CNET Networks Entertainment GameSpot | GameFAQs | Metacritic | MP3.com | TV.com | FilmSpot
Home | About Metacritic | About Metascores | What's New | Wireless Versions | Discussion Forums | Advertising Inquiries | Contact Us | RSS
Metacritic.com: We Deal With Criticism
     Help
> Switch to Advanced Search  
Film Video/DVD Music Games Books TV
Printer-Friendly Version Email This Page Discuss In Our Forums

Film

Upcoming Release Calendar
Weekend Box Office
Film Awards & Top 10s By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums

 

Wide Releases

sort by name sort by score

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

 

Limited Releases

sort by name sort by score

63 11th Hour, The
67 2 Days in Paris
56 Across the Universe
64 Arctic Tale
67 Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, The
49 Beauty Remains
55 Becoming Jane
87 Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
47 Bella
xx Berkeley
74 Blame It on Fidel
79 Brand Upon the Brain!
61 Bubble, The
67 Canvas
77 Control
71 Crossing the Line
60 Dans Paris
67 Death at a Funeral
56 December Boys
50 Dedication
80 Deep Water
68 Delirious
78 Devil Came on Horseback, The
77 Dixie Chicks: Shut Up and Sing
33 Dragon Wars
xx Fat Girls
54 Fierce People
46 Finishing the Game
72 For the Bible Tells Me So
41 Freshman Orientation
62 Golda's Balcony
49 Good Night, The
52 Goya's Ghosts
72 Great World of Sound
63 Hannah Takes the Stairs
45 Hottest State, The
xx House
54 Hunting Party, The
73 I Have Never Forgotten You: The Life & Legacy of Simon Wiesenthal
60 I Want Someone to Eat Cheese With
37 If I Didn't Care
84 In the Shadow of the Moon
65 In the Valley of Elah
65 Interview
78 Into Great Silence
62 Ira & Abby
29 Jack Ketchum's The Girl Next Door
61 Jane Austen Book Club, The
54 Jimmy Carter Man from Plains
53 Khadak
67 King Corn
83 King of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters, The
44 Klimt
72 Kurt Cobain About a Son
66 La Vie en Rose
xx Laaga Chunari Mein Daag
61 Ladrón que roba a ladrón
80 Lady Chatterley
83 Lake of Fire
69 Lars and the Real Girl
69 Last Winter, The
78 Live-In Maid
60 Lust, Caution
68 Lynch
52 Man of My Life, The
71 Manda Bala (Send a Bullet)
43 Meeting Resistance
52 Milarepa
59 Molière
xx Moving McAllister
65 Mr. Untouchable
54 Music Within
65 My Best Friend
76 My Kid Could Paint That
89 No End in Sight
40 O Jerusalem
88 Once
70 Out of the Blue
70 Outsourced
81 Paprika
79 Pete Seeger: The Power of Song
74 Price of Sugar, The
44 Rails & Ties
73 Rape of Europa, The
78 Rescue Dawn
46 Reservation Road
73 Rocket Science
51 Self Medicated
49 Shoot 'Em Up
39 Silk
49 Sleuth
47 Slipstream
75 Strange Culture
69 Talk to Me
50 Ten, The
74 Terror's Advocate
60 Them
86 This Is England
42 Trade
71 Unknown Soldier, The
63 Vitus
75 Waitress
63 Wristcutters: A Love Story

Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.

3:10 to Yuma
Lions Gate Films

3:10 to Yuma reviews
Critic Score
Metascore: 76 Metascore out of 100
User Score  
7.2 out of 10
based on 37 reviews
Read critic reviews
How did we calculate this?
based on 97 votes
Read user comments
Rate this movie

MPAA RATING: R for violence and some language

Starring Christian Bale, Russell Crowe, Ben Foster, Alan Tudyk, Gretchen Mol, and Peter Fonda

In Arizona in the late 1800's, infamous outlaw Ben Wade and his vicious gang of thieves and murderers have plagued the Southern Railroad. When Wade is captured, Civil War veteran Dan Evans, struggling to survive on his drought-plagued ranch, volunteers to deliver him alive to the 3:10 to Yuma, a train that will take the killer to trial. On the trail, Evans and Wade, each from very different worlds, begin to earn each other’s respect. But with Wade’s outfit on their trail – and dangers at every turn – the mission soon becomes a violent, impossible journey toward each man's destiny. (Lions Gate)


GENRE(S): Western  
WRITTEN BY: Elmore Leonard (short story)
Derek Haas
Michael Brandt
Halsted Welles
 
DIRECTED BY: James Mangold  
RELEASE DATE: Theatrical: September 7, 2007 
RUNNING TIME: 117 minutes, Color 
ORIGIN: USA 

What The Critics Said

All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...

100
Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert
James Mangold's 3:10 to Yuma restores the wounded heart of the Western and rescues it from the morass of pointless violence.
Read Full Review
100
Miami Herald Connie Ogle
The new version is a glorious, thrilling throwback that never sacrifices its solid roots in the western genre despite a sharp modern update that actually improves on the original.
Read Full Review
100
San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle
The finest American Westerns have a characteristic that 3:10 to Yuma shares. In a way that's almost mystical, they suggest a truth beyond the specifics of the tale.
Read Full Review
91
Baltimore Sun Michael Sragow
The rousing new Western 3:10 to Yuma has the sweep of an epic and the economy of a stopwatch.
Read Full Review
90
Film Threat KJ Doughton
Mangold has time to build sensational, studied characterizations, brilliant pacing (courtesy Mike McCuster, who also edited the director’s previous effort, the Johnny Cash biopic “Walk the Line”), and blistering action.
Read Full Review
90
Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan
James Mangold directs it with such energy and passion that it's as if he didn't know it's all been done before.
Read Full Review
88
New York Daily News Jack Mathews
Unlike Glenn Ford, a soft-spoken studio star who was cast against type as Wade 50 years ago, Crowe is a perfect fit. Not because of his bad boy behavior offscreen, but because he can blend charm and menace better than anyone.
Read Full Review
88
TV Guide Ken Fox
The nerve-racking wait at the Contention hotel is no longer the film's centerpiece, but the deeper characterization gives Bale an opportunity to once again sink his teeth into a complex role, and offers a reminder as to why the notoriously difficult Crowe is sometimes worth the trouble.
Read Full Review
88
Boston Globe Ty Burr
Both actors are among the best, most intuitively creative we have, and whatever transpires offscreen in Crowe’s case, onscreen they only serve their characters. Neither man showboats here, and it’s a thrill to watch them work.
Read Full Review
88
Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey
A riveting remake of a pretty terrific 1957 western about manhood, fatherhood and honor.
Read Full Review
83
Portland Oregonian Shawn Levy
A fine and sturdy picture, capable of standing alongside the many such films made when Westerns were one of our chief entertainments.
Read Full Review
83
Christian Science Monitor Peter Rainer
What Alfred Hitchcock once said about thrillers also applies to Westerns: The stronger the bad guy, the better the film. By that measure, 3:10 to Yuma is excellent.
Read Full Review
83
The Onion (A.V. Club) Tasha Robinson
Mangold delivers a taut modern take on a lesser classic, preserving the "High Noon" themes about doing the right thing against all odds, and injecting a more modern pacing and urgency without going overboard. His film isn't Leonard's classic, but it's a solid, genre-respecting Western in its own right.
Read Full Review
80
The Hollywood Reporter Michael Rechtshaffen
A largely compelling ride on the strength of a powerful cast led by Russell Crowe and Christian Bale.
Read Full Review
80
The New Yorker David Denby
In this movie, Fonda really is iconic. 3:10 to Yuma may be familiar, but, at its best, it has a rapt quality, even an aura of wonder.
Read Full Review
80
Variety Todd McCarthy
James Mangold's remake walks a fine line in retaining many of the original's qualities while smartly shaking things up a bit.
Read Full Review
80
Chicago Reader J.R. Jones
Period westerns are so unfashionable and costly that they usually require a top-drawer script to get off the ground -- and this one, adapted from an Elmore Leonard story and its 1957 movie version, travels with an arrow's clean arc.
Read Full Review
80
Time Richard Schickel
Who says remakes are always inferior to the original film? And who says the western is dead? Especially when a movie is as entertaining as this one, you begin to think this formerly beloved genre is due for a revival.
Read Full Review
78
Austin Chronicle Marjorie Baumgarten
This film is an example of a Western that ought to appeal to a healthy-sized contemporary audience, and is also a remake of the 1957 film of the same name, which is a hallmark of the type of psychological Western.
Read Full Review
75
USA Today Claudia Puig
Captures a potent sense of the Old West with its multidimensional raw performances and captivating final shootout sequence. But with its emphasis on emotional truths, it transcends the confines of a cowboy movie.
Read Full Review
75
ReelViews James Berardinelli
The 30-minute finale, which includes a tense stand-off with Ben's gang, is masterfully executed. It's perfectly paced, suspenseful, and ends in a way that's both appropriate and satisfying.
Read Full Review
75
Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman
This is how a Western today tries to give us more bang for the buck. By working this hard to be a crowd-pleaser, though, it may please fewer crowds.
Read Full Review
75
Rolling Stone Peter Travers
Maybe this redo didn’t need so many bells and whistles, but Mangold brings it home.
Read Full Review
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto) Jennie Punter
While the newer version's darker ending lends a more contemporary twist, overall 3:10 to Yuma is reverent to the original – a few more bullets and more spilled blood notwithstanding.
Read Full Review
75
New York Post Lou Lumenick
An extremely well-acted and well-directed remake of a 1957 oater.
Read Full Review
75
Charlotte Observer Lawrence Toppman
Mangold has been smart or fortunate in casting, and personalities sustain interest even when the narrative flags.
Read Full Review
75
Premiere Glenn Kenny
In the battle of the leading men, Crowe's character has a slight edge, and the actor really makes the most of it, showing us how boyishly mischievous charm and utter venality can exist without seeming contradiction in the same being. But Bale builds to a pretty impressive boil himself after laying back for about three quarters of the film.
Read Full Review
70
Salon.com Stephanie Zacharek
Overall, the picture is accomplished, intelligent and, in places, a little dull. Mangold isn't an economical filmmaker, and parts of 3:10 to Yuma suffer from needless bloat. The new version doesn't use the same kind of blunt, visually arresting shorthand as Daves' original...And yet somehow, maybe just barely, Mangold -- succeeds on his own terms, largely because the actors he's working with here.
Read Full Review
70
New York Magazine David Edelstein
As Ben Wade, gang leader and murderer, he gives an ironic performance, but Crowe’s irony is more intense than other actors’ obsession. He turns the idea of having so few emotions--of being beyond caring--into a bloody joke. He upstages everyone with his laughing eyes.
Read Full Review
70
Village Voice J. Hoberman
The movie's best performance belongs to Peter Fonda. Tough, terrific, and totally unrecognizable as a bounty hunter, this cantankerous old hippie is so leathery he deserves his own line of rawhide apparel.
Read Full Review
70
Newsweek David Ansen
What this version offers is the chance to watch Russell Crowe and Christian Bale—two of the more charismatic, macho leading men around--duke it out psychologically, while another fine but less well-known intensity artist, Ben Foster, steals
Read Full Review
70
The New York Times A.O. Scott
More likely to be recalled as a moderately satisfying entertainment than remembered as a classic.
Read Full Review
70
LA Weekly Scott Foundas
Under Mangold’s sure if uninspired hand, the new Yuma is reasonably exciting and terse, and, like its predecessor, built around a memorable villain of ambiguous villainy.
Read Full Review
67
Seattle Post-Intelligencer William Arnold
The result bears so little resemblance to the original that you have to wonder what happened. It seems more a remake of "How the West Was Won" than 3:10 to Yuma.
Read Full Review
63
Chicago Tribune Michael Phillips
The acting is its chief strength. Russell Crowe brings a cocky charisma to Ben Wade.
Read Full Review
50
Wall Street Journal Joe Morgenstern
The strengths of the first "3:10 To Yuma" were enhanced by its proportionality -- an intimate story told in 92 minutes. The story is no bigger in the new version, which goes on for 117 minutes. And it's certainly not better.
Read Full Review
50
Washington Post Stephen Hunter
The remake adds 24 minutes and subtracts most of the suspense.
Read Full Review

What Our Users Said

Vote Now!The average user rating for this movie is 7.2 (out of 10) based on 97 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.

Karen W. gave it an8:
A lot of violence, but awesome performances. Grabs hold of your emotions. The Western is back!

H. K. C. gave it a10:
Yes this is the one if you like the old West with a twist. Twist it does just about throughout the whole movie. So put on your spurs and saddle-up with a bag of Non-Buttered Popcorn and a 16 Caliber Diet Coke and Enjoy the Show. Regards, HK.

Dave R. gave it a3:
The longer it went on, the more it lost me. Good acting and atmosphere, but the characters made choices that made less and less sense, culminating in an absolutely unbelievable ending, and the pace alternated between being too slow and jumping over sequences and leaving us confused. James Bond can do that stuff and get away with it, because James Bond is a cartoonish character and we expect him to be over-the-top, but this lays claim to a more reality-based framework. It's a forgettable diversion at best.

Rex gave it a9:
This was a modern version of an old style western. I loved that it wasn't super realistic and gritty. I loved Russell Crowe and the ease in which his character’s intensity filled the screen. The scene with Bale’s wife when they are alone at the table was a perfect example. Speaking of Bale, I thought he was the best in this film. He is truly a talent that should be watched. . .the next Harrison Ford? I think so. When you watched him you did not think this is some heartthrob actor playing a one legged farmer. I believed his character from the beginning. Oscar worthy? No, but a very good film.

Jean D. gave it a9:
I'm not crazy about westerns, nor of violent films. I was convinced to see this movie and I'm so glad I did. The use of psychology and philosophy to show the characters was brilliant. Showing that anybody, regardless of moral character, can fall over to the opposite side. Even the good guys struggled with staying "good."

Mike A gave it a10:
Amazing film with an even more amazing cast. Love Crow and Bale together too. Hope they have other projects together in the future. The ending with it's moral ambiguity is wonderful. Maybe a sequel of some kind?

Bill C. gave it a4:
Remember when Nick Cage made good movies? It's been quite awhile hasn't it? Is the same happening now to Russel Crowe? He can act with the best of them, so what's he doing it this film.It starts out slow,follows the standard 1950's TV western plot, but then goes off the rails with a ending that makes no sense at all. Disapointing to say the least.

Read more user comments...

Discuss this movie in our forums

Return to top of page
Home | FILM | DVD/VIDEO | MUSIC | GAMES | BOOKS | TV | Forums | About Metacritic metacritic.com

About CNET Networks | Jobs | Advertise | Partnerships                                Visit other CNET Networks sites:

Copyright ©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use