Home page
FAQs
Site map
Glossary
Feedback
about RDS animal research facts medical benefits animal welfare hot topics & policy news & resources
the 3Rs animal welfare prize alternatives 1986 animals act
laboratory rabbitlimulus crab

the 3Rs

No-one wants to use animals unnecessarily or to cause them unnecessary suffering. The guiding principles in animal research today are called the three Rs:
  • Reduce the number of animals used to a minimum
  • Refine the way experiments are carried out, to make sure animals suffer as little as possible
  • Replace animal experiments with non-animal techniques wherever possible.

Reduce

There are many ways in which one can reduce the numbers of animals used in an experiment. It is very important to carry out a proper statistical analysis of the proposed experiment to determine how many animals need to be used. If too few animals are used then the results of the experiment are not reliable and it needs to be repeated, using more animals. Use too many animals and the results are still reliable, but animal life has been wasted. To reduce the number of animals used to the minimum, the correct number of animals must be used the first time.

It is also important that all other aspects of the experiment are properly designed and carried out correctly. If the experiment fails and needs to be repeated, animals will have been used unnecessarily.

Another way of reducing the number of animals used in an experiment is to use genetically identical animals. This prevents variation in the results from genetic variations between individual animals and thus makes it possible to get reliable answers using fewer animals.

A reduction in the numbers of animals used can also be achieved if the animals are born and bred in ultra-clean conditions and are free of any infections or illnesses which might otherwise interfere with the experimental results.

Refine

Research involving animals has to be designed so that any distress or suffering involved is kept to a minimum. For example, if the experiment would hurt the animal, an anaesthetic or painkiller would normally be given.

If an experiment involves taking repeated blood samples from an animal to measure, for example, the level of a particular hormone, it may be possible to implant a small device to continuously monitor the hormone. This can be done with a simple operation under anaesthetic, so that the animal does not have to be repeatedly caught, restrained and blood taken by syringe.

If an experiment involves animals with a painful or fatal disease, it can be designed so that the animals are painlessly killed at an early stage of the disease, when they only show mild symptoms, instead of waiting until they are clearly dying.

In some cases it is possible to develop a whole new way of conducting a test involving fewer animals. The LD50 test has been used for many years to find out how poisonous chemicals are. The way the test is designed means that some of the animals have to be given a fatal dose of a poisonous chemical. However, scientists have now developed a new test, called the Fixed Dose Procedure, to do the same job. This technique uses fewer animals and is designed so that none of them receive a fatal dose of the poison. The LD50 is now outlawed in the UK.

Laboratory animals spend most of their lives simply living in the animal house and not being used in an experiment, so it is important to consider their living conditions. In the past, laboratory animals would often be kept alone in barren cages. These days we prefer to keep animals in social groups, preferably in large cages or floor pens, with things for them to play with. Rabbits would be given bedding material, boxes and tubes. Rodents like to have nesting material. Dogs like running in groups and having human company. Monkeys like branches to climb, swings, ropes and platforms. Their diet can also be made much more interesting with fruit and other titbits. Some of these can be mixed in with wood shavings so that they have to forage for their food - a favourite activity.

Replace

A lot of scientific effort has been devoted to developing new, non-animal techniques which can be used in experiments instead of animals. There have been some notable successes, but overall, progress has been disappointingly slow.
  • The LAL test can now be used to test for pyrogens. Bacteria often shed little bits of their outer covering. If these substances, known as pyrogens, get into the bloodstream, they raise the body temperature. Even very tiny levels of pyrogens cause a dangerous temperature rise, so any liquid going to be injected or fed into a patient's blood stream has to be tested for pyrogen contamination. Previously this was done by injecting the liquid into a rabbit and monitoring the animal's body temperature. The new LAL test uses white blood cells taken from the horseshoe crab which can detect the pyrogens in a test-tube.
  • Insulin is a lifeline for millions of diabetics, but it is essential they give themselves the correct dose - either too high or too low a dose can be harmful. Each batch of insulin has to be tested to measure how active it is so that the correct dosage can be calculated. Previously, this was done by injecting the insulin into mice. Now that insulin is produced by bacterial culture rather than being extracted from pig and cow pancreases, it contains fewer impurities. So a new technique has been developed which uses a machine called a chromatograph which can provide information about purity, replacing the need to use animals to test for the purity and activity of batches of insulin.
  • Many non-animal techniques have been designed to replace the animal tests used in safety testing, but these new techniques do not always work well enough. A great amount of scientific work has been devoted to the search for a non-animal test to replace the Draize eye irritation test. This test studies whether a chemical irritates the eye by dropping a dilution of it directly onto the eye of an animal, usually a rabbit. Several different non- animal tests have been designed and have all been assessed to see if they accurately predict whether a substance will irritate the eye. Unfortunately, none of them worked well enough to be used to replace the existing animal test. Work is continuing to find a replacement for the Draize test.
Image footnotes
Top left
An animal technician checks the health of a laboratory rabbit.
Second from top
Blood cells from the horseshoe crab have replaced rabbits in testing for pyrogens.
top of page
Reduction: some examples
Related links
Replacement: alternatives
Animal research facts
Examples of the 3Rs from the UK Home Office
Application of the three Rs in medicines research
National Centre for The 3Rs
Glossary Terms
LD50
Pyrogen
email page to a friend