
Stereotypes in Internet BDSM
One of the things I've started to see a bit more clearly is the problems of meeting genuine bdsm folk. While the internet has made it easier to reach out and touch people, its also allowed the folk whom think bdsm has something to do with easy lays reach out and touch folk. A lot of misconceptions of the average horney geek guy leads to the pollution of the pool of genuine bdsm seeking folk. for example, on when I was last on alt, there are 3000 profiles of guys seeking girls vs 300 girls seeking guys. I've made up a bit of a scatter gun list of catagories.
Miss Conception
Some of the misconception is so common they could have their own stereotypes.
The Married Guy
Attracted to the bdsm scene as a method of a easy lay, no questions asked sex. An attribute of the married guy includes the inability to tell the truth. They cant even lie in bed straight.
The Horney Net Geek.
Classification from bondage.com, the HNG attributes include confusing fantasy with reality. Attracted to the bdsm scene as a method of an easy lay, no questions asked sex.Partial to sending pictures of his willy as an opening email.
Dangerous Dom.
While initially seeming quite reasonable and grounded, will slowly rope their mark in, destroying their subjects personality, confidence and self worth. An attribute of a dangerous dom would be their demands that their subject drop all contact with the outside world, especially with close friends.
Fantasy Sub.
A little knowledge is dangerous. While having the balls to acknowledge thier desire for submissiveness, the reality of submissiveness escapes them. An attribute of a fantasy sub is the galaxy of space between desire and reality a common tag line would be - "will fulfill my Domme's most hidden desires"
oh yeah? Like some woman's hidden desire to shoot all men in the head?

Unhinged Women.
An attribute of the unhinged woman is an unrealistic expecation of men's clairvoyant ability. Usually ends up in an abusive relationship time and time again, due to inability to get off the heroin of the bad boy syndrome and sort out her head differentiating being emotionally smacked around vs being physically smacked.
Differentiation and Segmentation
How to tell them apart? I feel there are a couple of tactics that can be taken.
In the first instance, meeting someone off the internet fairly fast can help with weeding out those who will and can and those who can't or woun't. Using instinct is your best tool that you have when selecting someone, however giving one's self head room for instinct to work is a art form in itself. There are a series of best practices for meeting folk from the internet, and that is to meet in a public place, organise safe calls and such like.

Scheduled Meetings
In meetings, there are a couple of stereotypes as well
Time wasters for subs.
They dont turn up or postpone meetings repetedly. They promise much but dont deliver, or safeword out quickly.
Dandy Doms
Would have some of the following characteristics. Have a great understanding of the limitations and freedoms that bdsm provides. Understand at the heart of what sane safe consensual (SSC) really means. Alternatively understand Risk Aware Consenusal Kink (RACK) They would have a knowledge of what their tools do to the flesh.
They would have have an advanced sense of intuition. If you're going to beat someone, you'd better notice if the beatee suddenly loses conciousness. For example, like.
have great self knowledge and be willing to talk through a scene before enacting it.
suffering subs
Suffering subs would have some of the following characteristics. Have great self knowledge. Know what they like and dont like. Have a good intuition. If you're going to let someone tie you up and beat you, you'd better have a good sense that the person is going to do it in a manner thats sane safe and consentual.
Once there are two genuine seekers of bdsm willing to give each other a fair go, then open non judgmental communication - expression of self and listening without placing judgement on the concepts.

Self Honesty
Only the participants can really honestly say whether their particular relationship is physical and emotional abuse or a cathartic beating with a cool mind fuck twist. Essentially either life reducing or life enchancing.