Introduction
A series of powerful earthquakes (the strongest with a magnitude of 6.8
in JMA-Japan Meteorological Agency; 6.5 on the Richter scale) and aftershocks
jolted northern Japan on October 23, 2004, killing at least 30 people and
injuring more than 2000 people largely as the result of building collapse.
The strongest earthquakes occurred during a period of several hours with
the main epicenter located near Yamakoshi village, Niigata Prefecture.
Thousands of landslides were triggered by the earthquakes and aftershocks
with much associated damage to roads, agricultural fields, and residential
areas in Niigata Prefecture. This preliminary report addresses several
types of slope failures induced by the 23 October 2004 earthquakes in Niigata
Prefecture, and is accompanied by a suite of photographs taken during a
field reconnaissance along the main route between Ojiya city and Yamakoshi
village, as well as along the Shinano River and in three residential areas
of Niigata Prefecture, i.e., Kamo town, Otoyoshi shuraku, and Takamachi
danchi (new town).
The survey was conducted by a joint investigation team led by Prof. Roy C. Sidle and Assoc. Prof. Toshitaka Kamai from the Slope Conservation Section, Geohazards Division, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, who visited Niigata between October 28 - October 31, 2004. The other members of the investigation team were Prof. Satoshi Goto (Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yamanoshi University), Dr. Eishou Ohta (OhtaGeo Consulting company), and Dr. Aurelian C. Trandafir (Slope Conservation Section, Geohazards Division, Disaster Prevention Research Institute,. Kyoto University).
The earthquake- induced landslides (and related damages to roads, buildings
and environment) shown in the photos are divided into three categories
as follows: landslides in natural and cut slopes, failures of artificial
fill slopes in urban areas, and failures around the perimeter of terraces
of rice paddy fields.
1. Landslides in natural and cut slopes
Figures 1-3 show photos of a landslide which dammed Maesawa River in Yamakoshi
village. A large block glide type of landslide was also triggered by the
earthquake along the road to Yamakoshi village (see Figs. 4-6). The sliding
mass traveled undisrupted and reached the opposite bank of Inokawa River,
and finally created a dam in the Inokawa River, blocking the confluence
of Inokawa and Maesawa Rivers. During the impact of the block glide with
the river, the landslide displaced alluvial sediments onto the opposite
bank as evidenced by the freshwater fish found on a landslide deposit (Fig.
7) as well as the alluvial cobbles found in the deposits.
Figures 8 and 9 show a school at Yamakoshi village that was struck and
partly buried by this large landslide. Examples of other landslides triggered
by the earthquake on natural slopes in the area of Yamakoshi village are
depicted in Fig. 10 and Fig. 15; the landslide in Fig. 15 formed a natural
dam across the Inokawa River. Figures 11-14 and Fig. 16 show damage to
roads and retaining walls due to earthquake-induced slope failures in Yamakoshi
village. Figure 17 depicts an earthquake- induced cut slope failure along
the route connecting the cities of Ojiya and Tokamachi.
Earthquake-induced slope failures along the Shinano River are shown in
Figs. 18-21. The large landslide from Fig. 18, which destroyed national
road #17 is a typical example of a slope failure caused by the amplification
of seismic acceleration at the corner of a mountain ridge. A railway that
remained suspended in the air after the landslide occurrence can be noticed
in the upper middle portion of Fig. 20.
According to the geological map provided by the Geological Survey of Japan,
all of the landslides shown in Figs. 1-21 occurred in the regional geological
structure consisting of sandy siltstone and thin-bedded alternations of
sandstone and siltstone. It is also important to mention that relatively
dry or only slightly wet soil conditions were present along the sliding
surface of these landslides.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
All rights reserved
updated: Nov. 4, 2004