Meta-Knowledge Engineering & Management Server ,                     ENEA (Ente Italiana per la Ricerca, Energia e l'Ambiente)
White e-paper .  References: Adam Maria Gadomski, ENEA's e-paper, http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/gad-dict.htm, page since 1999, last updating 15 Dec. 2005 on the MKEM Server.

  Meta-Ontological Assumptions: 
 Information, Preferences and Knowledge

  universal interrelations (IPK cognitive architecture) 


 The TOGA proposal of  universal paradigms for Knowledge Engineering & Management begins at  the IPK Universal  Reasoning Architecture Paradigm (URAP). It is funded on the (goal-oriented) selection, re-definition and systemic socio-cognitive application of a few canonical terms which enable to define a generic kernel of every symbolic reasoning function. The main orginal idea relies on  the generalization of well known data processing and  calculations algorithms.

 Definitions of the basic concepts of the IPK (Information, Preferences, Knowledge)
interrelations according to the TOGA standard ( see also  socio-cognitive engineering paradigms) are the essential part of  assumptions of the TOGA  meta-ontology and epistemology: 

 

            Data: everything what is/can be processed/transformed in computational and  mental processes. 
                     Concept data is included in the ontology of "elaborators", such as developers of methods, 
                     programmers and other computation service people.
                     In this sense, data  is a relative term and exists only in the couple (data, processing) or

                     (data, calculations).

 

            Information, I: data which represent a specific property of the domain of human or artificial agent's
                     activity (such as: addresses , tel. numbers,  encyclopedic data, various lists of names and
                     results of  measurements). 
                     Every information has always a source domain. It is a relative concept.
                     Information is a concept from the ontology of modeler/(problem solver)/decision-maker.

 

            Knowledge, K: every abstract property of human/artificial agent which has ability to process/transform
                      a (quantitatively / qualitatively) information  into other information or in another knowledge
.     

                      It can be: instructions, emergency procedures,  exploitation/user manuals, scientific materials,

                      models and theories. 
                      Every knowledge has its reference domain where it is applicable. It has to include the source 
                      domain of the processed information. It is a relative concept. For more.
 

            Preference, P: an ordered relation among two properties of the domain of activity of a cognitive agent,
                     it indicates a property with higher utility. Preference relations serve to establish an intervention 
                     goal of an agent.
Cognitive preferences are relative .
                     An agent ( preferences agent) which manages  preferences of an intelligent agent  can be external or
                     his/its  internal part.
 
            Goal, G: a hypothetical state of the domain of activity which has maximal utility in a current situation.
                     Goal serves to the choice and activates proper  knowledge which process new information.

            Document: a passive carrier of  Knowledge,  Information and/or Preferences (with different 
                    structures), comprehensive for humans, and it has to be recognized as valid and useful by 
                    one or more human organizations, it can be physical or electronic. 

            Computer Program:
                   - from  the modelers and decision-makers perspective: an active carrier of different structures
                   of  knowledge expressed in computer languages and usually focused on  the realization of predefined
                   objectives (its design-goal). It may include build-in preferences and information and/or request
                   specific IPK as data.
                  - from the software engineers perspective: a data-processing tool ( more precise technical def. you 
                    may find on the Web).

              Of course, the above presented concepts consist of a computational entity discussed more in deep in
              the white paper: Personoids Paradigms; http://erg4146.casaccia.enea.it/wwwerg26701/per-para.html 
 


  First Remarks

 

   Remarks I:  Information and knowledge are relative concepts and what is called knowledge can be  considered
            as information on a higher, more abstract meta-activity level (meta-reasoning level). 

 

  Remarks II: The IPK ontology requires a generic assumption on the existence of an abstract intelligent agent
            (AIA1 , Abstract Intelligent Agent, 2,  Abstract Intelligent Agents newsgroup) and its/his/her domain of activity
          . (see also here)

 

  Remarks III: From the TOGA's intelligent agent centered perspective, information, preferences and  knowledge
             are only comprehensive if they are related to the agent's domain-of-activity before pre-selected.
          

  The IPK ontology framework consists of the paradigm of personoids architecture

 

  Context Remarks
           - In less formal than TOGA theories (recently under continuous development), such as: "Information, Knowledge, 
           Wisdom" and "Data, Knowledge, Wisdom" (see Web) the concepts of information and knowledge are not 
          sufficiently computationally defined, and wisdom is also used in a metaforic sense.
           In TOGA, wisdom is a specific property of  preferences rules system of an intelligent agent.

 

          Wisdom (TOGA definition):  a property of a preferences system (it is a  meta-attribute of the set of  preferences)
                enabling high efficacy in the achiving of preselected goals  in the preselected class of  domains-of-activity
                of  an intelligent agent.
                Wisdom (as an indicator) has a qualitative value domain, its study are included in such domains as
                Axiology, Ethics and Business. In the case of artificial intelligent tools,  it is investigated by quality and

                knowledge engineers.

         - We may expect that  intuitive conceptualization frameworks as: (Intelligence, Knowledge, Information), 
        (Knowledge, Intelligence, Wisdom) and ( DIKW ), see also: http://honors.org/AH_Zine/June2000/fundamental.html),
        will be slowly transformed to the form of  the TOGA's IPK  architecture/ontology (maybe with other names but with 
        the  same definitions - unfortunately, people do it). By the way, the same  evolutive process is seen  in the 
        numerous variants of the BDI  (Believe, Desire, Intention) models of  various cognitive agents (see Web). 
        Another similar approach, developed independently, in parallel to TOGA, is SOAR (proposed by Allan Newell as a base
        for his General Intelligence). It is now an advanced AI development environment  but the  concepts of  information
       and knowledge are not clearly distinguished.
       - It is yet usefull to notice that for software system developers which start from before developed models,quasi all 
       problem specification information are considered as data, therefore the IPK conceptualization  is not well visible from 
       such technical perspective.


  More about meta-ontological and epistemological TOGA assumptions:
MKEM Home
Ontology
Knowledge structure
IPK architecture
TOGA Meta-theory

  Google search 
        ( Nov. 16, 2004):   Information, Preferences, Knowledge   2.250.000 docs. 1st & 2nd  from MKEM
       ( Sept. 30, 2005):  Information, Preferences , Knowledge  17.100.000 docs. 1st & 2nd  from MKEM
       ( Sept. 30, 2005):  Information, Preferences             103.000.000 docs. 1st is this page.

Go to A.M.G. Home-page                       All comments are welcome.


© 1997,2001, ENEA. HID, A.M.Gadomski. All  stuff  may be freely distributed in its full original format, if selected ideas are to be published in another format, a reference to the original source and to the author must be evidenced, intellectual rights reserved. No permission is granted to download and save professional images or any other material from these pages other than for viewing and citation purposes.  These are research pages,  representing the opinions of the contributors, but not necessarily of ENEA.