Weapons of the 17th Century
Chatura Weliwitigoda
Blade Weapons- Swords
The 17th century was a time where many advances in weaponry were
made. Many things changed in warfare but one thing did remain the same,
and that was the use of the sword. There were many different types of
swords used for different purposes including military, hunting and
social purposes. The sword was an instrument that could inflict pain
and death, but it also was an object of art and beauty.
Throughout
Europe swords were widely used in the 17th century. Depending on the
country and region swords were similar but also different at the same
time. For example, a curved sword that was used by the Turks was
different than a curved sword used by the Germans, but it was still a
curved sword. It is differences like these which made 17th century
Europe a “storage room” for different types and styles of swords.
There are several different classifications for swords. Curved swords,
long swords, short swords are some of the major classifications. Within
these classifications there were plenty of different styles of swords
which usually depended on what region on Europe it came from. Some
swords were used by different parts of the military. For instance, the
cavalry didn’t use the same swords as the foot soldiers.
Curved swords were widely used in the military throughout most of
Europe. These swords were usually for cavalry use. They were very
popular in Eastern Europe where this sword has Islamic origins. The
blades on curved swords were single edged and usually had multipe
grooves.
In countries like Poland and Hungary, the main curved sword was called
the Karabela. The Karabela had a grip formed of plaques which were held
by rivets to the tang. The guard was usually a cross with short
languets. The Karabela was used by the cavalry and the cross-guard
extended to form a substantial knuckle-bow, which reflected German
influence. The Turks used a curved sword whose hilt had a simple
cross-guard with very long extensions that ran up the grip and down the
blade. In Northern Europe curved swords had a distinctive pommel, which
took the shape of a lion or some other fierce animal. The guard was
fitted with perforated plates on each side and the blade was long,
slightly curved, single edged and had multiple grooves on the back
edge. As the century went on the design was modified to shorter guards
with one quillon and a knuckle-bow.
Another
long-lived curved sword was the falchion. This weapon was quite
different from the conventional curved sword. It had a re-curved
cross-guard and short heavy cleaver-like blade. It was used by troops
which were in charge of arranging transports and wagons during the
Thirty Years War. Italy and Germany had their own version of the
falchion. It had a very short broad blade, was single edged with a
clipped point. A simple S-shaped bar with down turned quillons was
utilized for the guard. The knuckle-bow stopped short of the pommel
which had a flat extension on the back. Another rare curved sword was
the dusack, which was made from a single piece of steel which was
shaped like a broad, curved single-edged cutlass.
During the 17th
century there was another sword that was also used mainly for combat.
The saber was a powerful weapon that was widely used in the battle
field. The saber was also used as “attire” by the gentlemen in that
era, but its purposes were more for combat rather than show. The Polish
saber had a “closed hilt” and was also known as the “hussar’s saber”.
It had a rounded knuckle-guard and it was bent to about one hundred
degrees. Some sabers had the knuckle-guard just bent vertically and not
joined at the pommel; others
had rounded knuckle-guards with horizontal bars to protect more of the
hand. There were many different designs for them. The blades of sabers
had a circular curvature and the width of the blade and cuts to their
opponents with sabers. The Tartar saber was the Polish military saber;
it had a blade that was very long and heavy.
Besides curved swords, the cavalry had other types of swords in their
arsenal of weapons. The backsword was commonly used by the cavalry as a
piercing and slashing weapon. Backswords were usually worn by
cuirassiers. During the 17th century backswords went through some
modification. The pommel took a more globular octagonal shape, which
was one of the main designs used in England. The hilt had fully
developed arms and the quillons were counter curved. A knuckle-bow and
a loop guard were also put in. This design was not only used on
backswords, but swords such as the English rapier and riding swords
also shared the same design.
One of the more commonly used swords in the 17th century was the
rapier, which had both military and civilian applications. At first the
rapier was a two edged sword which was mainly used for cutting and
thrusting. In Northern and other parts of Europe, the rapier was a
sword that civilians used to bring with them as regular attire. The
civilians usually had a rapier which was just a long, pointed fencing
sword. Gentlemen wore rapiers to show signs of rank. The more
embellished the sword was, the richer and more noble you were. It was
also used for dueling, which was the case when the gentlemen tried to
defend their ladies’ honor. The rapier blade usually squared-off
(ricasso) immediately below the grip. This was done in order to better
direct the use of the weapon. The offensive part of the blade usually
varied depending on the hilt and the usage. In the latter part of the
17th century the rapier went through some changes in size and form to
create a new type of sword; the small sword. [Images will be added
here].
The basic design of the small sword was the same throughout Europe,.
The Italian small sword had a hilt which had delicately chiseled
scrollwork. In Saxony the hilt was made of steel or guilded bronze, and
the grips were made of Meissen porcelain. The Germans had hilts which
were brightly colored. The blades for small swords were flattened,
hexagonal-sectioned, rhomboid or triangular-sectioned blades. The small
sword originated from the rapier, which is a very interesting change
that the weapon went through. The rapier had been used from the late
16th to early 17th century, by the end of the 17th century it was
turned into a small sword. The blade of the rapier was was shortened
and the made broader. This change began happening around the 1630’s,
which was when small swords or “light rapiers” were considered
fashionable to wear. By the 1640’s new hilts were developed for small
swords. The hilts consisted of a guard which was formed of a large
double shell with the blade passing through it. This was one of the
final steps in the evolution from rapier to small sword.
Another sword used during battle is the claymore. The word claymore
comes from the Gaelic word “claidheamohmor”, which meant great sword.
The claymore was a cross-hilted broad sword. This weapon was used in
the highlands of Scotland,
by mercenaries during the 17th century. It had a straight, broad,
double-edged blade, and it also had long, diamond sectioned quillons
which were angled towards the blade. This blade was shorter than
conventional two-handed swords, and was used by foot soldiers in
battle.
There were some swords which were used for hunting purposes only. Short
swords like hangers were exclusively used for hunting. This weapon was
widely carried, especially in England. Some of these swords could have
a hilt of iron, with a pommel in the shape of a bird or another animal
head. Some hangers also had the re-curved quillons which had a small
shell attached to it. The blades were usually short and curved.
Swords in this time period went through changes in many different ways.
The hilts of swords were also an important part change that depended on
the region in Europe. In the early part of the century Italian designs
for sword hilts were cross-hilts with knuckle-guards. This was all
around the years of 1600-1640. Western European designs for hilts also
incorporated the cross-hilt in the early part of the century,
knuckle-guards and knuckle-bows were added for extra protection.
Through the mid part of the century Western European designs changed;
the cross-hilts were curved at opposite ends, and the knuckle-guards
were change to cover more of the hand. The Italian designs changed as
well, cross hilts weren’t too popular anymore; so a circular guard was
placed above the grip, which covered the top part of the hand.
There were many swords that shaped the 17th century, both in the battlefield and in society. Swords
were elegant instruments of death that were a symbol of power to anyone
who owned one. The gentlemen that did have swords as part of their
daily attire, probably wanted to benefit from the elegance and power
that was present in their sword.
Blade weapons - Daggers
Swords weren’t the only blade weapons used in the 17th century. Daggers
and combat knives were also carried by soldiers as an extra means of
protection in the battle field. There were a number of small blade
weapons that a soldier could use. In the early 17th century daggers
were usually carried with rapiers. This was discontinued around the
year 1640. Nonetheless, daggers were continued to be produced even
after this. Some of these daggers included dirks and stilettos, which
were more of the standard daggers used at the time. There were some
daggers however, that were far from the standard. Other daggers were
used as a symbol of prestige and honor by civilians and guards.
The Scottish dirk, which was a descendant of the medieval ballock
knife, was one of the earlier daggers produced in the 17th century. The
earlier dirks had two lobes which were connected at the junction of the
grip and blade. The grips of dirks were usually decorated with bands of
studs and interlaced work. The norm by the end of the 17th century was
to entirely cover the hilts with interlaced work. The blade of a dirk
was usually broad, single edged and sometimes the back edge was set
with brass. In the second half of the century, the grip was sometimes
done in brass, which was usually decorated and engraved.
Stilettos are one of the most famous daggers known to us today. It was
the best known Italian dagger; its tapering blade was of triangular
section. The quillons were generally short and straight, and the grip
was usually narrow and it also had a small pommel. The hilt and grips
took many different forms. Wrythen grips were grips and quillons which
were pierced and chiseled to represent helmeted warriors. The hilts
were usually cut with diamond-shaped facets. Some stilettos were
developed for gunners. The blades of these stilettos were usually
engraved with a table for calculating the weight of the shot needed for
the cannon. Most stilettos were probably developed for self-protection,
because most of them were short and plain. The Italian stilettos go
back to about the year 1650 and the prototypes for the stilettos go
back to the year 1600. The prototypes were thrusting daggers with very
long and narrow pommels. There were more daggers that were created for
different types of guards.
Some daggers like the main gauche were intended for the left hand. Main
gauches were usually used by right-handed swordsmen, who would carry
their sword in their right hand and the dagger in their left. It was
the reverse with left-handed swordsmen. The blades of these daggers had a distinctive central ridge which might be inscribed and dated.
Not all daggers were as straightforward as the ones mentioned above.
Some daggers were put on the guns as an accessory like a bayonet, and
others used “trickery” to get to their opponents. There are some
daggers with blades which divide into three separate sections at the
push of a button. When the button is pushed, it operates a powerful
spring which is set in the blade. These daggers were known as dueling
daggers had the ability to catch opponent’s rapiers and hold them away
from the body giving the swordsman an easy target to strike. This
dagger was made in the first quarter of the seventeenth century. These
daggers mostly originated from France and Italy.
The sword breaker was an English dagger, a quillon dagger which was
fitted with a relatively simple guard but had a massive saw-edged
blade. The purpose of this dagger was to catch an opponent’s sword
blade, with the saw-like teeth cut into it. Well-tempered blades could
be broken by sword breakers.
Bayonets were daggers which were attached to guns and muskets. The word
refers to Bayonne in France, which was an important blade making
center. Musketeers were armed with bayonets. There are two different
types of bayonets, a plug bayonet and a socket bayonet. A plug was
bayonet was designed to fit inside the barrel of the gun. It had a
tapered grip and the blade was 12 inches. The military versions were
usually plain and uninteresting, but after the year 1680, more
elaborate versions were made. Some versions were also made for hunting.
The socket bayonet was designed to fit the socket on the side of the
barrel of the gun. In Italy and Spain the bayonets were made for the
chase, and were usually decorated. In the year 1688 French troops were
also given a bayonet with a sleeve that would fit over the muzzle of
the gun. Bayonets were a creative way to combine a relatively new
technology like firearms with old fashioned blade weaponry.
The Saxon Electoral Guard had daggers which had large pommels and were
fluted. The blades were plain and the quillons were short. The
Dalmatian troops in Venice used a dagger which had a blade with a
tapering triangular section. The quillons turned sharply down towards
it. Both pommel and were cut in spiral flutes.
The dagger was an important part of a soldier’s gear; even though it
was small. Daggers went hand-in-hand with swords and played an
important role during battle. Though daggers and swords were important
during battle, they were not the only weapons that soldiers had to rely
on.
Staff Weapons
Staff weapons were used throughout history as a
powerful weapon to hold off enemies. From about the year 1200 to 1650
the pole-arm was used once again in the battlefield. Their appearance
signified the end of armored horsemen and gave an increased importance
to the infantrymen. Most staff weapons were used in the military to
show rank. Throughout 17th century Europe, there were many different
types of pole-arms. They can be classified by the following uses:
thrusting, cutting, percussion, and combination types. Throughout the
years pole-arms slowly evolved and took shape to be deadly weapons.
Thrusting pole-arms played an important role in the battlefield. The
langue-de-boeuf (ox tongue) was a pole-arm that had a flat or long
ribbed blade. The blade either had a square or triangular shape which
went to a tapering point. Another weapon that was very similar to the
langue-de-boeuf is the early partisan. The early partisan had small
wings at the base of the blade, which was triangular in shape, and as
time went on these wings got longer and more decorative. It was used as
a weapon in earlier centuries but in the 17th century was used by
officers to indicate rank, but was also used as weapon when necessary.
There were many versions of the partisan. One of the different versions
of the partisan was called the corseque , which had curved wings
bending back towards the butt of the weapon.
One of the more famous thrusting weapons was the pike. The pike was a
spear used by heavy infantry. It was used for thrusting more than
throwing. It was about 14 to 20 feet long, and usually had a small
head. The shafts were protected for 3 to 4 feet to prevent them being
cut by swords of the opposing cavalry. The pike was used as a defense
from cavalry; it was braced onto the ground and pointed towards the
opposing cavalry. The pike men protected the musketeers as they were
reloading.
Another thrusting pole-arm that was used by the cavalry was called the
lance. It was also called the Horsemen’s Spear. This weapon was divided
into 4 parts, the truncheon, the shaft, the head and the grate. This
weapon was used to knock more horsemen off their horses.
Cutting pole-arms were another array of weapons used in the
battlefields. They could deliver devastating wounds and could
incapacitate an enemy very quickly. The classifications of cutting
pole-arms comes from one type of pole-arm called the couteau de breche,
which was basically a knife blade attached onto a shaft. This weapon
was primarily a slashing and chopping weapon. All other cutting
pole-arms evolved from this basic design. Weapons like the glaive, the
bardiche, the lochabar and the Jedburgh axe are examples of pole-arms
used in 17th century combat . The glaive was a larger couteau de
breche. It had a small extension on the back, which could have been
used as a parrying hook. The bardiche was a pole-arm with a long
crescent-like blade, which extended far beyond the pole. On the upper
end it was attached to the shaft with a socket and on the bottom end it
had a flange which was nailed to the pole. This weapon was used to
slash enemies and sometimes even used to chop limbs.
The halberd was one pole-arm that went through five centuries of
changes. The halberd is classified as a cutting weapon, although as
years went by and advances were made it became a combination type
staff, which incorporated thrusting and cutting, but by the 17th
century it was the thrusting part of the weapon that was the most
important. The halberd consisted of “an axe blade surmounted by a
thrusting point backed by a pointed beak”. In the 17th century there
were many changes made on the halberd. Some of these advances were the
following: elaborate piercing and engravings were put on, the
reinforced point was eliminated, it was given a light square head with
a short spike. The halberd was also used to show rank.
There were usually used by town militiamen, place and church guards who carried them as parade weapons.
Axes like the Lochaber axe, had two sockets which attached the blade to
the pole. The blade was usually large and curved. There was a hook
which faced the opposite edge of the blade. This weapon was used to
severely cut the enemy. The use of the hook is still under question.
Another axe used around this time period was the Jedburgh axe. They
were known as Jedburgh staves in the early 17th century. The axe is
from Scottish origin.
Percussion pole-arms consisted of one handed weapons such as the mace,
war hammer, and the bec de corbin. These weapons were designed to be
used on horseback. Weapons like the military flail and the Morgenstern
are prime examples of percussion pole-arms. The Morgenstern was a club
which usually had spikes arranged in a “star” configuration. It
sometimes also had a spear point at the end. It was used to deliver
fatal blows to the enemy; the combination of the force at which the
club was striking the opponent and the spikes thrusting through the
skin and bone, made this weapon a very dangerous asset. Though these
weapons are primitive, some were used in parts of Europe in the
battlefield.
Combination pole-arms like the English bill is considered to be another
version of a halberd. The blade of the English bill differs from the
blade of the halberd. The blade has a forward curve on the upper end,
which also a characteristic of the agricultural version called the
billhook. The spear of the weapon was usually round, square or flat.
The Lucerne Hammer was another combination pole-arm had a spear point
and a pointed beak. Instead of a blade like the halberd, the Lucerne
Hammer had a four-pronged hammer. The prongs were meant for piercing.
The weapon was meant to pierce an opponent while delivering a
devastating blow to the enemy.
Even though pole-arms were becoming less useful by the end of the 17th
century, they served as a deadly weapon in the battlefield. They were
always considered a secondary weapon and never got the type of
recognition that swords would get; even though, they were important in
the battlefield, the use of pole-arms became more and more uncommon
when firearms were being used in the battlefields.
Firearms
Firearms in the seventeenth century were an integral part of the
battlefield. A relatively new technology for those times, firearms
shaped and changed warfare. Even though firearms were invented
centuries ago, even today we see the effects of firearms in warfare.
It is important to note that when firearms did come into regular use in
the battlefield, some of the older weapons which have been used for
hundreds of years were slowly being replaced. For instance, archers
were a breed of soldier which coming to an end by the seventeenth
century. More and more countries started to rely on the use of the
firearm than the bow and arrow. It is obvious that the introduction of
the firearm to the battlefield was of historic proportions that took
place in all of Europe.
Ignition systems and their evolution was one of the most important
developments to happen in combat in the 17th century. All the countries
in Europe benefited from these advancements. The battlefield was slowly
but surely becoming overrun by firearms. The firearms of that time
period went through many different changes, in design and ignition
systems. The ignition system was one of the most important parts of
firearms. There needed to be an efficient ignition system to fire the
ammunition. There were different types of ignition systems, which
evolved through time. The ignitions were the following: matchlocks sear
locks, wheel-locks, and flintlocks.
Matchlocks were ignition systems which incorporated the slow match,
which had to be brought into contact with the priming powder. This was
done by a combination of levers. When the lower arm is pulled up toward
the stock, the upper arm is lowered to the pan. This ignition
originated from the trigger mechanisms of crossbows.
There was another type of matchlock called the snap matchlock. This
ignition system was attached to a metal plate. It had a cock which was
kept pressed onto the pan with the spring. The cock had jaws which held
a slow fuse or match. In the lock plate, a stud or sear protruded
through an aperture. As the cock was raised from the pan, the heel, a
section at its lower end, was held by the sear. A button was placed at
the rear end of the sprung lever. This button projected through the
lock plate. As soon as the button was pressed, the cock was released by
the sear; allowing the cock to snap down onto the pan. This ignition
system was rarely used in the 17th century but was found in some guns.
The sear lock was an ignition system which was introduced in the late
16th century and was used till the close of the 17th century. The sear
lock was different from the snap-matchlock, because it operated in the
opposite fashion. The cock which had the slow match was held back, away
from the pan. Linked by levers and to a long lever shaped trigger, the
cock was pivoted on a spindle. This trigger was underneath the stock
and ran parallel to it. The cock was lowered into the pan when the
trigger was pulled towards the stock.
Another category of ignition systems was called the wheel-lock. This
ignition system consisted of a lock plate, which was shaped to fit a
wheel. A pan was attached to the top edge, and there was a wheel which
was mounted at the bottom of the pan. A strong V-shaped mainspring was
linked to a short chain. The short chain was also the wheel spindle.
The lock plate was a sear, which was held into position by a spring.
The cock could be moved onto or away from the plate manually. The cock
was brought down on to the pan cover when the wheel was turned until
the sear clicked onto position. Once the sear was engaged, that’s when
the cock struck the pan and fired the gun. The wheel-lock was not used
much during the 17th century because it was replaced by the flintlock.
The flintlock is believed to have been invented in France around the
year 1620, by an inventor called Marin le Bourgeoys. By the 1640s the
flintlock had already been fitted on military weapons. The flintlock
was a type of snap-lock, which had a vertical sear which was attached
to the inner side of the cock spindle. Another variation of a flintlock
ignition was called the snap-hance lock. The flint was held in the jaws
of the cock, which struck the steel plate that was vertically (hinged)
over the pan. Scottish firearms incorporated snap-hance locks in their
design.
With firearms appearing in battle, different and new military
strategies were brought about, which changed warfare considerably in
those times. Firearms were used in all the countries in Europe. To the
general public, one of the well known fire-arms of that time was the
musket. The musket, in combination with other fire-arms, shaped modern
warfare. Firearms, being a relatively new technology, were produced or
sought out by every country in Europe during this time. Some of the
fire-arms of that period include: the musket, the caliver, the carbine,
and the harquebus.
The musket was a weapon that was developed slowly but surely replace
the use of archers in the battlefield. Most muskets were quite hefty
pieces of equipment and required many other accessories to go with
them. A ramrod was one of these accessories which was used to pack the
bullet and powder into the barrel of the musket. It was usually a
little longer than a barrel of a musket and was made of wood. A powder
pouch would also be carried by the musketeer; this was to make sure he
had an ample supply of powder during battle. A fuse rope was also
needed to light the gun powder. The fuse rope was used in the ignition
systems of the muskets. Since the musket was large and heavy, usually
the musketeer would need a musket rest. A musket rest was a pole that
gave the barrel of the musket support while the musketeer was shooting.
It usually helped the musketeer control the gun and supported some of
the musket’s weight.
The harquebus was a light gun which had a barrel length of 75 cm
(2.5 ft), a bore of 17, and a total length of 90 cm (3ft). This was
another fire-arm that was used by the cavalry, but in the 17th century
it declined in popularity and it was replaced by the carbine.
The carbine was a fire-arm that was prominent in battle. It was used by
the cavalry. The term describes the fire-arm as being a short, light
gun. Carbines were said to be “about a yard or more long in the
barrel”. The carbine was usually fitted with a wheel or snap lock. It
contained a side bar so it could be carried around the shoulder. They
had a barrel of 76 cm (30 in), a total length of 114 cm (44 in), and a
bore of 24.
The caliver was a gun that was longer than arquebus but shorter than
musket. It was a term that was used in England to describe “a type of
long gun used without a rest for military purposes”. The barrel length
of a caliver was about 100 cm (39 in), a bore of 17 and its total
length was about 137 cm (4.5 ft). This fire-arm was not used in England
after the Civil War.
Pistols were secondary weapons used in the 17th century battlefield.
The barrel length varied upon country. Some barrels were longer than
others, but the average barrel length was about 8.75 inches, and the
average total length was about 14.5 inches and they weighed roughly
around 1 – 4 pounds. Though pistols were used in the military; it
wasn’t uncommon for civilians to also own pistols, which were used for
various reasons.
Some firearms weren’t as “straightforward” as the ones mentioned above.
During the 17th century there were some guns that were known to have
more than one barrel. Some pistols were known to have as many as 9
barrels. Other firearms also had rotating barrels which could be called
the early versions of machine guns.
Firearms slowly started replacing weapons that had been used for
centuries. Firearms like the musket slowly but surely started to
replace the pike. Once the bayonet was perfected, muskets became
obsolete. Another weapon that firearms replaced was the bow and the
crossbow. Since bullets were sent at a higher speed than arrows, they
were deadlier weapons. The use of archers slowly declined throughout
the century.
Even though bows and crossbows were becoming less popular during the
17th century, they weren’t totally replaced. They were still used in
battle and were very effective weapons, proving why they had been in
use for centuries.
The crossbow was a stringed projectile weapon. It was a bow which was
mounted on a crosswise by a system of cord bindings or by a metal
bridle, a tiller, which was attached to a wooden shaft. A shaped disc
called a nut was mounted with its axis across the stock. The nut was
grooved on the upper surface to serve as a runner for the bolt.
In the first half of the 17th century, the crossbow was used for
hunting in countries like Italy, France and Spain. This weapon was used
to bring down large and dangerous animals like wolves, bears and stags.
There were other types of crossbows like the stone and bullet crossbows
which were used to hunt small animals. Later on in the century, stone
and bullet crossbows were used for sporting purposes, especially in
Germany, Belgium, England and Switzerland.
Another type of crossbow called the light crossbow was also in use at
the time. It was a small crossbow which was usually made with a steel
tiller. This weapon could easily be concealed and was considered to be
an underhand weapon. One of the unique features about this crossbow was
that it had a reloading mechanism. This weapon was banned in the 17th
century.