“Digital Natives,” “Net Generation,” “Millenials” …or maybe just “students.”
I keep seeing references to the “Net Generation” and other labels for students who are growing up in the new age of information (see for example: Learning Independence: New Approaches For Educating The Net Generation). And in each new article, the claim is made that these students are examples of a totally new creature that can’t learn in traditional ways and for which dramatically new teaching methods must be developed.
Here’s is an interesting quote from the article cited above:
“Although they value education highly, Net Geners learn differently from their predecessors. This generation is unique in that it is the first to grow up with digital and cyber technologies.“
I’m all for innovation in education, and likewise, I’m completely in favor of taking advantage of new technologies to engage students in learning. Heck, I advocate for it all the time, this blog being just one place I do so…but every time I see one of these articles I have the feeling you get when you’re in the passenger seat and you see a danger up ahead, and you still thrust out your right foot for the brake you know is not there…I want to try to slow things down and ask some questions like, “How do you know these students learn differently?” “Have you done extensive research on this question?” “Has the research been replicated?”
I may be wrong, and please correct me if that is the case, but from what I’ve seen so far, the answer to these questions is no. I haven’t seen any convincing research that shows students today are fundamentally different from students of past generations, and yet we are continually told that we should fundamentally change the way we teach because of these apparent changes in our students.
For example in the Net Generation article referenced above, the authors state:
“Not only are Net Geners acculturated to the use of technology, they are saturated with it. By the time he or she has reached 21 years of age, the average NetGener will have spent:
- 10,000 hours playing video games,
- 200,000 e-mails,
- 20,000 hours watching TV,
- 10,000 hours on cell phones, and
- under 5,000 hours reading (Bonamici et al. 2005).
Having been raised in an age of media saturation and convenient access to digital technologies, Net Geners have distinctive ways of thinking, communicating, and learning (Oblinger and Oblinger 2005; Prensky 2006; Tapscott 1998).” (emphasis added)
I’ve seen these statistics before, and I accept them as true; however, the conclusions drawn from them are usually not based on research, but rather on conjecture: students are exposed to X hours of media Y, therefore they learn differently. I’m inclined to agree that the amount of time spent using electronic media is probably having an effect on these learners, but I don’t know what that effect is, and until I do, I’m going to use different criteria for determining how I teach.
One encouraging quote I came across recently was from Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor at American University.
“It is very common to hear people say, Here’s the Millennial or the digital generation, and we have to figure out how they learn. Poppycock. We get to mold how they learn.”
That is more to my way of thinking. Sure, we use digital media and all that to enhance our teaching, but we do it in ways that coax deeper levels of thinking and communicating from out students.
My first attempt to hit the brakes was in 2003 in an article I wrote for the online journal “Technology Source,”
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants: Some Thoughts from the Generation Gap
I think some of the points I made there are still relevant. We do need to continually adapt our teaching to our students’ needs, but it is the teacher who is best suited to determine the needs of our students, because, despite what we keep hearing, there is no homogeneous group out there with a dramatically new learning style. Rather, our student are more diverse than ever.
I use technology every day in my teaching. I promote the use of technology to other teachers. I do it, however, for very different reasons. I think technology provides useful tools that are increasingly part of everyone’s lives, not because I think my students cannot learn without them.