CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot: Halo 3 | GameFAQs | MP3.com | TV.com | FilmSpot
Inmate sends B.I.G. case into disarray
By Jim Welte - MP3.com
September 26, 2007 at 11:40:00 AM | more stories by this author

Prisoner who had implicated two LAPD officers in the 1997 killing of the rapper recants testimony.

The murder of Notorious B.I.G., already one of the more frustratingly complex cases in recent memory, just got quite a bit more convoluted.

Notorious B.I.G. Notorious B.I.G.

A prison inmate who had implicated a former Los Angeles Police Department officer in the March 1997 shooting death of the rapper has renounced his story and accused B.I.G.'s family and their attorney of bribing him to link police to the murder.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Waymond Anderson, who is serving a life term for murder, said in a recent deposition that he lied about LAPD involvement in the slaying as part of a scam in which he would have received a percentage of any settlement from the city in the wrongful death lawsuit brought by B.I.G.'s mother, Violetta Wallace and his widow, Faith Evans.

Anderson said he was offered the bribe to tell detectives that former Los Angeles Officer Rafael Perez had told him that another ex-officer, David Mack, was involved in the murder. But in a recent deposition, he repudiated his earlier statements.

"I don't know David Mack, I don't know Rafael Perez," Anderson told lawyers representing relatives of the slain rapper, whose real name was Christopher Wallace.

The two officers "had no involvement with the...murder," Anderson said under oath. At various points in the deposition, he said, "It was a lie, and I'm ashamed of it," and, "I did what I had to do to survive."

Wallace's wrongful death lawsuit against the city had become the primary source of any activity in the unsolved murder of B.I.G., who was gunned down outside the Petersen Automotive Museum in the Mid-Wilshire District after a music industry party on March 9, 1997.

His reversal sends the case into disarray. The family's lawyer, Perry R. Sanders Jr., vigorously denied Anderson's claim that he offered to pay him to lie in court about Perez and Mack, calling the allegations "100 percent, demonstrably false.

"This is wholesale, made-up-out-of-whole-cloth perjury," he told the Times.

In another strange twist, Sanders told the paper that Anderson appeared to have been acting at the behest of a Times reporter, Chuck Philips, who has written extensively about Wallace's death and raised questions in those stories about the theory that the LAPD was involved in B.I.G.'s slaying.

Sanders said Anderson "clearly would like to please Mr. Philips, because he's singing his song, first, second and third verse and certainly the chorus." In a court filing after the deposition, two attorneys working with Sanders on the Wallace case suggested that an unidentified "third party" had induced Anderson to commit perjury.

Back to Today's News »

6 Comments

Oldest First | Newest First
I am the attorney for the Estate and I personally provided proof to the LA TIMES that this witness committed perjury There was no swearing contest, the things he said are provably false. I made clear that the REAL STORY should be WHAT IS HIS MOTIVATION TO LIE?...The LA TIMES chose to ignore our requests to not widely disseminate clear perjury and now the question really is WHAT IS THEIR MOTIVATION TO INTENTIONALLY WIDELY DISSEMINATE LIES?..Could it be that Anderson credits Chuck Philips of the LA TIMES for trying to get him out of jail for murder and Chuck is the only person to ever publish the whopping lie that Biggie killed Tupac? It is truly time for people to wake up and question the TIMES motivation for its lopsided coverage of this important unsolved murder and the cover-up of that murder. The family and ltheir lawyers have said from the beginning that all they want is the truth to come out, even if it means they are wrong about their theory. Unfortunately, when witnesses start to act this way and the local paper publishes obvious lies it means that we are probably on the right track Thanks,

Perry Sanders
Posted 09/29/2007 3:47pm
We sow what we rip. We all know this. Hopefully, some of us stay from this kind of trouble.
Posted 09/27/2007 5:16am
Let me get this straight. This guy testified under oath. Now he says he was lying at the time. How do you know when a liar is telling the truth? There is no way to know with 100% accuracy. Also, this bozo is serving a life sentence so maybe he just wants a bit of fame before he dies. He got some when he implacated the cops, now he is getting some by trying to recant his sworn statements. What a gong-show.
Posted 09/26/2007 6:01pm
I'm curious at to his motives for speaking out now. Might it be pressure from the LAPD to recant? They could make his prison term mighty unpleasant.
Posted 09/26/2007 4:02pm
It took him 10 years?
Posted 09/26/2007 2:37pm
This is very interesting, I can't wait to see the outcome. But overall I hope that it works out for the better, for Biggie Smalls family. I have created a great resource to get MP3/iPod downloads
Please visit here...
http://watch-dogreviews.com/iPod-Downloads.html
Posted 09/26/2007 12:32pm
Sign up now to post a comment!
advertisement

Tags

add
Data Warehouse Clear Gif