Tuesday, February 08, 2005

Censor the Media


One has to be pretty far on the left not to see the media as biased against freeing Iraqi from tyranny. The bad news is generally highlighted, and the good news ignored; U.S. killed is the headline of the day, while the hundreds of terrorist eliminated for once and for all seems to never happen. Obviously, this is an attempt to repeat the glory days of the Vietnam War when the media turned military victory into defeat, and was the Democrat’s backbone in forcing a cowardly withdrawal, leaving millions of South Vietnamese and Cambodians to their own Holocaust.

But, what to do? When Americans are being shot at and killed in the line of duty; when they knowingly put themselves at risk to free a people from tyranny; when the country is at war; and when in the long run ALL Americans are at risk from biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons terrorists and their state supporters might use against us; we cannot afford to have the media freely providing aid and comfort to the enemy. The stakes are too high.

Often, it as though the media does not know which side it is on. They argue that they are “objectively reporting the news” and therefore should not be for one side or another. Thus, you read not about “terrorists” cutting off heads of their hostages, blowing up innocent civilians (and violating the most fundamental clauses of the Geneva Conventions), but “insurgents,” “radicals,” or the latest, “militants” killing hostages. “Killing,” not murdering. Killing is what enemy soldiers do to each other in battle. Murder is the intentional killing of an unarmed civilian. But, have you ever read of the terrorists murdering someone? Not strange that you do not. Why, this would be partisan reporting.

This is war. If the media has its way and we withdraw immediately from Iraq, or even begin staged withdrawals now with a timetable, the terrorists win. With the support of Syria, this is assured. Then, the resulting democide by the victorious terrorists may well come close to that in South Vietnam after we withdrew. And, so heartened by our lack of will, the terrorists throughout the world could only get more state support, including even possible help on nukes from North Korea or China (somehow, it has been forgotten that China is still ruled by its Communist Party, and our enemy).

In both World Wars I and II, the media reports on the war were strictly controlled. They must be again. Just in lives alone that might be saved thereby, it is necessary. How far should this go? I would use the censorship of World War II as criteria. This would mean, for example, that news reports of secret commando operations in Iran, or the employment of a secret weapon, or . . . well, you get the idea.

If the media continues its refusal to support the war, or censor itself (oops, correction, it does censor itself against good news), and no government censorship is applied, then I will predict this. If any American cities are destroyed by nuclear weapons, or there is a terrorist created plague of some deadly disease killing millions of Americans, the possibility of which is one of the reasons we are at war, the media will not only be censored forthwith, but survivors will violently attack reporters, commentators, and the offices of the media they believe to be partly responsible.

Link of Note

”Fourth estate or fifth column?“ (1/29/05) By Thomas Sowell

“Too many in the media today regard the reporting of the Vietnam War as one of their greatest triumphs. It certainly showed the power of the media— but also its irresponsibility. Some in the media today seem determined to recapture those glory days by how they report on events in the Iraq war.”


At 1:28 AM, Dean Esmay said...

Powerful stuff, but I caution you: in World War II, the papers did publish bad news all the time. The thing was that they reported good news and very obviously wanted us to win. That's the real problem we have today.

Fine blog you have here, Professor.

At 8:57 AM, Anonymous said...

Well, the major media mostly parroted the Bush administration's lies/misinformation about Iraq in the run up to war. And the liberal bias of FOX news is truly astounding. (sarcasm)

Rummel, you are a fool. I suggest you join the "reality based community."

At 11:03 AM, Anonymous said...

This is some funny shit, old man. The best part is that Mr. Rummel calls himself a "freedomist", while at the same time, he's calling for the abolition of the first amendment. Awwwww yeah, self-parody is sweet!

"I believe in freedom: the freedom to agree with me!"

At 11:12 AM, Anonymous said...

The big difference that should worry you is that in World I and II (and the Civil War which also featured wide spread censorship) we had a declared war, not some nebulous "We're at war, kinda" thing we have now. It's one thing to ignore the Constitution during a clearly defined period of war, but you're advocating ignoring it during this nebulous kinda-at-war phase. Why don't you call for a proper declaration by Congress and THEN advocate censorship? That way we'd have some kind of limit on how long it lasts or how it could start.

At 2:21 PM, Anonymous said...

We must destroy our freedom in order to save it!

What an utter fool. I guess we also need to silence the many Republicans, conservatives, libertarians and retired military folks who are complaining about this war. Then the terrorists will have truly won!

At 11:23 PM, Anonymous said...

Hey, at least you admit that one of the reasons we're at war is to provoke terrorist attacks in the future. Most State-worshippers aren't that forthright. Thanks for pointing that out - so many folks operate under the assumption that governments have an interest in protecting their subjects.

At 7:16 AM, Anonymous said...

Hello, this is James Redford. (Email: jrredford@yahoo.com .)

Prof. Rudolph J. Rummel, I've used your government mass-death-toll analysis in two of my published essays, the first being entitled "The Government Causes the Crime" (c. October 2001) and the second entitled "Jesus Is an Anarchist" (c. December 2001), both originally published on the Anti-State.com website.

What your own empirical statistics on such matters quite clearly demonstrates is that, overwhelmingly, governments are the most predatory upon their "own" citizens. More than four times the amount of non-combatants have been condemned to death for purely political reasons by their own governments within the past century than were killed in that same time-span from wars. All totaled, neither the private-sector crime which government is largely responsible for promoting and causing or even the wars committed by governments upon the subjects of other governments come anywhere close to the crimes government is directly responsible for committing against its own citizens--certainly not in amount of numbers. Without a doubt, the most dangerous presence to ever exist throughout history has always been the people's very own government.

Obviously the profound lessons of your own research have been utterly lost upon you. From your above commentary it is quite clear that you are no friend of liberty. The first casualty of war is truth--and you would enshrine this ancient government tradition of lies even further by having the U.S. government outright censor the media outlets. The fact that the major media is a de facto nationalized propaganda branch of the government has also been lost upon you. But then, considering that you think Dan Rather & Co. would actually bother to inform you about the true level of corruption of the U.S. government, it only figures that you would be in the dark.

First the rhetoric about invading Iraq was because Iraq was supposed to have been involved in the 9/11 attacks, but absolutely no evidence of that could be produced so that line was dropped. Then it was because Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, but no such weapons have been found, so that line has been dropped. Now it's about "liberating" the Iraqi people--how absolutely selfless and thoughtful Bush & Co. are to spend billions of U.S. tax-payers' money and sacrifice hundreds of U.S. soldiers' lives in the effort to free the Iraqi people by taking their personal firearms away. I suppose the next thing Bush & Co. are going to do is sell all their worldly possessions, donate the proceeds to charity and join a monastary.

But anyone parrotting the "liberation" line is either a truly ignorant person or a lying sycophant--the same goes with the other lines, as well. This war has not the slightest thing in the world to do with "liberating" the Iraqi people--other than liberating them from their oil reserves and strategic military real-estate. We have this Presidential administration's own official statements regarding their intent to invade Iraq made almost exactly one year before the 9/11 attacks, saying in their official policy report that they would still invade Iraq even if Saddam and his regime no longer existed. So this invasion has not the slightest thing in the world to do with Saddam or whatever political system was in operation in that country--the U.S. was going to invade Iraq no matter what.

Below are particularly relevant excerpts from the document "Rebuilding America's Defenses--Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century: A Report of The Project for the New American Century," September 2000 ( http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf ):

Page 14 (or 26 in the PDF browser):

"While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

Page 17 (or 29 in the PDF browser):

"From an American perspective, the value of such bases would endure even should Saddam pass from the scene."


Page 51 (or 63 in the PDF browser):

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor."

And they got their "new Pearl Harbor" twelve months later. How very fortunate for them and their globe-dominating "Project."

Below are the June 3, 1997 signers of the Project for the New American Century's Statement of Principles ( http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm ):

Elliott Abrams
Gary Bauer
William J. Bennett
Jeb Bush
Dick Cheney
Eliot A. Cohen
Midge Decter
Paula Dobriansky
Steve Forbes
Aaron Friedberg
Francis Fukuyama
Frank Gaffney
Fred C. Ikle
Donald Kagan
Zalmay Khalilzad
I. Lewis Libby
Norman Podhoretz
Dan Quayle
Peter W. Rodman
Stephen P. Rosen
Henry S. Rowen
Donald Rumsfeld
Vin Weber
George Weigel
Paul Wolfowitz

See also:

"U.S. Harbored Terrorists to Bolster Its Case," Matt Bivens, Moscow Times, March 15, 2004, Page 8 http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/03/15/007.html

"Secret Bechtel Documents Reveal: Yes, It Is About Oil," David Lindorff, CounterPunch, April 9, 2003 http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff04092003.html

"Crude Vision: How Oil Interests Obscured US Government Focus On Chemical Weapons Use by Saddam Hussein," Jim Vallette, Steve Kretzmann and Daphne Wysham, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network/Institute for Policy Studies, 2nd edition: August 13, 2002 http://www.ips-dc.org/crudevision


The U.S. government has a well-documented history (i.e., modus operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the Pearl Harbor attack, the Vancouver Island shelling of 1942, Operation Northwoods (which although didn't go forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on it), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the 9/11 attacks, and etc., etc., etc.

Those who control the U.S. government didn't just know in advance and intentionally let the 9/11 attacks happen as a Hegelian dialectical PsyOp in order to obtain more power and control--they funded, shepherded, trained and protected the terrorists every step of the way. They didn't just intentionally let it happen: they made it happen.

The below post by me contains the November 10, 2003 article "September 11--Islamic Jihad or Another Northwoods?" by Tim Howells, Ph.D., which is a very good, short introduction to just some of the more damning mainstream major media articles and U.S. government primary documentation which proves up one side and down the other that the 9/11 attacks and the following anthrax attacks were a Hegelian dialectical PsyOp staged by the U.S. government as a pretext in order to obtain more power and control. I append my own additional end-notes at the conclusion of Dr. Howells' article, in order to add further mainstream documentation.

From: James Redford ( jrredford@yahoo.com )
Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.education,alt.education.alternative,alt.education.research,misc.education
Subject: The U.S. Government Staged the 9/11 Attacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:56 GMT

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.college/msg/cdb2f90b15ea3233?dmode=source (This is the updated Google link, as Google changed-up their usenet archive since the PsyOp 9/11 website had been last updated.)


The below contains hardcore mainstream major media and government primary documentation on past government-staged Hegelian dialectic terrorist PsyOps events:


Concerning the Oklahoma City bombing, see the below links:

"PROOF there were additional explosive charges":


WhatReallyHappened.com Oklahoma City Bombing page:


"Bomb Damage Analysis Of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building" by Brigadier General Benton K. Partin, retired head of U.S. Airforce Weapons Development:


"Was FBI early arrival in Oklahoma City?--Hotel receipt shows top terror man showed up 9 hours before blast":


Iraqis were definitely involved in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma City. There is quite a lot of evidence demonstrating this. We even know the names of some of those Iraqis, like Al-Hussaini Hussain, who was also working as a baggage-handler at Boston's Logan International Airport during the 9/11 attacks, which is where American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 originated from.

Al-Hussaini Hussain is the person that witnesses identify as John Doe No. 2 who was with Timothy McVeigh in dropping off the Ryder truck in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building. He was arrested by the FBI trying to leave the U.S. and his release was ordered by Bill Clinton through the Justice Department. Found in his custody during that arrest was the blue jogging suit that witnesses described.

Al-Hussaini Hussain is former Iraqi Republican Guard, and four other former Iraqi Republican Guard members were arrested soon after the bombing of the Murrah Federal building, but their release was ordered by Bill Clinton. These former Iraqi Republican Guard members are part of the 3,500+ Iraqi military members and their family brought into the U.S. after the Gulf War by George Bush, Sr. and further continued by Bill Clinton. For more on this transfer of Iraqi military into the U.S., see the below major media news articles:

"Iraq POWs Paid to Resettle in U.S.; Lawmakers Protest" (Los Angeles Times, 8/24/93):


"Resettling Iraqi POWs in U.S. Criticized; Lawmakers Urge Clinton to End 'Potentially Dangerous' Policy" (Washington Post, 8/25/93):



Many of the confiscated tapes of the twelve video survailance cameras that were in front of the Murrah Federal building record exactly what witnesses described: Al-Hussaini Hussain dropping off the Ryder truck with Timothy McVeigh--Al-Hussaini Hussain as the passenger and Timothy McVeigh as the driver. And this according to high-level FBI sources who have seen the tapes, as quoted by the Los Angeles Times and Oklahoma City KFOR-TV news. These video survailance tapes were confiscated by the U.S. government under the National Security Act.

For more on this evidence which I have been relating to you, I urge you to watch at least the first part (which deals with the Oklahoma City bombing) of the video documentary "911: The Road to Tyranny" by political talk radio host Alex Jones, of which can be viewed below in its entirety for free:




http://infowars.com/video_clips.html (There is only the first part of the video on the Infowars website.)

And see:

"Search For The Missing Iraqis: Ask Daddy Bush And Clinton" by Wade Inganamort:


See also:

"The real story of Iraqis at OKC bombing. Not the one you think!":


As well, see the on-line book The Oklahoma City Bombing and The Politics of Terror:


The above book by David Hoffman is very thoroughly referenced, and is introduced by Oklahoma State Rep. Charles Key.


Terrorism is the health of the state, which is why so many governments throughout history have manufactured terrorism in which to serve as a pretext in order to usurp ever more power and control.

Below is documentation on Vladimir "Mr. Hexogen" Putin* and the 9/99 Russian apartment building bombings:

The September 1999 Russian apartment building terror-bombing campain used Hexogen (i.e., Cyclonite; RDX) as the explosive and was blamed on Chechen terrorists despite there being not the slightest shred of evidence that Chechens were behind it, and it later turned out that the bombings were done by the Russian government itself (i.e., under former KGB spy and FSB head, and then Prime Minister, Vladimir Putin) in order to get the Russian people behind another war against Chechnya (oh, how familiar it all sounds!)--indeed, the Russian government (i.e., the FSB, the present-day KGB) was actually caught red-handed by local police and citizens in the city of Ryazan planting live explosives (i.e., Hexogen) with live detonators in an apartment building!

The below article by David Satter, published by The Hudson Institute, is probably the best over-all article concerning much of the evidence that the 9/99 Russian terrorist bombings were done by the Russian government. The National Review article is simply based upon The Hudson Institute article, but without the very important and informative end-notes (and so I recomend that you read The Hudson Institute article).

"The Shadow of Ryazan: Who Was Behind the Strange Russian Apartment Bombings in September 1999?" by David Satter, The Hudson Institute, April 19, 2002:



"The Shadow of Ryazan--Is Putin's government legitimate?" by David Satter, National Review, April 30, 2002:


The below website, Terror-99, deals with the Russian government's involvement in the 9/99 Russian terrorist bombings, and has a huge amount of mainstream major-media news-articles demonstrating that the Russian government was behind the bombings:


For an additional amount of vital evidence not covered in the David Satter article, see the below two articles:

"Bali Halloween" by Israel Shamir:


"Fear of Doing the Boss a Disservice," Moscow Times, April 11, 2002, pg. 8:


David Satter has also written more on this matter in the below book by him:

Darkness at Dawn: The Rise of the Russian Criminal State (Yale University Press; May 2003) ISBN: 0-300-09892-8, or 0300098928:





* "'Gospodin Geksogen' ('Mr. Hexogen')" by Dr. Alexandr Nemets and Dr. Thomas Torda, July 19, 2002


"'Mr. Hexogen' (Continued)" by Dr. Alexandr Nemets and Dr. Thomas Torda, July 23, 2002


It was the FBI that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993:

None of this would be known today if it were not for the FBI's undercover agent Emad A. Salem taping his conversations with his FBI handlers (unbeknownst to them). Salem thought that the FBI might try to pin it on him so he took measures to protect himself. Indeed, without the FBI the '93 WTC bombing would never have happened, as it was agent Salem who built the bomb for the would-be Muslim "terrorists." Salem wanted to use fake ingredients for the "bomb" but the FBI ordered him to make a real one. When the making of the bomb was complete Salem told the FBI that they could now arrest the would-be terrorists, but the FBI told Salem that the bombing is to go forward. After agent Salem went public with his tapes in a news conference the FBI found it necessary to pay him over a million dollars just to shut him up. See the October 28, 1993 New York Times article "Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast":


And see also:

"Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed":


On the above webapage you can find the below two audio clips from one of Emad A. Salem's recorded conversations with one of his FBI handlers, FBI Special Agent John Anticev:


The above clip is an excerpt from the below longer clip:


The above clips were also broadcasted on WBAI Radio in the city of New York.

The below transcript is from 2:57 to 4:31 min:sec from the longer clip (SalemWBAI.mp3):

FBI Special Agent John Anticev: But, uh, basically nothing has changed. I'm just telling you for my own sake that nothing, that this isn't a salary, that it's--you know. But you got paid regularly for good information. I mean the expenses were a little bit out of the ordinary and it was really questioned. Don't tell Nancy I told you this. [Nancy Floyd is another FBI Special Agent who worked with Emad A. Salem in his informant capacity.]

Emad A. Salem: Well, I have to tell her of course.

Anticev: Well then, if you have to, you have to.

Salem: Yeah, I mean because the lady was being honest and I was being honest and everything was submitted with a receipt and now it's questionable.

Anticev: It's not questionable, it's like a little out of the ordinary.

Salem: Okay. Alright. I don't think it was. If that's what you think guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A. and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Anticev: Well.

Salem: And then he put his head in the sand and said "Oh, no, no, that's not true, he is son of a bitch." [Deep breath.] Okay. It's built with a different way in another place and that's it.

Anticev: No, don't make any rash decisions. I'm just trying to be as honest with you as I can.

Salem: Of course, I appreciate that.

Anticev: And as far as the payments go, and everything like that, they're there. I guarantee you that they are there.


The best analysis and documentation on the creation of modern Islamic fundamentalism of the Afghanistan variety that I found is in the beginning chapters of the below book:

The War on Freedom: How and Why America was Attacked, September 11th, 2001 by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, foreword and afterword by John Leonard (Tree of Life Publications; June 2002), ISBN: 0-930852-40-0 (0930852400), 400 pages:


See also:

"50 years on, Lavon Affair still sparks public debate in Israel," Dan Baron, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, July 20, 2004:


Israeli Roots of Hamas:


Puppet On A String: Hamas Dances To Israel's Tune
By Paul Joseph Watson:


The Phony (Mossad) Al Qaeda Cell in Palestine:




Tracking the 19 Hijackers
What are they up to now?
At least 9 of them survived 9/11:




WAM: Busted! Mossad Exposed
Mossad Exposed In Phony 'Palestinian Al Qaeda' Caper
By Michele Steinberg and Hussein Askary:



Nidal planned to oust Saddam
28 August 2002: The Palestinian terrorist, Abu Nidal, was working for the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, for the last four years and was plotting a coup against Iraqi president Saddam Hussain at the behest of Western powers, top diplomats said.:



Hamas history tied to Israel
By Richard Sale
UPI Terrorism Correspondent From the International Desk
Published 6/18/2002:



JP Editorial: The Hamas-Likud Pairing
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 21:08:04 +0300 (EET DST)
From: Michael Freund ( mbf@actcom.co.il )

Dear IRIS Subscriber,
The following editorial appeared in the Jerusalem Post on August 28, 1995. It is reprinted with permission.

IRIS Staff

Editorial from August 25, 1995:


Israeli Roots of Hamas are being exposed
by Dean Andromidas
Executive Intelligence Review (EIR), 18 January 2002
Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca , 12 April 2002:


Sharon War Plan Exposed:
Hamas Gang Is His Tool

by Jeffrey Steinberg

Executive Intelligence Review, 20 July 2001
Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca , 5 April 2002:


Israel's Hamas
by George Szamuely

The New York Press Volume 15, Issue 17, April 2002
Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca , 23 April 2002:


Israel's Sacred Terrorism by Livia Rokach, foreword by Noam Chomsky (AAUG Press; Third Edition: 1986):



And let us not forget that the largest terrorist act in Palestine was and remains the bombing of the King David Hotel on July 26, 1946 by Jews dressed as Arabs. 91 people were killed and around 45 people were injured. The attack was ordered by David Ben Gurion and directed by Menachem Begin, both of whom would later become Israeli Prime Ministers. For more on that, see:

King David Hotel bombing:


The Bombing Of The King David Hotel:


See also:


5/18/03 Nine killed in double Jerusalem suicide bombing
http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2003%20News%20archives/May%202003%20News/18%20n/Nine%20killed%20in%20double%20Jerusalem%20suicide%20bombing.htm Police Chief Shlomo Aharonishki said the first bomber was disguised as an Orthodox Jew and that a skullcap and prayer shawl were found on him. (Interesting that nobody ever suspects that bombers who look like Arabs might be in disguise, especially since the King David Hotel was blown up by Israelis dressed as Arabs, not to mention the infamous Lavon Affair. In any event, the timing makes it obvious that the bombings were intended to derail the peace process. Now, who wanted that to happen? That's your ultimate mastermind.)


See the below website for more hardcore documantation resources:

PsyOp 9/11: Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism:


At 10:09 PM, bbc press said...

Special DNN - BUSINESS NEWS Report For R.J. Rummel!

The Ten million dollar pixel website does something NO other ONE million pixel web site can! - The'll Give TWO million dollar away!!
Just recently we reported about The Tenmilliondollarwebsite.com. The site is a copycat of The Million Dollar Homepage by a 21-year-old British entrepreneur Alex Tew. The Ten million dollar is rapidly evolving into the fastest growing 'pixel' web site online. They now offer $2.000.000,00 to the largest advertiser on their site.

THE NETHERLANDS, October, 2005 - The tenmilliondollarwebsite.com takes pixel advertising several big steps further. As you can see on http://tenmilliondollarwebsite.com/blog The site had more than 100,000.00 pageviews in 6 weeks being online!! We now have an Alexa page rank far into the 100.000 says Walter proud. He and Janwillem, two guys from The Netherlands are the owners of the site.

They want to live their dream and start an own (Internet) marketing, hosting and consultant business, using the proceedings of the site... They have without a doubt the most valuable name...

To boost the value of your TROPI (Traffic Return On Pixel Investment we learned) they organized a huge and unique promotion!
Asking about this special promotion, Janwillem says: As said before, we can do something no other million dollar website can do: We are giving away more than $2.000.000,00!!

We will give one of our advertisers $2.000.000,00 ( two million dollars) as soon as our site is filled for 50%! The best thing about it is: Nobody needs to participate in any kind of lottery to have a chance to become a millionaire.

We asked the guys from Holland who will get the money then and what they have to do for it;. It is simple, they replied. To win this $2.000.000,00, you'll need to become the largest advertiser on our site and we'll personally give you $2.000.000,00 (two million dollars). We will do so as soon as our site is filled for 50%!!

On top of this, we'll choose five of our advertisers at random, no matter what size or time they are with us, and reward them each with $100.000,00! Also after the site is filled for 50%! So, in fact, we are giving away $2,500.000,00! Part of that could be yours. All you need to do is buy some pixels on our site!

Walter tells us that he knew their site would become a success and now he predicts this promotion will boost the site in the top five movers and shakers!!' We are here to set records! And we will. This means great exposure for all of our advertisers! We have had people boosting their sales figures mainly by the visitors they get from us!

A great stunt like this will certainly attract oceans of curious and click happy people who will be visiting our site. Who would not want to get $2.000.000,00 in cash from the ten million dollar website? Just for being the largest advertiser on the only TEN million dollar website!

Both guys smile when they say: We'll invite anyone to buy pixels and have a chance to change their lives!
Wow, Even if you would buy advertisement for $1.000.000,00 you'd still gain a full 100%
Remember! Your $100,00 pixel friends placed on our site could mean you gain at least $100.000,00!!!

We are no students, and we are not looking to pay for college. Yet, when the site is successful enough, we would love to pay and we will pay for people who never had college or even seen a school before in their lives. We have made plans when the site reaches a certain level of success, says Janwillem.

Find out more about Walter and Janwillem, W2solutions.info and their www.tenmilliondollarwebsite.com
W2solutions.info will be a Dutch business which offers profit design, profit solutions, web hosting services, consultation services and they endeavor to use own design as well as open source software for client projects wherever possible in order to keep development costs down. We are working very hard to try and get this baby walking. The site will be a great help. We ask anyone to buy our pixels.

Be their largest advertiser and gain $2.000.000,00!

Because bigger is better.

Delivered by Superblogsubmitter - blogsubmitter pro - The New Blog Submitter

At 7:10 AM, San Diego Dentists said...

Hi: I was looking for information on San Diego dentist and can upon your site. I'm working on a site about San Diego & Tijuana dentists and looking for any good facts that I might be able to incorporate into my site to really provide an in-depth information source. After reading your Blog, I found it interesting, but, it wasn't what I was looking for. Well I'm off again in search for San Diego dentist info.

At 12:59 AM, Anonymous said...

Having glanced at Rummel's works - with his free quotations from Kant to Montaigne - one can see that here is a man who has made a career of throwing (other people's) brilliance into a blender and comes up with undrinkable slop. Underneath it all is a right wing craziness (and most right wing people are not crazy) which talks about democracy but which supports wars and the suppression of news. He reminds me of the political scientist quoted by the CIA agent in Graham Greene's Quiet American who provides a justifying theory for murder, cruelty and subservsion all in the name of freedom and liberation. No wonder he supports the ridiculous adventure in Iraq!


Post a Comment

<< Home