories, a consulting firm based in Skokie, Ill., studied the airplane wreckage. Corley and his team photographed aircraft debris on the roof of WTC 5, including a chunk of fuselage that clearly had passenger windows. "It's from the United Airlines plane that hit Tower 2," Corley stated flatly. In reviewing crash footage taken by an ABC news crew, Corley was able to track the trajectory of the fragments he studied--including a section of the landing gear and part of an engine--as they tore through the South Tower, exited from the building's north side and fell from the sky.

-----------------

CLAIM 4: "It has been standard operating procedures for decades to immediately intercept off-course planes that do not respond to communications from air traffic controllers," says the Web site oilempire.us. "When the Air Force 'scrambles' a fighter plane to intercept, they usually reach the plane in question in minutes."

FACT: Whether for good or ill, this is simply untrue. In the decade before 9/11, NORAD intercepted only one civilian plane over North America: golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet, in October 1999. With passengers and crew unconscious from cabin decompression, the plane lost radio contact but remained in transponder contact until it crashed. Even so, it took an F-16 1 hour and 22 minutes to reach the stricken jet. Rules in effect back then, and on 9/11, prohibited supersonic flight on intercepts. Prior to 9/11, all other NORAD interceptions were limited to offshore Air Defense Identification Zones (ADIZ). "Until 9/11 there was no domestic ADIZ," FAA spokesman Bill Schumann stated. After 9/11, NORAD and the FAA increased cooperation, setting up hotlines between ATCs and NORAD command centers, according to officials from both agencies. NORAD has also increased its fighter coverage and has installed radar to monitor airspace over the continent.

Posted by: Old Scratch at September 16, 2006 11:50 AM

I agree with the poster above who says the Leftist knee-jerk reaction to the 9/11 Truth movement is really harming all of us.

If I don't misrepresent S. Ferguson's point of view, she implied 9/11 Truth proponants do not accept what is "far scarier to acknowledge that there is an violent extremist Islamist movement that U.S. policies in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere helped foster, which we don't control, and which is fundamentally opposed to both Western secularism and US policies abroad." This is just false.

Does anyone really believe the people in the 9/11 movement think they have more "control" over their own government, than over some reputed scattered "terrorists?"

NOT.

By that, you would imply people still believe in elections, even after the last two were stolen. I mean, even Greg Palast, who thinks 9/11 Truth is nuts and many other researchers, know the last two elections were stolen. That's hardly cynical anymore.

Do you really feel it is "scarier" to have terrorists hanging and hiding around, than to feel one's own government, which is supposed to protect, defend and represent us, is a bunch of foul sick traitors? Who are capable of anything?

(In comparison, the betrayal of a pedophile priest, who at least allows his victims to live, looks insignificant.)

In fact, many people refuse to look at the evidence for 9/11 skepticism simply because they couldn't bear to face its conclusion. I have met many such people.

Where is this, "It's so much more comforting to think the government did it" coming from? Stenographing recycled talking points?

The 9/11 Truth position gives much less peace of mind than the status quo because of which is the enormous power of the USA State and the, subsequent to 9/11, stripping away of our civil rights under the cover of law and "protecting us from terror."

The reality is that the horror of 9/11 Truth is what keeps people believing the government's lies..(In an abridged, "hang-out" form, or otherwise.)

It's not fear which causes our recognition, but emotional courage.

S. Ferguson also said:

"Indeed, al Qaeda's critique of globalism is in some ways very similar to the one espoused by Alex Jones."

This is another zinger from the catalog of Government/Mass Media talking points i.e. ~"The 9/11 Truth people are in cahoots with the Terrorists." That tactic is really so transparent and convenient.

S. Ferguson brought these two points, if I represent her points fairly, correct me if I'm wrong:

9/11 Truthers don't admit the fear which comes with being an American, i.e. one who rips off the rest of the world, and they are too timid to experience the guilty fear of potential retribution, so they escape into a fantasy ~ the government did it. Isn't that oh so more comforting?

And

S. Ferguson also promoted the idea 9/11 truthers agree with the "terrorists" and the 3rd world people whom we, as a "country," have wronged. (obviously not personally) (And to be more exact it's really not our "government," who does the wrong but a global, probably corporate, but definitely private, elite who have highjacked the U.S.A. and its Media.)

These two things contradict:

How can we both be too weak to admit that the rest of the world is against us - - that they hate us, and at the same time be allied with those very same foreign America haters?

The psychology and projection in this becomes very obvious.

Actually, one can believe the rest of the world has reason to hate us, and would like to strike back AND that the U.S. government engineered this 9/11 strike as a pretext for a pre-emptive war, to get its Empire straight and to create a means to toughen up against dissent/"terrorists" here at home.

So the real accusation against 9/11 Truth is that we are "terrorists" and mentally ill because we don't turn a blind eye whatever our "government" does to supposedly secure our "way of life?" Actually we admit and cry out - our government is not on our side - which is extremely traditional American.

To my stunned amazement American guilt, fear - which derives from that guilt, and the forces of conformist thinking, strikes blind many USA-ers, and all "pundits," Right and Left both.


Posted by: Peggy Carter at September 17, 2006 7:45 AM

FOR OLD SCRATCH MY ASS YOUR FULL OF SHIT

SEN. MARK DAYTON DID A FULL INVESTIGATION OF NORAD INTERCEPTS 12 MOS. BEFORE 911

AND NORAD FIGHTERS WERE 67 FOR 67 100% ACCURATE IN BRINGING DOWN PLANES

YET ON 911 0 FOR 4 IN A 2 HOUR SPAN.

AND DICK CHENEY IS THE CRIMINAL WHO DID THIS.

Posted by: SGT. MANILLA JOHN BASILONE USMC at September 18, 2006 8:46 PM

Claim:transponders were turned off

It is a well-known fact that the transponder of UA 93 - like the ones of the other hijacked airplanes - was switched off. But much less known are two further incidents: the transponder was back on at a later point, and the airplane's radar blip vanished from the controller's radar screens several minutes before the crash.

Even without transponders, FAA & others can use primary radar returns to determine a flight's position (not altitude)

Still doesn't explain why our few fighter jets were dispatched to defend the Atlantic Ocean and then took their time, traveling at a third of their max. speed, to return to defend America.

Think about it when Congress is asked to approve
$361 million per F-22 aircraft (In April 2006, the Government Accountability Office estimated the cost)

Why the heck do we need supersonic fighter jets if they aren't flown at supersonic speeds to defend US?

Posted by: neil at September 19, 2006 12:31 AM

'As for crackpot, yes, that's a strong word, but to say that 9-11 was ordered by Queen Beatrix and the Bilderberg group is pretty crazy.'

Please, quantify that. How is it crazy? I realize you are ill-informed on the subject, but methinks before writing an article of this nature you would do more research.

Posted by: Machinator at October 1, 2006 11:32 PM

If you'd like to watch a video that documents this day for free online you can go here

http://fluxrostrum.blogspot.com/2006/10/pulse-5-911-5-years-of-war-and-terror.html

Posted by: FluxRostrum at October 3, 2006 1:49 PM

The South Tower Napalm Bomb
SIXTH VIEW

http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/WTCnapalmbomb6th1.htm

Posted by: Jon Carlson at October 13, 2006 12:04 AM

The problem with most of you conspiracy theroists is that you do not take any evidence into account that does not support you argument. If even one of you could split the middle on this issue then maybe your position would be easier to swallow. You are exremist of a diffrent kind. You are of the same mind set that radical right winger's who kill people to save people(anit-abortion movement). None of you truly represents America you are just as shamless as our Government when it come to covering up facts that don't support your arguments. You people are no better than Bush.

I am neither Left nor Right. But they seem to be a better alternative than Alex Jones. Would you people prefer he run the country. I love America and there are alot of things wrong with the U.S. but please stop bashing America. And I'm refering the NWO and things of that sort. Please if you are going to present an argument Leave the Queen of England out of it and NWO. Because there is alot of compelling evidence to support a better investigation, like the melting point of metal and then piggy back frivolous comments to the good hard evidence you contaminat it and no one wants to listen.

Please calm down. Take a minute to think about other explanations for how the Towers could have come down.

Lets see how many mean spirited comments I get back on this one

Posted by: Don at October 20, 2006 5:42 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?




E-mail this POWER PLAYS entry to:


Your e-mail address:


Message (optional):



2835