Alan Greenspan is at it again--attempting to distort history, and influence how history will view him. He doesn't want to be blamed for the housing bubble, nor any developing recession. He had nothing to do with any of it, if you ask him.
In October 2006, in a speech, Greenspan stated that the housing boom (and thus any future housing bubble) was the result of the Berlin Wall coming down and not because he drove interest rates to record low levels.
FT reported his words of distortion this way:
“I don’t think that the boom came from a 1 per cent Fed funds rate or from the Fed’s easing. It came from the collapse of the Berlin Wall,” Mr Greenspan told a private audience in Canada...Greenspan is back at it again, today.
News wires are reporting that via satellite link to a business conference in Hong Kong, he stated that a recession was likely. But, again, does it have anything to do with the enormous liquidity he created during his years as Fed chairman? Not according to Greenspan. It is just that it has been a long time since we have had a recession and one is just due. It seems that Greenspan wants to make a recession a periodic thing, rather than the result of activities of the Federal Reserve, especially the Fed activities under his watch.
This is what Greenspan told the Hong Kong conference attendees:
"When you get this far away from a recession, invariably forces build up for the next recession, and indeed we are beginning to see that sign..."Translation: Don't blame him and the flood of new money he poured into the system while he was Fed chairman.
But that is exactly where blame should be placed.
During Alan Greenspan's reign as chairman of the Federal Reserve, interest rates were generally kept artificially low and Greenspan flooded the economy with new money.
When Greenspan took over at the Fed, the money supply (
as measured by M2) stood at $2,792.3 billion. When Greenspan left the Fed 18 years later, M2 money supply stood at $6.713.6 billion. An increase of 140.4%
This remarkable explosion in money supply even prompted
some at the Fed to point to the money supply boom as a cause of the housing price boom:
"Like other asset prices, house prices are influenced by interest rates, and in some countries, the housing market is a key channel of monetary policy transmission."It's the same for an overall recession. There is nothing purely cyclical about it. It is the actions of the Fed that cause the recession.
As Lew Rockwell explained about the bust in the dot com stocks and the profound impact interest rates have on investment decisions:
"
Left to the market, interest rates are determined by the supply of credit (a mirror of the savings rate) and the willingness to takes risks in the market (a mirror of the return on capital). What throws this out of whack is manipulation by the central bank. When the Fed feeds artificial credit into the economy by lowering interest rates, it spurs investments in projects that don’t eventually pan out. In this economic boom, the high-tech and dot com manias resulted from a decade of sustained money growth via lower interest rates. When the Fed stepped on the brakes to prevent prices from rising, it prompted a sell-off, and hence a downturn."It is the same with the current housing and stock market led boom. It is a Fed money induced boom, launched during the Greenspan era.
The only face-saving edge that Greenspan has going for him at this point is that new Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke, is pumping money faster than Greenspan did (January M2 money supply growth was 10% on an annualized basis). Thus a full-fledged recession is probably not right around the corner--and thus the mess that Greenspan started will eventually appear to be all Bernanke's fault.
Labels: Bernanke, FederalReserve, greenspan, RealEstate