Scientists cure cancer, but no one takes notice

David McRaney

Issue date: 1/23/07 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1


Since the original publication of this article we have been inundated with responses from the public at all walks of life. It is important to note that research is ongoing with DCA, and not everyone is convinced it will turn out to be a miracle drug. There have been many therapies that were promising in vitro and in animal models that did not work for one reason or another in humans. To provide false hope is not our intention. There is a lot of information on DCA available on the web, and this column is but one opinion on the topic. We hope you will do your own research into the situation. So, we have added links to resources at the end of this column. If you are arriving here form a linking website like Fark, then those links will not appear because they tend to grab only the text. For those visitors, here is a link to the original research:


Scientists may have cured cancer last week.


So, why haven't the media picked up on it?

Here's the deal. Researchers at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada found a cheap and easy to produce drug that kills almost all cancers. The drug is dichloroacetate, and since it is already used to treat metabolic disorders, we know it should be no problem to use it for other purposes.

Doesn't this sound like the kind of news you see on the front page of every paper?

The drug also has no patent, which means it could be produced for bargain basement prices in comparison to what drug companies research and develop.

Scientists tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body where it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but left healthy cells alone. Rats plump with tumors shrank when they were fed water supplemented with DCA.

Again, this seems like it should be at the top of the nightly news, right?

Cancer cells don't use the little power stations found in most human cells - the mitochondria. Instead, they use glycolysis, which is less effective and more wasteful.

Doctors have long believed the reason for this is because the mitochondria were damaged somehow. But, it turns out the mitochondria were just dormant, and DCA starts them back up again.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Here's the big catch. Pharmaceutical companies probably won't invest in research into DCA because they won't profit from it. It's easy to make, unpatented and could be added to drinking water. Imagine, Gatorade with cancer control.

So, the groundwork will have to be done at universities and independently funded laboratories. But, how are they supposed to drum up support if the media aren't even talking about it?

All I can do is write this and hope Google News picks it up. In the meantime, tell everyone you know and do your own research.


This is a column of opinion written by Printz Executive Editor David McRaney. Comments can be sent to

Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 71


posted 1/23/07 @ 5:05 PM EST

could you cite your source please? i'd like to read the research article. :D

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment


posted 1/23/07 @ 5:44 PM EST

Indeed, if you could forward whatever information you've got about the drug, it could prove very helpful for those of us looking for more detail.
Thanks very much. (Continued…)


posted 1/23/07 @ 6:19 PM EST

The new scientist article:


posted 1/24/07 @ 1:18 AM EST

Beautiful article, I've been following the work on DCA. There is no way anyone will fund the human trials to show this works against cancer. Its too cheap to make and they can't make 30 billion off of it, so they won't consider it. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

David McRaney Executive Editor

posted 1/24/07 @ 2:27 PM EST

All I ask is everyone pass this on. Eventually someone with more power than me will get this out into the mainstream.


(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

John Cain

posted 1/25/07 @ 11:15 AM EST

It's ridiculous how much you are off base here. Do a little research next time: (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Executive Editor David McRaney

posted 1/26/07 @ 12:43 PM EST

The article you sent me to is also an opinion, and as such, it is also speculative as to what DCA can do in humans and what drug companies will do concerning it. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment


posted 1/28/07 @ 1:55 AM EST

If the process is not patented, any company could patent it. Marconi got a patent on a radio even though he obviously didn't invent RF waves.

I think the Canadian government should pay for the trials and donate it to humanity. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment


posted 1/28/07 @ 5:01 PM EST

Holy crap. Gatorade with cancer control would sell like crazy. Grade A article. I'll do my part and post the link to everywhere. :D

tyler probst

posted 1/29/07 @ 5:21 AM EST

well its up on entensity so theres a start though i'm still skeptical

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Most Popular Articles


Are you going to college to get an education or a job?
Submit Vote

View Results