Home Page
Just a few observations for those who are interested in getting "into" classical music.

First off, collections and anthologies of multiple artists are great places to start. For every Moonlight Sonata Beethoven wrote, there were 27 pieces of crap they will stick on every "Beethoven's Greatest Hits" that you have to sit through to get to the piece you like. I've been impressed with the Mad About... and the RCA-Victor 60+ Greatest Hits series, and the Heavy Classix discs. The Classical Music for Dummies series are supposed to be good, too. Ignore the fact that they'll have goofy titles like, "Music from Old Cartoons." Also, I've found the Hooked on Classics discs, as cheesy as they are, as a good introduction. You'll get exposed to the best bits and pieces of twenty composers in an hour. Just hide them when you're done listening.

Soundtracks to films about composers or classical music are good bets, because they are recorded with excellent quality, and are geared for people who don't like classical music. Check out the soundtracks for "Shine" (piano music), "Immortal Beloved" (Beethoven) and "Amadeus" (Mozart). And pick up a CD of Disney's Fantasia. Find out what you like on these, buy real CDs with the same music, then tell people the soundtracks belong to your uncultured wife.

Unless it is really weird music, anything written after 1850 is considered by the Classical Music Snobs to be trash, so be aware when you mention modern composers in cultured company. Copland and Gershwin wrote fantastic stuff, but it is for 'commoners'. Bela Bartok also wrote really awesome stuff, but unless you are into progressive heavy metal, you probably won't like it. In fact, almost no one likes it, so the snobs think it is great.

Be very careful about avant-garde composers and performers. The Kronos Quartet has done some phenomenal renditions (their cover of Purple Haze is breathtaking), but they have a penchant for choosing some really screwed up, almost unlistenable stuff. I think they drop acid.

A couple of observations about choosing recordings. In a contest, the Telarc CD always wins. They are all recorded direct to digital with digital mics to 20-bit digital masters, and they go to ridiculous extremes to have the best sound, the best performances, and the best liner notes.

If you can't find the Telarc copy of something, you're usually still okay. For solo or chamber work, choose by the performer. For example, David Helfgott, while having an inspiring story, is not a first-rate classical pianist. Van Cliburn was. For orchestral work, look for a good conductor. Screw the snobs here. The Boston Pops under John Williams, and the Cincinnati Pops under Eric Kunzel, and Sir Neville Mariner with St. Martin in the Fields (see the Amadeus soundtrack) are fantastic. For vocal music, John Rutter and the Cambridge singers are top-notch.

With orchestral work, it is the conductor and the recording that make the performance great, rather than the orchestra. When you've got 20 violinists playing the same thing, it really doesn't matter who they are.

All that aside, here are my picks and pans:

[ Books | Films | Music | Politics | Religion | Poetry | Programming | Photo Album ]
[ Top | Apostate?!? | Resume | Site Map | Search | What's New ]

These pages provided exclusively by apostate.com. Unless otherwise noted, all text Copyright 1994-2002 by Joshua J. Ellis (josh@apostate.com). All rights reserved. Use of the information hereon is subject to the terms of Legal Statement. Site has been content rated and validated.
last modified Tue, 20-Dec-2005