Curabitur porta hendrerit lectus. Aenean ut mi. Quisque cursus velit.
Web 2.0 Expo emphasizes the educational aspect of Web 2.0 through an expanded conference and tradeshow, bringing the themes and core principles to a wide audience. Read more
When I wrote my Call for a Blogging Code of Conduct last week, I suggested some ideas of what such a code might contain, but didn't actually put forth a draft that people could subscribe to. We're not quite there yet, but we have a plan.
We've drafted a code of conduct that will eventually be posted on bloggingcode.org, and created a badge that sites can display if they want to link to that code of conduct.
But because we want a period of review, we don't want to finalize that code yet. I've put a draft below (and you'll see it's based closely on the BlogHer Community Guidelines that I linked to last week.) But we're also working with wikia to put the draft through a wiki-based review process on blogging.wikia.com. (There's an easy to remember shortcut link at http://blogging.wikia.com/wiki/BCC) Please feel free to join in and edit the wiki as well as encouraging others to do so. We'll post the final version on bloggingcode.org, along with the html to display the badge and link to the code.
(While wikis are great for developing the code, we don't want it to be a moving target once people have signed up for it.)
Here's the first draft:
We celebrate the blogosphere because it embraces frank and open conversation. But frankness does not have to mean lack of civility. We present this Blogger Code of Conduct in hopes that it helps create a culture that encourages both personal expression and constructive conversation.
1. We take responsibility for our own words and for the comments we allow on our blog.
We are committed to the "Civility Enforced" standard: we will not post unacceptable content, and we'll delete comments that contain it.
We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that:
- is being used to abuse, harass, stalk, or threaten others
- is libelous, knowingly false, ad-hominem, or misrepresents another person,
- infringes upon a copyright or trademark
- violates an obligation of confidentiality
- violates the privacy of others
We define and determine what is "unacceptable content" on a case-by-case basis, and our definitions are not limited to this list. If we delete a comment or link, we will say so and explain why. [We reserve the right to change these standards at any time with no notice.]
2. We won't say anything online that we wouldn't say in person.
3. We connect privately before we respond publicly.
When we encounter conflicts and misrepresentation in the blogosphere, we make every effort to talk privately and directly to the person(s) involved--or find an intermediary who can do so--before we publish any posts or comments about the issue.
4. When we believe someone is unfairly attacking another, we take action.
When someone who is publishing comments or blog postings that are offensive, we'll tell them so (privately, if possible--see above) and ask them to publicly make amends.
If those published comments could be construed as a threat, and the perpetrator doesn't withdraw them and apologize, we will cooperate with law enforcement to protect the target of the threat.
5. We do not allow anonymous comments.
We require commenters to supply a valid email address before they can post, though we allow commenters to identify themselves with an alias, rather than their real name.
6. We ignore the trolls.
We prefer not to respond to nasty comments about us or our blog, as long as they don't veer into abuse or libel. We believe that feeding the trolls only encourages them--"Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it." Ignoring public attacks is often the best way to contain them.
We also decided we needed an "anything goes" badge for sites that want to warn possible commenters that they are entering a free-for-all zone. The text to accompany that badge might go something like this:
This is an open, uncensored forum. We are not responsible for the comments of any poster, and when discussions get heated, crude language, insults and other "off color" comments may be encountered. Participate in this site at your own risk.
TrackBack URL: http://blogs.oreillynet.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1952
I am all for gallantry and warm fuzzy feelings but I really thought that this idea of a bloggers code of conduct has been resigned to the old meme in the sky graveyard. Alas though it appears to have been carried forth by Tim O’Reilly who has ju...
Well, the tempest in a teapot of Kathy Sierra versus Chris Locke and the general incivility of the blogosphere has finally bubbled over to the point where industry luminaries like Tim O'Reilly are proposing a Blogger's Code of Conduct. Agree to the ter...
Now that the obscenity and death threats have started to infest the tech bloggers, media mogul Tim O'Reilly wants everyone in the blogosphere to play nice. He's made some badges to help you know what goes on what sites. Prediction?...
Tim O'Reilly is a perfectly nice, bright guy, who has had a great deal of success with an ever expanding line of Geek and Nerd books and associated products. I like them all and admire his well-deserved success. But Tim O'Reilly has, as seemingly all ...
The idea of a formal Code of Conduct is taking form for some people, and resembles a pile of shit for some others. Tim O’Reilly has published a draft Code of Conduct on his weblog, which makes interesting reading if nothing else. Here follow my t...
Read More: http://www.private-intellectual.de/?p=458
While I don't think it smacks of censorship because there's no government action, I don't like the communitarian trend of promoting the idea that bloggers are responsible for what commenters say: The preliminary recommendations posted by Mr. Wales and ...
Well doing my usual glance across the internet I cam across this Nice News Story following a “Blogger” who has posted a Blogger’s Code of Conduct. Where by Blogs are meant to carry certain badges to either agree with or disagree with ...
Wendy of Girl on the Right authored this in response to the weird "Bloggers Making Rules Of Conduct For Blogging" thing thats going around, and since we really couldn't say it any better than her, we've Katic Couric-ed her article,...
Like Oliver Kamm, I've been thinking about this this blogger Code of Conduct. 1. Blogs are but one item on the varied menu of information...
Estos dÃas hay un debate en Internet sobre la aplicaciÃ³n de cÃ³digos Ã©ticos a los blogs. La idea partiÃ³ de Tim O’Reilly con un compromiso de siete puntos para evitar hechos como los ocurridos a finales de marzo, cuando Kathy Sierra, una blog...
Read More: http://www.outono.net/elentir/?p=1111
Consistency, fairness and making people learn to deal with hurt feelings like grown ups. These are not values for the bloggers that follow Tim O'Reilly's guidelines: We define unacceptable content as anything included or linked to that: is being used...
Looks like the blowup between Chris Locke and Kathy Sierra irked Tim O’Reilly enough to put this together: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/draft_bloggers_1.html As much a rock star as Tim is, I’ll go on record as saying I don̵...