The FBI covering their behinds here would mean they are scared of more truth coming out. The FBI playing games here would mean they are puppets of a larger game.

Hunter S. Thompson on Meet the Press

I don’t know that we’ve ever linked Osama bin Laden or Saddam to the disaster down here. You couldn’t take this case to court in an American courtroom and win. It’s speculation. I don’t know if there is circumstantial evidence. Is there? I mean, do you know?

—Hunter S. Thompson

Just posted this story on urban75.net forum and the editor binned it stating

***
“Oh dear. It’s another conspiraloon site regurgitating that same old ‘controlled demolition’/‘no plane hit the Pentagon’ bollocks, and I’m not having that bollocks all over again.

So we all know what that means.

‘TeamLiberty’ indeed” ****
end

Seriously, the editors and admin of that site are really weird.
So thats where i spend alot of time banging my head against the wall, wondering how some people can be sooo fucking retarded.

This guy’s been doing some nice work.

Zark I feel your pain.

The editor of U75 is a narcissistic fucknut. He’s been carefully pruning the topics of conversation there for years. I really don’t know what his program is.

whenever i mention the word ‘agent’ he flips out. Gets me through the day. heh There is a poster called Jazz, who continually runs down blind alleys, looks like a complete fuckhead and his posts are retained. — very very strange forum.

!Is the FBI covering their own collective behinds, so when the truth comes out, their part of the “investigation” went by the book? Or are they just playing games with us!

Take the information as it is. If it turns out the FBI is fucking with us then it is ammunition against them. The official reports must be used as they usually discredit other official reports.
I agree with your links valis to do with the ‘name’ game. CenGlobRes has a great article on the name game

I love how he pulled the post not because of what was said in the post itself, but because of the source of the info in the post being a “conspiraloon website”.

strange fucker editor

you want another quote? ok;

Thread = Former CIA Analyst Says Iran Strike Set For June Or July
editor=
It’s from prisonplanet, so it goes straight in the bin like all the other shit from that ridiculous site!‘binned

We’ll, there is indeed no hard evidence…so I believe it.

So let me see.

The point of posting this article is to cast doubt on whether al qaeda attacked the US on 911.

Ok.

Bin Laden works for the CIA doesn’t he? I thought this was common knowledge by now.

Is the FBI covering their own collective behinds, so when the truth comes out, their part of the “investigation” went by the book?

I doubt it. Nobody’s ever claimed to have evidence that OBL was behind the attacks. A lot of people claim it to be so very strenuously, and with great certainty, but nobody’s ever said, “Osama was behind 9/11 and this is why.” And, shit, the man himself denies it- and why would he do that, unless he really hadn’t?

The point of posting this article is to cast doubt on whether al qaeda attacked the US on 911.

No the point of posting it is to show that dispite the President and media claiming a direct undisputable link between Usama/Osama and the 9/11 attack, even one of the law enforcment/investigative agencies of the US government admits that they have no hard evidince linking Usama/Osama to the 9/11 attacks.

I remember that the evidence was suposed to be shared by Phony Tony Blair at one point. I guess, since it doesn’t exist, that the evidence was never shared.

Which reminds me: On 12/9/2001, the UN unilaterally declared that it would assist in every manner possible in finding and bringing the perpetrators to justice. How’s that going?

Given they were able to find such evidence for the Cole bombing, appearently, given far less material to work with. In this case, that we have occupied all those famous caves in Tora Bora filled with what should be literally mountains of potential evidence, have successfully aquired the person who is claimed to be the operational director of the attack, etc, it seems the FBI position is incredulous, or that they were deliberately directed not to investigate Bush’s family friend and America’s former favorite CIA asset from the Reagan years. It is of course yet one more very glaring and incredulous oddity for a government that wishes to “sell” their version of this story.

I thought Osama was on video claiming responsibility http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,251-2194844,00.html

So is that an admission that the video is fake? Or …

whoops

eep: thats fatty bin laden

who is actually a dirty south rapper

CNN: Bin Laden says he wasn’t behind attacks

look at the date of this article

it’s osama *i*bin laden, damnit.

“who is actually a dirty south rapper”
lol

I see no evidence presented in the Muckracker Report whatsoever, of any purported exchange having actually taken place between someone from the Muckracker Report and Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI.

It is very interesting, however, that the Osama page from the FBI MWT list doesn’t mention any connection to the 9/11 attacks.

But why no verifiable evidence presented — or any verification whatsoever — to support the claim of the purported exchange between someone from the Muckracker Report and Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, having actually taken place?

.........

- Ø®£Z –

Hmmm, the CIA authenticated the fatty tape, so I guess the FBI and CIA are still not communicating.

“I doubt it. Nobody’s ever claimed to have evidence that OBL was behind the attacks”

Bzzzzzzzzt.

Yes they did. The Shrub did when he was demanding that Afghanistan hand Osama over or else. They said you show us the evidence that he did it and we’ll hand him over. Bushs reply was that he had irrefutable evidence that Osama was behind it but to release it would endanger too many US agents close to the tall guy, so it had to stay top secret.

Really cant be bothered looking for a link so youll have to go find it yourself.

Wombat — Omar Saeed Sheikh was named as the money man for UBL and Omar who was ordered by ISI to pay Mohammed Atta. Not to be confused with Shaihk Saiid UBL brother in law(BIL) — who has repeated stated he is not his BIL, but easily crossed over because of the similar name.

The Name Game

Almost every week I hear something about how the Taliban wouldn’t hand over Osama and that’s why we bombed ‘em. But as I remember, they agreed to hand him over for trial to a “neutral” country, such as Pakistan. Does anyone else remember that? We said no, of course. (I’f looking for a link.)

zark: thats the closest to a link that I’ve seen as well. That still functions off the assumption that the ISI is still a CIA proxy. Which by logical extension makes Bin Ladin and the rest of the “Arab afghans” CIA assets.

Hmmm, the CIA authenticated the fatty tape,

And proceeded to mistranslate it

Goerge Bush has more of a direct link to the attacks than Osama Bin Laden. From Jack Abramoff taking boatrides with Mohammad Atta in Floida, Jeb Bush using the same airline as the one that trained the hijackers, Marvin Bush running security at the Trade Towers, Pakastani Intelligence Paying Mohammad Atta then meeting with the Congressional Committee on Imperial Bullshit, to having foreknowledge of the events that was painstakenly ignored violently covered up.

Bin Laden must have had a pretty sweet deal in order to agree to becoming the most hated man on Earth.

All that may be true Makapa, however, Bush did not plan the attacks, as far as we know, and Bin Laden did, once again, as far as we know. But I’d have to say that this story does not surprise me in the least. First of all, I wouldn’t think there would be any hard evidence against Bin Laden, the U.S. doesn’t even know where he is… as far as we know. I like that, I’m going to start using it more frequently. Anyway, how would the U.S. have gathered any evidence against him even if they wanted to, which I doubt they do because the administration wouldn’t want the focus to shift back to the fact that we have no idea where Bin Laden is.

Genius, we don’t know if key U.S. intelligence people know where bin Laden is or not. He is an ultimate boogey man providing fuel for the Neo-Con agenda of war for decades, and they probably don’t want to close the book on him and blow that wad unless they really need to. al-Zarqawi was suppossedly killed today, which means one step closer to destroying al-Qaeda in some peoples minds. This is a chess game for the Neo-Cons. Give the masses hope, then pump them full of fear.

ok so if there is no evidence he was invovled…then how does anyone know he was invovled?

I mean we bombed the fuck out of Afgahnastan based on what? hunches?

Loose Change II …
Check it out…it’s all here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5137581991288263801&q=loose+change+II

“Bin Laden must have had a pretty sweet deal in order to agree to becoming the most hated man on Earth.”
He is no where near being the most hated man on earth, that possition must surley go to George Bush, look at the protests that errupt in every country he visits, even Ireland where they usually trow flowers at American Presidents.
Or are you confusing Earth with the USA?