About E. F. Schumacher
Ernst Friedrich Schumacher was born in Germany in 1911. A Rhodes scholar
at Oxford in the 1930's, he fled back to England before the Second
World War to avoid living under Nazism. Although he was interned
as an enemy alien during the War, his extraordinary abilities were
recognised, and he was able to help the British government with
its economic and financial mobilisation.
the War, Schumacher worked as an economic advisor to the British
Control Commission charged with rebuilding the German economy. From
1950 to 1970 he was Chief Economic Advisor to the British Coal Board,
one of the world's largest organisations, with 800,000 employees.
His farsighted planning (he predicted the rise of OPEC and the problems
of nuclear power) aided Britain in its economic recovery.
In 1955 Schumacher traveled to Burma as an economic consultant. While
there, he developed the principles of what he called "Buddhist
economics", based on the belief that good work was essential
for proper human development and that "production from local
resources for local needs is the most rational way of economic life."
He also gained insights that led him to become a pioneer of what
is now called appropriate technology: earth- and user-friendly technology
matched to the scale of community life.
Schumacher subsequently became a featured writer - along with Leopold Kohr,
John Papworth, Danilo Dolci, Paul Goodman, John Seymour, and Satish
Kumar - in the British Journal Resurgence. His best-selling book,
Small Is Beautiful (1973), was republished by Hartley &
Marks in 1999. His two other books are Good Work and A
Guide for the Perplexed.
E.F. Schumacher's last lecture in 1977
A tribute to E.F Schumacher by Leopold Kohr
E.F Schumacher's last lecture in 1977
You can download a report of E.F. Schumacher's very last public expression of his philosophy given at the MRA industrial conference in Caux in 1977 and printed by the New World News.
Caring, for real by E.F Schumacher
Tribute to E. F. Schumacher by Leopold Kohr
the Nobel Prize selection committee had wished to give the prize
in economics to an innovator, they would not have alternated between
the repairmen of the left and the repairmen of the right side of
the ship of state caught in the increasing pull of Niagara River
a mile above the Falls; they would have selected Dr E. F. Schumacher,
whose death on 6 September 1977 of a heart attack in Switzerland
tore him away at the very time his ideas were close to a breakthrough.
He was one of the few economists who had really something new to
offer. Instead of concentrating on mending the sides of the overgrown
hull of the ship, he suggested: get out of it. Save yourself in
a fleet of small lifeboats.
former protégé of Maynard Keynes, who brought the
young German student during the last war from internment on an isolated
English farm to the fermenting halls of Oxford University, Schumacher
first captured the famous economist's attention through a paper,
Multilateral Clearing, which he had written between tending the
fields. When it was published in the spring of 1943 in Economica,
it caused some embarrassment to Keynes who, instead of arranging
for its separate publication, had used the essay almost verbatim
in his famous Plan for an International Clearing Union which the
British Government issued as a White Paper a few weeks later.
his swift rise, Schumacher became chief editorial writer on economics
for The Times, a Kissinger-like achievement for a native German
so early in postwar England. In this capacity he was, among other
things, in due course charged with the somewhat uncomfortable task
of preparing, many years before the event, the obituary of Maynard
Keynes, of whose theories he had by then become increasingly critical.
He subsequently served as adviser to the India Planning Commission,
as well as to the governments of Zambia and Burma - an experience
which led to his fascinating essay on Buddhist Economics. The final
twenty years before his retirement, he held the position of Chief
Economist to the British Coal Board, and later Chief Statistician.
I presume it was his attempt to penetrate the inextricable complexities
confronting the overblown political and economic giant organizations
of our time that gave him the first idea for writing Small is Beautiful
which, among many other things, revealed him as the only person
who had accurately and consistently predicted for fifteen years
the approach of the world's current fuel crisis.
basic development theories can be summed up in two catch-phrases:
Intermediate Size, and Intermediate Technology.
the first, he wrote:
given political unity is not necessarily of the right size as a
unit for economic development . . . In this matter [of appropriate
size] it is not possible to give hard and fast definitions. Much
depends on geography and local circumstances. A few thousand people,
no doubt, would be too few to constitute a 'district' for economic
development. But the community of a few hundred thousand people,
even if fairly widely scattered, may well deserve to be created
as a development district. The whole of Switzerland has less than
6 million inhabitants. Yet it is divided into more than 20 cantons
and each canton is a kind of [autonomous] development district,
with the result that development towards formation of vast industrial
concentration is minimized.
other words, the first half of Schumacher's development philosophy
is based on the administrative idea superimposing on large-area
states a cantonal structure of such modest unit-dimensions that
vast industrial concentration (with all this entails in imbalance,
ineptitude, and diseconomies of scale) becomes not only unnecessary
but also uneconomical.
second half of his system - Intermediate Technology - is the direct
consequence of the first. For once development district is 'appropriately'
reduced, it becomes possible to fulfill a society's material requirements
by means of less expensive and simpler equipment than the costly,
computerized, labour-saving machinery necessary for satisfying the
massive appetite for the remedial transport and integration commodities
without which a far-flung modern market community cannot exist.
Though this means a reduction in productivity, it does not mean
a reduction in the product that a smaller society needs for the
enjoyment of even the highest humanely attainable standard of living.
it differently, the reduced efficiency of intermediate technology
provides the same amount of goods, but at a higher cost in labour,
than can be achieved under conditions of labour-saving advanced
technology. However, since higher labour cost (in terms not of wages
but of longer working hours) means simply that the desired level
of production can be achieved only by full rather than partial employment
of the available labour force, they represent socially no additional
cost at all. They are, in fact, a benefit. It is unemployment -
the degrading saving of manpower through the inappropriate use of
advanced machinery - which is the prohibitive cost which no society
can afford to pay in the long run. For unlike earlier forms of unemployment,
the unemployment caused by excessive technological progress spells
in the end only one thing - the revolt of the unemployed.
is still only vaguely understood by modern growth theorists for
whom intermediate technology means merely a step backwards. One
has to go back all the way to Vespasian to encounter a government
advanced enough to realize the social value of higher rather than
lower costs. As Suetonius tells us: When an inventor offered the
Emperor to transport giant columns to the top of Capitol hill at
an unheard-of low cost, Vespasian rewarded him richly for his technical
genius, but dispensed with his services with the remark, 'You must
permit me also to let the man in the street earn his bread.' By
the standards of modern economics, this would earn a student a failing
grade at Harvard or Oxford.
however, with orthodox economics having run its course, and hiding
its ineptitudes in mathematical obscurity of Nobel-Prize-winning
proportions, Schumacher's ideas, particularly on the question of
how to sponge up unemployment and at the same time solve the energy
crisis, have begun to make their impact in Asian and African countries
whose leaders realize that what is needed is not highfalutin theory
but a bit of horse sense. People such as Indians, or Zambians, and
lately even leaders such as Governor Brown of California and President
Carter of the United States (though not yet the economists advising
them) seem to be among the first since Vespasian to understand once
again after their talks with Schumacher that New Man, whose coming
they all await with such impatience, is in need of two props: an
older mode of production in the form of intermediate technology,
and an older political environment in the form of more translucent,
smaller and more meaningfully human societies.
was also another side to Schumacher's praise of smallness of which
few of his admirers were aware. This had to do neither with technology
nor with political organization, but with the composition of delightful
verses for his children. I was fortunate to acquire some of them
when, after a week's stay as my guest in Puerto Rico in 1973, I
somewhat shocked him with the request to sign a paper in order to
balance his accounts with me. He laughed when he found out that
what I wanted was not a promissory note, but the text in his own
handwriting of the poem he had recited to me earlier that day -
and which I should like to share with the reader in memory of a
friend who inspired us all not only by his wisdom and charm, but
also by the abiding humour of his humanity.
Age you prematurely.
Though, if all be told:
They keep you young when old.
1980 Loepold Kohr